What's new

Stupid’ nuclear arms race, Beijing will make sure it can destroy US only ‘ONCE’ – Chinese media boss – RT World News

khansaheeb

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
17,009
Reaction score
-8
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom


‘Stupid’ nuclear arms race, Beijing will make sure it can destroy US only ‘ONCE’ – Chinese media boss – RT World News

Matching the number of nuclear weapons with Washington is a mad rush, when all it takes for successful deterrence is having enough to wipe out the United States once, the editor of the daily d ‘Chinese State Global Times.
“China will not enter a nuclear arms race with the United States. We think it’s stupid. I know the United States can destroy China 10 times, but we WILL ENSURE that we have the full capacity to destroy the United States once ”, Hu Xijin tweeted on Wednesday.

Hu was commenting on an opinion piece by Laura Grego, a member of MIT’s Nuclear Security and Policy Laboratory, which warned that the US development of missile defense systems has prompted Russia, China and others to develop weapons. more dangerous capable of defeating them.
“The new Chinese missiles protect against the possibility that the United States may one day believe that its technical advances allow it to strike China first while remaining invulnerable to a retaliatory nuclear attack,” wrote Grego, referring to recent reports of a hypersonic missile test that Beijing indirectly denied.

This is precisely the point Hu made last week, urging the United States to “give up the crazy idea that he can hit China and Russia, but they can’t hit him” and remember how the Cold War doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) helped defuse nuclear tensions.


Also on rt.com
Washington Must Go Crazy: Nuclear Age Logic of Mutual Destruction Will Keep America Safe, Sneers Chinese Media Boss



Hu has headed the Global Times since the English-language daily was launched in 2009, under the auspices of the People’s Daily, the main newspaper of the Communist Party of China.
Wednesday’s tweet is a shorter, more precise version of an argument he made ten days before, claiming that China’s development of nuclear deterrence was aimed at “to ensure that the United States abandons the idea of nuclear blackmail against China, or use nuclear forces to fill the void, because conventional American forces cannot crush China.”
Reports earlier this month that the People’s Liberation Army successfully tested a nuclear-capable intercontinental hypersonic missile raised alarm in Washington, with U.S. officials claiming they were taken by surprise.


Also on rt.com
A “Sputnik moment”? Milley hints China’s hypersonic weapons test has left US in arms race dust



In an interview on Wednesday, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley said the “Very important event” was “very disturbing” and “very close” at one time Sputnik, a reference to the 1957 shock to the West when the USSR launched the very first orbital satellite.
Russia had previously knocked out the United States and NATO alike in 2018, deploying several advanced weapon systems, including two hypersonic missiles, Kinzhal and Avangard. Another hypersonic missile system, dubbed Zircon, has been successfully tested since then.


Also on rt.com
Russian Navy’s hypersonic cruise missile Zircon to transform the balance of power at sea



Do you think your friends would be interested? Share this story!



rt Gt





Posted by Mary In World News Last Modified 27 October 2021 - 11:54pm
 
Stupid human argue on the Earth day and night. The outer Space is so attractive and mysterious.
 
ONCE? Nobody can die twice. if one is eliminate than that's it
 
Death is better than alive during nuclear fallout where the earth is flooded with radioactive slowly torture those survive.
 
Death is better than alive during nuclear fallout where the earth is flooded with radioactive slowly torture those survive.

Not really the strong will survive and shake it off to build a better future. Approx. 10% of the world population could survive a potential WW3
 

Back
Top Bottom