The Top 10 Armies You Don't Want to Fight.
- Thread starter RayKalm
- Start date
DESERT FIGHTER
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2010
- Messages
- 46,973
- Reaction score
- 95
- Country
- Location
The SC
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2012
- Messages
- 32,233
- Reaction score
- 21
- Country
- Location
When you call skirmishes "wars" than you are very mistaken, but since it inflates your egos than it is fine.
Some one can loose or win battles in a war but it is the ultimate outcome that counts in reality, and only time will tell who have won the war.
The SC
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2012
- Messages
- 32,233
- Reaction score
- 21
- Country
- Location
They should either put Israel beside the US on the list, or remove it.
India might be dangerous in a 10 to 1 ratio in a war, but on a 1 to 1 or if over powered it is far from being dangerous, than it shouldn't be on list of the top 10.
The US is number one, but it always depends on the situation and foe(s) at hand, in special circumstances it can be defeated even at sea. All the assumption about the US are made as if it moves with all its powers every where it goes, which is false.
It has to keep much of its powers inland to defend itself if attacked, so the projection of its powers is very overestimated and belongs to the "make believe' notion of psycho-warfare.
India might be dangerous in a 10 to 1 ratio in a war, but on a 1 to 1 or if over powered it is far from being dangerous, than it shouldn't be on list of the top 10.
The US is number one, but it always depends on the situation and foe(s) at hand, in special circumstances it can be defeated even at sea. All the assumption about the US are made as if it moves with all its powers every where it goes, which is false.
It has to keep much of its powers inland to defend itself if attacked, so the projection of its powers is very overestimated and belongs to the "make believe' notion of psycho-warfare.
Similar threads
