What's new

Pakistan fires 120 rockets in latest wave of cross-border shelling in Kunar

A pack of PAF F-16s was flying top cover with JDAMs over AH-1F strike package, just in case the Northern Alliance Army turns up.

We should expand surgical strikes into Kunar and Nooristan. We also should mount covert ops in N.Alliance strongholds where their strength lies.

Gen Raheel Sharif visited Kabul last week to tell them to zip it or face the music. Looks like charsis didn't catch the memo, therefore the danda had to be given.

@Stealth
 
1-Afghan army hasn't been able to protect Kabul, let alone Afghanistan, they should be thankful to ISAF for always coming for help.
2-Afghans have been delibrately harboring TTP elements. Mullah Radio operates from Afghanistan and US arrested one key TTP commander while being escorted by Afghan security forces a while ago. When afghan security officials openly vow to hurt Pakistan, there is little prospect for a cooperative action.

first..Afghan is enough powerful to protect itself,unless some massive help Taliban secure from Pakistan.

second,your logic is flawed.if they can't even protect themselves,how could they harbor terrorists to fight Pakistan??same way,the Afghan Talibans,who took refuge in Pakistan,should we blame Pakistan Govt for harboring terrorists against Afghanistan??

use logic bro.its the same situation you guys faced even 2 years ago.
 
first..Afghan is enough powerful to protect itself,unless some massive help Taliban secure from Pakistan.
Umhum, then why did they run off to US for complaining and "avenging" rocket attacks?

second,your logic is flawed.if they can't even protect themselves,how could they harbor terrorists to fight Pakistan??same way,the Afghan Talibans,who took refuge in Pakistan,should we blame Pakistan Govt for harboring terrorists against Afghanistan??
There are two aspects,
1- Terrorists operate in regions where Afghan forces have no control
2- Where their interest coincide Afghans either protect such assets or just ignore their working
U.S. Latifullah Operation Violated Afghan Sovereignty: Karzai
 
The irony here is killing me, again proving in international relations the only motto that always stands is :
The powerful is always right, the weak is always wrong
See, the chest thumping pakistani's now bombing a country which is still in shambles for the very same godamm reason for which they were bombed by U.S.A.Then they pleaded, their prime minister literally begged for the drone strikes to stop, their millitary chiefs gave empty threats , still they got bombed....day in day out a drone strike greeted the face of countless terrorists and also some innocents.The pakistani's begging at that time used the argument that collateral damage is not an acceptable price for the no. of terrorists killed in drone strikes.America at that time ignored the pleading of its unfaithful concubine, showed the mislaid ways of terrorists hiding in its wombs and continued to bomb the very source of origin .
Come now , the U.S.A is gone, like a mistress suddenly free from it abusive power drunk husband, pakistani's have targeted now the always weak little girl which uptill now was protected by its masters.In its actions the mistress forgets her own treatment , uses the same excuses to bomb as was used by U.S.A to bomb her....the same smugness that was displayed by her master is now evident on her face, the lashes received by U.S.A are still raw, the anger still their deep in her gut, just now its diverted to where it can exert it.....AFGHANISTAN.
 
Umhum, then why did they run off to US for complaining and "avenging" rocket attacks?

same reason why you guys complained when US drones bombed Pakistan.don't want to escalate things.if ANA shot down a helo(which is well within their means) or launch same kind of bombing,it'll be a full scale attack.
 
Pakistan Makes Deadly Air Strikes in Afghanistan in Fight With Taliban

ISLAMABAD—Taliban fighters attacked several Pakistani military posts along the Afghan border on Saturday, sparking an hourslong gunbattle that included Pakistan launching airstrikes in Afghanistan, authorities said.

Pakistan said soldiers killed 16 militants, while Afghan officials said the airstrikes killed five civilians.

The fighting was the latest cross-border attack along the volatile and porous Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier and again tests the two countries' uneasy relations.

Two Pakistani military officers blamed the local Pakistani Taliban for the attack, saying dozens of fighters from the group crossed into Pakistan overnight to stage the assault.

The insurgents attacked at least two military checkpoints in the northwestern tribal region of Bajur, killing one soldier and wounding two others, local government official Shah Naseem said. Mr. Naseem said the heavily armed attackers also targeted several military posts in the border village of Nao Top, about 50 kilometers (30 miles) northwest of Khar, the main town in Bajur.

The army responded, sending helicopter gunships into battle as troops chased the attackers. The assault killed 16 insurgents, the two army officers told the Associated Press. The attackers then fled toward Afghanistan, the officers said, speaking on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to talk to journalists.

The officers said their intelligence suggested local Pakistani Taliban fighters launched the attack. They said the fighters, originally from the Bajur tribal region and the northwestern Swat Valley, have been hiding in the village of Ghund in neighboring Afghanistan's Kunar province.

Gen. Abdul Habib Sayedkhaili, the provincial police chief of Kunar province, said two Pakistani helicopters crossed into his country and opened fire in Dangam district. Their attack killed five Afghan civilians and wounded 10 others, Gen. Sayedkhaili said, adding that Pakistani forces fired mortar shells into Afghanistan throughout Saturday.

Afghanistan and Pakistan share a 2,250-kilometer border, and militants from both sides routinely launch cross-border attacks before fleeing back into their respective countries. The border area is remote and off limits to reporters, making it difficult to independently confirm information about fighting or military operations in the tribal regions.

Mortar attacks and other military operations routinely strain relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Afghan President Hamid Karzai long has accused Pakistan of sheltering Taliban militants and other extremists.

The Pakistani Taliban have killed thousands of people in an attempt to impose Islamic law in Pakistan and end the government's support for the U.S.-led war in neighboring Afghanistan.

Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has made negotiations with the Taliban a centerpiece of his government. Supporters of the peace talks argue that negotiations are the only way to end the cycle of violence while critics say a deal will only strengthen militant ranks, allow them to regroup and strike back with more force.

http://online.wsj.com/articles/paki...-afghanistan-in-fight-with-taliban-1401553562
 
same reason why you guys complained when US drones bombed Pakistan.don't want to escalate things.if ANA shot down a helo(which is well within their means) or launch same kind of bombing,it'll be a full scale attack.
For that they need to be in Kunar- Which is controlled by Taliban....
 
There are two aspects,
1- Terrorists operate in regions where Afghan forces have no control
2- Where their interest coincide Afghans either protect such assets or just ignore their working
U.S. Latifullah Operation Violated Afghan Sovereignty: Karzai


of course Pakistan-Afghanistan Border has become an area on which no one has control.I'd not say that some agencies aren't supporting these outfits.there are too many vested interests,while some are simply abomination which was created as something else and went rogue.but its better to persue a joint attack on these elements.its not that much hard you know.shelling afghan civilians and boasting will not achieve anything,other than increasing tensions.
 
of course Pakistan-Afghanistan Border has become an area on which no one has control.I'd not say that some agencies aren't supporting these outfits.there are too many vested interests,while some are simply abomination which was created as something else and went rogue.but its better to persue a joint attack on these elements.its not that much hard you know.shelling afghan civilians and boasting will not achieve anything,other than increasing tensions.
A shell doesn't discriminate a human and a terrorist, especially when terrorists are hiding among the civilians.....As long as Afghans don't take control of the province and root the militants out, there will always be a shall dropping here and there.
 
For that they need to be in Kunar- Which is controlled by Taliban....

so,you accepts that border region is not "Entire" control under ANA.plus,Taliban doesn't control any region of Afganistan.they just got some foothold.Afghanistan's peaceful polling is the proof.

A shell doesn't discriminate a human and a terrorist, especially when terrorists are hiding among the civilians.....As long as Afghans don't take control of the province and root the militants out, there will always be a shall dropping here and there.

then don't cry a river when Afghanistan use same reason to use their attack inside Pakistan.if I remember correctly,they just did same only few months ago and you guys was ready to wage war against them..
 
so,you accepts that border region is not "Entire" control under ANA.plus,Taliban doesn't control any region of Afganistan.they just got some foothold.Afghanistan's peaceful polling is the proof.
afghan_election_v2_786.gif



then don't cry a river when Afghanistan use same reason to use their attack inside Pakistan.if I remember correctly,they just did same only few months ago and you guys was ready to wage war against them..
Well shelling is in response to attacks by militants....ANA doesn't exist in these provinces, how could she attack?....
 
afghan_election_v2_786.gif




Well shelling is in response to attacks by militants....ANA doesn't exist in these provinces, how could she attack?....

as I say,footholds...

about Joint Attack,I didn't say with immediate action.but any joint and simultaneous attack on terrorist positions will be far more effective.
 
Dang...Pakistan has rockets in abundance it seems. :D

What are these?
 
as I say,footholds...
there is a difference between a foothold and a stronghold.....

about Joint Attack,I didn't say with immediate action.but any joint and simultaneous attack on terrorist positions will be far more effective.
With US yes because they have the capability to do so....Same can't be said with ANA.....
 
its Terrorist in afgan army uniform dont kill civilian for that
 
Back
Top Bottom