What's new

Trump Presidency - Opportunity for strategic reset

CriticalThought

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 10, 2016
Messages
7,094
Reaction score
13
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
Over the past few decades, Afghanistan has been central to the Pak/US relationship. The story of miscalculations and missteps from both sides is saddening but very much real. As it stands today, the relationship is shaped and guided by follies of the past. In this background, the newly elected president Donald Trump brings fresh possibilities. Proper leverage of these refreshing changes can lead to a new era of cooperation amongst these two allies who find their interests widely divergent.

A central promise in Donald Trump's campaign was a less interventionist America. It remains to be seen how this translates to policy in Afghanistan, but for the sake of analysis, let us assume that Mr. Trump would be very interested in any proposal that results in bringing back all American forces from their foreign misadventure.

Enter Pakistan. With the upcoming change in the White House where the 'old guard' is bowing out, Pakistan has the golden opportunity to present a case for mutual interests. For long, Pakistan has been accused of double dealing, back stabbing, and in general working against American interests. This can change if both countries sit on the table as equal partners: Pakistan providing boots on the ground, and the US providing the funding. Let us analyze how and why this could work.

It is common knowledge that Pakistan has considerable leverage with the Taliban. If Pakistan was to take a more active role in stabilizing Afghanistan, it would come in the form of proper training and arming of the Taliban and organizing them into a proper functioning government. Such an outcome ties well with Pakistan's own internal security objectives. Pakistan has a vested interest in making this happen.

In the aftermath of Zarb-e-Azb, the major threat being faced by Pakistan is from terror camps and hideouts lying inside Afghanistan. As these terrorist elements continue their offensive, it will become imperative for Pak Army to address the problem at its source. But Pakistan's active role in forming a friendly government on its western borders can preempt such drastic measures.

The process of stabilizing Afghanistan will be long and arduous. Given Pakistan's current logistic capabilities, replacing American troops with Pakistani boots on the ground will need to be carefully planned. Logically, the process would start in Afghan provinces adjacent to our western border and slowly - yet surely - proceed to the rest of Afghanistan.

In conclusion, if Pakistan desires security, it needs to be willing and able to work for that security. Such a forward looking approach requires broad consensus between civilians and military. Whether our politicians and generals will rise to the occasion and grasp the opportunity while it lasts remains to be seen.
 
Over the past few decades, Afghanistan has been central to the Pak/US relationship. The story of miscalculations and missteps from both sides is saddening but very much real. As it stands today, the relationship is shaped and guided by follies of the past. In this background, the newly elected president Donald Trump brings fresh possibilities. Proper leverage of these refreshing changes can lead to a new era of cooperation amongst these two allies who find their interests widely divergent.

A central promise in Donald Trump's campaign was a less interventionist America. It remains to be seen how this translates to policy in Afghanistan, but for the sake of analysis, let us assume that Mr. Trump would be very interested in any proposal that results in bringing back all American forces from their foreign misadventure.

Enter Pakistan. With the upcoming change in the White House where the 'old guard' is bowing out, Pakistan has the golden opportunity to present a case for mutual interests. For long, Pakistan has been accused of double dealing, back stabbing, and in general working against American interests. This can change if both countries sit on the table as equal partners: Pakistan providing boots on the ground, and the US providing the funding. Let us analyze how and why this could work.

It is common knowledge that Pakistan has considerable leverage with the Taliban. If Pakistan was to take a more active role in stabilizing Afghanistan, it would come in the form of proper training and arming of the Taliban and organizing them into a proper functioning government. Such an outcome ties well with Pakistan's own internal security objectives. Pakistan has a vested interest in making this happen.

In the aftermath of Zarb-e-Azb, the major threat being faced by Pakistan is from terror camps and hideouts lying inside Afghanistan. As these terrorist elements continue their offensive, it will become imperative for Pak Army to address the problem at its source. But Pakistan's active role in forming a friendly government on its western borders can preempt such drastic measures.

The process of stabilizing Afghanistan will be long and arduous. Given Pakistan's current logistic capabilities, replacing American troops with Pakistani boots on the ground will need to be carefully planned. Logically, the process would start in Afghan provinces adjacent to our western border and slowly - yet surely - proceed to the rest of Afghanistan.

In conclusion, if Pakistan desires security, it needs to be willing and able to work for that security. Such a forward looking approach requires broad consensus between civilians and military. Whether our politicians and generals will rise to the occasion and grasp the opportunity while it lasts remains to be seen.
A strategic reset of the magnitude you are talking about is going to come about only if we see a history altering event (mahlgnitude of 911 or something) and such an event is very unlikely to say the least. The US-Pak relations are going to be business as usual in all likelihood. Although I agree that we should cooperate with the US to reap mutual benefits but the reality is, Pakistan and the US cant be on equal terms and any such an arrangement is,understandably, likely to heavily favour American interests over ours.
A joint US Pak intervention in Afghanistan is unlikely, bordering on impossible, given the geostragic dynamic of the reigion (the Indian, Chinese, Russian dynamics).
We are probably better off waiting the issue out until the US loses interest (which is will) and project soft power into the country, while simultaneously neutralising the Indians from doing the same.
 
A strategic reset of the magnitude you are talking about is going to come about only if we see a history altering event (mahlgnitude of 911 or something) and such an event is very unlikely to say the least. The US-Pak relations are going to be business as usual in all likelihood. Although I agree that we should cooperate with the US to reap mutual benefits but the reality is, Pakistan and the US cant be on equal terms and any such an arrangement is,understandably, likely to heavily favour American interests over ours.
A joint US Pak intervention in Afghanistan is unlikely, bordering on impossible, given the geostragic dynamic of the reigion (the Indian, Chinese, Russian dynamics).
We are probably better off waiting the issue out until the US loses interest (which is will) and project soft power into the country, while simultaneously neutralising the Indians from doing the same.

I agree. The thing is, Mr. Trump seems to be a history altering event. There is also the matter of his non-interventionist promises. For me, its a wait and watch.

Really, it is up to Nawaz Sharif's charisma and negotiation prowess to at least put the option on the table. Around the forum, I have seen people complaining about Musharraf's lack of foresight and political will. This time around, we should be slightly bold and brash. We are not as much affected by F-16 diplomacy. CPEC gives us slightly better economic position. But in order to make our demands, we need a fully thought out and well balanced plan that creates a win-win for both sides.
 
I agree. The thing is, Mr. Trump seems to be a history altering event. There is also the matter of his non-interventionist promises. For me, its a wait and watch.

Really, it is up to Nawaz Sharif's charisma and negotiation prowess to at least put the option on the table. Around the forum, I have seen people complaining about Musharraf's lack of foresight and political will. This time around, we should be slightly bold and brash. We are not as much affected by F-16 diplomacy. CPEC gives us slightly better economic position. But in order to make our demands, we need a fully thought out and well balanced plan that creates a win-win for both sides.
It depends on how much of CEO Trump prevails over President Trump. My gut feeling is that CEO will be the winner. If we look at the critical nominations it looks more like a senior executive team building with folks who are ready to take orders in a one way conversation. Democracy is to be preserved not to be practiced. Let's see what Mevla has kept for us in the "box of candies".....
 
Really, it is up to Nawaz Sharif's charisma and negotiation prowess to at least put the option on the table.
Do you really believe we can rely on the hobo's charisma and negotiation?
The thing is we have been chronically lacking in diplomatic foresight and our present government is not going to deliver.
The situation is ripe for change, with Trump taking office, Russia's resurgence, China ever increasing assertiveness etc but whether or not anyone in the GoP is going to do much about it is anyone's guess.
Pakistan is a relatively smaller pawn on the geopolitical checker board and there are bigger forces at play that are way beyond the scope of mere mortals like you and I.
 
Do you really believe we can rely on the hobo's charisma and negotiation?
The thing is we have been chronically lacking in diplomatic foresight and our present government is not going to deliver.
The situation is ripe for change, with Trump taking office, Russia's resurgence, China ever increasing assertiveness etc but whether or not anyone in the GoP is going to do much about it is anyone's guess.
Pakistan is a relatively smaller pawn on the geopolitical checker board and there are bigger forces at play that are way beyond the scope of mere mortals like you and I.

That is our biggest weakness. Ineffective leaders who are subservient to foreign interests.
 
I think nothing will change,trump is only interested in winning election and after he win election he will do nothing more and things will continue in same manner.
 
Let's find out how things go but so far your foresight has been pretty good looking back on this thread. Hopefully the part about Pakistani boots is wrong. Well done @CriticalThought
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom