What's new

Japan's economy to grind to a halt in 2nd quarter: JPMorgan

My dear @TaiShang ,


Japan’s debt-to-GDP ratio looks bad. But as economist Hazel Henderson notes, this is just a matter of accounting practice—a practice that she and other experts contend is misleading. Japan leads globally in most areas of high-tech manufacturing, including aerospace. The debt on the other side of its balance sheet represents the payoffs from all this productivity to the Japanese people.

According to Gary Shilling, writing on Bloomberg in June 2012, more than half of Japanese public spending goes for debt service and social security payments. Debt service is paid as interest to Japanese “savers.” Social security and interest on the national debt are not included in GDP, but these are actually the social safety net and public dividends of a highly productive economy. These, more than the military weapons and “financial products” that compose a major portion of U.S. GDP, are the real fruits of a nation’s industry. For Japan, they represent the enjoyment by the people of the enormous output of their high-tech industrial base.




Japan's FOREX + Pension is over $3.5 Trillion (there are academics that would speculate it even higher at over $5 Trillion), @TaiShang . Mind you our economy is but a half of the PRC's.

It is just a matter of perspective, dear @Nihonjin1051 . As with China's stock decline. In economics and finance, it is all abut from which angle you look at the issue. No need to be alarmist or doom's day fatalists.


The Greece of Asia: Japan's Growing Sovereign Debt Time Bomb
Der Spiegel

The eyes of the financial world are on Greece and other heavily indebted euro-zone countries. But Japan is in even worse shape. The country's debt load is immense and growing, to the point that a quarter of its budget goes to servicing it. The government in Tokyo has done little to change things.



Today's Tokyo has become a permanent mecca of consumption, its boroughs seemingly divided according to target markets. The city's Sugamo district, for example, is dominated by the elderly. Escalators in the subway station there go extra slow, while the stores along the Jizo Dori shopping street offer items such as canes, anti-aging cream and tea for sore joints. The Hurajuku neighborhood, on the other hand, is teeming with fashionistas made up to look like Manga characters.

This world of glitter, however, is but an illusion. For years, the world's third-largest economy has been unapologetically living on borrowed cash, more so than any other country in the world. In recent decades, Japanese governments have piled up debts worth some €11 trillion ($14.6 trillion). This corresponds to 230 percent of annual gross domestic product, a debt level that is far higher than Greece's 165 percent.

Such profligate spending has turned Japan into a ticking time bomb -- and an example that Europe can learn from as it seeks to tackle its own sovereign debt crisis. Japan, the postwar economic miracle, has never managed to recover from the stock market crash and real estate crisis that convulsed the country in the 1990s. The government had to bail out banks; insurance companies went bust. Since then, annual growth rates have often been paltry and tax revenues don't even cover half of government expenditures. Indeed, the country has gotten trapped in an inescapable spiral of deficit spending.

The fact that this tragedy has been playing out in relative obscurity can be attributed to a bizarre phenomenon: In contrast to the debt-ridden economies in the euro zone, Japan continues to pay hardly any interest on what it borrows. While Greece has recently had to cough up interest at double-digit rates, for example, the comparable figure for Japan has been a mere 0.75 percent. Even Germany, the euro zone's healthiest economy, has to pay more.

Endless Amount of Money

The reason is simple: Unlike countries in the euro zone, Japan borrows most of its money from its own people. Domestic banks and insurers have purchased 95 percent of the country's sovereign debt using the savings deposits of the general population. What's more, the Japanese are apparently so convinced that their country will be able to pay off its debts one day that they continue to lend their government a seemingly endless amount of money.

Experts warn that this system cannot go on for much longer. Takatoshi Ito, an economics professor at the University of Tokyo, says for example that Japan could become the "next Greece" if its government doesn't change course; the money, he says, will eventually run out. Ito and a colleague have calculated that even if the Japanese people invested all of their assets in sovereign bonds, it would only be enough to cover 12 years of state expenditures.

But who is supposed to come to Japan's rescue once that point has been reached? "If Japan is forced to go looking for investors abroad, a debt crisis will be unavoidable," says Jörg Krämer, the chief economist of Commerzbank, Germany's second-largest bank.

The man tasked with averting this disaster has his office in a building that looks like a fortress compared to the glass-and-steel skyscrapers surrounding it. The walls of the Bank of Japan, the country's central bank in Tokyo, are made of heavy, gray stone decorated with thick columns and gables.

Yet the impression of an impregnable fortress is misleading. The bank's 63-year-old governor, Masaaki Shirakawa -- a thin man with neatly parted hair -- no longer adheres to the disciplined monetary polices his Western counterparts preach. Instead, Shirakawa keeps the money printers going to stimulate the economy. Since 2011, his bank has launched emergency programs with a total volume of around €900 billion. In comparison, the euro bailout funds jointly financed by the euro zone's 17 member states only add up to €700 billion.

Carefully Weighing Each Word

For some time now, Japanese banks have been able to borrow money from the central bank at interest rates close to zero. By following this policy, Shirakawa is doing exactly what a number of European politicians -- and particularly ones from cash-strapped Southern European countries -- have been asking the European Central Bank (ECB) to do: He is financing the Japanese government. He denies doing so, and the method he uses are circuitous, but it amounts to the same thing.

So far, though, his strategy has done little to help. "At the moment," Shirakawa admits, "the effect of our monetary policy in stimulating economic growth is very limited." The cheap money is stuck in the banks rather than flowing into the real economy. "The money is there, liquidity is abundant, interest rates are very low -- and, still, firms do not make use of accommodative financial conditions," Shirakawa adds. "The return on investment is too low."

Shirakawa is sitting stiffly in a black leather chair with a straightened back and crossed legs. He carefully weighs each word.

The chief central banker, though planning to retire this spring, is currently under massive pressure. The government of newly elected Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, a conservative, recently made clear that it expects Shirakawa to print even more money. Abe's inauguration took place on Boxing Day.

The prime minister wants to launch a massive new €91 billion ($120 billion) economic stimulus program, refuelling the Japanese economy with public investments in the construction sector. At the same time, Abe wants Shirakawa to pump unlimited cash into the economy. If the central banker is unwilling to go along with those plans, Abe has warned he is prepared to change the law and place the central bank under government control.

It's the kind of idea economists have little regard for. "That would be tantamount to the driver of a car steering towards a wall and putting the pedal to the metal one more time before impact," economist Krämer says dryly. Klaus-Jürgen Gern, an Asia expert at the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, speaks of "pure helplessness".

Election Gift?

Central bank chief Shirakawa himself seems unsure of the best way to respond. Four days after Abe's electoral victory, the central banker apparently caved and increased his emergency sovereign bond and securities buying program by a further €90 billion. Observers described it as a Christmas present for the imperious election winner.

Still, it also appears that Shirakawa is likewise aware that he may just be throwing good money after bad -- even if, according to Japanese tradition, he hides the concession behind prim courtesies.

Money is only a means with which "to buy time," he says. "It can alleviate the pain. But the government has to implement reforms too."

That may be, but every political effort that has been made in recent decades to activate the overregulated economy has failed. In the retail sector, for example, proceedings have become hopelessly old-fashioned. The industry has slept through many IT revolutions because the country seeks to "preserve as many jobs as possible through extreme state regulation," says Martin Schulz, who has worked since 2000 at the Tokyo-based Fujitsu Research Institute.

It even appears that election victor Abe may be planning to scrap his predecessor's plan to increase the value-added tax (the VAT sales tax) in several steps, from 5 to 10 percent.

One thing is sure, warns central banker Shirakawa, "If we don't deliver fiscal reform, then the yield on Japanese government bonds will rise."

'A Real Problem'

Were that to happen, it would be tantamount to pulling a card directly from the center of a house of cards. Fully one-quarter of the government's overall budget currently goes toward servicing debt. Were Tokyo forced to pay higher interest rates, it's mountain of debt would grow even more rapidly.

One additional "potential risk," is the "amount of holdings of Japanese government bonds within the banking sector," as central bank chief Shirakawa politely notes. If long-term interest rates were to rise considerably, it could affect the stability of the sector.

That, at the very latest, would mark the point at which the crisis could spill across Japan's borders. In Germany, financial institutions like Mitsubishi UFJ may not be widely known, but they are still internationally networked mega-institutions that have the potential to destabilize the entire finance community.

Predicting the potential effects of the Japanese debt crisis is extremely difficult. But researcher Schulz is convinced that there won't be any "major crash." Out of self-preservation, he says, it is unlikely that large holders of Japanese bonds, such as domestic banks, would shed those bonds very quickly. Such a move would severely damage faith in Japanese debt and, by extension, in the banks that hold that debt. Instead, he predicts "many small crises" in the coming years. He and other economists further believe that there is plenty of room to raise taxes as a countermeasure; taxes in Japan remain relatively low.

Nevertheless, warns Commerzbank economist Krämer, one shouldn't give short shrift to the potential dangers of the Japanese debt crisis. "The psychological effect could be the most dangerous one," he says. What would happen, for example, were investors to suddenly lose faith in other heavily indebted countries such as the US.

"Japan remains one of the world's biggest industrial nations, and the yen is an important currency for international monetary transactions," says Asia expert Gern. "If everything were to spin out of control, then the world would have a real problem."
 
It is just a matter of perspective, dear @Nihonjin1051 . China as with China's stock decline. In economics and finance, it is all abut from which angle you look at the issue.

Well taken. Let me also address the issue of quantitative easing, please permit me.

Myths About Quantitative Easing

Some of the money for these government expenditures has come directly from “money printing” by the central bank, also known as “quantitative easing.” For over a decade, the Bank of Japan has been engaged in this practice; yet the hyperinflation that deficit hawks said it would trigger has not occurred. To the contrary, as noted by Wolf Richter in a May 9, 2012 article:

[T]he Japanese [are] in fact among the few people in the world enjoying actual price stability, with interchanging periods of minor inflation and minor deflation—as opposed to the 27% inflation per decade that the Fed has conjured up and continues to call, moronically, “price stability.”

He cites as evidence the following graph from the Japanese Ministry of Internal Affairs:

image001.gif


How is that possible? It all depends on where the money generated by quantitative easing ends up. In Japan, the money borrowed by the government has found its way back into the pockets of the Japanese people in the form of social security and interest on their savings. Money in consumer bank accounts stimulates demand, stimulating the production of goods and services, increasing supply; and when supply and demand rise together, prices remain stable.



Regards,
 
My dear Cirr,

The thing with Japan is that we are indebted to ourselves. LOL.

We borrow none from foreigners because quite frankly Japan is the largest creditor nation in the world.

;)

Japan foreign assets hit record $3.2 trln as top creditor nation| Reuters

LOL!!!

I know,I know。

Still,the Japanese government is doing its level best to inject inflation(2% correct me if I am wrong) into the economy to just keep alive the modicum growth Japan is seeing。

High inflation = high interest rates(negative real interest rates are simply not an option,not for an aging country with a large chunk of the population relying on incomes from savings)= high government interest payments(could easily double or triple considering that Japan has been a zero interest rate country for years,if not decades)= less government spendings or moree borrowings = weak economic growth
 
Last edited:
I know,I know。

Still,the Japanese government is doing its level best to inject inflation(2% correct me if I am wrong) into the economy to just keep alive the modicum growth Japan is seeing。

High inflation = high interest rates(negative interest rates are simply not on,not for an aging country with a large chunk of the population relying on incomes from savings)= high interest payments(could easily double or triple considering that Japan has been a zero interest rate country for years,if not decades)= less government spendings or moree borrowings = weak economic growth

My dear Cirr,

You have valid points and concerns. Really. But i will end this by stating the following:

The Japanese government is in deep debt, but the rest of Japan has ample money to spare.The Japanese government’s debt is the people’s money. They own each other, and they collectively reap the benefits.
 
My dear @TaiShang ,


Japan’s debt-to-GDP ratio looks bad. But as economist Hazel Henderson notes, this is just a matter of accounting practice—a practice that she and other experts contend is misleading. Japan leads globally in most areas of high-tech manufacturing, including aerospace. The debt on the other side of its balance sheet represents the payoffs from all this productivity to the Japanese people.

