What's new

Why Modi chose Bhutan as his first foreign destination as PM ...

Brahmos_2

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
THPRE_MODI_BHUTAN_1935187f.jpg


Narendra Modi personally chose to make Bhutan the destination of his maiden foreign trip as India Prime Minister. The visit is likely to take place in mid-June and a multi-ministerial team of government of India officials left for Bhutan this noon on an Advance Security Liaison to prepare for Modi's visit. Modi zeroed in on Bhutan for this unique and unprecedented honour (no previous Indian PM has made Bhutan the destination of his or her first foreign trip) for a variety of reasons.

Bhutan had conducted Operation All Clear in December 2003 against India-specific insurgents and thrown them out in this military operation – something that no neighbour has ever done for India. Apart from Bhutan being a zero-problem model neighbour, Thimphu also offers a zero-problem destination for the Indian PM's maiden foreign visit. Bangladesh and Sri Lanka—two other Saarc neighbours which were discussed in the PMO and the MEA as possible destinations of Modi's first foreign trip—would have created problems domestically.

Modi's visit to Bangladesh at this time would be meaningless till the two sides make a forward movement on the two pending bilateral issues – Land Boundary Agreement and Teesta water accord, both of which are being stiffly opposed by the state government of West Bengal. Besides, the BJP itself opposed the LBA when the UPA government had pitched for it strongly last year.

Visiting Sri Lanka at this point of time by the Indian PM would have been like stoning a beehive as it would have been vociferously condemned by all political parties in Tamil Nadu.

Modi had other choices too from a list of major powers like Russia, Japan and China for his maiden foreign trip. The first of this listRussia—eliminated itself by its weird move of lifting its embargo on selling weapons and defence equipment to Pakistan.

Japan and China could have been possible destinations, the former because it is the only major power with zero bilateral problems with India and the latter because Chinese premier Li Keqiang had unveiled an important piece of diplomatic symbolism last year by making India the destination of his first foreign visit.

But then given the deep distrust and bitter rivalry between Japan and China, choosing either of them for Modi's first foreign trip would have upset the other. Modi could have done to China what China did to India by making China the first stop of his foreign tour and then traveling on to Japan for his second leg of his maiden foreign tour like Li did. The Chinese PM had landed in India first and from New Delhi had proceeded to Pakistan. But then this move too wouldn’t have been non-controversial which Modi wanted for his first foreign trip.

Thus, Bhutan was found to be the ideal choice. It also shows that while Modi continues to keep foreign policy high up in his scheme of things, his immediate focus is on contiguous neighbours.

The China factor is an important part of the conversation on anything related to Bhutan these days. Bhutan shares 605-kilometer border with India and 470-km border with China. Beijing is very keen on establishing full-fledged diplomatic relations with Bhutan and open its embassy in Thimphu.

The Chinese move has made many in the Indian strategic establishment jittery. Modi choosing Bhutan as the first destination of his foreign trip would go a long way in reassuring the Bhutanese about India, particularly after the UPA government’s faux pas of cancelling fuel subsidies to Bhutan last year, only to revoke the cancellation shortly thereafter.

The extremely close political ties between India and Bhutan are also reflected in their bilateral trade as India is Bhutan's largest trading partner and accounts for 98 percent of its exports and 90 percent of its imports. Besides,

Bhutan is set to be a major source of hydel power for India in a few years as India is set to reap dividends of its $1.2 billion worth investment on the construction of three hydropower projects in Bhutan having a combined installed capacity of 1,400 megawatts.

Energy, infrastructure, rail connectivity and trade and investments will be high on Modi’s agenda in his talks with the Bhutanese leaders


Why Modi chose Bhutan as his first foreign destination as PM | Firstpost
 
Keep Russia, Israel and Afghan in one side. If we lose any1 of it we will lose our advantage, and pakistan is playing a clever move too by jelling with Russia....

Bhutan and Nepal should also be kept close

and a tight check on bangladesh's increasing extremism
 
Bad move. Should have visited Russia or hell even China.
 
Bad move. Should have visited Russia or hell even China.

China?? :lol: Fat chance of that. Russia maybe, Japan is probably the major power that Modi is interested most in. the U.s. seems clearly another with a visit to Germany too likely. In any case, Modi will meet both Russian & Chinese leaders in the BRICS meeting.
 
China?? :lol: Fat chance of that. Russia maybe, Japan is probably the major power that Modi is interested most in. the U.s. seems clearly another with a visit to Germany too likely. In any case, Modi will meet both Russian & Chinese leaders in the BRICS meeting.

But why Bhutan? He went to get dry fruit from there or what?
 
I don't know. Well I guess it was Modi's choice. Maybe even a wiser choice.

A non controversial choice - the article mentions the reasons. There seems to be a lot of symbolism attached with which country he decides to visit first. By this move he is freed from that issue and take a trip to any country he wishes after the Bhutan trip.
 
Oversimplification!

Modi had other choices too from a list of major powers like Russia, Japan and China for his maiden foreign trip. The first of this listRussia—eliminated itself by its weird move of lifting its embargo on selling weapons and defence equipment to Pakistan.

Author seems to have no idea about Indian dependency on Russia when it comes to defence. It's more like India needs Russia than Russia needs India. Neither Russians nor Indians are tyros, international politics doesn't work the way as it has been portrayed in the article. Those fancy words used by author for sure sooth eyes and ears but don't really add any weight.
 

Back
Top Bottom