What's new

‘Stay With Me’: Afghan Government Begs Citizens Not to Flee

Annexing territory is a matter of global hues and cries and there is no way Pakistan can afford it..just look at Russia on the Crimean affair...Put Pakistan can ensure a shadow or proxy government in Afghanistan which can sign an accord on Wakhan Corridor to develop it as a bi-lateral economic zone..So Afghans and Pakistan both benefit...Pakistan should also push ahead with a plan involving Iran, Russia and Turkey to stabilize and develop Afghanistan..
 
You are a Shaikh chali COAS who eats Khyali Pulao
haha... No , i prefer cooking khyali pulao On eating it.
but did you noticed that huge "IF" in my sentence. or just on trolling mode ?
 
Last edited:
Annexing territory is a matter of global hues and cries and there is no way Pakistan can afford it..just look at Russia on the Crimean affair...Put Pakistan can ensure a shadow or proxy government in Afghanistan which can sign an accord on Wakhan Corridor to develop it as a bi-lateral economic zone..So Afghans and Pakistan both benefit...Pakistan should also push ahead with a plan involving Iran, Russia and Turkey to stabilize and develop Afghanistan..
Why sign an accord when we can actually annex the wakhan corridor. Just like the afghans dont accept the durand line we can put forward a claim to wakhan saying the british illegally gave it to afghanistan during the great game (it was part of kpk). And once the claim is in place move the army near to the border and slowly overtime annex it. The wakhi people already are anti-afghan and would be more than willing to join us!
 
Why sign an accord when we can actually annex the wakhan corridor. Just like the afghans dont accept the durand line we can put forward a claim to wakhan saying the british illegally gave it to afghanistan during the great game (it was part of kpk). And once the claim is in place move the army near to the border and slowly overtime annex it. The wakhi people already are anti-afghan and would be more than willing to join us!

1st, we can blame Afghanistan for attacks. even if there is no attack . Still blame them today, tomorrow, day after tomorrow, and after 3-4 week and 10-15 "Makeup attacks" Inter your armies in Wakhan.
2nd, i am not in favor of leaving residents In wakhan. just throw them out, We can't trust Afghanis. they can create problems for Us.
3rd, Do not annex Wakhan corridor "OFFICIALLY"" , just make your presence there. it will keep us away from any International Pressure. May be after 20-25 years. But during this time, Print Pakistan's Maps time to time showing Wakhan as a part of Pakistan, and after each Such map. State it a "PRINTING MISTAKE" after 2-3 days , that's how we can change minds.
 
1st, we can blame Afghanistan for attacks. even if there is no attack . Still blame them today, tomorrow, day after tomorrow, and after 3-4 week and 10-15 "Makeup attacks" Inter your armies in Wakhan.
2nd, i am not in favor of leaving residents In wakhan. just throw them out, We can't trust Afghanis. they can create problems for Us.
3rd, Do not annex Wakhan corridor "OFFICIALLY"" , just make your presence there. it will keep us away from any International Pressure. May be after 20-25 years. But during this time, Print Pakistan's Maps time to time showing Wakhan as a part of Pakistan, and after each Such map. State it a "PRINTING MISTAKE" after 2-3 days , that's how we can change minds.
How would china react to us annexing wakhan? Because wakhan acts as the only border between the two countries.
 
12038543_146765682338169_2762359574112370096_n.jpg

• we should attack Afghanistan & capture this marked region :sniper:
• it will allow us to trade with central Asian states without Afghanistan factor !

we are already doing it, through CPEC (Xingjiang province of China, which borders 7 countries, 4 out of them central asian ) , however we should indeed lay claim to this area, to counter Afghan claim of Loy Afghanistan !!!
 
the government dont feed the family its the people who live there
 
How would china react to us annexing wakhan? Because wakhan acts as the only border between the two countries.
And why will china do so ?
Afghanistan's trade with china is barely 2-3% of it's total trade.
while Afghanistan's trade with Pakistan is 48% of it's total trade.
China will not Sacrifice it's $ 50-60 billions of investment in Pakistan for some Million dollars of trade.
But
China can still trade with Afghanistan, but this time through "PAKISTAN OCCUPIED WAKHAN" ... what say ?
 
And why will china do so ?
Afghanistan's trade with china is barely 2-3% of it's total trade.
while Afghanistan's trade with Pakistan is 48% of it's total trade.
China will not Sacrifice it's $ 50-60 billions of investment in Pakistan for some Million dollars of trade.
But
China can still trade with Afghanistan, but this time through "PAKISTAN OCCUPIED WAKHAN" ... what say ?
Like the sound of that :D maybe after a decade or so a referendum to make it official.
 

Back
Top Bottom