What's new

Pakistan - The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization.

Caretaker CM or head of PCB doesn't bring him credibility otherwise Zardari should be more credible than him.

Thik hai, mujhe jo kahna tha maine kah diya. ab baat ghumane ki koi zarurat nahi hai.

indian delusions - trying to steal our ancient ancestors and our history, just shows how shitty indian history is.

You mean ancient ancestors of Arains, Qizilbash, Awan, Sumroo, Mirs etc. :sarcastic::sarcastic:
 
Do you realize you have conceded a major point in debate by accepting that IVC and Vedic people are same??

Indian always maintain that Vedic Civilization predates IVC and both are one and same. Your Pakistani brothers will kill you now :P
!!

I though we are discussing history here and not point scoring? Rig Vedic and IVC same thing basically, what you think?
 
IVC people are the ones who migrated down south India. They are now called Dravidians. There's a reason why South Indians are majorly Shiva Worshippers. IVC people were not central asian nomads. IVC people had great trade links with Mesopotamia and Egypt. Genetically current Pakistanis are not in any way linked to IVC. That credit goes to Dravidians.

According to Erdosy, the ancient Harappans were not markedly different from modern populations in present-day Pakistan. Craniometric data showed similarity with prehistoric peoples of the Iranian plateau and Western Asia.

Erdosy, George, ed. (1995), The Indo-Aryans of Ancient South Asia: Language, Material Culture and Ethnicity, Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, ISBN 3-11-014447-6

Wikipedia = Indo-Aryan_migration
 
Why aren't you Pakistanis writing in ancient Pali, Prakrit or Gandhara language? Why you changed to Urdu? Ditto for Dravidian language. It changed with time.

Caretaker CM or head of PCB doesn't bring him credibility otherwise Zardari should be more credible than him.



Mr. Dravidian, why the Dravidian of Indus Valley didn't wrote story book in Dravidian language?
 
Suppose you are a person who got cancer in one hand. Doctors had to amputate it.

The man(India) will be credited with all the deeds done by his hands. No one will come and say "Look, this chopped off hand (Pakistan) did all the work".

Pakistan is just a dismembered portion of ancient India. Either you own a shared legacy with India or you are nothing but 1000 year old state descended from Heavens into the lap of Bin Qasim.

Incredibly sad, indians have no history of their own.
 
Suppose you are a person who got cancer in one hand. Doctors had to amputate it.

The man(India) will be credited with all the deeds done by his hands. No one will come and say "Look, this chopped off hand (Pakistan) did all the work".

Pakistan is just a dismembered portion of ancient India. Either you own a shared legacy with India or you are nothing but 1000 year old state descended from Heavens into the lap of Bin Qasim.

You are again avoiding my question, Rig Vedic and IVC people were same and one right?
 
IVC and Vedic people are not the same according to academics. they believe ANI portion is remnant of Rigvedic migrant population, and ASI is remnant of IVC people. further ASI in northern part of south asia is different from southern part, with possibly a distant common origin. both ANI and ASI evolved in subcontinent within past 15,000 years, although subcontinent has been populated since 60,000 years ago.

not saying i agree with everything above, but that is the prevalent view.
 
Why aren't you Pakistanis writing in ancient Pali, Prakrit or Gandhara language? Why you changed to Urdu? Ditto for Dravidian language. It changed with time.

Although you are genius but let me remind you that almost all languages spoken in Pakistan have same roots as Sanskrit and evolved over period of 1000s of year while Dravidian languages belong to altogether different group. So, these story books are not written by Dravidian unless you say that after writing these books people of IVC suddenly decided to give up Sanskrit and start speaking some alien languages.

Incredibly sad, indians have no history of their own.

They wouldn't have talked much about IVC if the historical scripture were written in some Dravidian language.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom