What's new

Pakistan adopts careful tone on Israel, experts read between lines



ISLAMABAD -- Pakistan has responded to the Israel-Hamas war with an unusually measured tone, standing out among Asia's Muslim-majority countries and fueling speculation about the chances of Islamabad someday normalizing ties with Israel.

The Pakistani government is typically a harsh critic of Israel, with which it has no diplomatic relations, and a defender of Palestinian rights. But while countries such as Indonesia and Malaysia have pointedly blamed the conflict on Israeli policy, Pakistan has so far taken a softer approach.

As news broke of Hamas militants storming Israel on Saturday, interim Pakistani Prime Minister Anwaar ul Haq Kakar posted on X that he was "heartbroken" by the violence. "We urge restraint and protection of civilians. Enduring peace in the Middle East lies in a two-state solution with a viable, contiguous, sovereign State of Palestine."

This was noticeably milder than, for example, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's reaction tweet on Sunday, in which he wrote: "The confiscation of land and property belonging to the Palestinian people is done relentlessly by the Zionists. As a result of this injustice, hundreds of innocent lives were sacrificed."

Pakistan's Foreign Office issued its own cautious statement, saying: "We are closely monitoring the unfolding situation in the Middle East and the eruption of hostilities between Israel and Palestinians. We are concerned about the human cost of the escalating situation."

Rand analyst Derek Grossman noted on X, "Pakistan, which has been traditionally anti-Israel and pro-Palestine, interestingly goes easy on Israel, simply expressing concerns over the escalating situation."

Even Molana Fazal ur Rehman, chief of Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (F) -- the leading Islamist political party in Pakistan -- asked the Palestinians to respect the human rights of Israelis. This was unprecedented, since Islamist leaders in Pakistan are known for their staunch pro-Palestinian stance.

Saturday's Hamas assault on Israel left more than 1,200 people dead, while Israel's retaliatory strikes on Gaza have killed over 1,100 so far, according to local authorities.

As the war goes on, sentiment may harden. Kakar has since lamented the Israeli occupation of the West Bank. And while Pakistan has yet to see major protests against Israel, on Friday, Rehman's party was planning to express "solidarity" with the Palestinians. Jamaat-e-Islami, another Islamist party, declared this week to be "Palestinian Solidarity Week."

Still, there have been no announcements of "Death to Israel" rallies, which were common in the past.

Experts see several factors in play.

Ahmed Quraishi, an Islamabad-based national security expect, expressed hope that Pakistan's response was at least partly due to introspection. "There is some concern, albeit muted, about publicly supporting a brazen attack on civilians the way Hamas did on Saturday," he told Nikkei.

Sabookh Syed, a political analyst in Islamabad, said that since Hamas started the current conflict in Gaza, Pakistani religious leaders saw little reason to come out forcefully against Israel. Islamists, he said, have so far largely "ignored the reaction of Israel, which has killed many Palestinians."

There may be other considerations. Pakistan is mired in an economic crisis, relying on a $3 billion bailout from the International Monetary Fund. Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center, told Nikkei that Islamist groups in Pakistan are under the influence of the powerful military and have likely been advised to keep a low profile, to avoid antagonizing Western governments just when Islamabad badly needs assistance.

The U.S. and many other Western countries have voiced firm support for Israel.


https%253A%252F%252Fcms-image-bucket-production-ap-northeast-1-a7d2.s3.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%252Fimages%252F_aliases%252Farticleimage%252F4%252F0%252F0%252F0%252F46670004-1-eng-GB%252F2021-05-19T144458Z_2023170979_RC22JN90Y6X8_RTRMADP_3_ISRAEL-PALESTINIANS-PAKISTAN-PROTESTS.JPG
A pro-Palestinian protest in Karachi in May 2021: Pakistani public opinion may be an obstacle to future normalization with Israel. © Reuters

The ruling establishment may also prefer to avoid burning bridges with the Israelis.

Pakistan insists that recognition of Israel is conditional upon the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state. But over the years, there has been some quiet interaction.

The first known high-level public contact was in 2005, when Pakistan's and Israel's foreign ministers met in Turkey. Since then, multiple meetings have been reported in the media, although none were officially acknowledged.

While much of the Muslim world refuses to establish formal relations with Israel, this has been gradually changing. Years after Israel made peace with Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994, it sealed agreements in 2020 with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco.

Before the Hamas attack and Israeli retaliation, many were anticipating the next big step -- an accord between Israel and Saudi Arabia -- and there was talk that Islamabad might follow Riyadh.

The outbreak of war has raised questions about whether an Israeli-Saudi deal can be salvaged. The Saudis have joined Israel's critics, with the kingdom's foreign ministry saying, "We recall our repeated warnings of the dangers of the situation exploding as a result of the continued occupation."

But some believe Pakistan may consider forging a relationship down the road.

"As of now, the government of Pakistan has no tangible plans to recognize Israel," a government official told Nikkei Asia on condition of anonymity. But the official added, "The possibility of recognition can't be ruled out in the future if it serves Pakistan's national interests."

Syed said that backdoor discussions about recognizing Israel have been taking place for a long time. "The ruling elite of Pakistan wants to recognize Israel and they will make the move if and when the time is opportune," he said.

Quraishi, too, believes normalization is a possibility. "When [the government of] Pakistan decides to take a course of action in its national interest, things tend to fall into place," he said.

Such a move would risk angering a population of about 240 million that appears to harbor broad anti-Israel sentiment. But Quraishi, who met Israeli President Isaac Herzog in May last year in Jerusalem, argued that such feelings in Pakistan are mostly manufactured.

"[Anti-Israel sentiment] is more of a populist political card in domestic politics," he told Nikkei.

Not everyone is convinced that normalization is possible, however. Kugelman believes it is a nonstarter.

"Pakistan links the issue of a Palestinian state to Kashmir, which means that recognizing Israel in the absence of a Palestinian state would equate to Pakistan abandoning the cause of Kashmir," Kugelman said, referring to Islamabad's territorial dispute with India.

"Taking such a position," he said, "would amount to political suicide in Pakistan."
 
A practical stand, guess they see what the immediate stake holders in that part of the world are doing. Just talk and protest .. then leave it to Israelis.
 
This is on a need to know basis. We can speculate but apparently the whole article is nothing but speculation.

I would agree if the command and affairs were in hands of someone that can be trusted, someone who doesn't find excuses when the duty calls.

People worry about their economics, when their brethren are being butchered, will die hungry.
 
Last edited:
I would agree if the command and affairs were in hands of someone that can be trusted, someone who doesn't find excuses when the duty calls.

People worry about their economics, when their brethren are being butchered, will die hungry.

The closest experience we have had to weltuntergang is the Covid19 pandemic. I like to think that Pakistani nation performed in a disciplined manner.
 
The closest experience we have had to weltuntergang is the Covid19 pandemic. I like to think that Pakistani nation performed in a disciplined manner.

In your recent memory. But I think only a century or so before that they were enslaved by a foreign occupation fewer in numbers.

By the way who was at the helms of the affairs during time of Covid?
 
That's because you are an Indian, All Pakistanis support Palestine, that is categorical and does'nt matter what the corrupt poodles say. About 100k demonstrated in London Yesterday (Saturday) . Talking about corrupt poodles now we know why Imran Khan and his band of useless corrupts strung Pakistan up with an IMF loan. It was all part of the plan to neutralise Pakistani people so they don't have the strength to support the Palestinian people. But then as before Allah is the decider of destiny.

Pakistan - with the local American handlers called the "Pakistan Army" have most certainly worked together to neutralise Pakistan in every sphere and facet both on a local and on a global scale - that is a given for sure now.
 
Last edited:
In your recent memory. But I think only a century or so before that they were enslaved by a foreign occupation fewer in numbers.

By the way who was at the helms of the affairs during time of Covid?

I wasn't alive a century ago despite gypsies and Indians suggesting otherwise.

An elected government which could put into action any necessary action it deemed fit enjoying unprecedented administrative legislative powers given the circumstance.

Even the interim government's statement is in line with mainstream political consensus on the issue.

If anyone is under the illusion that such a matter is at the mercy of popular politics or dictatorial whims, i admire your simple ways of life.
 
I wasn't alive a century ago despite gypsies and Indians suggesting otherwise.

An elected government which could put into action any necessary action it deemed fit enjoying unprecedented administrative legislative powers given the circumstance.

Even the interim government's statement is in line with mainstream political consensus on the issue.

If anyone is under the illusion that such a matter is at the mercy of popular politics or dictatorial whims, i admire your simple ways of life.

Politics, optics and diplomacy aside, let us talk from pure perspective of being Muslim, what should have been the action from Pakistan (not stance but action).
 
Politics, optics and diplomacy aside, let us talk from pure perspective of being Muslim, what should have been the action from Pakistan (not stance but action).

The world is Pakistan's oyster.

Pakistani charity organisations already have logistics in place. We can speculate that Pakistan is working closely with Jordan and Egypt on the matter. Apart from UN, Pakistan would engage the OIC and propose a notion of IMAFT deployment in Gaza as a protectorate force.

Some naughty ones include ideas sending over Afghans as counter to alleged Indian volunteers in the Israeli defence forces.

Despite the oyster, Pakistan has very little clout on the Palestinian Authority which seem disoriented.

This is a humanitarian crisis not a Muslim crisis.
 
That's because you are an Indian, All Pakistanis support Palestine, that is categorical and does'nt matter what the corrupt poodles say. About 100k demonstrated in London Yesterday (Saturday) . Talking about corrupt poodles now we know why Imran Khan and his band of useless corrupts strung Pakistan up with an IMF loan. It was all part of the plan to neutralise Pakistani people so they don't have the strength to support the Palestinian people. But then as before Allah is the decider of destiny.
But pakistanis will immediately sell themselves if they get some money

I mean while history suggests that

Didn't we voluntarily sold so many of Pakistanis as "co lateral damage"
 
Pakistan has condemned Israel and will put up its case in OIC. This is the latest.
 
Beggars can never be choosers. Pakistan will always be treated like a street beggar. :lol:
 
Pakistan is completely irrelevant. Protests or no protests, has absolutely no bearing on anything.
You would think so but turns out the government doesn’t thing so. Why are they stopping protests?

Do they think Israel will come and save them?
 

Back
Top Bottom