What's new

Mynamar Chose Mig29smt over J10

Status
Not open for further replies.

Storm Force

BANNED
Joined
Sep 19, 2009
Messages
5,100
Reaction score
-66
Country
India
Location
United Kingdom
THIS IS AN ARTCILE ON A LITTLE known fighter Order competition by Mynamar (burma) that took place last year between CHINA,S J10 & RUSSIAN MIG29SMT

It appears despite Mynamar being closely allied to China their air force chose the MIG29SMT twin seater over the chinease single engined fighter

Don,t now how true this is

China's J-10 suffered its first overseas defeat to the Mig-29 Fulcrum


Fulcrum - 1 | Chinese Copies - 0

On 23rd December 2009 a significant event took place which sadly went under reported. When inane drivel were making its way to the news, the event which established the superiority of a fighter over another went largely unnoticed. It was on that very day the first news regarding results of the competition came out in the open. The Myanmar Air force(Tatmadaw Lei) chose the Mig-29M/M2 Fulcrum over the much hyped China's J-10, and its smaller cousin which was rejected by China itself- the JF-17 Thunder.
This competition was like no other. On one hand the fulcrum was facing setbacks everywhere. First it was in Malaysia where due to endemic corruption and the interference of Middle men, the spares for the Mig-29s were ridiculously over priced by the time it reached the end user. This prompted Malaysia to retire its Mig-29s prematurely. The second setback was on the Algerian front, where another corruption involving Russian middle men lead to sourcing inferior parts for upgrading the Mig-29s. This lead Algeria to cancel the order, which left the Russians in deep soul searching. Just recently the middle men were arrested and criminal cases initiated against them. There were also wild rumors of Myanmar's Mig-29s being grounded due to poor after sales service(which got proved wrong). The Chinese fighters on the other hand had no such setbacks. In addition to the fact that Myanmar is in China's backyard, the Chinese fighters, especially the J-10 was marketed as "ultra modern" and was even offered highly advantageous price and payment conditions.

However the results of that tender was dramatic.

The J-10 is a product of widespread assistance by the western powers during the years of the Cold war. During the cold war, the U.S encouraged Israel to help the Chinese boost their capabilities against what they considered as the "Evil Empire" which was giving the whole western world & China quite a challenge. China and the Soviet Union were at each other throats after the Soviets refused to bow down to china's demands to return "their" land. After many bloody skirmish, where the Chinese suffered enormous causalities on the hands of the vastly superior Red Army, there was much bad blood between them. The western powers capitalized on this and began to rub shoulders with the Chinese. The Chinese too sold them J-7s to be used on the U.S DACT(Dissimilar Air Combat Training) simulating Soviet fighters. In the mist of this Honey moon, Israel starting sharing their technology with the blessings of Washington. And on top of that list(and a prime candidate since that project was stopped and was not in active service), was the Israeli Lavi.

Israeli Lavi Protoype:
http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/7333/lavi.jpg

J-10 Production Model:
http://www.****************/pictures/data/3239/medium/J-10_10107R.jpg

However before Israel can offer full assistance, the Tienanmen massacre led to an abrupt halt to the help. However the Chinese still retained all the blueprints and maybe even a Lavi mock-up. It was only natural for the Chinese Aerospace having done nothing but copying and reverse engineering fighters for the past 4 decades, to continue reverse engineering the Lavi. The cold war ended and China found itself partnering with its former enemy to ask for help. The Russian engineers who came out in the open reported several blueprints of Lavi in Hebrew! Russians who were cash strapped at this point agreed to help and also offered their engine. After a lot of reverse engineering and a few prototype crashes, J-10 finally flew. The Chinese fan boys were instantly captivated by the "beautiful" Israeli fighter and began over hyping its performance. The fighter was so secretive that only recently did china accept its existence. The first battle for this fighter was against the JF-17 which was a cheap project built on the Super-7(Super J-7) project. The J-10 clearly came out winning on the specs, which lead the PLAAF putting all its money on J-10 and ditching the JF-17, which at this point was referred as Junk Fighter -17 by the aviation community. After the triumphant domestic win, J-10's first real competition outside its motherland was in its neighborhood, Myanmar. There it was pitted against the Mig-29, Soviet Union's first Fourth Generation fighter.

Inspite of the other advantages heaped on the Chinese fighters, the result is that only the superior fighter wins.
J-10 with its single engine was more risky compared to the twin engined Mig-29. It losses out on Thrust to Weight ratio to the Mig-29. Its G-limits are unknown, as is its range, while Mig-29Ms data is well known. It shares 95% commonality with Mig-29K(hence the Fulcrum-D designation) & can share or have a constant flow of spares & after sales support with the IN. Its stall performance and recovery is unknown, while Mig-29 is known for breath taking stall maneuvers in airshows... hence getting out of a stall for a Mig-29 is a piece of cake. It has 9 hardpoints which can be increased to 13 with multi locks, while J-10's said to be 11. It can carry 6.5 tonnes in weapon tonnage while J10's unknown. However some Chinese fan boys claim 4.5 tonnes and some even 6 tonnes. In avionics, there is the clear Russian superiority over Chinese copies. Taking all these facts into consideration, it's no wonder that the Mig-29M fulcrum was chosen over a Chinese plane. Apart from the desperate and poor PAF, which has no reliable & cheap suppliers, it seems there is no one else who is willing to take this Chinese fighter yet.

There is little doubt now that the J-10 has suffered a blow to its prestige with its first overseas defeat.

References:
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/6246/specialreportj10c.jpg
- MiG-29M/M2
http://www.roe.ru/cataloque/air_craft/aircraft_20-24.pdf
Russia To Sell 20 MiG-29 Fighters To Myanmar - Defense News
domain-b.com : Myanmar opts for Russian MiG-29s over Chinese fighters
 
now that was quite unexpected ,China with the huge economic and military leverage over Myanmar should have been able to sell the J10, however the Mig29SMT has several improvements over the Mig 29 and if the Russians made a firm commitment over supplies and maintenance then it was probably a good deal.

However most Chinese sources would deny a Lavi link to the J10 , I wonder if this news is reliable....:undecided:
 
Good decision by them, The Mig29 is truly one of the best out there.
 
If their requirement was twin seat then J10 is anyway out of comparision.!
 
Hmmm. The better Fighter won the race.
 
This is even more significant considering than Myanmar would want to save money and go for the economical choice considering it's size and economy, rather than the costly choice. The fact that they chose the migs (expensive, diplomatic loss) despite Chinese leverage proves something most people here dont want to know.

Sorry for off topic. I had read many posters here say that JF-17 will soon be having production lines setup in different countries such as Turkey, and possibly China would make some for itself too. What's up with that ? Are there any confirmed export customers for JF 17 ?
 
I understand why this hype is being created on an issue such irrelevant as this. Mig29smt and J-10 are totally uncomparable.. there would be several reasons to substantiate this and i believe most people would be able to figure out. I mean how can u compare a twin engine with a single one first of all.. Secondly J-10 just entered service plus its a totally diff platform.

Just because a few people at farnborough were impressed by the cost-capability ratio of the Jf-17 and put it in comparison to the mig-29.
So the russians decide to intentially give hype to the (J-10 vs SMT) deal to prove a point.. (competotion in other word)


J-10 is still new and maturing whereas the mig29 is an extensively modified and upgraded over several number of years to become what it is today... an overpriced relic of the cold war. I mean u cant even keep track of the number of versions of the mig-29.

However i guess its more todo with the requirements of the Mynnmar airforce and their spending capability rather than the j-10's understantement.
The clear reason would be that Mig-29 smt is more capable aircraft at this point in time compared to j-10 and that the mig is tried and tested, however the age of mig-29 is coming to an end as it getting old and outdated... wheresas the J-10 is just born and is only just the first block.. so in the long run the j-10 has more potenial..

Hilarious article i must say
 
Last edited:
guyz guyz....just accept that j-10 lost to mig!
but that doesn't make j-10 less of a fighter!!!
for example if india chooses super hornet over rafale and typhoon then that DOES NOT make rafale and typhoon any less than super hornet....
 
to me mayamay is a poor country. thus haveing mig 29 before j 10 is thoughtful beacuse you will need traing equipment new weapons ECT.... so in my case j 10 was droped
 
I think the article is aimed at taking a sucker punch at China. Especially how it talks abt JF-17.

Regarding the avionics ... does China have the capability to develop all the avionics? Also does Indian industry has the capability or is it dependent on Israel and French avionics?
 
guyz guyz....just accept that j-10 lost to mig!
but that doesn't make j-10 less of a fighter!!!for example if india chooses super hornet over rafale and typhoon then that DOES NOT make rafale and typhoon any less than super hornet....

These days its becoming rarer and rarer to be able to hear voice of reason on the forum. But whenever you do, its always nice and refreshing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom