What's new

US refuses to endorse Ghani’s claim of Pakistan’s role

truthfollower

BANNED
Joined
Mar 8, 2019
Messages
1,841
Reaction score
-4
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
US refuses to endorse Ghani’s claim of Pakistan’s role
Anwar IqbalPublished September 3, 2021 - Updated about 13 hours ago
Facebook Count
Twitter Share

40
A file photo of US State Department spokesperson Ned Price. — AFP/File

A file photo of US State Department spokesperson Ned Price. — AFP/File
WASHINGTON: The US State Department has refused to endorse former Afghan president Ashraf Ghani’s claim that 10 to 15 thousand Pakistanis had joined the Taliban offensive on Kabul.
Instead, a senior State Department official praised Pakistan and other partners for providing "critical assistance” to US efforts to evacuate American troops and civilians from Afghanistan.
“I’m just not in a position to comment on that, to confirm those reports,” said the department’s spokesperson Ned Price when asked to comment on Mr Ghani’s claim. The US official did not respond to another query: Whether Washington still considers Mr Ghani as Afghanistan’s legitimate ruler.
“If we have anything more, we’ll provide it,” said Mr Price when asked if he would comment on another claim that the Taliban forces now in Kabul include foreign troops.
But Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland, who also addressed this Wednesday afternoon news briefing, included Pakistan among a dozen countries who, she said, provided critical support to US evacuation efforts.
“We’re enormously grateful to the huge network of countries that have provided critical assistance for our evacuation efforts,” she said while naming Pakistan, Kuwait, Qatar, Turkey and the UAE among the countries that supported the evacuation. She also named America’s key European allies – Britain, France,
Germany, Italy, Spain and others – “who have helped transit Americans and others to safety.”
“Our close coordination with our allies and partners remains critical both on evacuation and relocation, but also as we begin to scope our ongoing relationship with the Afghan people and with the Taliban,” she said.
On Wednesday, the US media published excerpts from a July 23 conversation between President Joe Biden and Mr Ghani. In that telephone call, Mr. Biden urges his Afghan counterpart to empower his Defence Minister Bismillah Khan Mohammadi to combat Taliban fighters in key population centres.
Mr Ghani responds by claiming that he was “facing a full-scale invasion” by Taliban and at least 10-15,000 international terrorists, predominantly Pakistanis.
Commenting on such claims, Pakistan’s US Ambassador Asad Majeed Khan said that Pakistan’s role in Afghanistan was being mischaracterised.
“Pakistan’s leadership has consistently said that we have no favorites in Afghanistan and would work with any government in Kabul that has the support of the Afghan people,” he said.
“We continued to urge both the Afghan government and the Taliban to show flexibility and engage more meaningfully in order to secure a political settlement and a comprehensive ceasefire,” Mr Kahn said. “Unfortunately, neither side was in any mood to listen.”
In a separate briefing, another State Department officials told journalists that “the majority” of Afghans who worked for the United States during its 20-year military campaign in Afghanistan have been left behind.
Asked how many of those who were given Special Immigrant Visas (SIV) had left Afghanistan with US forces, the official said; “I would say it’s the majority of them, just based on anecdotal information about the populations we were able to support.”
He said that US officials who worked on the ground were “haunted by the choices we had to make and by the people we were not able to help depart” in this first phase of the evacuation.
“It wasn’t pretty. It was very challenging,” the senior official said, “and it involved some, some really painful trade-offs and choices for everyone involved.”
There were at least 20,000 SIV applicants in the pipeline prior to the US withdrawal, and the State Department has not provided a specific count of how many of them were able to move to safety with US forces.
At Wednesday’s briefing, Mr Price told reporters that more than 31,000 people had arrived in the US from Afghanistan between August 17 and 31, and nearly 24,000 of them were “Afghans at risk” — a broad category that includes SIVs, other visa holders, those recommended for refugee designations, and others.
Published in Dawn, September 3rd, 2021
 
now where are all those brain washed and brain dead indian who barked on top of their lungs claiming that 15K jihadis were enroute from Pakistan?.


as usual we are right and they are wrong.
 
now where are all those brain washed and brain dead indian who barked on top of their lungs claiming that 15K jihadis were enroute from Pakistan?.


as usual we are right and they are wrong.


Indians are fools. They started this campaign by fooling themselves, the experiment was successful. In fact is still working well for Modi government who controls the media and narrative in India.

Later they tried this with other countries, including US. Initially they buyer the idea believing India but over the years they have realised Indians live in fool's paradise far from reality. In public they ll show 56inch chest, but behind the doors they are begging to western allies.


Any ways its India's loss in the end.
 
Indians are fools. They started this campaign by fooling themselves, the experiment was successful. In fact is still working well for Modi government who controls the media and narrative in India.

Later they tried this with other countries, including US. Initially they buyer the idea believing India but over the years they have realised Indians live in fool's paradise far from reality. In public they ll show 56inch chest, but behind the doors they are begging to western allies.


Any ways its India's loss in the end.



agreed

it is almost as if indians love to live a lie.... or a dream world
 
The US is no longer taking Ghani‘s calls. He is of no use to them.



What did India lose and what had Pakistan gained exactly?



india lost Afghan territory that they used to carry out terrorist attacks against Pakistan under american/nato protection......... :azn:.......india no longer has their terror launch pads in Afghanistan nor do they have american/nato protection. Pakistan is now free to focus 100% completely on our forsaken eternal enemy to our east for the first time since 1999-2001.......:azn:
 
india lost Afghan territory that they used to carry out terrorist attacks against Pakistan under american/nato protection......... :azn:.......india no longer has their terror launch pads in Afghanistan nor do they have american/nato protection. Pakistan is now free to focus 100% completely on our forsaken eternal enemy to our east for the first time since 1999-2001.......:azn:

India is not worried. This is not the 1990s. Pakistan’s ability to hurt India in anyway has been vastly reduced. Just don’t blame India for terrorism the next time something happens.
 
Wait till all the western people left from Afghanistan. Picture abhi baki hai..
 
Wait till all the western people left from Afghanistan. Picture abhi baki hai..



Unless Hindia takes in 5-10 million Afghan refugees who are headed for US, UK and Europe, the West is not interested in what India has to say.

Talk and tweets are cheap.

Northern Alliance found this out the hard way.

India-Afghanistan Strategic Agreement.jpg
 
Last edited:
Ghani needs to understand that blaming Pakistan to get milk from Bharati cow, those days are done and now he is a nobody so no matter much he curse Pakistan Indians won't be paying him the same amount as they did before, suck it up buttercup.
 
Unless India hosts 5-10 million Afghan refugees who are headed for US, UK and Europe, the West is not interested in what India has to say. Talk is cheap.
Do you think USA cares about Afghan, pakistan people? False sense of being important.
 
Back
Top Bottom