What's new

Israeli forces enter Nairobi mall: security source

Status
Not open for further replies.
So they are fighting against Assad, who gave them home and respectable life. Then that is really a backstabbing. But there are videos claiming as Palstenians fighting for Assad in Yarmouk.

Hezbollah fighting for Assad ... Hamas fighting for Petro dollars from persian gulf states !

Kameez tay pa lay, fair discussion ve kar laiin

How is the life bro ? :coffee:
 
Don't turn every topic into a naswar thread, stay on topic.
 
Any latest updates ? has the seize ended?
 
Siege is still going on.

Israel and Kenya are old allies so friends naturally help each other out.

But I love the after effects of such help as it gives rise to epic conspiracy nonsense.

Its as if any mention of Israel into a debate lowers the people's IQ to the single digits so that all they spew is nonsense. :D

I love it. :D
 
Siege is still going on.

Israel and Kenya are old allies so friends naturally help each other out.

But I love the after effects of such help as it gives rise to epic conspiracy nonsense.

Its as if any mention of Israel into a debate lowers the people's IQ to the single digits so that all they spew is nonsense. :D

I love it. :D
Thanks for the update man, It's also being told that the Mall itself is partially owned by the Israelis
 
'palesitnians' kill, Israelis help save

Kenyan journalist Larry Madowo tweets: 3 Israeli trauma specialist doctors 2 arrive @ Kenyatta National Hospital tomorrow to attend to #WestgateAttack victims. 1500 units of blood
 
In Saudi Arabia we stomp people if they didn't play by our rules. After all, they came on their own will. Either to adopt or go back to where you came from.

Yet, many Indians/others are dying to get here, in case you don't know.

It's those rules that I was questioning.

And yes, many Indians and Pakistanis and others do work there, to get a share of the oil wealth. Not to become proud Saudi Arabians, which they can't anyway.

Anyway my post was to a Palestinian berating Israel as a "theocratic" state. When the fact is that Israel is a more secular entity than all other countries in that region, with freedom of religion for all.
 
@janon,
In actuality neither does KSA qualify as a theocracy, even though they have a much closer relations between state and religion than Israel.

In a pure theocracy, the civil leader is believed to have a direct personal connection with the civilization's divinity. For example, Moses led the Israelites, and Muhammad ruled the early Muslims. Law proclaimed by the ruler is also considered a divine revelation, and hence the law of God. An ecclesiocracy, on the other hand, is a situation where the religious leaders assume a leading role in the state, but do not claim that they are instruments of divine revelation. For example, the prince-bishops of the European Middle Ages, where the bishop was also the temporal ruler. Such a state may use the administrative hierarchy of the religion for its own administration, or it may have two 'arms,' -- administrators and clergy—but with the state administrative hierarchy subordinate to the religious hierarchy. The papacy in the Papal States occupied a middle ground between theocracy and ecclesiocracy, since the pope did not claim he was a prophet who received revelation from God and translated it into civil law.

Theocracy is distinguished from other, secular forms of government that have a state religion, or are influenced by theological or moral concepts, and monarchies held "By the Grace of God". In the most common usage of the term, some civil rulers are leaders of the dominant religion (e.g., the Byzantine emperor as patron of the head of the official Church); the government claims to rule on behalf of God or a higher power, as specified by the local religion, and divine approval of government institutions and laws.

Secular governments can also coexist with a state religion or delegate some aspects of civil law to religious communities. For example, in Israel marriage is governed by officially recognized religious bodies who each provide marriage services for their respected adherents, yet no form of civil marriage (free of religion, for atheists, for example) exists nor marriage by non-recognized minority religions.

I doubt that @Hazzy997 even knows the meaning of the word theocracy, more like he just uses every "offensive" word he knows against Israel, even if he doesn't understand the meaning.
Actually most of his posts are as close to reality as this one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom