What's new

Naval Blockade of Pakistan

Originally posted by SATAN@Mar 30 2006, 11:13 AM
What is the best weapon to take out the Gorshkov and the Akulas?

I can find nothing in the PN arsenal capable of taking out Gorshkov and Akula.

Baburs can be trained on Bombay and Karwar.

Show me a sub launched/air launched Babar first.
I havent seen it yet.Have you?

In case of another war, if Karachi is attacked, say buhbye to Mooombhai , the Bhaba atomic complex will explode ..sending radioactive dust all over Mooombhai.Nuclear Meltdown!!!!! DejaVu Cheronobyl style.

There is a agreement between India and Pakistan.They wont attack each others nuclear installations.

In any case, remember many of your rivers flow from India. :cool2:

Lets go BACK TO THE TOPIC shall we? :cool:
 
Originally posted by Zeeshan S.@Mar 30 2006, 05:58 AM
Orions can be effectively used and equipped with Babur and Harpoon missiles (Note Orions haven't been modified to carry Babur) but it is possible. Orions taking flights at a close range to guard the coasts can become an effective source to take out Indian destroyers and frigates. However, they can possibly become a target and in war everything is possible to become a target no matter what it is. We are talking on a paper here.
[post=8120]Quoted post[/post]​

So with the airborne baburs on coastal duty, and no sub yet available for babur firing IN wud find it easier.

With IN sea harriers and Mig 29 on sea duty and the availabilty of MKI PAF and PN stands very less chance of avoiding a blockade.

Gwadar wont change the equation ,as In has grown since 71 and has more vessels and tech to tackle the added port.

And mind you PAF and PN also wud be stretched beyond their limits as they have to guard two ports with virtually a few orions and few subs.
 
I'm sure if you study the map you'll understand that to get to Gwadar, you need to cross Karachi first. PN doesn't need to 'stretch' itself. Light security at Gwadar would do while PN puts up its best efforts to save Karachi or make a stand somewhere between Karachi and Gwadar.
 
Originally posted by Sid+Mar 31 2006, 11:00 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Sid &#064; Mar 31 2006, 11:00 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>I&#39;m sure if you study the map you&#39;ll understand that to get to Gwadar, you need to cross Karachi first.
[post=8222]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b]


Ok IN comes to karachi with full force 2 AC, 22 Swea harriers,29 Mig 29K ,8 Tu 132,8 destroyers,9 frigates,14 corvettes,22 other ships ( minesweepers,missile boats etc),15 subs.

And mind you i have left enoufh ships back home to defend any unwanted sneakers.

PN wont stand a chance.The strategic depth of gwadar would be farce if you dont have enough ships to defend karachi.



Originally posted by Sid@Mar 31 2006, 11:00 PM
PN doesn&#39;t need to &#39;stretch&#39; itself. Light security at Gwadar would do while PN puts up its best efforts to save Karachi
[post=8222]Quoted post[/post]​

That best efforst wont help PN, a miracle also would be useless if PN in the present form tries to defend karachi from IN.


<!--QuoteBegin-Sid
@Mar 31 2006, 11:00 PM
or make a stand somewhere between Karachi and Gwadar.
[post=8222]Quoted post[/post]​
[/quote]


Some where between karachi and Gwadar, then In would easily make a port call at karachi.

PN needs to get news ships ,ASW,ACs urgently.Otherwise the onus of defening pakistan would be solely on the shoulders of PA which is a better fighting force.
 
Originally posted by Prashant@Apr 1 2006, 01:30 AM
Ok IN comes to karachi with full force 2 AC, 22 Swea harriers,29 Mig 29K ,8 Tu 132,8 destroyers,9 frigates,14 corvettes,22 other ships ( minesweepers,missile boats etc),15 subs.

And mind you i have left enoufh ships back home to defend any unwanted sneakers.

PN wont stand a chance.The strategic depth of gwadar would be farce if you dont have enough ships to defend karachi.
That best efforst wont help PN, a miracle also would be useless if PN in the present form tries to defend karachi from IN.
Some where between karachi and Gwadar, then In would easily make a port call at karachi.

PN needs to get news ships ,ASW,ACs urgently.Otherwise the onus of defening pakistan would be solely on the shoulders of PA which is a better fighting force.
[post=8241]Quoted post[/post]​


This will take care of any indian floating tin can :GUNS:

VA-111 Shkval underwater rocket

In 1995 it was revealed that Russia had developed an exceptionally high-speed unguided underwater missile which has no equivalent in the West. Code-named the Shkval (Squall), the new weapon travels at a velocity that would give a targeted vessel very little chance to perform evasive action. The missile has been characterized as a "revenge" weapon, which would be fired along the bearing of an incoming enemy torpedo. The Shkval may be considered a follow-on to the Russian BGT class of evasion torpedoes, which are fired in the direction of an incoming torpedo to try to force an attacking to evade (and hopefully snap the torpedo&#39;s guidance wires). The weapon was deployed in the early 1990s, and had been in service for years when the fact of its existence was disclosed.

Development begain in the 1960s, when the Research Institute NII-24 (Chief Designer Mikhail Merkulov) involved in the artillery ammunition research was instructed to launch the development of underwater high-speed missile to fight nuclear-powered submarines. On 14 May 1969, pursuant to a government resolution, NII-24 and GSKB-47 merged into the Research Institute of Applied Hydromechanics (NII PGM), which formed the basis of the present day &#39;Region&#39; Scientific Production Association. Advances in the development of jet engines and fuel technologies, as well as outstanding results in the research of body motion under cavitation made it possible to design a unique missile with a dived speed much greater than that of conventional torpedoes.
When the suction on the low-pressure side of the propeller blade dips below ambient pressure [atmospheric plus hydrostatic head] the propeller blade cavitates -- a vacuum cavity forms. There is water vapor in the cavity, and the pressure is not a true vacuum, but equal to the vapor pressure of the water. High-speed propellers are often designed to operate in a fully-cavitating (supercavitating) mode. A high speed supercavitating projectile, while moving in the forward direction, rotates inside the cavity. This rotation leads to a series of impacts between the projectile tail and the cavity wall. The impacts affect the trajectory as well as the stability of motion of the projectile. The present paper discusses the in-flight dynamics of such a projectile. Despite the impacts with the cavity wall, the projectile nearly follows a straight line path. The frequency of the impacts between the projectile tail and cavity boundary increases initially, reaches a maximum, and then decreases gradually. The frequency of impacts decreases with the projectile&#39;s moment of inertia.


Apparently fired from standard 533mm torpedo tubes, Shkval has a range of about 7,500 yards. The weapon clears the tube at fifty knots, upon which its rocket fires, propelling the missile through the water at 360 kph [about 100 m/sec / 230 mph / 200-knots], three or four times as fast as conventional torpedoes. The solid-rocket propelled "torpedo" achieves high speeds by producing a high-pressure stream of bubbles from its nose and skin, which coats the torpedo in a thin layer of gas and forms a local "envelope" of supercavitating bubbles. Carrying a tactical nuclear warhead initiated by a timer, it would destroy the hostile submarine and the torpedo it fired. The Shkval high-speed underwater missile is guided by an auto-pilot rather than by a homing head as on most torpedoes.

There are no evident countermeasures to such a weapon, its employment could put adversary naval forces as a considerable disadvantage. One such scenario is a rapid attack situation wherein a sudden detection of a threat submarine is made, perhaps at relatively short range, requiring an immediate response to achieve weapon on target and to ensure survival. Apparently guidance is a problem, and the initial version of the Shkval was unguided However, the Russians have been advertising a homing version, which runs out at very high speed, then slows to search.

A prototype of the modernised "Shkval", which was exhibited at the 1995 international armaments show in Abu Dhabi, was discarded. An improved model was designed with a conventional (non-nuclear) warhead and a guided targeting system, which substantially enhances its combat effectiveness. The first tests of the modernised Shkval torpedo were held by the Russian Pacific Fleet in the spring of 1998.

The &#39;Region&#39; Scientific Production Association has developed developed an export modification of the missile, &#39;Shkval-E&#39;. Russia began marketing this conventionally armed version of the Shkval high-speed underwater rocket at the IDEX 99 exhibition in Abu Dhabi in early 1999. The concept of operations for this missile requires the crew of a submarine, ship or the coast guard define the target&#39;s parameters -- speed, distance and vector -- and feeds the data to the missile&#39;s automatic pilot. The missile is fired, achieves its optimum depth and switches on its engines. The missile does not have a homing warhead and follows a computer-generated program.

On 05 April 2000 the Russian Federal Security Service [FSB] in Moscow arrested an American businessman, Edmond Pope, and a Russian accomplice, on charges of stealing scientific secrets. A FSB statement said it confiscated "technical drawings of various equipment, recordings of his conversations with Russian citizens relating to their work in the Russian defense industry, and receipts for American dollars received by them." Pope, a retired US Navy captain who spent much of his career working in naval intelligence, was at the time of his arrest the head of a private security firm. On 20 April 2000 the FSB revealed that Pope had been seeking plans the Shkval underwater missile. Pope was detained during an informal contact with a Russian scientist who had participated in the Shkval&#39;s creation.

The arrest of Daniel Howard Kiely, deputy head of the Applied Research Laboratory at Pennsylvania State University, came almost simultaneously. The laboratory led by Mr. Kiely has for many years been developing torpedoes for US warships and submarines. Professor Kiely had joined Pope in Moscow to offer technical advice and determine the tasks for Pope&#39;s further activity. Kiely was interrogated as a witness. His testimony and objects confiscated during the search proved his involvement in Pope&#39;s activities. Later the 68-year-old professor was released and allowed to return to the United States.
The objective of the High-Speed Undersea Weaponry project at the US Office of Naval Research is to develop the vehicle guidance, control and maneuvering capabilities for the quick reaction weapons. High-speed weapons could offer an advantage for Anti Submarine Warfare (ASW) "close encounter" scenarios. The overall system response of a high-speed weapon for breaking off engagements with enemy submarines would be measured in seconds, rather than minutes. The High-Speed Undersea Weapons project has three tasks; Vehicle Guidance, Vehicle Control, and Test Bed Development. Vehicle Guidance deals with homing sensors, signal processing, waveform design, and autopilot commands that are used to guide (either autonomously or with external interaction) the weapon to its target. Vehicle control deals with control and maneuvering of the high-speed weapon with emphasis on stabilizing the supercavitating bubble cavity, and optimizing the flow for low drag. Technical issues include instability due to vehicle planing and tail slap, interaction between cavity with propulsion exhaust, and propulsion system transients, including startup. Test Bed Development is an ongoing effort that develops a test platform to test and evaluate S&T candidate systems such as homing systems, vehicle control, and propulsion systems.
 
Sorry.PN is nowhere near acquiring Shkval.Besides the moment a Shkval is fired the location of the launch vessel is compromised.

Can we get down to discussing the scenario with what PN/IN have/plan to acquire?
 
Originally posted by Samudra@Apr 3 2006, 05:08 AM
Sorry.PN is nowhere near acquiring Shkval.Besides the moment a Shkval is fired the location of the launch vessel is compromised.

Can we get down to discussing the scenario with what PN/IN have/plan to acquire?
[post=8341]Quoted post[/post]​


Hmm really? didnt know you were a Senior officer in the Pakistan Navy...thanks for letting us know .

The subject pertains to the Naval Blockade of Pakistan,how to contain it...NOT what PN and the indian navy have to acquire.

[Mod Edit: If you did NOT pay any heed to last couple of &#39;edits&#39; in your posts; this is your LAST reminder. MUTUAL RESPECT is the KEY. If you continue with your sarcastic personal attacks on other members, you will run out of your share of sympathy]
 
A lot of it depends on hw hot baluchistan is at the time of blockade.If baluchistan remains hot then they will do the share of halting supplies to rest of pakistan as PA wud be busy with India.
 
Prashant said:
A lot of it depends on hw hot baluchistan is at the time of blockade.If baluchistan remains hot then they will do the share of halting supplies to rest of pakistan as PA wud be busy with India.

Please explain.......:rolleyes:
 
Samudra said:
Sorry.PN is nowhere near acquiring Shkval.Besides the moment a Shkval is fired the location of the launch vessel is compromised.

Can we get down to discussing the scenario with what PN/IN have/plan to acquire?

how do you know this? can you post a link?
thanks.


and....Oh yeah A.Rahman, i was merely trying to figure out how Samundra knows so much about the Pakistan Navy Acquisitions. He seems to be more informed than anyone in here..;)
 
SATAN said:
Please explain.......:rolleyes:

What shud i explain???

So my assumption is that if baluchistan issue is not solved by then it could be a major headache for PA as baluchistan rebels will try to interept supplies,the PA will be busy with IA on the eastern borders and that will leave lesser soldiers to guard the western baluchistan areas.
 
Require Some Specification Regarding Babur Cruise Missile

Admin Edit: Next time be more clear what you want, and do put your thoughts in to avoid one-liners.
 
RAPTOR said:
how do you know this? can you post a link?
thanks.


and....Oh yeah A.Rahman, i was merely trying to figure out how Samundra knows so much about the Pakistan Navy Acquisitions. He seems to be more informed than anyone in here..;)

Considering this is a Russian Missile, will Pakistan be able to purchase this??
 
Not possible in the foresee-able future I'd say as India always uses its leverage in Moscow to limit Pakistan-Russian ties, specially with regards to military acquisitions.
 
Sid said:
Not possible in the foresee-able future I'd say as India always uses its leverage in Moscow to limit Pakistan-Russian ties, specially with regards to military acquisitions.


And i feel it will succeed.Even if the MRCA contract goes to a non soviet supplier,still the IA/IN/IAF has lot of orders to keep the russians happy.
 
Back
Top Bottom