What's new

Pakistan providing false information to IMF on economy, GDP growth unlikely to exceed 4%

KingRaj

BANNED
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
399
Reaction score
-8
Country
India
Location
India
Think-Tank IPR’s Statements

However, recently, an influential think-tank Institute for Policy Reforms (IPR) released its fact sheet and exposed the actual image of economic state of affairs in Pakistan and the performance of the government, which was exhibited “falsely” in the statements issued by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). “This may be due either to wrong information being provided by the (Pakistani) authorities or a lack of awareness of latest trends or due to pressure to demonstrate the efficiency of the programme and its staff,” an IPR statement said.

“The cotton crop has failed and output is likely to be down by over 18 percent. This alone can reduce the GDP growth rate by one percentage point, given the role of cotton in the national economy,” it added. “Exports plummeted by over 14 percent in the first six months. Imports grew in overall quantity terms, thereby adversely impacting on production in import-substituting industries.
The think tank said the largest industrial plant of the country, the Pakistan Steel Mills, is shutdown. Therefore, it is unlikely that the GDP growth rate will substantially exceed three percent in 2015-16. IPR criticized IMF on its assessment on the country’s poverty reduction. The mission said, “Over the last decade or so poverty has come down in Pakistan.”

It said, according to the Social Policy and Development Centre’s estimates, the number of poor is annually increasing by more than three million. “The pressure for fiscal contraction under the IMF program has probably been one factor contributing to the recent increase in poverty,” the statement said.

The think tank said the cash deficit may exceed 4.3 percent of the GDP in 2015-16 due to the cost of the prime minister’s agriculture relief package, higher tariff differential subsidy following the reduction in electricity tariff by Rs3/kilowatt hour, lower revenue from the gas infrastructure development cess and lower cash surplus by the provinces. “In fact, it will not be surprising if the fiscal deficit in 2015-16 exceeds the level attained last year of 5.3 percent of the GDP,” it added.

Pakistan’s Elusive MDGs:

Pakistan is unfortunately one such country that is shuffling in the millennium development race. According to a UN Report, Pakistan’s pace for progress on MDGs has been extremely slow and achievements minimal. The overall development indicators have not been particularly encouraging. The country’s population and unemployment are growing, pushing more people to poverty. The health sector is scrambling to tend the ever growing number of patients. Pakistan’s performance regarding 4th and 5th MDGs i.e. maternal and child health has been prominently bad. Its maternal and infant mortality ratios are amongst the highest in the region.

Despite much-claimed pro-poor efforts by successive governments, precisely it is safe to say the country has failed to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs); making the MDGs an elusive dream.

The scourge of rising inequality

Similarly, achieving Strategic Development Goals (SDGs) does not seem be possible at all. All sorts of subsidies and food stamp schemes have failed to empower the poor segments of the society economically. The per capita income of Pakistanis has risen to US $ 1513; but, this is the average or mean income that is meaningless for a big number of Pakistanis who despite toiling labor throughout the day, earn not more than 4 to 5 dollars a day. This has resulted in development disparities among federating units and intra-provincial and withindistrict inequalities. Punjab is rated as the most developed province while, Baluchistan is dubbed as the most impoverished region. To ensure a trickle-down effect of all macro-economic development on the masses, reforms need to be put in place; otherwise, the vision of a comprehensive development will remain distant even in the years to come.

Exports on decline: PPMA’s Concern

Speaking at a press conference on February 2, 2016, Pakistan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (PPMA) Central Chairman Hamid Raza also demonstrated his concern over theconstant decline in medicines exports of Pakistan and said that ill-advised policies of the government and undue interference by the Health Ministry had caused serious impediments to growth of the Pharma industry.

The PPMA s representatives including former chairmen Dr Kaiser Waheed and Zahid Saeed said that with present non-conducive policies of the government, Pharma industry of the country could not achieve its "Vision-2020" for increasing medicines exports from mere $200 million to $5 billion on annual basis.


Pakistan needs to do more on fiscal reforms and wipe out inequality: WB - SpecialReport - Dunya News
 
That's even worse. It's barely three pages, and provides zero sources. In fact, it talks more about IMF making false statements than it does Pakistan giving fake numbers (which I can't seem to find in the paper). Even if were to assume the allegations were right, the paper fails to actually provide it's sources.

The closest source it gives is "economic journalists", what the **** does that even mean?
 
Only
That's even worse. It's barely three pages, and provides zero sources. In fact, it talks more about IMF making false statements than it does Pakistan giving fake numbers (which I can't seem to find in the paper). Even if were to assume the allegations were right, the paper fails to actually provide it's sources.

The closest source it gives is "economic journalists", what the **** does that even mean?
Only excerpts are available for public on website.Clients get full report.

Anyways the analysis right on spot for Pakistan's growth prediction as two of Pakistan most important sectors cotton crop and the related textile failed spectacularly.

“The cotton crop has failed and output is likely to be down by over 18 percent. This alone can reduce the GDP growth rate by one percentage point, given the role of cotton in the national economy,” it added. “Exports plummeted by over 14 percent in the first six months. Imports grew in overall quantity terms, thereby adversely impacting on production in import-substituting industries.
 
"However, there have been a number of developments which could impact negatively on the growth rate in 2015-16. The cotton crop has failed and output is likely to be down by over 18%"
According to whom? There was a drop with the cotton crop, due to unforseen cirumstances (nature), but where did this 18% come from? It doesn't say.

"This alone can reduce the GDP growth rate by one percentage point, given the role of cotton in the national economy"

What is that role? In fact, how are you weighting this?

"Further, the largest industrial plant of Pakistan , the Pakistan Steel Mills, is shutdown."

There was a risk of this, but I don't think it was. If anyone can clarify or confirm this, I'd appreciate it.

"Therefore, it is unlikely that the GDP growth rate will substantially exceed 3 percent in 2015-16."

What is IPR's method of calculation? How are they coming up with this number? Doesn't say.

There are so many basic issues I have with this "study", which is more of a pseudo-scientific rant.

A lot of speculation, very little substance.

Only

Only excerpts are available for public on website.Clients get full report.

Anyways the analysis right on spot for Pakistan's growth prediction as two of Pakistan most important sectors cotton crop and the related textile failed spectacularly.

“The cotton crop has failed and output is likely to be down by over 18 percent. This alone can reduce the GDP growth rate by one percentage point, given the role of cotton in the national economy,” it added. “Exports plummeted by over 14 percent in the first six months. Imports grew in overall quantity terms, thereby adversely impacting on production in import-substituting industries.
How did they get the numbers though? Why is it likely? Where did the likely number even come from? How are they measuring the growth rate?

They could very well be right, but their logic doesn't make sense.

To say that this "analysis" is right on spot, it's ridiculous.

There is no indication that these are mere excerpts, especially considering how the language used flows.

Going through the site, this paper is listed as a "fact sheet".

"However, there have been a number of developments which could impact negatively on the growth rate in 2015-16. The cotton crop has failed and output is likely to be down by over 18%"
According to whom? There was a drop with the cotton crop, due to unforseen cirumstances (nature), but where did this 18% come from? It doesn't say.

"This alone can reduce the GDP growth rate by one percentage point, given the role of cotton in the national economy"

What is that role? In fact, how are you weighting this?

"Further, the largest industrial plant of Pakistan , the Pakistan Steel Mills, is shutdown."

There was a risk of this, but I don't think it was. If anyone can clarify or confirm this, I'd appreciate it.

"Therefore, it is unlikely that the GDP growth rate will substantially exceed 3 percent in 2015-16."

What is IPR's method of calculation? How are they coming up with this number? Doesn't say.

Shit, I double posted.
 
"However, there have been a number of developments which could impact negatively on the growth rate in 2015-16. The cotton crop has failed and output is likely to be down by over 18%"
According to whom? There was a drop with the cotton crop, due to unforseen cirumstances (nature), but where did this 18% come from? It doesn't say.

"This alone can reduce the GDP growth rate by one percentage point, given the role of cotton in the national economy"

What is that role? In fact, how are you weighting this?

"Further, the largest industrial plant of Pakistan , the Pakistan Steel Mills, is shutdown."

There was a risk of this, but I don't think it was. If anyone can clarify or confirm this, I'd appreciate it.

"Therefore, it is unlikely that the GDP growth rate will substantially exceed 3 percent in 2015-16."

What is IPR's method of calculation? How are they coming up with this number? Doesn't say.

There are so many basic issues I have with this "study", which is more of a pseudo-scientific rant.

A lot of speculation, very little substance.


How did they get the numbers though? Why is it likely? Where did the likely number even come from? How are they measuring the growth rate?

They could very well be right, but their logic doesn't make sense.

To say that this "analysis" is right on spot, it's ridiculous.

There is no indication that these are mere excerpts, especially considering how the language used flows.

Going through the site, this paper is listed as a "fact sheet".

"However, there have been a number of developments which could impact negatively on the growth rate in 2015-16. The cotton crop has failed and output is likely to be down by over 18%"
According to whom? There was a drop with the cotton crop, due to unforseen cirumstances (nature), but where did this 18% come from? It doesn't say.

"This alone can reduce the GDP growth rate by one percentage point, given the role of cotton in the national economy"

What is that role? In fact, how are you weighting this?

"Further, the largest industrial plant of Pakistan , the Pakistan Steel Mills, is shutdown."

There was a risk of this, but I don't think it was. If anyone can clarify or confirm this, I'd appreciate it.

"Therefore, it is unlikely that the GDP growth rate will substantially exceed 3 percent in 2015-16."

What is IPR's method of calculation? How are they coming up with this number? Doesn't say.

Shit, I double posted.
Pakistan’s Cotton Crop Falls to Lowest Level Since 1998 - Sourcing Journal

Cotton production falls 32pc - Newspaper - DAWN.COM
 
Another NGO...
Making huge claims without proper substance....

Problem is many pakistanis dont ask for evidence when a statement is put forward...

We as a nation are very vulnerable to propoganda....

Always question the sources and methods....just dont read the conclusion
 
Another NGO...
Making huge claims without proper substance....

Problem is many pakistanis dont ask for evidence when a statement is put forward...

We as a nation are very vulnerable to propoganda....

Always question the sources and methods....just dont read the conclusion
Politicians are bad....eveywhere
 

Back
Top Bottom