What's new

Taking over Pakistan controlled Kashmir is war with China and Pakistan

1672476776500.jpeg

@beijingwalker 😊
 
What happened in 1948 was last and final and now neither side is capable of taking Kashmir from each other because of nukes. Neither side has given each other Kashmir, we took it from Kashmiris.
I would expect a more rationale and mature response from you.

And I expected substantially more sophistication from you.

Azad Kashmir has never been under any sort of de facto occupation, and there has been no proxy war there. Nothing has changed.

IOK, on the other hand, is important to us for several reasons, including our water security (if we take the amoral position of not caring about our brothers and sisters living under draconian rule). It was the center of a thriving insurgency / resistance movement and kept India's security establishment busy. Everything has changed.

Do you see the difference?
 
India is not in a position to confront China. AJK is safe, not because of PA, but because of Pakistani nuclear weapon and China.
THe problem from Pakistan's perspective is that it had no financial reserve to fight a war. Wars are expensive ventures and we are bankrupt. Whether we lower our Nuke threshold or rely on China remains to be seen.
A
 
No offense but a bit childish, sir. It's not their soldiers fault that bollywood makes them out to be superhumans to sell movies.
That being said, it's very funny

Did Chinese open the Ladakh front to drain Indian resources from LoC due to the  efforts of Imran Khan, or the traitor Bajwa ??
lol, you seem to be getting your supply directly from the IEA.
As if the Chinese needed bajwa to whup indians, the same bajwa who refused to put pressure on india and was going all aman kia aasha when the LAC was hot.

They also didn't need IK, in case you feel the need to mention him to avoid answering.
 
No offense but a bit childish, sir. It's not their soldiers fault that bollywood makes them out to be superhumans to sell movies.
That being said, it's very funny

Correct. Lekin tawa lagaanay ka koyi mauqa haath say naheen jaana chaahiye; warna yeh Indian hamaaray sir per sawaar ho jaayain gay.😛😛😛
 
Kashmir is a trilateral issue between India, Pakistan and China. Afghanistan, Tajikistan are also party to the conflict.

Pakistan is ready to host a trilateral summit on Kashmir inviting representatives of Tajikistan and Afghanistan as observers.

Kashmir mean... Pak kashmir and GB, and Chinese part and india part.... Right?

These are the trilateral issue between all three countries. .

Well, personally I believe that issue has solved a long ago..... It is like beating a dead horse again and again .... Nothing will be changed in the future
 
Last edited:
..... the same bajwa who refused to put pressure on india and was going all aman kia aasha when the LAC was hot.

Mir Bajwa was even ready to offer his "gaaf" to Modi; but Modi declined, on account of him being a registered "Khassi". 😛😛😛
 
Last edited:
Terrain play a big role as well. Not easy to conquer AJK, also natives will fight against Indians as well.
Where does this terrain argument go when you all make claims about conquering ladakh, sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh
 
It's not their soldiers fault that bollywood makes them out to be superhumans to sell movies.

Correct. But many of their retired army officers, like MG(R) GD Bakshi, MG(R) KK Sinha, MG(R) Vishambar Dyal, LC(R) RSN Singh etc. etc., who frequently appear on their channels, as defence analysts, are extreme "Chutiyas" and "Phuddus", of first order. They beat even Bollywood. 😛😂😛
 
you seem to be getting your supply directly from the IEA.
As if the Chinese needed bajwa to whup indians, the same bajwa who refused to put pressure on india and was going all aman kia aasha when the LAC was hot.

They also didn't need IK, in case you feel the need to mention him to avoid answering.
You should be extremely naive to think Chinese only moved into Ladakh just to protect their 'claim line', and not the CPEC. It is logical to believe that then COAS (Bajwa) had more than something to do with this flanking manoeuvre, reducing Indian superiority in men and material to 1:1, on the LoC. Bajwa actually paved the way for some lasting peace by splitting the Indian attention in this manner to counter their belligerence. Shaheed Arshad Shareef was all praise for Bajwa along with Fawad Chaudhary , for Bajwa's advice of measured response in Feb. 2019. Imran himself angrily retorted to NA ruckus created by N-league over Aug 2019 'non-moves' by India by saying, "Tou kya main hamla kardun India pe... ?? " Now who were you calling coward again ???
 
Kashmir is a trilateral issue between India, Pakistan and China. Afghanistan, Tajikistan are also party to the conflict.

Pakistan is ready to host a trilateral summit on Kashmir inviting representatives of Tajikistan and Afghanistan as observers.
What do the other two have to do with it?
 

Back
Top Bottom