What's new

Why Defence Ministry Is Considering A Cut In Standing Military

dadeechi

BANNED
Joined
Sep 12, 2015
Messages
4,281
Reaction score
-8
Country
India
Location
United States
Why Defence Ministry Is Considering A Cut In Standing Military
All India | Written by Sudhi Ranjan Sen | Updated: May 21, 2016 01:22 IST

army-generic_650x400_61460573833.jpg

The salary and pension and the revenue expenditure put together is more than the money available to buy new weapons systems this year.

New Delhi:
Highlights
  1. 11-member committee asked to identify areas to 'rationalize manpower'
  2. The pension bill is 82,332 crore, about 12,000 crore more than last year
  3. One of the casualties of this fund crunch is the Mountain Stike Corps

At 1.5 million strong, the Indian military is the third largest military in the world. But now, it could go in for "right sizing" of "force structure" or in simple terms a drastic cut in manpower. An 11 member committee led by Lieutenant General DB Shekatkar (retired) has been constituted for this.

Sources told NDTV that the committee - which will submit its report by August - has been tasked to look into areas of "overlap" and convergence within the three forces - Indian Army, Navy and Air Force - allowing for a reduction of manpower.

The committee has been also asked to identify areas to "rationalize manpower", examine possible areas of multi-tasking by troops. Finally, the committee will also suggest ways to "optimize" the combat potential by induction of more technology as against more boots on the ground.


The exercise, in part, has been necessitated by a burgeoning revenue, pension and salaries bill. This year the pension bill is a staggering Rs. 82,332 crore, about Rs. 12,000 crore more from the last financial year. The salary and pension and the revenue expenditure put together is more than the money available to buy new weapons systems this year. And, the rising trend in revenue expenditure is only likely to increase in the coming years.

"If my memory serves me right in 1982, the pension bill was about 300 crore, in 1992 it went up to 12,000 crore and last year (2015-16) the same pension bill stood at about 60,000 crore," Amit Cowshish, a former but one of the most respected Defence Accounts Officer told NDTV.

"Every year there is a huge gap in amount asked for and amount allocated. I don't think it is possible to sustain the growth (in allocation) which is expected by MoD," he said.

One of the casualties of this fund crunch is the Mountain Stike Corps - aimed countering any aggression from China. About 80,000 more men are to be added and it is likely to cost over Rs. 60,000 crore. "At this rate you can forget the Cyber Command, the Space Command and the main problem with the Mountain Strike Corps is paucity of funds" Mr Cowshish added.

http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/why-...onsidering-a-cut-in-standing-military-1408389
 
Why Defence Ministry Is Considering A Cut In Standing Military
All India | Written by Sudhi Ranjan Sen | Updated: May 21, 2016 01:22 IST

army-generic_650x400_61460573833.jpg

The salary and pension and the revenue expenditure put together is more than the money available to buy new weapons systems this year.

New Delhi:
Highlights
  1. 11-member committee asked to identify areas to 'rationalize manpower'
  2. The pension bill is 82,332 crore, about 12,000 crore more than last year
  3. One of the casualties of this fund crunch is the Mountain Stike Corps

At 1.5 million strong, the Indian military is the third largest military in the world. But now, it could go in for "right sizing" of "force structure" or in simple terms a drastic cut in manpower. An 11 member committee led by Lieutenant General DB Shekatkar (retired) has been constituted for this.

Sources told NDTV that the committee - which will submit its report by August - has been tasked to look into areas of "overlap" and convergence within the three forces - Indian Army, Navy and Air Force - allowing for a reduction of manpower.

The committee has been also asked to identify areas to "rationalize manpower", examine possible areas of multi-tasking by troops. Finally, the committee will also suggest ways to "optimize" the combat potential by induction of more technology as against more boots on the ground.


The exercise, in part, has been necessitated by a burgeoning revenue, pension and salaries bill. This year the pension bill is a staggering Rs. 82,332 crore, about Rs. 12,000 crore more from the last financial year. The salary and pension and the revenue expenditure put together is more than the money available to buy new weapons systems this year. And, the rising trend in revenue expenditure is only likely to increase in the coming years.

"If my memory serves me right in 1982, the pension bill was about 300 crore, in 1992 it went up to 12,000 crore and last year (2015-16) the same pension bill stood at about 60,000 crore," Amit Cowshish, a former but one of the most respected Defence Accounts Officer told NDTV.

"Every year there is a huge gap in amount asked for and amount allocated. I don't think it is possible to sustain the growth (in allocation) which is expected by MoD," he said.

One of the casualties of this fund crunch is the Mountain Stike Corps - aimed countering any aggression from China. About 80,000 more men are to be added and it is likely to cost over Rs. 60,000 crore. "At this rate you can forget the Cyber Command, the Space Command and the main problem with the Mountain Strike Corps is paucity of funds" Mr Cowshish added.

http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/why-...onsidering-a-cut-in-standing-military-1408389
What is India's cost of having forces and material in Jammu Kashmir ?
 
I think its good to reduce the number of Standing army and use those funds to equip the reduced army with better Equipment .. and toys , maybe I am wrong..
 
1.5m active army is small for Indian population.
 
What is India's cost of having forces and material in Jammu Kashmir ?

Even if Kashmir issue is resolved the army would still be maintained.

The downside to the resolution of the Kashmir issue would be that the army would loose the opportunity to get real experience in handling guerrilla & asymmetric warfare. They would have to contend with training exercises.
 
Even if Kashmir issue is resolved the army would still be maintained.

The downside to the resolution of the Kashmir issue would be that the army would loose the opportunity to get real experience in handling guerrilla & asymmetric warfare. They would have to contend with training exercises.

You didn't reply my question
 
This will be a good move if it happens - modern wars are won by technology, training and leadership, not numbers. See the Gulf War, when if I recall the Iraqi forces had a numerical advantage.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom