What's new

The price of high-speed ambitions

jbond197

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
7,300
Reaction score
-20
Country
India
Location
United States
The price of high-speed ambitions


As China mourns lives lost in last week's high-speed rail crash near Wenzhou, there is also a tone of anger in the air.

"The people don't need this world number one or that world title. All we want is safety!," commented one reader of a news story posted on the popular Sina portal.

But the crash's other casualty is likely to be China's ambitions for its railway technology, which it has been developing rapidly and had high hopes of making an export success.

Before the crash, all talk had been of the government's drive to break records. The high-speed rail network was to be the largest in the world, as well as being completed in record time.

Those accolades are no longer being thrown around, as some blame that urgency and ambition for the death of at least 39 people.

The first of China's bullet-train lines opened in 2007 with plans to lay 16,000km (10,000 miles) of high-speed track by 2015, making it the biggest high-speed rail network in the world.

But the project has had its share of problems, even before the fatal crash.

First because of allegations of mass corruption that went all the way to top of the railway ministry, then later for delays caused by power shortages.

But some say that this latest incident could have been prevented, had authorities heeded the alarms raised.

"The Japanese say they have warned the Chinese for years about scaling up on this rapid pace," says Allistair Thornton from IHS Global Insight.
The town of Shuangyu in the eastern Chinese province of Zhejiang
_54310607_119872605.jpg

A bullet train passes the wreckage of two other high-speed trains which collided two days earlier

This is regarded as significant as some of the technology which Chinese companies say they 'reinnovated' was bought from Japan's Kawasaki, as well as from Canada's Bombadier and Germany's Siemens.

The other allegation is that the construction period was shortened unnecessarily.

"There is criticism on this kind of acceleration of the construction, experts warned there could be some problems in later operations," says Ingrid Wei, infrastructure analyst for Credit Suisse in Shanghai.
Global plans

However, Chinese companies were thinking even further ahead, past completion date.

Chinese train companies CSR Corp, CNR Corp and China Railway Group were hoping to sell the new technology to foreign countries, directly competing with the likes of Siemens and Bombadier.

But the crash has shaken public faith in China's rail system both inside and outside of the country.

bullet train launch
_54310611_117570890.jpg

In June the Beijing to Shanghai high-speed train route was opened to the public

Experts say that means potential clients such as Malaysia, Venezuela and Saudi Arabia who were looking into replicating China's rail expansion plans will be putting those ambitions on hold.

And potentially highly lucrative markets for China such as the US, will no longer be options.

"It's pretty hard to imagine any politician in the US signing on the dotted line for Chinese high-speed rail now. And so that's a huge market the Chinese were hoping to tap into and that's evaporated," says Mr Thornton.
Profit or loss

That poses an even bigger financial problem for the state-owned rail companies.

The Chinese government has invested huge amounts of money into developing the high-speed rail network.

"It's not clear whether they will now be able to turn this into a profitable enterprise," says Mr Thornton.

Not least because ticket prices are too high for many Chinese consumers to afford. And after the crash, many others will be deterred from taking the high-speed trains.

However, Ms Wei says the high-speed rail network project is a state asset and will be strongly supported by the central government.

Before then, the government will have to answer some tough questions: why the systems failed and why safety was not the top priority.
 
Actually, we're also having issues regarding railways safety not due to human error but political corruption. What happened in China is simply very very unfortunate and regrettable. They have achieved well and are one of the global leaders in high-speed train transport. We must appreciate what is good and must understand that accidents however unfortunate, cannot stop progress.

Mao-mata Banerjee needs to learn from this.
 
Mishaps happen even in the West......ICE trains of Germany........etc
 
@Tshering...I agree..even i have seen several posts that Indian friends sometimes becomes very blind while putting a thought regarding any other country....when our won house in not in Order....
 
Oh, please. It is one accident (tragic as it is), which will be investigated and then any faults identified rectified. The system will be improved and things will move on.

Point is in the ambitions to achieve Numero one position, breaking records they ignored all the safety flaws. The accident resulting because of those flaws is the cost of that high ambitions..

I am sure Chinese will definitely look into the fault line and don't try to rush up again..
 
Actually, we're also having issues regarding railways safety not due to human error but political corruption. What happened in China is simply very very unfortunate and regrettable. They have achieved well and are one of the global leaders in high-speed train transport. We must appreciate what is good and must understand that accidents however unfortunate, cannot stop progress.

Mao-mata Banerjee needs to learn from this.

I agree with you but human errors and the political corruption is basically not the major issue here.. It was a rush up to be numero uno and wish to break certain records and that's the point writer wants to convey..
 
At present airways is economical than HSR. But in 50 years from now when oil will be scarce, China's high speed ambition will start paying off. So it should be seen as long term investment. As with any new technology there will be teething troubles. For now it is a technology demonstration which will help China to bid for HSR around the world.
 
Point is in the ambitions to achieve Numero one position, breaking records they ignored all the safety flaws. The accident resulting because of those flaws is the cost of that high ambitions..

I am sure Chinese will definitely look into the fault line and don't try to rush up again..

"ALL" the safety flaws is unjustified hyperbole.

There were track allocation issues after a lightning strike. Let's wait for the final investigation report, shall we?
 
"ALL" the safety flaws is unjustified hyperbole.

There were track allocation issues after a lightning strike. Let's wait for the final investigation report, shall we?

I agree the cause of accident, whether safety flaws or any other factor, is yet to be established. But going by the way CCP is handling the whole matter by blacking out coverage of the issue, i doubt anything not confirming to their already established position will come out.. Anyways we can only wait and see..
 
Ambition is good. Cause of accident is human error,I hear.
 
I agree the cause of accident, whether safety flaws or any other factor, is yet to be established. But going by the way CCP is handling the whole matter by blacking out coverage of the issue, i doubt anything not confirming to their already established position will come out.. Anyways we can only wait and see..

The blacking out of coverage etc. is classic Communist Party recipe, and not the accident itself. Whether the report is made public or not is another matter, but I am sure that the engineers will pin-point, and rectify any issues identified.
 
China is being introduced to a phenomenon that Western audiences are very familiar with: A daily barrage of potential new analysis which sometimes contradict each other.

Again, they will have to find something for this because this abundance of analysis has unpleasant side effects such as confusion, sometimes panic and finally: indifference. This is also another argument for those who appreciate a scarce coverage that unliterally emphasizes the positive side of this story.

Furthermore, the government has announced measures to force a breakthrough with regard to safety at work and in all forms of traffic. There were indeed earlier promises that have been made and it's something that China has long been struggling with. Symptoms such as problems that fester and that they take action after victims have fallen is something that occurs in many countries.

But it seems that the Chinese are still making progress in supervising their government and the emancipation of their media.
 
What they needs is a millitary type radar on the nose and tail of the train which can detect another train from a safe distance and automatically brake!
 
^^Surely you were joking, right? There are simple and better ways and even if this radar works (it won't due to noise), you will be applying brakes for train coming from opposite direction...every time.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom