What's new

Pakistan is Russia’s ‘most important’ partner in South Asia: Putin

Russia's quiet rapprochement with Pakistan
By Stephen Blank

Quietly and unobtrusively, a Russo-Pakistani rapprochement has been developing behind the scenes of world politics for the last two years. On Pakistan's side, the almost spectacular deterioration of relations with the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has led it to seek new friends, especially as the alliance accelerates its withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Russia also fully understands that Pakistan is a crucial player in Afghanistan and that, as NATO withdraws, it becomes all the more urgent for Moscow to seek some sort of modus vivendi with Islamabad.

Russia initiated four-party talks with Tajikistan, Pakistan and Afghanistan to discuss the future of the last of these. Furthermore, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari met six times

ad_choices_i_UR.png

lg.php



with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev between 2008 to 2012, and President Vladimir Putin is set to visit the South Asian country in September.

This modest, albeit real, rapprochement is, however, built upon a long-standing foundation of mistrust. Russian officials have long been concerned over the safety and security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons arsenal. Due to those concerns and Pakistan's record, foreign policy analysts like Alexei Arbatov observed that for Russia, Pakistan is a principal potential threat to non-proliferation.
Other observers, like the former director of Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service and Ambassador to India, Vyacheslav Trubnikov, view Pakistan, Iran and North Korea as destabilizing nuclear powers. Therefore, Russia wants Pakistan to join the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

While this residual Russian suspicion remains, other factors have impelled Moscow to seek a rapprochement with Islamabad. The deteriorating Afghan situation, the realization that it must deal with Pakistan on its own merits - apart from the Indo-Pakistani connection - to help secure Afghanistan and Central Asia, and the opportunities provided by the erosion of the US-Pakistan alliance are too important for Moscow to avoid. Thus, Russia has now determined to deal with Pakistan independently and acknowledges that relations will be on a bilateral presidential level - as they are with India.

Moscow has been alert to these possibilities for some time. Already, in 2009, Russian state television accused the US of trying to destabilize Pakistan to damage China, Pakistan's "all-weather" ally and friend.

Since then, Moscow has also announced its support for Pakistan's efforts to join the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). While this latter move may be regarded as a concession to Beijing, which has long-supported Pakistan's entrance into the SCO, there is no sign that China is ready to welcome India, which Moscow has supported, into the SCO. But there is no doubt that Pakistan's membership in the SCO would strengthen the SCO's claim and perhaps its capacity to involve itself in Afghanistan after the departure of the International Security Assistance Force.

There are tempting energy and economic objectives as well that could lead to advantageous geopolitical outcomes between the two countries. Russia's Gazprom has regularly hinted at its interest in investing in or helping to build the proposed but troubled Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline. Since that pipeline has been a potential showcase for US policy, Russian participation would not only enhance Moscow's ties and influence with all the players, it would also undermine US credibility and policy in Central Asia.

Beyond the TAPI pipeline, Moscow clearly also has interests in expanding its energy profile throughout South Asia, for example in assisting Sri Lanka's oil exploration projects.

As expected, the new rapprochement is also founded on trade. Russian exports to Pakistan rose to US$620 million in 2008 from $93 million in 2002, and both sides feel there is room for further growth. Then-prime minister Putin said in 2011 that Russia views Pakistan as a reliable and very important partner. Putin's remarks were indicative of how far Russian-Pakistani relations has progressed, despite Moscow's long-held suspicions of Islamabad's aims.

Yet, perhaps the most striking aspect of this rapprochement is that it now may also encompass security cooperation. Discussions are already underway about expanding defense ties by holding joint military exercises, exchanging trainees and trainers, and selling Russian weapons to Pakistan. It remains to be seen if such cooperation will truly materialize and expand. But if it does, the reactions of India and China to these events will merit close scrutiny.

To be sure, Moscow-Islamabad relations are not exclusively positive. Pakistan's support for terrorist groups, its fast-growing nuclear program, as well as its past history of international nuclear proliferation are surely not forgotten.

But, as the Central and South Asian configuration of states now undergoes a new transformation, Russia needs to reach out to Pakistan and has the opportunity to exploit Washington's difficult relations with Islamabad. Therefore Putin's upcoming visit to Pakistan in September will be, for many reasons, a visit worth watching.

Dr Stephen Blank is a professor at the Strategic Studies Institute of the US Army War College at Carlisle Barracks, PA. The views expressed here do not represent those of the US Army, Defense Department, or the US government.

(This article first appeared in The Jamestown Foundation. Used with permission.)

(Copyright 2012 The Jamestown Foundation.)
 
I'm loving this.

China loves Pakistan.

Russia says Pakistan is their most important partner in South Asia. However When Pakistan joins SCO, this may lead to a regional realignment, basically Pakistan might change it's regional identity to be considered a Central Asian country.

I wonder how Indians will think of that. There are some Indians who never accepted Pakistan's existence!

westerners think Pakistan is a strong country.

LOL - Patently untrue. Never met any Indian who hasn't accepted Pakistan's existence. You could consider yourself Central Asian or South American. You can neither change geography, nor history nor culture. Neither Arabs nor Central Asians will ever accept you as Arabic or Central Asian. Everyone thinks of you as South Asian, including India. You really need to reconcile yourself with this fact.
 
LOL - Patently untrue. Never met any Indian who hasn't accepted Pakistan's existence. You could consider yourself Central Asian or South American. You can neither change geography, nor history nor culture. Neither Arabs nor Central Asians will ever accept you as Arabic or Central Asian. Everyone thinks of you as South Asian, including India. You really need to reconcile yourself with this fact.

Ok lemme explain you the reason for this confusion which many Pakistanis have, there is no doubt Pakistan and even Afghanistan have been considered in South Asia, but just in a political sense post 9/11 Bush administration and many in the west started counting alot of central asian countries, North African countries, Pakistan and Afghanistan to be part of Greater Middle East.
Now let me explain you the details, if you look at Pakistan its at the cross roads of regions, if you come to Punjab, as an outsider, you would find it absolutely south asian, the moment you cross Indus and go to KPK province , you would find it more like Afghan culture, if you go to North to Gilgit Baltistan, you would feel it to be absolutely Central Asian, different from Afghan or South Asian culture. If you go southwest to Balochistan, their folklore, music, history ...etc would feel like Middle Eastern, since they share simmilarities with Balochistan in Iran and to some extent Oman, which used to extend up to Makran regions of Pakistan till 1950's. It is because of this diversity , the confusion exists, its just like Turkey which is in both Middle East and Europe...Pakistan is at the cross roads, yes traditionally cuz it was part of British Indian subcontinent...it is south asia...but the reality on ground is it depends where you are in Pakistan...people have absolutely diverse cultures.
 
Russia is just trying to put a check on Central Asia through limited cooperation with the Pakistani military. The transfer of things such as RD-93 and perhaps some other things helps them keep a line of communication open with leaders in key Pakistani institutions. Given how much trouble Pakistan can stir in Central Asia, Russia will need to keep Pakistan in the loop, at least to some extent. Moreover, there is also the chance that Pakistan might truly distance itself from the US and begin pursuing its vital interests across the region, so RD-93 and Mi-171 keeps Pakistan aware of Russian interests, however slightly.

But there's nothing strategic or major happening between the two.
 
Russia in general are a peaceful nation and geographically , we can build a gas pipeline from Russia easily for cheap rates

every nation is peaceful ... amazingly except our eastern neighbors o_O ... its the leaders who r retarded and dumb to understand peace :smokin:
 
Hi,

Pakistan has no resources and reasons to stir up any trouble in central asia. All pakistan politics are sub continent and afg centric---. There is nothing for pakistan to gain in central asia. As for road / railroad and gas pipeline access to gwadar for the russians----that may not be a problem.

The U S----may act like a bi-tch most of the time---but when it comes to pak---it will be very difficult for it to let go.

Also---a lot depends on what russia wants to do---. Resolve the kashmir issue with india and maybe the U S influence is out of the picture in the sub continent. That would be a huge blow to the american interests in the region--specially in the oil fields of the middle east.
 
Bringing up old post is not going to do any good as we have not seen any development in Pak Russia ties.
 
a crucial partner :-) what a joke "A crucial partner but we won't sell a bullet to Pakistan " :sniper:
 

Back
Top Bottom