What's new

US Army Wants a Harder-Hitting Pistol

Indus Falcon

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Messages
6,910
Reaction score
107
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
US Army Wants a Harder-Hitting Pistol
Jul 03, 2014 - by Matthew Cox

The U.S.Army is moving forward to replace the Cold War-era M9 9mm pistol with a more powerful handgun that also meets the needs of the other services.

As the lead agent for small arms, the Army will hold an industry day July 29 to talk to gun makers about the joint, Modular Handgun System or MHS.

The MHS would replace the Army's inventory of more than 200,000 outdated M9 pistols and several thousand M11 9mm pistols with one that has greater accuracy, lethality, reliability and durability, according to Daryl Easlick, a project officer with the Army's Maneuver Center of Excellence at Fort Benning, Ga.


"It's a total system replacement -- new gun, new ammo, new holster, everything," Easlick said.

The Army began working with the small arms industry on MHS in early 2013, but the effort has been in the works for more than five years. If successful, it would result in the Defense Department buying more than 400,000 new pistols during a period of significant defense-spending reductions.

Army weapons officials maintain that combat troops need a more effective pistol and ammunition. But experts from the law-enforcement and competitive shooting worlds argue that tactical pistol ammunition -- no matter the caliber -- is incapable of stopping a determined adversary without multiple shots in most cases.

One of the major goals of the MHS effort is to adopt a pistol chambered for a more potent round than the current 9mm, weapons officials said. The U.S. military replaced the .45 caliber 1911 pistol with the M9 in 1985 and began using the 9mm NATO round at that time.

Soldiers who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan have complained that the 9mm round is not powerful enough to be effective in combat.

"The 9mm doesn't score high with soldier feedback," said Easlick, explaining that the Army, and the other services, want a round that will have better terminal effects -- or cause more damage -- when it hits enemy combatants. "We have to do better than our current 9mm."

The MHS will be an open-caliber competition that will evaluate larger rounds such as .357 Sig, .40 S&W and .45 ACP.

The FBI and several major police departments recently decided to return to using the 9mm round after finding that .40 caliber ammunition was causing excessive wear on its service pistols. The heavier bullet and greater recoil over time resulted in frame damage to well respected makes such as Glock and Beretta, according to Ernest Langdon, a shooting instructor and respected competitive pistol shooter who has worked for gun makers such as Beretta, Smith & Wesson, and Sig Sauer.

"Most of the guns in .40 caliber on the market right now were actually designed to be 9mm originally and then turned into .40 calibers later," Langdon told Military.com.

Langdon served 12 years in the Marine Corps where he was the chief instructor of the Second Marine Division Scout Sniper School and the High Risk Personnel Course. He's been a competitive pistol shooter for 15 years where he has won competitions in the International Defensive Pistol Association and two World Speed Shooting titles.

Larger calibers, such as .40 S&W, have significantly more recoil than the 9mm making them much harder for the average shooter to shoot accurately, he said.

"I don't think anybody would argue that shot placement is the most important for terminal ballistics," Langdon said. "Even though you say a .45 is better than a 9mm, it's still a pistol caliber. Chances are if it is a determined adversary, they are going to have to be shot multiple times regardless of the caliber."

Many law-enforcement shooting incidents have shown this to be reality, he said.

"I talked to a Chicago cop that shot a guy eight times with a .45 to kill him and that was a 230 grain Hydra-Shok," Langdon said. "And that guy now carries a 9mm …he realized that handgun bullets suck. "You have to shoot people a lot with a handgun."

Langdon has trained numerous personnel from all branches of the U.S. military, FBI, Secret Service and other federal agencies as well as state and local law enforcement.

As part of the joint requirement process for MHS, Army weapons officials did a "very thorough cost-benefit analysis" that showed supported the effort, Easlick said.

"We have got an old fleet of M9s right now; it's costing us more to replace and repair M9s than it would cost to go get a new handgun," he said.

The Army spent years on an effort to search for a replacement for itsM4 carbine, but ended up adopting the improved M4A1 version used by special operations forces.

Beretta officials maintain that the company has offered to upgrade M9 many times.

"We have submitted numerous changes or product improvements that really address a lot of the shortcomings that are either perceived or real," said Gabe Bailey, Business development manager for Beretta's military division.

The Marine Corps adopted the M9A1 in 2006 that features a rail for attaching lights or lasers, checkering on the front and back of the grip and a beveled magazine well for smoother magazine changes.

Some of the improvements Beretta offered included an enhanced sight system, changing the angle of the slide-mounted safety to avoid inadvertent safety activation and a threaded barrel, Bailey said.

Army officials, however, say the M9 does not meet the MHS requirement.

"The M9 doesn't meet it for a multitude of reasons," Easlick said. "It's got reliability issues; the open slide design allows contaminates in. The slide-mounted safety doesn't do well when you are trying to clear a stoppage -- you inadvertently de-cock and safe the weapon system."

Army Wants a Harder-Hitting Pistol | Military.com

What do you guys suggest?
 
5.png

I personally like the FN Five-seven 5.7X28mm, but it has an issue, with rounds only being available with FN.
 
They should have never dropped the .45 1911. If it aint broke, don't fix it.

As long as the pistol is 9mm or above, calibre isn't relevant.
....

As I was always taught, there isn't a 'knock down caliber', but there IS knock down placement.:guns:
 
They should have never dropped the .45 1911. If it aint broke, don't fix it.



As I was always taught, there isn't a 'knock down caliber', but there IS knock down placement.:guns:
There is a reason govt depts want to change things. "Change" means $$$'s in someones pocket/s
 
.45 1911. If it aint broke, don't fix it.

At the time, the Beretta was the right decision.

As is the case now, Army pistol stocks were worn out.

The question that needs to be asked for US tax payers is whether it is worth spending millions on a new firearm, training, equipment etc with incremental improvement when the Army is still taking deliveries of the M9.

Unless there is an attitude change and the US Chiefs are willing to think out of the box and go with FN 5.7, I think this is just a waste of time and money, just as the previous rifle/pistol competitions were.
 
Dan Wesson Specialist Tech Gear .45ACP 5-inch Stainless FNS 8D

Dan-Wesson-Valor-01993-806703019932.jpg.jpg


I really like this one, but it's not cheap. I think MY next will be a Rock Island Armory 1911 in 9 MM. I have two 9 MM's now and I don't want to have to buy another caliber of ammo. Plus it's only $450 and I've read only good reviews.:triniti:
 
They should ideally go for the .45, but should they select 5.7 (highly unlikely) they can ask for the rights from FN for different OEM's to manufacture that round.

The .45 ACP rounds are not that good against body armor though, the velocity is relatively lower and the bullet diameter is larger.

In theory the .40 S&W should be ideal. But as the article mentions, it causes a lot of wear and tear on the guns. And it's harder for a novice shooter to control the recoil compared to a 9mm, and bullet placement is always more important than the bullet itself, so the greater effectiveness of the bullet wouldn't matter if they can't place the shots consistently.
 
Last edited:
This is a beauty. Dan Wesson RZ-10. Nice 10 mm. Packs a wallop !! Maybe not right for the military, but would be GREAT for me !!:enjoy:


Dan-Wesson-Dan-Wesson-RZ-10-01907-806703019079.jpg.jpg
 
Last edited:
There is not much of a difference between the 9mm and .45 despite the .45 fanboys silly stories and annoying over usage of the term 'knock down power'.

Militaries are confined to using hardball ammo, with that said the .45 does edge the 9mm but the difference is minimal. Interesting is that in hallow point a 9mm often has similar or better ballistics performance compared to a .45; this is something that has been proven through ballistics gel tests.

I prefer a 9mm simply because it holds a lot more ammo. Many people shoot horrible groups while standing stationary and shooting at stationary targets, now if someone has to use a firearm to protect themselves in real life then that person will have high adrenalin which will make them have an accelerated hart rate, make them twitchy and cause them to breath heavy. All of these things are horrible for good shot placement, now factor in a moving target and the results won't be good.

This is why i am not a big fan of large caliber, small capacity pistols. Many rounds will miss their target, possible all the rounds will, this means that you are either dead or you will have to reload, and simply reloading can get someone killed.

And at the end of the day a .45 will not penetrate most body armor, not a chance.
 
I carry a 9 MM. Most bad guys don't wear body armor so that's not a concern. It's all about location, location, location anyway. There are some .45's that are small and light enough to make concealed carry easier, but then you have a capacity problem. Most are 6+1 in the pipe, where as my 9MM is 10+1.


Double tap drill at 10, 15 and 20 yards.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom