kidwaibhai
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2006
- Messages
- 1,494
- Reaction score
- 0
Chemical Weapons
Although allegations have been leveled against Pakistan for conducting research into biological warfare since the early 1990s, Pakistan is not suspected of either producing or stockpiling biological weapons (BW).[1] However, it is generally believed that Pakistan has a well developed bio-technology sector that is capable of supporting limited biological warfare-related research and development.[2] In 1996, the U.S. Department of Defense stated that Pakistan "had the resources and capabilities appropriate to conducting research and development relating to biological warfare," and "was conducting research and development with potential biological warfare applications."[3] But the U.S. government has not presented any evidence to corroborate its assertions.
The Pakistani government insists that it has never developed, produced, or stockpiled biological weapons or agents and that a bio-warfare program is not part of the country's defense matrix. Pakistan signed the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 1972, which it ratified in 1974.[4] Since then, Pakistan has remained a vocal advocate for the success of the BTWC. During the various Review Conferences of the BTWC, Pakistani representatives have urged more robust participation from state signatories, invited new states to join the treaty, and as part of the non-aligned group of countries have made the case for guarantees for states' rights to engage in peaceful exchange of biological and toxin materials for purposes of scientific research.[5]
In the wake of Pakistan's May 1998 nuclear tests, the U.S. Department of Commerce imposed sanctions on a large number of government, quasi-government, and private sector entities suspected of participating in Pakistan's nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons-related delivery programs. In the process, the U.S. government also imposed sanctions on chemical and biological facilities on suspicion that they might be involved with chemical and bio-warfare programs. These four entities were: The Center for Advanced Molecular Biology, Lahore; Karachi CBW Research Institute; Karachi CW & BW Warfare R&D Laboratory; and the National Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad.[6] Despite being sanctioned, there is no independent evidence to suggest that any of the above four institutes were or are engaged in offensive biological warfare programs.
Key Sources:
[1] Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Assessing the Risks, Office of Technology Assessment
website, August 1993, archived at http://www.wws.princeton.edu/~ota/ns20/alpha_f.html
Proliferation Threat and Response, Office of the Secretary of Defense website, January 2001,
http://www.fpc.state.gov/c4729.htm.
[2] Proliferation Threat and Response, January 2001.
[3] Biological Weapons Proliferation, Canadian Security Intelligence Service, June 200, http://www.csis-scrs.gc.ca/eng/miscdocs/200005_e.html
[4]"Status of Multilateral Arms Regulation and Disarmament Agreements," United Nations Institute for Disarmament website, http://disarmament2.un.org/treatyStatus.nsf.
[5] Rissanen, Jenni, Left in Limbo: Review Conference Suspended on Edge of Collapse, The
Acronym Institute website, February 2002, http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd62/62bwc.htm.
[6] "Rules and Regulations", Federal Register website, 19 November 1998, v. 63, 223.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=
1998_register&docid=fr19no98-18.pdf.
Biological Weapons
Pakistan has had no publicly known chemical warfare (CW) program in the past. Pakistan has also signed and ratified the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and remains a member of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in good standing.[1] Pakistan is self-sufficient in the production of chemicals such as sulfuric acid, caustic soda, soda ash, and chlorine. However, it relies on imports for most of the raw materials and intermediates for dyes, pigments, paints, varnishes, pesticides, plastics, and fertilizers.[2] Although Pakistan likely has the technical capability to produce choking, blood, blister, and nerve, agents for use in chemical warfare, the Pakistani government is legally committed to refrain from developing, manufacturing, stockpiling, or using chemical weapons.
Information concerning Pakistan's alleged CW programs during the 1980s and 1990s is limited, conflicted, and fragmentary. In 1997, the Indian newspaper Indian Express citing European intelligence documents alleged that Pakistan had a well developed CW program dating back to the late 1970s. According to the Express, possible Pakistani chemical weapons included blistering, nerve and blood agents. The report cited Pakistan's imports of large quantities of dual-use chemicals such as phosphorous compounds and arsenic and the absence of their use in civilian chemical industry as indirect evidence of a CW program. Pakistan's imports of gas masks, respirators, and chemical and biological weapons protection suits were also linked to the pursuit of chemical or biolgical warfare capabilities.[3] However, despite suspicions, there is no positive proof in open-source literature of an offensive Pakistani CW program.
In the 1980s, the Soviet Union also alleged that Pakistan had armed insurgents battling the Soviet forces in Afghanistan with cartridges and grenades stuffed with toxic chemicals.[4] Although information regarding the agents supplied to Afghan insurgents by Pakistan is limited, the alleged chemical weapons confiscated from insurgents in Afghanistan was found to contain CS or "tear gas," an agent not restricted by the CWC. Furthermore, the source of the chemical filled grenades was the United States and not Pakistan.[5] Other allegations involving the possible use of CW agents center on the plane crash in August 1988 that killed then Pakistani Army Chief of Staff and President, General Zia-ul-Haq. Some experts believe that the saboteur/s used a nerve agent similar to VX to incapacitate the pilots of the plane carrying Zia.[6] However, the identity and motivations of the perpetrator/s of the alleged assassination, if known to the Pakistani or U.S. government authorities, have never been made public.
In the mid-1990s, the Afghan government accused Pakistan of supplying the Taliban militia with chemical weapons.[7] However, the charge remains unsubstantiated. Similarly, during 2002-2003, Indian military officials expressed concerns that Pakistani backed insurgents battling the Indian security forces in Kashmir might have obtained chemical weapons such as poisonous gas or other neurotoxic substances.[8] However, these allegations also remain unsubstantiated. In other instances, Kashmiri insurgents were alleged to have apparently substituted guns with syringes to inject poisonous substances into their victims.[9] In 1998, Indian police officials reportedly seized two kilograms of cyanide and the anesthetic flouthene from Sikh separatists in the state of Punjab. The Punjab police officials subsequently blamed Pakistan military's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) directorate as the source of the chemicals and alleged that the arrested militants intended to poison the water supply or to target a military or paramilitary base in the country.[10] However, there is no independent evidence to support the Indian officials' assertions.
Subsequent to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, evidence surfaced that senior Pakistani nuclear scientists Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmood and Chaudhry Abdul Majeed may have helped Al-Qaida develop concepts for the aerial dispersion of chemical and biological warfare agents.[11] In 2002, Pakistani police also unearthed chemical laboratories belonging to the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, a militant Islamic group with links to Al-Qaida, in the port city of Karachi. Investigations revealed that the group was preparing to produce poisonous gases for a possible terrorist attack.[12] However, these problems point to the involvement of non-state actors; and do not suggest state complicity in developing chemical weapons.
Despite suspicions that Pakistan may be pursuing a clandestine CW program, the charges and allegations have never been proven. In 1999, the Pakistani government announced a mandate for all domestic chemical producers to "furnish details of the chemicals" imported for use in Pakistan.[13] Following this, in October 2000, the government promulgated a law to prohibit the development, production, and use of CW. The above laws were made in pursuance of the CWC, which Pakistan ratified in 1997.[14] In April 2003, the OPCW announced that it would be conducting inspections in the country.[15] Pakistani officials subsequently reported that the inspections were routine and that Pakistan does not possess chemical weapons. The OPCW also announced that it had conducted inspections in Pakistan in 2001 and 2002.[16] However, the findings of the inspections were not made public. Following the inspections in May 2003, Pakistani news sources reported that the OPCW had given an "all clear" report of their inspections.[17] In October 2003, Islamabad was re-elected to the OPCW's Executive Council, a seat which it has continuously held since 1999, a privilege reserved for state parties in good standing.[18]
Key Sources:
[1] State Parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention, Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, http://www.opcw.org/html/db/members_ratifyer.html.
[2] Prospects of Chemical Industry in Pakistan, Ministry of Industries & Production, Government of Pakistan, http://www.eac.gov.pk/PakInvGuide/prospects of chemical industry in pakistan.pdf.
[3] Manvendra Singh, "Pakistan still building up lethal chemical weapons," Indian Express, 10 July 1997, http://www.expressindia.com.
[4] "Subversive Operations from Pakistan," BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 9 September 1980; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[5] "Pravda on President Carter's Zig-Zag Tracks of a Hare," Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union for Abroad," 19 April 1980; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 21 April 1980, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[6] Edward Jay Epstein, "Who Killed Zia?" Vanity Fair, September 1989; archived at, http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/zia.htm.
[7] "Afghan minister says Taliban used Pakistani chemical weapons," Deutsch Presse-Agentur, 7 October 1996; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 7 October 1996, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[8] "Indian Army Officer: Terrorists in Kashmir Reportedly Possess Chemical Weapons," Times of India, 1 May 2003; in FBIS Document: SAP20030501000001, (September 2003).
[9] "Militants swap guns for poison in Kashmir," Sify News, 24 June 2003, http://headlines.sify.com/2202news4.html.
[10] "Pakistan's ISI planned mass poisoning in India, says official," Deutsche Presse-Agentur, 6 September 1998; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 6 September 1998, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[11] Douglas Franz and David Rohde, "A Nation Challenged: Biological Terror; 2 Pakistanis Linked to Papers on Anthrax Weapons," New York Times, 28 November 2001, http://www.nytimes.com; B. Muralidhar Reddy, "Pakistan Denies Link Between Scientists and Al Qaeda," Hindu, 29 November 2001, http://www.hinduonnet.com; Tom Walker, Stephen Grey, and Nick Fielding, "Bin Laden's Camps Reveal Chemical Weapon Ambition," The Sunday Times, 25 November 2001, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/.
[12] "Karachi labs hint at terrorists trying to acquire chem weapons," Press Trust of India, 19 September 2001; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 19 September 2001, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[13] "Government to monitor toxic chemical use in Pakistan," Deutsche Presse-Agentur, 27 February 1999; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 27 February 1999, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[14] "Pakistan promulgates law against chemical weapons," Deutsche Presse-Agentur, 11 October 2000; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 11 October 2000, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[15] B. Muralidhar Reddy, "Chemical Weapons Inspectors Visit Plant in Pak.," Hindu, 1 May 2003; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 1 May 2003, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[16] Ibid.
[17] "UN Chemical Weapon Inspectors End Tour of Pakistani Fertilizer Plant," Financial Times Information, 20 June 2003; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 20 June 2003, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[18] "Pakistan Re-Elected to Prohibition of Chemical Weapons Council," Financial Times Information, 24 October 2003; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 24 October 2003, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
I dont think that this is an issue that we have discussed in this forum as of yet. I think that Pakistan should have chemical and biological weapons in case some ends up wiping are Nuclear weapons buy a strategic hit.
Although allegations have been leveled against Pakistan for conducting research into biological warfare since the early 1990s, Pakistan is not suspected of either producing or stockpiling biological weapons (BW).[1] However, it is generally believed that Pakistan has a well developed bio-technology sector that is capable of supporting limited biological warfare-related research and development.[2] In 1996, the U.S. Department of Defense stated that Pakistan "had the resources and capabilities appropriate to conducting research and development relating to biological warfare," and "was conducting research and development with potential biological warfare applications."[3] But the U.S. government has not presented any evidence to corroborate its assertions.
The Pakistani government insists that it has never developed, produced, or stockpiled biological weapons or agents and that a bio-warfare program is not part of the country's defense matrix. Pakistan signed the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 1972, which it ratified in 1974.[4] Since then, Pakistan has remained a vocal advocate for the success of the BTWC. During the various Review Conferences of the BTWC, Pakistani representatives have urged more robust participation from state signatories, invited new states to join the treaty, and as part of the non-aligned group of countries have made the case for guarantees for states' rights to engage in peaceful exchange of biological and toxin materials for purposes of scientific research.[5]
In the wake of Pakistan's May 1998 nuclear tests, the U.S. Department of Commerce imposed sanctions on a large number of government, quasi-government, and private sector entities suspected of participating in Pakistan's nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons-related delivery programs. In the process, the U.S. government also imposed sanctions on chemical and biological facilities on suspicion that they might be involved with chemical and bio-warfare programs. These four entities were: The Center for Advanced Molecular Biology, Lahore; Karachi CBW Research Institute; Karachi CW & BW Warfare R&D Laboratory; and the National Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad.[6] Despite being sanctioned, there is no independent evidence to suggest that any of the above four institutes were or are engaged in offensive biological warfare programs.
Key Sources:
[1] Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Assessing the Risks, Office of Technology Assessment
website, August 1993, archived at http://www.wws.princeton.edu/~ota/ns20/alpha_f.html
Proliferation Threat and Response, Office of the Secretary of Defense website, January 2001,
http://www.fpc.state.gov/c4729.htm.
[2] Proliferation Threat and Response, January 2001.
