What's new

Unusual Troop Movement over Islamabad- elections in AJK

Amen to that. but his siblings abroad will wage a war like Murtaza Bhutto. so they must be taken out as well where ever they are.
thing is,.. that Nawaz always has some of his siblings in India , Middle east or West or he is himself out .. to ensure all his family is not taken out by the people who have enough of this guy
u must be kidding. right ?
 
Actually; our aid would mostly experince a decrease during military rule. Even so; the economic aid was not enough to bring upon any significant changes.

chart%201.png


Our economy did not flourish because of aid; it flourished because of quick reforms that were implemented and enforced overnight - anyone who would pose as an obstacle would face the Army's danda. The military government wouldn't waste a second; it was constantly at work, improving Pakistan for the better.

A military government is very efficient and is carried out under a fast-pace; the hurdles that civilian governments would have to make just for decisions (like Kalabagh Dam, West CPEC Route) are not faced by the Military Government.

Democracy is for specific countries that suite their conditions and needs.

With all due respect. are you a naive or just trying to be one? Showing different charts to me and telling me the opposite.Who said that the aid got decreased during military regimes. Pakistan had 3 military coups. 1958 – 1971, 1977 – 1988, 1999 – 2008 and now look at the graph again. We were getting all kinds of aid during these times and not the other way around. USA had their interests in the region and specifically against USSR. India was close to USSR and that's why we got so much aid to protect our selves. We were too much dependent on them and when ever they stopped paying us we faced bad economy and that's the problem.

Every single time they needed us , they paid hell lot of money and we were thriving and telling the people that look at the economy and that military is the best option. It's a co incidence that it was always a military coup when they needed us otherwise we wouldn't be getting any money.

And if you so much in favor of military gov, then why don't other countries does the same and give us a example? Reason is dictators might be good at making people to follow rules but in International community, we can't survive with just a Yes/No option which mushi did when USA invaded Afghanistan. Go and learn some facts before writing and preaching some thing which has always hurt us.
 
Kuch ni hona,,, Chill everyone!!
"THAT" is not what is going on.... :lol:
 
Mysterious banners urging COAS to take over put up across country
Saher Baloch | Ikram Junaidi | Waseem Ahmad Shah — Updated a day ago
57845780e1959.jpg

ISLAMABAD/KARACHI/PESHAWAR: A little-known political party of Punjab put up banners in 13 cities across the country on Monday with its leaders urging Chief of Army Staff Gen Raheel Sharif to impose martial law and form a government of technocrats.

The banners have been put up in Lahore, Karachi, Peshawar, Quetta, Rawalpindi, Faisalabad, Sargodha, Hyderabad, etc, by the Move on Pakistan party and unlike its earlier campaign requesting the army chief to reconsider his retirement plan due in November the message is quite ominous this time around.

A banner hanging at a traffic intersection on the thoroughfare between Chief Minister House and the Rangers headquarters in Karachi reads: Janay ki baatain hui puraani, Khuda k liye ab ajao (Talks of leaving are now old; for God’s sake now come).

Ali Hashmi, the central chief organiser of the party, told Dawn that the goal of their campaign was to suggest to the army chief that after imposing martial law a government of technocrats should be made in Pakistan and Gen Raheel should himself supervise it.

While the official mouthpiece of the army — the Inter-Services Public Relations — remained silent, analyst Amir Rana believed that the latest move strengthened the view that something was cooking up.

Interestingly, the banners sprang up overnight on all major thoroughfares in the 13 cities, even in cantonment areas, despite the presence of several checkpoints and extra security.

Mr Hashmi claimed that his party’s banners were removed in Lahore and Faisalabad in the morning.

The Move on Pakistan party — which has little grass-root support — has been registered with the Election Commission of Pakistan for the past three years and a Faisalabad-based businessman, Mohammad Kamran, is its chairman. He runs a number of schools and ‘businesses’ in Faisalabad, Sargodha and Lahore.

The party came into the spotlight in February when it put up posters and banners across the country asking the army chief not to retire and “help in eradicating terrorism and corruption”.

Though five months back the party maintained that it was not inviting the army to take over, this time it said that “there is no choice but to enforce martial law and form a government of technocrats”.

Mr Hashmi said that the absence of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif from the country for more than 40 days proved that there was no need of a political government. “Those who have been running the country will keep running it.”

Regarding his future plans, he said: “We have been considering holding rallies from Faisalabad to Lahore and Karachi to Sukkur in the second phase to convince the army chief that he should intervene for the betterment of the country and nation.”

Analyst Rana said that there could be some forces behind the persons responsible for the latest campaign.

“Some elements always remain ready to find ways to come close to the armed forces and make an alliance with the establishment,” he said, adding: “Although a change cannot be brought with such moves, it strengthens the doubt that something is going on.”

The issue was widely discussed on TV talk shows and on the social media.

The ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, however, was cautious in making any comment.

At a private TV programme, Minister of State for Privatisation Mohammad Zubair said that the army chief had already expressed his intention that he would not seek an extension in his tenure. “He [Gen Raheel] is the head of a great institution. I’m sure the person who will replace him will be equally professional and competent.”

He said that only legal experts could say what action be taken against those putting up such banners and posters.

Pakistan Peoples Party leader and Adviser to the Sindh Chief Minister on Information Maula Bux Chandio said in a press talk that Gen Raheel would take a decision in the best national interest.

He, however, asked the army chief not to pay any heed towards the advice or suggestions of sycophants.

Meanwhile, when asked whether the inscription on the banners amounted to sedition, a Peshawar police official said in a lighter vein that the message on the banners was vague and the organiser of the party might be asking the army chief to come to Peshawar.

Published in Dawn, July 12th, 2016


http://www.dawn.com/news/1270214
 
DO U believe that Military Dictatorship is a solution?
maybe it is. even Late Edhi thought so that a socialist dictatorship was a solution because our Feudal lords and Industrial elites have a perpetual stranglehold over our lives forever. in the name of democracy they have their nominated their bloodline to rule us forever.

people like Imran will never be allowed to come to power due to a cabal of this elite group that has much of its wealth stashed away in offshore accounts and use all means to ensure that they stay in power.


by the way re posters.. they are false flag and the word among the khakis is that its a shambolic act by the Noora league to cause confusion and malign the army.
 
Guys i work in diplomatic enclave and there is nothing going on.. Only some high level military personnel were visiting US embassy and there were some kind of URS was going on on kashmir highway so they must have extra tighten up the security ..
 
Economically a Military Government is more beneficial - not to mention decrease in corruption and higher efficiency.

Nope. Nope. Nope.

You only need to look at Pakistan's history to see that precedence has been set. The so-called economic growth during military rule has largely been a sham.

Decrease in corruption? I beg to differ.

Higher efficiency? You think having autocratic rule brings higher efficiency? lol
 
maybe it is. even Late Edhi thought so that a socialist dictatorship was a solution because our Feudal lords and Industrial elites have a perpetual stranglehold over our lives forever. in the name of democracy they have their nominated their bloodline to rule us forever.

people like Imran will never be allowed to come to power due to a cabal of this elite group that has much of its wealth stashed away in offshore accounts and use all means to ensure that they stay in power.


by the way re posters.. they are false flag and the word among the khakis is that its a shambolic act by the Noora league to cause confusion and malign the army.
THE way i see .. despite conflicts and bad blood b/w us .. the mentality of common people in India and pakistan is almost same. so if democracy can flourish in india ( its not perfect in sense) than it can do same in Pakistan.
Also Dictators generally keep good relations with feudal lords, powerful industrial barons in order to secure their position. what India currently have and pakistan needs is strong constitutional institutions ( Judiciary, Election commission, Planning Commission, Auditors, Central/Federal Bank etc ) which can withstand any undue pressure from Govt and in which people can trust.
Expecting an ideal dictator who will set everything on correct path is futile.
 
i think since PTI arranged sit in, the current govt of incompetent corrupts arranged a new parade on Aug 14. where were you at that time..you did not read the news?
How long have you been out of Pakistan. Don't you know that a lot of news is just speculation and future events are not always according to news. What ever news you are reading, the reality is that in future there will be no more dharnas in Islamabad and no parade on 14 August.
 
Some people have gone bonkers for dictatorshit... retards!
1-ayub=pressured by people to gtfo (lets not forget fatima jinnah episode)
2-yahya or whoever he was... thanks for breaking pakistan...
3-zia-taliban... thank you o great one!
4-mushy=again forced by the people...

moral = theyll either fk up and leave or people will get tired and make them... apni izzat apne hath me...
 
Nawaz will be scared after knowing this..
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom