What's new

Pakistan Navy forces out an armed Indian Submarine from Pakistani waters.

Why was it not drowned. Why we hesitated, it clearly violated territorial water space. Our Aircraft carrying the Air Chief was shot down just because it violated the air space. The turks shot down the Russian Aircraft for the same. Why we hesitated. Are we afraid of India. A big question Mark? on our Navy Chief and CJOSC.
 
It is negative but it is meant for a certain section of the Indian population, you are welcome to be part of that section or not of it. The same paycho terrorists have similar issues; frustrated, jobless and so on. The hindutva in India have the same mentality.

I have little feelings for any race, just spite for petty minded hateful idiots which that post is meant for.
If that's the case, there is no end for it.
I don't know what Pakistan wants but agar plebiscite ke result se things will be like USA - Canada's relationship between us both not matter what the result (Only for south Kashmir) I'm all in for it.
People have seen too much blood since 1947 on both sides. It should end now but unfortunately some people don't want this to end.
 
A submarine coming up to periscope depth / snorkeling, means it's in an extremely vulnerable position.

Question:
1) Is the endurance of the batteries so washed out, that they had to surface in Paksitan's EEZ only 80NM / 148Km from the Pakistan's coastline.

2) The noise makers forced it to surface and acknowledge PN's presence.

View attachment 353454

Look at the above pic, the location of the sub is highly suspicious.

Note: 148Km = 80NM

What do you think, what sort of intelligence they might be interested in? We do know theres a SCU- Sub construction unit there in Omara but what else??
 
Why was it not drowned. Why we hesitated, it clearly violated territorial water space. Our Aircraft carrying the Air Chief was shot down just because it violated the air space. The turks shot down the Russian Aircraft for the same. Why we hesitated. Are we afraid of India. A big question Mark? on our Navy Chief and CJOSC.
So according to you the sub should be drowned. What if tomorrow, a Pakistani plane violates indian airspace,should Indians do the same
 
So according to you the sub should be drowned. What if tomorrow, a Pakistani plane violates indian airspace,should Indians do the same

According to his statement india already has that record.
 
What do you want us to do if territory is breach,we will act and act hard according to our doctrine any uninvited guest will treating accordingly just like atlantique,we also have your spies and Kasab so please dont lecture us.

Then expect same from Pakistan because you are breaching our territory since 71.
 
IN chief already denied anything like this happened calling it basless.

2nd question is what is an indian submarine doing at persicope depth in enemy waters???Thats suicidal and no trained navy would do that.It negates the entire concept of stealth.

Finally,the persicope arrangement seen in the one black and white photo they released doesn't match either the indian kilo class,or sindhughosh class or the akula but is very similar to the agosta 90B class.So either they mistook their own submarine or this is a deliberate stunt to secure more funds from the army dominated budget.
 
Last edited:
It's really funny.. Instead of having 600 meter diving capacity the submarine was roaming around Pakistani water by surface. First of it's kind.
No Ulloo banao..
We dont claim false as your surgical strikes...
We have evidence and we have shown it to the world..

trained navy
That is the point....Is navy trained ..??? NOOO..
 
it should have been sunk
this is what the Indians would do . they already burnt our fishing boats

Hi,

Could have done it---if Paf had strong air force----.

This message is for those fools on this board who claim that there would be no war with india for 10 years---.

For them---thewar---it just happened---Pakistan just chickened out---and why---because your air force had decided to donate the funds for the most superior fighter aircraft in the arena to CHARITY---.
 
We dont claim false as your surgical strikes...
We have evidence and we have shown it to the world..


That is the point....Is navy trained ..??? NOOO..

Just compare the periscope arrangements,you will get your answer.Its very similar to agosta 90b.
 
Regardless of songs and your attempt in being a seal fighting over a grape; the Sub was detected early by happenstance due to an exercise taking place. It is likely that it was surfaced for either intelligence purposes or simply because the batteries on the 209 arent in a good condition anymore and need frequent snorkeling.

There are ASW tactics to push Sub to surface or periscope depth. PN may have pinged it to come on surface.
 
Deep down the water? like 0 m? That sub was sailing on surface... next time you will claim you detected a bright yellow round thing coming from India towards pak airspace and managed to sink it with in 12 hours of detection... the sun...


So,

Subs don't sail showing themselves in open waters---once they leave their base and submerge---they stay submerged. They are hidden assets and never surface when in vicinity of surface vehicles---. They can snorkel but never close to enemy waters---knowing that the area is under constant surveillance---.

The sub was PINGED hard and was forced to surface.
 
If that's the case, there is no end for it.
I don't know what Pakistan wants but agar plebiscite ke result se things will be like USA - Canada's relationship between us both not matter what the result (Only for south Kashmir) I'm all in for it.
People have seen too much blood since 1947 on both sides. It should end now but unfortunately some people don't want this to end.
Could be, should be is irrelevant. What matters is what is done now; to avoid sons, fathers, brothers & daughters and sisters as well now; from dying on what is nothing more than a water dispute.

Well, I can't say for sure from infra video. But if it is, then it is a major fail on PN. You guys arrest poor fishermen but let a sub go?
Yes.. it's something called international law and being professionals that we dont shoot aircraft out in planned ambushes or shoot patrolling troops in what is essentially a cessation of hostilities.
Perhaps you can write to the PN about being unprofessional warmongering bloodthirsty savages as the best role model to match the behavior you are suggesting as best for your own armed forces.
 

Back
Top Bottom