[3] Biological Weapons Proliferation, Canadian Security Intelligence Service, June 200, http://www.csis-scrs.gc.ca/eng/miscdocs/200005_e.html
[4]"Status of Multilateral Arms Regulation and Disarmament Agreements," United Nations Institute for Disarmament website, http://disarmament2.un.org/treatyStatus.nsf.
[5] Rissanen, Jenni, Left in Limbo: Review Conference Suspended on Edge of Collapse, The
Acronym Institute website, February 2002, http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd62/62bwc.htm.
[6] "Rules and Regulations", Federal Register website, 19 November 1998, v. 63, 223.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=
1998_register&docid=fr19no98-18.pdf.
Biological Weapons
Pakistan has had no publicly known chemical warfare (CW) program in the past. Pakistan has also signed and ratified the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and remains a member of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in good standing.[1] Pakistan is self-sufficient in the production of chemicals such as sulfuric acid, caustic soda, soda ash, and chlorine. However, it relies on imports for most of the raw materials and intermediates for dyes, pigments, paints, varnishes, pesticides, plastics, and fertilizers.[2] Although Pakistan likely has the technical capability to produce choking, blood, blister, and nerve, agents for use in chemical warfare, the Pakistani government is legally committed to refrain from developing, manufacturing, stockpiling, or using chemical weapons.
Information concerning Pakistan's alleged CW programs during the 1980s and 1990s is limited, conflicted, and fragmentary. In 1997, the Indian newspaper Indian Express citing European intelligence documents alleged that Pakistan had a well developed CW program dating back to the late 1970s. According to the Express, possible Pakistani chemical weapons included blistering, nerve and blood agents. The report cited Pakistan's imports of large quantities of dual-use chemicals such as phosphorous compounds and arsenic and the absence of their use in civilian chemical industry as indirect evidence of a CW program. Pakistan's imports of gas masks, respirators, and chemical and biological weapons protection suits were also linked to the pursuit of chemical or biolgical warfare capabilities.[3] However, despite suspicions, there is no positive proof in open-source literature of an offensive Pakistani CW program.
In the 1980s, the Soviet Union also alleged that Pakistan had armed insurgents battling the Soviet forces in Afghanistan with cartridges and grenades stuffed with toxic chemicals.[4] Although information regarding the agents supplied to Afghan insurgents by Pakistan is limited, the alleged chemical weapons confiscated from insurgents in Afghanistan was found to contain CS or "tear gas," an agent not restricted by the CWC. Furthermore, the source of the chemical filled grenades was the United States and not Pakistan.[5] Other allegations involving the possible use of CW agents center on the plane crash in August 1988 that killed then Pakistani Army Chief of Staff and President, General Zia-ul-Haq. Some experts believe that the saboteur/s used a nerve agent similar to VX to incapacitate the pilots of the plane carrying Zia.[6] However, the identity and motivations of the perpetrator/s of the alleged assassination, if known to the Pakistani or U.S. government authorities, have never been made public.
In the mid-1990s, the Afghan government accused Pakistan of supplying the Taliban militia with chemical weapons.[7] However, the charge remains unsubstantiated. Similarly, during 2002-2003, Indian military officials expressed concerns that Pakistani backed insurgents battling the Indian security forces in Kashmir might have obtained chemical weapons such as poisonous gas or other neurotoxic substances.[8] However, these allegations also remain unsubstantiated. In other instances, Kashmiri insurgents were alleged to have apparently substituted guns with syringes to inject poisonous substances into their victims.[9] In 1998, Indian police officials reportedly seized two kilograms of cyanide and the anesthetic flouthene from Sikh separatists in the state of Punjab. The Punjab police officials subsequently blamed Pakistan military's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) directorate as the source of the chemicals and alleged that the arrested militants intended to poison the water supply or to target a military or paramilitary base in the country.[10] However, there is no independent evidence to support the Indian officials' assertions.
Subsequent to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, evidence surfaced that senior Pakistani nuclear scientists Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmood and Chaudhry Abdul Majeed may have helped Al-Qaida develop concepts for the aerial dispersion of chemical and biological warfare agents.[11] In 2002, Pakistani police also unearthed chemical laboratories belonging to the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, a militant Islamic group with links to Al-Qaida, in the port city of Karachi. Investigations revealed that the group was preparing to produce poisonous gases for a possible terrorist attack.[12] However, these problems point to the involvement of non-state actors; and do not suggest state complicity in developing chemical weapons.
Despite suspicions that Pakistan may be pursuing a clandestine CW program, the charges and allegations have never been proven. In 1999, the Pakistani government announced a mandate for all domestic chemical producers to "furnish details of the chemicals" imported for use in Pakistan.[13] Following this, in October 2000, the government promulgated a law to prohibit the development, production, and use of CW. The above laws were made in pursuance of the CWC, which Pakistan ratified in 1997.[14] In April 2003, the OPCW announced that it would be conducting inspections in the country.[15] Pakistani officials subsequently reported that the inspections were routine and that Pakistan does not possess chemical weapons. The OPCW also announced that it had conducted inspections in Pakistan in 2001 and 2002.[16] However, the findings of the inspections were not made public. Following the inspections in May 2003, Pakistani news sources reported that the OPCW had given an "all clear" report of their inspections.[17] In October 2003, Islamabad was re-elected to the OPCW's Executive Council, a seat which it has continuously held since 1999, a privilege reserved for state parties in good standing.[18]
Key Sources:
[1] State Parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention, Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, http://www.opcw.org/html/db/members_ratifyer.html.
[2] Prospects of Chemical Industry in Pakistan, Ministry of Industries & Production, Government of Pakistan, http://www.eac.gov.pk/PakInvGuide/prospects of chemical industry in pakistan.pdf.
[3] Manvendra Singh, "Pakistan still building up lethal chemical weapons," Indian Express, 10 July 1997, http://www.expressindia.com.
[4] "Subversive Operations from Pakistan," BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 9 September 1980; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[5] "Pravda on President Carter's Zig-Zag Tracks of a Hare," Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union for Abroad," 19 April 1980; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 21 April 1980, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[6] Edward Jay Epstein, "Who Killed Zia?" Vanity Fair, September 1989; archived at, http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/zia.htm.
[7] "Afghan minister says Taliban used Pakistani chemical weapons," Deutsch Presse-Agentur, 7 October 1996; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 7 October 1996, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[8] "Indian Army Officer: Terrorists in Kashmir Reportedly Possess Chemical Weapons," Times of India, 1 May 2003; in FBIS Document: SAP20030501000001, (September 2003).
[9] "Militants swap guns for poison in Kashmir," Sify News, 24 June 2003, http://headlines.sify.com/2202news4.html.
[10] "Pakistan's ISI planned mass poisoning in India, says official," Deutsche Presse-Agentur, 6 September 1998; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 6 September 1998, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[11] Douglas Franz and David Rohde, "A Nation Challenged: Biological Terror; 2 Pakistanis Linked to Papers on Anthrax Weapons," New York Times, 28 November 2001, http://www.nytimes.com; B. Muralidhar Reddy, "Pakistan Denies Link Between Scientists and Al Qaeda," Hindu, 29 November 2001, http://www.hinduonnet.com; Tom Walker, Stephen Grey, and Nick Fielding, "Bin Laden's Camps Reveal Chemical Weapon Ambition," The Sunday Times, 25 November 2001, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/.
[12] "Karachi labs hint at terrorists trying to acquire chem weapons," Press Trust of India, 19 September 2001; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 19 September 2001, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[13] "Government to monitor toxic chemical use in Pakistan," Deutsche Presse-Agentur, 27 February 1999; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 27 February 1999, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[14] "Pakistan promulgates law against chemical weapons," Deutsche Presse-Agentur, 11 October 2000; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 11 October 2000, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[15] B. Muralidhar Reddy, "Chemical Weapons Inspectors Visit Plant in Pak.," Hindu, 1 May 2003; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 1 May 2003, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[16] Ibid.
[17] "UN Chemical Weapon Inspectors End Tour of Pakistani Fertilizer Plant," Financial Times Information, 20 June 2003; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 20 June 2003, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
[18] "Pakistan Re-Elected to Prohibition of Chemical Weapons Council," Financial Times Information, 24 October 2003; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, 24 October 2003, http://www..lexis-nexis.com.
I dont think that this is an issue that we have discussed in this forum as of yet. I think that Pakistan should have chemical and biological weapons in case some ends up wiping are Nuclear weapons buy a strategic hit.