According to Gary Shilling, writing on Bloomberg in June 2012, more than half of Japanese public spending goes for debt service and social security payments. Debt service is paid as interest to Japanese “savers.” Social security and interest on the national debt are not included in GDP, but these are actually the social safety net and public dividends of a highly productive economy. These, more than the military weapons and “financial products” that compose a major portion of U.S. GDP, are the real fruits of a nation’s industry. For Japan, they represent the enjoyment by the people of the enormous output of their high-tech industrial base.




Japan's FOREX + Pension is over $3.5 Trillion (there are academics that would speculate it even higher at over $5 Trillion), @TaiShang . Mind you our economy is but a half of the PRC's.
i do agree with you that japan is in better shape than the US on economic terms, as the us is the biggest debtor nation in history, and that always end in disaster throughout history. however japan's downfall is its rapidly aging, shrinking population and nuclear meltdown and radiation. they are almost irreversible.

japan will serve as a warning to china and others. china needs to change its population policy. youths are the future. an aged society is much less vibrant and doomed to decline.
 
Bank of Japan's Sato warns of diminishing returns from monetary easing program

r

Bank of Japan board member Takehiro Sato speaks during an interview with Reuters at the central bank in Tokyo September 26, 2012.
REUTERS/YURIKO NAKAO

Bank of Japan board member Takehiro Sato on Wednesday warned of diminishing returns and potential drawbacks of maintaining the bank's massive stimulus program for too long, such as delaying government efforts to fix Japan's tattered finances.

Steady progress in restoring Japan's fiscal health is crucial for the success of the BOJ's quantitative and qualitative easing (QQE) campaign - including a smooth exit from the huge asset-buying program, the former market economist said.

"Once market participants have concerns about (Japan's) fiscal discipline, controlling long-term interest rates will become difficult even for the BOJ," Sato said in a speech to business leaders in Kofu, Yamanashi prefecture.

Saddled with the industrialized world's heaviest public debt and having delayed a sales tax hike last year, the government will craft a fiscal plan this month to meet its ambitious target of bringing the primary budget, which excludes interest payments, to a surplus by fiscal 2020.

Premier Shinzo Abe has worried fiscal hawks by stressing that he will prioritize boosting economic growth and tax revenues, rather than spending cuts. Critics say the BOJ is keeping lawmakers complacent about fiscal reform by driving borrowing costs to artificially low levels with its huge bond purchases.

Sato acknowledged that the BOJ's bond buying was affecting the government's fiscal plans and warned of the potential drawbacks of QQE, such as drying up bond market liquidity.

He said the BOJ may face difficulty buying government bonds at its current pace as financial institutions, many of whom need to set aside a certain amount in bonds for collateral, run out of debt paper to sell to the central bank.
"At some point, the BOJ may fail to draw enough bids in its bond-buying operations," Sato told a news conference.

"If this happens constantly, it may become difficult to achieve our pledge to increase base money at an annual pace of 80 trillion yen ($650 billion)."

His warning on the potential risks of QQE contradict Governor Haruhiko Kuroda, who has said there are no significant drawbacks that warrant attention.

RATE FLOOR INTACT

Sato also countered Kuroda's view that QQE was still pushing down hard on bond yields, pointing to the fact that long-term interest rates have bounced back to levels before the monetary expansion of October last year.

"It appears to me that the degree of difficulty in implementing QQE is rising," as its effect in pushing down nominal interest rates has been diminishing, he said.

Sato was among those who voted against the BOJ's decision last October to expand QQE to prevent slumping oil prices, and a subsequent slowdown in inflation, from delaying an end to deflation.

While warning of the diminishing returns of QQE, Sato brushed aside the possibility of reverting to a policy targetting interest rates and cutting the 0.1 percent in interest the BOJ pays to excess reserves parked with it.

"Tweaking the interest won't mesh with our balance sheet target. At present, that's not in our plan," he said.

Some market players speculate the BOJ may cut or abandon the 0.1 percent interest in the future to push down yields and weaken the yen.
 
i do agree with you that japan is in better shape than the US on economic terms, as the us is the biggest debtor nation in history, and that always end in disaster throughout history. however japan's downfall is its rapidly aging, shrinking population and nuclear meltdown and radiation. they are almost irreversible.

japan will serve as a warning to china and others. china needs to change its population policy. youths are the future. an aged society is much less vibrant and doomed to decline.

You act like Japan is less than 10 million , lol. Japan , tho small compared to nations like India and China , in population terms, still is quite overpopulated for her national size (land). Standing at 128 million , Japan is highly dense. In fact, Japan's population is almost the size of UK + France and Germany combined. lol.

You should be more concerned about South Korea, whose population is almost 1/3rd that of Japan's; and their population crisis is worse.

Bank of Japan's Sato warns of diminishing returns from monetary easing program

r

Bank of Japan board member Takehiro Sato speaks during an interview with Reuters at the central bank in Tokyo September 26, 2012.
REUTERS/YURIKO NAKAO

Bank of Japan board member Takehiro Sato on Wednesday warned of diminishing returns and potential drawbacks of maintaining the bank's massive stimulus program for too long, such as delaying government efforts to fix Japan's tattered finances.

Steady progress in restoring Japan's fiscal health is crucial for the success of the BOJ's quantitative and qualitative easing (QQE) campaign - including a smooth exit from the huge asset-buying program, the former market economist said.

"Once market participants have concerns about (Japan's) fiscal discipline, controlling long-term interest rates will become difficult even for the BOJ," Sato said in a speech to business leaders in Kofu, Yamanashi prefecture.

Saddled with the industrialized world's heaviest public debt and having delayed a sales tax hike last year, the government will craft a fiscal plan this month to meet its ambitious target of bringing the primary budget, which excludes interest payments, to a surplus by fiscal 2020.

Premier Shinzo Abe has worried fiscal hawks by stressing that he will prioritize boosting economic growth and tax revenues, rather than spending cuts. Critics say the BOJ is keeping lawmakers complacent about fiscal reform by driving borrowing costs to artificially low levels with its huge bond purchases.

Sato acknowledged that the BOJ's bond buying was affecting the government's fiscal plans and warned of the potential drawbacks of QQE, such as drying up bond market liquidity.

He said the BOJ may face difficulty buying government bonds at its current pace as financial institutions, many of whom need to set aside a certain amount in bonds for collateral, run out of debt paper to sell to the central bank.
"At some point, the BOJ may fail to draw enough bids in its bond-buying operations," Sato told a news conference.

"If this happens constantly, it may become difficult to achieve our pledge to increase base money at an annual pace of 80 trillion yen ($650 billion)."

His warning on the potential risks of QQE contradict Governor Haruhiko Kuroda, who has said there are no significant drawbacks that warrant attention.

RATE FLOOR INTACT

Sato also countered Kuroda's view that QQE was still pushing down hard on bond yields, pointing to the fact that long-term interest rates have bounced back to levels before the monetary expansion of October last year.

"It appears to me that the degree of difficulty in implementing QQE is rising," as its effect in pushing down nominal interest rates has been diminishing, he said.

Sato was among those who voted against the BOJ's decision last October to expand QQE to prevent slumping oil prices, and a subsequent slowdown in inflation, from delaying an end to deflation.

While warning of the diminishing returns of QQE, Sato brushed aside the possibility of reverting to a policy targetting interest rates and cutting the 0.1 percent in interest the BOJ pays to excess reserves parked with it.

"Tweaking the interest won't mesh with our balance sheet target. At present, that's not in our plan," he said.

Some market players speculate the BOJ may cut or abandon the 0.1 percent interest in the future to push down yields and weaken the yen.


Sato is against raising taxes, so his protest is expected.

Anyways, we will raise taxes as planned.

Abe has to make these tough decisions.

Unlike previous Premiers who were unable to make such decisions.

-------------

Japan still set for 2017 tax hike despite struggling economy | The Japan Times
 
I know,I know。

Still,the Japanese government is doing its level best to inject inflation(2% correct me if I am wrong) into the economy to just keep alive the modicum growth Japan is seeing。

High inflation = high interest rates(negative interest rates are simply not on,not for an aging country with a large chunk of the population relying on incomes from savings)= high government interest payments(could easily double or triple considering that Japan has been a zero interest rate country for years,if not decades)= less government spendings or moree borrowings = weak economic growth

Flawed economics.

The debt which is simply savings of Japanese people is increasingly being invested in countries like India at 10-13% p.a. interest rates.India with it's close to 500 Billion USD reserves will never default so in effect the lending is risk free. A return of 10-13% with zero risk would then go into paying interest to Japanese savings which commands a considerable less interest.

Japanese infrastructure is developed, there is no need for enormous govt spending in building supply side capacities like China has been doing. Hence the Govt Spending inside Japan can be lower and can be invested overseas.
 
You act like Japan is less than 10 million , lol. Japan , tho small compared to nations like India and China , in population terms, still is quite overpopulated for her national size (land). Standing at 128 million , Japan is highly dense. In fact, Japan's population is almost the size of UK + France and Germany combined. lol.

You should be more concerned about South Korea, whose population is almost 1/3rd that of Japan's; and their population crisis is worse.




Sato is against raising taxes, so his protest is expected.

Anyways, we will raise taxes as planned.

Abe has to make these tough decisions.

Unlike previous Premiers who were unable to make such decisions.

-------------

Japan still set for 2017 tax hike despite struggling economy | The Japan Times

Yes, I guess there is a disagreement between the two:

Many people questions Mr. Abe's economy policy, in fact.

Monetary stimulus hasn’t fixed Japan’s economy or chronic deflation
BRIAN MILNER

The Globe and Mail

Published Sunday, Jun. 21, 2015 7:07PM EDT

Last updated Sunday, Jun. 21, 2015 7:11PM EDT

When it comes to heavy central bank intervention in the economy, it would be hard to top the Bank of Japan’s all-out effort to attack chronic deflation and revive a flatlining economy. Since shedding its traditional reticence in 2013 about deploying ultra-aggressive monetary tools, the bank has unleashed record ******** of monetary stimulus.

But halfway through 2015, with the liquidity taps wide open, the desired outcome remains as elusive as ever. Exports are faltering despite a devalued yen; household spending is still unenthusiastic; and the spectre of economy-crippling deflation is once again casting a dark shadow over the landscape.

Japan releases its latest monthly inflation, household spending and unemployment numbers Friday. Most of the attention will be on prices. The consensus inflation forecast for May is 0.0 per cent year over year, and that may be optimistic.

The BoJ’s policy-setting board decided last week to continue expanding the monetary base at an annual clip of ¥80-trillion ($799-billion), while staying relatively upbeat about the economic recovery and sticking to its revised forecast in April that inflation would hit its 2-per-cent target no later than September, 2016. But economists say the central bank’s economic and inflation assessments are too rosy and that it will have to inject even more stimulus in the months ahead to keep deflation at bay.

Two and a half years after Prime Minister Shinzo Abe swept into office with a bold plan to turn around Japan’s faltering fortunes, quickly dubbed Abenomics, the government’s world-topping debt leaves little room for further fiscal expansion. And we may soon find out what happens when a central bank also runs out of ammunition in the midst of battle.

“No matter how the numbers turn out [this week], it really doesn’t matter for the markets,” said Carl Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics in Valhalla, NY. “The bottom line is that I don’t think there’s much more the Bank of Japan can do. They’re already buying up pretty much all the [government] bond market, certainly at the margin. So they can’t really increase their quantitative easing. And they can’t cut interest rates, because they’re already at zero.”

The May data alone “will surely not trigger any policy response. But we remain convinced that the Bank of Japan will have to step up the pace of easing later this year, as inflation is unlikely to pick up as quickly as policy makers hope,” said Marcel Thieliant, Capital Economics’ Japan watcher.

Mr. Thieliant expects both headline and core inflation for May to show a decline of 0.3 percentage points from a year earlier.

“This would mostly be the result of a surge in prices a year ago as firms continued to pass on the higher sales tax to consumers, rather than any renewed plunge in prices this year,” he said in an e-mail from Singapore. “However, gas and electricity prices are slated to fall by around 3 per cent in July, so inflation should still turn negative in the third quarter.”

There is “scant evidence to suggest that the era of exceptionally low rates of inflation with multiple episodes of deflation has ended,” Bank of Nova Scotia economist Derek Holt said in a note, warning that Japan’s inflation rate could sink to its lowest reading in two years.

“In fact, it’s entirely conceivable that this will just be a third failed attempt to buck long-run deflationary forces since the property and equity market bubbles popped [in 1991].”

This should be expected, because deflation “is the natural counterpart to a shrinking economy” stemming from a declining population and shrinking labour force, Mr. Weinberg said. He calls it “Econ 101. You take people out of an economy, it gets smaller. It means top-line growth is going to come down for almost every company [at about the same average rate as the decline in the population]. Some companies will always do better, but there’s nothing good that can come from a shrinking population.”

While a lack of inflation is worrisome, the same influences mean there likely won’t be much cheer on the consumer spending or employment fronts either.

Capital Economics’ Mr. Thieliant predicts a modest 2 per cent rebound in core household spending in May from the previous month, when spending shrank 3.5 per cent. That would leave spending “dangerously close to a contraction this quarter,” he said.

The jobless rate for May is expected to come in at about the same 3.3 per cent level as in the previous month, just above the rate that in normal times might lead to wage pressures. But not when companies are worrying about demand. People tend to sit on their wallets if they expect prices are going to fall and real wages to remain relatively flat or lower.

“The whole deflation mindset is very hard to kick in just a couple of years,” said Jennifer Lee, senior economist with BMO Capital Markets. “It’s very much like a slow crawl at a snail’s pace.”
 
Yes, I guess there is a disagreement between the two:

Many people questions Mr. Abe's economy policy, in fact.

Let me tell you why taxes will be raised:

1. Last year there was an agreement that requisite for quantitative easing would be raising tax rate

2. Last year there was a tax reduction for Japanese corporations

3. This year Japan recently passed a new corporate tax code , again, a requisite for tax increase

4. Decreasing national spending to 1% is in tandem with raising taxes. Long term wise this will benefit Japan.

5. Hard decisions but necessary decisions. So far, Abe's arrow policy seems to be working as Japan's economy has increased to an annualized 3.9%, and manufacturing is increasing again (with fluctuations as per May's data).

Thus, its about leveraging political and economic impetus. Abe knows this, so do other key players.
 
You act like Japan is less than 10 million , lol. Japan , tho small compared to nations like India and China , in population terms, still is quite overpopulated for her national size (land). Standing at 128 million , Japan is highly dense. In fact, Japan's population is almost the size of UK + France and Germany combined. lol.

You should be more concerned about South Korea, whose population is almost 1/3rd that of Japan's; and their population crisis is worse.




Sato is against raising taxes, so his protest is expected.

Anyways, we will raise taxes as planned.

Abe has to make these tough decisions.

Unlike previous Premiers who were unable to make such decisions.

-------------

Japan still set for 2017 tax hike despite struggling economy | The Japan Times

It would have been better if Abe had made this reform right when he was elected with huge mandate. Leaders have maximum political capital right after election which slowly erodes. He waited a little too long and the road ahead will be tougher for him poltically
 
It would have been better if Abe had made this reform right when he was elected with huge mandate. Leaders have maximum political capital right after election which slowly erodes. He waited a little too long and the road ahead will be tougher for him poltically

I am in the camp that Abe should have started this early on as well. My guess is that he delayed long enough to secure the agreement(s) with ally party, Komeito, in order to secure a victory in the Diet regarding the Collective Self Defense Mandate. The union between LDP and Komeito was necessary to pass the bill. Plus, Abe had to delay long enough to sort out an agreement with Kuroda and other key members of the BOJ to agree with his QE late last year.

Again, i credit this to the shrewd politicking of Abe Sensei. All this while touring the world to boost Japanese image abroad and to reinforce our interests and pledges in South Asia, Southeast Asia, the Pacific States, South America, European Union, NATO, United States and South America, Africa.

In the end, my friend @Spectre --- its about leveraging your resources. Abe did this, and had to consider all factors.

Next: Passing the TPP.
 
I wonder there if there is a ceiling/limit to excessive-QE and debt-driven growth? If something is artificially kept afloat , the consequences will be even more severe.
As a US lackey there is still room for printing more yen. That is the #1 thing being a lackey has is the ability to print a lot without killing your dollar. But they are not US, there will be a time when uncle Sam will say enough devaluation, stop printing. Than they will be in deeper trouble. China can help with that by decreasing imports from Japan.
 

Back
Top Bottom