What's new

SHOOTING BLANKS: PARRIKAR SCRAPS RS 1,000 CRORE INDIAN ARMY GUN DEAL

Tuchha

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
257
Reaction score
-9
Country
India
Location
India
SHOOTING BLANKS: PARRIKAR SCRAPS RS 1,000 CRORE INDIAN ARMY GUN DEAL AFTER ITALIAN BERETTA FAILURE LEAVES ISRAELI VENDOR THE ONLY OPTION

Beretta_ARX_160_Rifle.jpg

Beretta offered its ARX160 model but it didn't work well with night vision
by Ajit K Dubey

Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar has scrapped a controversial Army deal worth around Rs 1,000 crore to procure 45,000 rifles amid allegations of corruption in the acquisition process. The potential deal fell under scrutiny over the possibility of favors being given to Israeli firm, Israeli Weapons Industry, over its other rivals in the deal.
  • The tender for the rifles was issued in 2010 in which 44,600 close quarter carbines (rifles) were to be provided to the infantry units for combating terrorists in close fights.
  • The deal was scrapped after 28 firms interested in producing the new carbine rifle were reduced to just one
  • The potential deal fell under scrutiny over the possibility of favors being given to Israeli firm, Israeli Weapons Industry
  • Italian firm Beretta had offered its ARX160 model but failed the night-vision modification tests
  • Twenty-eight companies had shown interest in the tender but ultimately after only the Israeli firm was left as ‘single vendor’ in the race for the coveted contract.

A senior Defence Ministry official told Mail Today: "The tender has been scrapped after deliberations with all stakeholders and legal advice. The Army has been asked to restart the process to buy the guns”.
“The process for acquiring the guns may have been affected but there will be zero tolerance for corruption,” the official added.
Though the Defence Ministry allows single vendor cases to be carried through, but it generally prefers only multi-vendor cases at the final stages to reap benefits in terms of cost due to competition.
Italin_Soldier_ARX_160_Carbine.jpg

An Italian soldier with a Beretta ARX 160
The Ministry has now asked the Army to restart the tender under fast-track procedure, but Parrikar has made it clear that the next tender should also be a multi-vendor procedure, sources revealed.
The deal had come under cloud after Union minister Rao Inderjit Singh expressed doubts over the process of selection of the Israeli gun at the Defence Acquisition Council meeting in June.
During his stint in the Defence Ministry, the minister had also sought a CBI probe into the deal.
After objections were raised about the tender process, Parrikar had held meetings with all stakeholders including secretary, defense production, Ashok Gupta; director general, acquisition, Smitha Nagaraj; Army deputy chief Lt Gen.
The potential deal fell under scrutiny over the possibility of favors being given to Israeli firm, Israeli Weapons Industry (pictured), over its other rivals in the deal. The tender for the rifles was issued in 2010 in which 44,600 close quarter carbines (rifles) were to be provided to the infantry units for combating terrorists in close fights.
Subroto Raha and other senior officers to find out a way to go ahead with the ongoing deal, but it did not yield results.
In the initial phase of procurement, the Army had sent the Request for Information to 28 companies and after getting responses, the Request for Proposal was sent to five firms.
IWI_Galil_Assault_Rifle.jpg

IWI Galil ACE 22 5.56×45mm NATO Carbine
“At the trial stage of the competition, just two companies - Italian Beretta and Israeli Weapon Industry - were left. The Galil ACE CQB carbine was offered by IWI while Beretta had offered its ARX160 model,” the official said.
Sources said the Directorate General of Quality Assurance rejected Beretta because a safety measure on its laser sight was found unsuitable.
The night sight by Beretta, widely used in the US, was fitted with a small screw, which needed to be opened before use. This screw dropped off during trials resulting in its rejection, and subsequently the ‘single-vendor’ situation.
The Ministry has now asked the Army to restart the tender under fast-track procedure, but Parrikar has made it clear that the next tender should also be a multi-vendor procedure, sources revealed. The tender called for night-vision sights to be fitted onto the “Picatinny rail”- a standardized bracket - on the top of the barrel.
Since no munitions manufacturer makes night sights, it was suggested to keep options open.
The global tender for the carbines was issued with the option to get transfer of technology to build another 1.2 lakh such carbines by the Ordnance Factory Board.
Defence sources said it needs to be clarified as to why such a deal was allowed to progress when several three-star and two-star rank officers were involved in supervisory role.
All new weapon purchases are the responsibility of the Deputy Chief of Army Staff (Planning and Systems), who reports to the Chief of Army Staff directly.

http://www.indiandefensenews.in/2016/10/shooting-blanks-parrikar-scraps-rs-1000.html
 
was there any single deal in Congress regime that was corruption free? Just curious.

Hath ki safai was at peak in defence contracts.

Rafale deal was spearheaded by Congress but BJP first scrapped the MMRCA deal and then reissued with in different way. Same is about to happen with this deal too. Sadly Politics nowadays are second name of corruption in this world so dont get surprised when Congress scraps deals signed by this BJP govt (whenever Congress makes a comeback).
 
Have any of the OFB's responded with their products? Or is it just a pure foreign tender?

Rafale deal was spearheaded by Congress but BJP first scrapped the MMRCA deal and then reissued with in different way. Same is about to happen with this deal too. Sadly Politics nowadays are second name of corruption in this world so dont get surprised when Congress scraps deals signed by this BJP govt (whenever Congress makes a comeback).

There are lot many deals that go unhindered under the present govt. MMRCA was scrapped as congress left behind a venomous snake. Congress babus's were so incompetent that they could not take a decision on the fighter jets for a decade resulting in cost escalations. BJP stepped in and took a bold decision by scrapping the deal and instead went ahead with a govt-govt deal for Rafale. The gap will be filled by either Grippen,F-18 or F-16's under Make in India.
 
Have any of the OFB's responded with their products? Or is it just a pure foreign tender?



There are lot many deals that go unhindered under the present govt. MMRCA was scrapped as congress left behind a venomous snake. Congress babus's were so incompetent that they could not take a decision on the fighter jets for a decade resulting in cost escalations. BJP stepped in and took a bold decision by scrapping the deal and instead went ahead with a govt-govt deal for Rafale. The gap will be filled by either Grippen,F-18 or F-16's under Make in India.

If U are happy with it why shud anyone object to that. Its your country and your money. My main point was regarding politics and I still stand firm to what I said (not that I am pointing specifically at India).
 
If U are happy with it why shud anyone object to that. Its your country and your money. My main point was regarding politics and I still stand firm to what I said (not that I am pointing specifically at India).

I dont disagree with you mate. Everything is fair in Love, War and politics. I just pointed out the reason behind decesion taken for MMRCA. There should be continuity in governance but not at the cost of corruption.
 
If U are happy with it why shud anyone object to that. Its your country and your money. My main point was regarding politics and I still stand firm to what I said (not that I am pointing specifically at India).

I guess Indians know India better than Pakistanis ( And Veice Versa )
 
I dont disagree with you mate. Everything is fair in Love, War and politics. I just pointed out the reason behind decesion taken for MMRCA. There should be continuity in governance but not at the cost of corruption.

U are absolutely right but let me point at another aspect of it. Bear me out as a neutral person. Rather lets suppose this very deal was for Pakistan Army. The tender was floated in 2010, means the requirement was raised even much long ago. Which means since then PA is bearing out with something they eagerly want to replace. Now the process would be restarted. To make is speedy either they ll go for Govt to Govt deal (which ll hike the price quite a lot) or in case of open tender PA wud have to wait for another many years while they ll be still living with the rifle they wanted to replace since long ago. So who is mainly suffering in the long run...its PA. Is it worth it??? I wud be getting different answers bcz of different logics and reasons.

I guess Indians know India better than Pakistanis ( And Veice Versa )

Thats what I exactly meant. I have got no business at all to even point at something that is yours. My perspective was totally different and that was Politics worldwide.
 
U are absolutely right but let me point at another aspect of it. Bear me out as a neutral person. Rather lets suppose this very deal was for Pakistan Army. The tender was floated in 2010, means the requirement was raised even much long ago. Which means since then PA is bearing out with something they eagerly want to replace. Now the process would be restarted. To make is speedy either they ll go for Govt to Govt deal (which ll hike the price quite a lot) or in case of open tender PA wud have to wait for another many years while they ll be still living with the rifle they wanted to replace since long ago. So who is mainly suffering in the long run...its PA. Is it worth it??? I wud be getting different answers bcz of different logics and reasons.

You are right if the Govt to govt deal took the same amount of time as that of the regular tender, but here it just took an year for the govt to govt deal to be worked out(Pretty fast with the govt standard). The IAF would not have suffered damage by a further delay of an Year as the Su-30's are in production and so have the Tejas started flying for IAF (Which if during Congress would not have seen light for the next decade or so). By the time Rafale's fly in , the Single Engined fighters would begin production too. The best part with this deal is, the sanctioned Squadron limit will be achieved sooner than the tender if it were left to continue.
 
Every party makes money, only the methods are different.

Congress is a socialist party hence they support nationalization and engaging PSUs in the deals. Since you cannot make money out of PSU deals, they have to find a way through payments to the middle men.

On the other hand BJP is capitalist party hence need to make money through crony capitalism.

There is a reason why Congress insisted in engaged HAL for MMRCA while BJP cancelled the MMRCA deal to pave way to dump HAL in favor of their private industry buddy.
 
Rafale deal was spearheaded by Congress but BJP first scrapped the MMRCA deal and then reissued with in different way. Same is about to happen with this deal too. Sadly Politics nowadays are second name of corruption in this world so dont get surprised when Congress scraps deals signed by this BJP govt (whenever Congress makes a comeback).

This is more about corruption than about BJP-Congress.

Neither BJP nor Congress scraps every deal politically unless there is something wrong going on. The problem with Congress was they didn't monitor their ministers which encouraged corruption.
 
SHOOTING BLANKS: PARRIKAR SCRAPS RS 1,000 CRORE INDIAN ARMY GUN DEAL AFTER ITALIAN BERETTA FAILURE LEAVES ISRAELI VENDOR THE ONLY OPTION

Beretta_ARX_160_Rifle.jpg

Beretta offered its ARX160 model but it didn't work well with night vision
by Ajit K Dubey
Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar has scrapped a controversial Army deal worth around Rs 1,000 crore to procure 45,000 rifles amid allegations of corruption in the acquisition process. The potential deal fell under scrutiny over the possibility of favors being given to Israeli firm, Israeli Weapons Industry, over its other rivals in the deal.



    • The tender for the rifles was issued in 2010 in which 44,600 close quarter carbines (rifles) were to be provided to the infantry units for combating terrorists in close fights.
    • The deal was scrapped after 28 firms interested in producing the new carbine rifle were reduced to just one
    • The potential deal fell under scrutiny over the possibility of favors being given to Israeli firm, Israeli Weapons Industry
    • Italian firm Beretta had offered its ARX160 model but failed the night-vision modification tests
    • Twenty-eight companies had shown interest in the tender but ultimately after only the Israeli firm was left as ‘single vendor’ in the race for the coveted contract.
A senior Defence Ministry official told Mail Today: "The tender has been scrapped after deliberations with all stakeholders and legal advice. The Army has been asked to restart the process to buy the guns”.
“The process for acquiring the guns may have been affected but there will be zero tolerance for corruption,” the official added.
Though the Defence Ministry allows single vendor cases to be carried through, but it generally prefers only multi-vendor cases at the final stages to reap benefits in terms of cost due to competition.
Italin_Soldier_ARX_160_Carbine.jpg

An Italian soldier with a Beretta ARX 160
The Ministry has now asked the Army to restart the tender under fast-track procedure, but Parrikar has made it clear that the next tender should also be a multi-vendor procedure, sources revealed.
The deal had come under cloud after Union minister Rao Inderjit Singh expressed doubts over the process of selection of the Israeli gun at the Defence Acquisition Council meeting in June.
During his stint in the Defence Ministry, the minister had also sought a CBI probe into the deal.
After objections were raised about the tender process, Parrikar had held meetings with all stakeholders including secretary, defense production, Ashok Gupta; director general, acquisition, Smitha Nagaraj; Army deputy chief Lt Gen.
The potential deal fell under scrutiny over the possibility of favors being given to Israeli firm, Israeli Weapons Industry (pictured), over its other rivals in the deal. The tender for the rifles was issued in 2010 in which 44,600 close quarter carbines (rifles) were to be provided to the infantry units for combating terrorists in close fights.
Subroto Raha and other senior officers to find out a way to go ahead with the ongoing deal, but it did not yield results.
In the initial phase of procurement, the Army had sent the Request for Information to 28 companies and after getting responses, the Request for Proposal was sent to five firms.
IWI_Galil_Assault_Rifle.jpg

IWI Galil ACE 22 5.56×45mm NATO Carbine
“At the trial stage of the competition, just two companies - Italian Beretta and Israeli Weapon Industry - were left. The Galil ACE CQB carbine was offered by IWI while Beretta had offered its ARX160 model,” the official said.
Sources said the Directorate General of Quality Assurance rejected Beretta because a safety measure on its laser sight was found unsuitable.
The night sight by Beretta, widely used in the US, was fitted with a small screw, which needed to be opened before use. This screw dropped off during trials resulting in its rejection, and subsequently the ‘single-vendor’ situation.
The Ministry has now asked the Army to restart the tender under fast-track procedure, but Parrikar has made it clear that the next tender should also be a multi-vendor procedure, sources revealed. The tender called for night-vision sights to be fitted onto the “Picatinny rail”- a standardized bracket - on the top of the barrel.
Since no munitions manufacturer makes night sights, it was suggested to keep options open.
The global tender for the carbines was issued with the option to get transfer of technology to build another 1.2 lakh such carbines by the Ordnance Factory Board.
Defence sources said it needs to be clarified as to why such a deal was allowed to progress when several three-star and two-star rank officers were involved in supervisory role.
All new weapon purchases are the responsibility of the Deputy Chief of Army Staff (Planning and Systems), who reports to the Chief of Army Staff directly.

http://www.indiandefensenews.in/2016/10/shooting-blanks-parrikar-scraps-rs-1000.html
Why hasn't India Looked towards Russia for Rifles? In 1991-92 they bought AkM's but not now? Any specific reason for that?
 
Rafale deal was spearheaded by Congress but BJP first scrapped the MMRCA deal and then reissued with in different way. Same is about to happen with this deal too. Sadly Politics nowadays are second name of corruption in this world so dont get surprised when Congress scraps deals signed by this BJP govt (whenever Congress makes a comeback).

Congress will never make a comeback to central government in next 3 decades
 
Why hasn't India Looked towards Russia for Rifles? In 1991-92 they bought AkM's but not now? Any specific reason for that?

Its an open tender. Any supplier meeting the RFI specifications can come forward.
 
Its an open tender. Any supplier meeting the RFI specifications can come forward.
I agree with your statement. But why hasn't India tried to put up a facility for small arms with the help of Russia. I know indigenous programs are a good way but this might have helped you also in export of small arms.
 

Back
Top Bottom