What's new

Let us show ancient swords and discuss their properties.

The modern form with the hilt design, hand guard, serrated edges is a medieval design, didnt exist in the Gupta era.

Other than that, huge board swords like that have existed before the Guptas, just with different hilts.

True when i meant modern,i meant shape of blade.Serrated edge and hilt were added by rajputs.The original asi was different than the modern type,more leaf like design.
 
qIG6HOK.jpg


Celtic longsword - The ancient celts were reknowned for their iron working and this was the weapon of the celtic nobility/champions.Probably the first design to feature a fuller.80-90 cm.The gauls used this for slashing.Romans encountered these weapons.However the celtic wooden shields and longswords were unable to match the legionaries with mail armor,shields and gladius as they often couldn't employ their cumbersome weapon in packed formations.Legionaries would take the blow on the shield,then stab quickly with galdius from beneath.
Pros- Good reach.Great hacking power.Balanced.
Cons - Requires space to use.Overhead swing needed for maximum power.Thrust is weak.

6kpvp1t.jpg

2xQLQww.jpg


Dacian Falx
& Thracian Rhomphaia - Both of these 2 -handed curved sickle like weapons have a common origin in the bastarnae tribes of the danube region.The dacians(modern romania) use the falx,the thracians employed the rhomphaia.The weapon can be classified as a polearm than a sword.The 1-handed small falx was 50 cm,2 -handed falx was around 90 cms.The rhomphaia was less curved but longer.Both weapons were sharpened on the inside edge and generated brutal downward cutting power.The length of the two-handed falx allowed it to be wielded with great force, the point piercing helmets and the blade splitting shields - it was said to be capable of splitting a shield in two at a single blow. Alternatively, it might be used as a hook, pulling away shields and cutting at vulnerable limbs, or striking the edge of a strong shield. The inward curving point was still able to pierce the armor or flesh of the target behind the shield, rendering even the most reinforced shields much less effective defensively against a falx wielder.The romans encountered this weapon in their conquest of dacia,where it proved to be able to cut through roman shields,pierce helmets and even the most advanced roman segemented body armor .It was theonly time the romans changed their armor after encountering a particular weapon by issuing metal handguards,iron reinforced helmets and shields.The rhomphaia was first used by thracian auxillaries fighting for greek city states and in macedonian armies.Early byzantine varangian guards are also described using this weapon.
Pros - Great reach,Devastating cutting power,great anti-armor capability,
Cons - Purely offensive weapon(poor for parrying an opponents blow),Combined with 2-handed design making use with shield impossible left user highly vulnerable,required space to use.

rTvnbSt.jpg


Roman Spatha - Originally a cavalry sword,it was introduced by gallic cavalry auxillaries in roman service.Length 80-95 cms.Shows definite celtic longsword influence.It replaced the gladius as the weapon of the infantry in the late imperial era due to its better reach.The spatha and similar blades became the most common sword type of the barbarian tribes of the dark ages(franks,alans,germanic tribes etc)The spatha was also employed by eastern roman-byzantine empire and sassanids with local modifications.The arming sword and viking sword are derivatives of this.

T5JPbVP.jpg


Turkish Kilij -
The forefather of scimitar/sabre designs originating in central asia around 300 bc among avars and turks it was popularized in the middle east by the turks.The turko-mongol saber,the arabic saif,the later sabre designs in europe and middle east,indian tulwar and persian shamshir are all later derivatives of this.Continued in use until the 18th century in the ottoman armies.Generally around 80 cms in length.It has a broadened flaring tip which adds to the weight of the cut.A lethal cutting weapon and lightweight with a small handguard.Especially suited for use from horseback.Was very popular with british cavalrymen of napoleonic era.
Pros - Deadly cutting power,suited for cavalry use,light and manuverable blade,moderately effective handguard,weighted tip gives much more power(concentrating mass forward on the blade, orients the cutting edge with the natural swing of the arm allowing for a "draw cut" action from a normal blow and creating a tremendous amount of "artificial" sectional density due to blade/target alignment.
Cons - Awkward on the thrust due to curvature,moderate reach.

Many others like chinese dao,japanese katana & wakizashi,Javan Kris,European longsword & bastard sword,scottish
claymore,german zweihander greatsword,french estoc & polish koncerz,indian tulwar and pata,persian shamshir,Spanish/european Rapier,Pirate cutlass,turkish yatagan etc.
 
Inscribed Sword of Tipu Sultan
C. 1790 A.D.
Place of Origin: Srirangapattnam, Karnataka
Material: Steel
Dimensions: L: 74.1 cm
Acc. No. 56.17/1

One of the world's rare artefacts this sword once belonged to the great national hero Tipu Sultan, the ruler of Mysore, now a segment of Karnataka. A dauntless warrior Tipu ruled this Deccani part around the closing years of the 18th century. The Delhishahi hilt with its circular disc pommel, oval grip, small knuckle-guard, short quillings and small langets, is damascened all over in gold in floral and creeper design. The fine steel blade, devoid of jauhar, is inscribed and bears the verses from the Holy Quran together with the name of Tipu Sultan and his capital Srirangapattnam. The wooden sheath is covered with maroon velvet.

arms-big3.jpg


Enamelled Dagger
Late 17th Century
Place of Origin: Rajasthan, Rajput
Materials: Steel
Dimensions: L: 34.9 cm.
Acc. No. 59.1/2

This most colourfully enamelled dagger abounding in rare beauty consists of a straight-blade and straight hilt without a guard. The blade tapers gradually and the hilt is thin, slender and delicate. It is similar to peshqabz, a variant style of dagger popular amongst Mughal rulers though while the latter is a sturdy weapon, the former, kard, is a fanciful specimen generally carried by the queen or the princess. It can even be called a knife for it serves rather than cuts. The kard, in question, has a single-edged blade of Damascus steel whose point is thickened to permit it to be passed through mail, if needed. The ram-shaped hilt of metal is profusely encrusted with rubies, emeralds and other jewels. The sheath of metal is delicately perforated with images of birds, animals and creeper designs.
arms-big7.jpg


Bhavani Talwar i.e. Sword of Chatrapati Shivaji Raje Bhonsale of Maratha Kingdom, India.
bhavani-talwar-sword-puja-photo.jpg


Maratha Talwar
2167230849_dacac9780b_o.jpg
 
Indian Broad Swords Over The Years

OEeq07M.jpg


Sunga, bharhut, 3rd-2nd Century BC

1v5qB.jpg


Khanlingan Guard, 2nd Century BC

XkLGr.jpg


Andhras, Sanchi, 1st Century BC

Vf6G0iO.jpg

kwHjRqq.jpg


Guptas, 3d-4th Century AD

N0xx7sH.jpg


Cholas, 10th-11th Century AD

2D2B5Zg.jpg


Rani ki vav, 10th-11th Century AD

Pr890IF.jpg


Chennakesava Temple, Hoysala, 10th-11th Century AD

http://oriental-arms.com/photos/items/51/003351/ph-0.jpg

And survived to near modern times as the Khanda

True when i meant modern,i meant shape of blade.Serrated edge and hilt were added by rajputs.The original asi was different than the modern type,more leaf like design.

Even the heavy blunt shaped ones have existed for a long time. And the swords of the Guptas were really no different from what you see in Mathura and else where before them.
 
Last edited:
You guys seems very knowledgeable on ancient world history. Is this part of your college major?
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom