What's new

ISIS has Saudis on highest alert

Saudi Arabia isn't Iraq.


Certainly not Iraq. Saudi Barbaria is House of Al-Saud drunk on power and busy creating monsters, now it seems their monster is here to haunt them. ISIS hasn't got the manpower to mount any offensive, they'll just go back to good ol' Jihadi tactics of blowing things up..
 
SA might prove to be the easiest too conquer. Much of the fighters are Saudi and there's a lot of local support, not to mention in the militairy and intelligence.
Local support for ISIS is limited in KSA

Western analysts and intelligence contractors have overestimated Saudi support
 
Saudi Arabia isn't Iraq.

Correct, but the same mechanics are at play. An underground revolution that seeks topple the regime. Given that there are even more sleeper cells and grassroot support, you will be surprised how fast and quick it will all go.
 
Certainly not Iraq. Saudi Barbaria is House of Al-Saud drunk on power and busy creating monsters, now it seems their monster is here to haunt them. ISIS hasn't got the manpower to mount any offensive, they'll just go back to good ol' Jihadi tactics of blowing things up..

Whatever you say, got some bills to count.:smokin:

waleed-talal.jpg



oil.jpg

Correct, but the same mechanics are at play. An underground revolution that seeks topple the regime. Given that there are even more sleeper cells and grassroot support, you will be surprised how fast and quick it will all go.

I don't talk wishes rather real.:triniti:
 
Certainly not Iraq. Saudi Barbaria is House of Al-Saud drunk on power and busy creating monsters, now it seems their monster is here to haunt them. ISIS hasn't got the manpower to mount any offensive, they'll just go back to good ol' Jihadi tactics of blowing things up..


That is pure fiction that S.A supports ISIS...ISIS has is the main factor in the Failure of FSA to topple Bashar Al Asad and there is no way S.A would support them...ISIS served purely Iranian interests in Syria and their uprising in Iraq seems to be more with the help of in'tl Agencies who want to destabilize the M.E in general and widen rifts between Sunni-Shia in particular across the world..

Once again if Iran and Hezbullah had not intervened in Syria,the uprising of this ISIS monster was least likely..
 
This is getting wayyy too confusing. Who exactly is funding ISIS ?? We are always told that Saudi Arabia funds ISIS. Now it seems that Saudi Arabia is getting ready to fight ISIS ? Can't the middle east keep their fights simple ? I mean like the Pakistan-India fights. Here we just fire pot shots over the borders and exchange parcels during Eid and Diwali :undecided:
 
ISIS clowns attacking KSA? The Land of the Two Holy Mosques? A country never fully conquered by any outsider.

:rofl:

They will receive the same medicine that the Al-Qaeda goons received in the 2000's and the Houthi sect.

Death and humiliation and more of that.

Or this after a trial:



This goes for anyone that wants to do the holy land harm. Allah (swt) is protecting Makkah and Madinah from any harm at all times and its people.​
 
This is getting wayyy too confusing. Who exactly is funding ISIS ?? We are always told that Saudi Arabia funds ISIS. Now it seems that Saudi Arabia is getting ready to fight ISIS ? Can't the middle east keep their fights simple ? I mean like the Pakistan-India fights. Here we just fire pot shots over the borders and exchange parcels during Eid and Diwali :undecided:

Its the same case of growing snakes in the backyard that our neighbor tasted. Fuel inurgent groups to gain strategic advantage and in a couple of years they bite back - zaineeath hi aisi hai dono chele ki or unke masters ki.
 
ISIS clowns attacking KSA? The Land of the Two Holy Mosques? A country never fully conquered by any outsider.

:rofl:

They will receive the same medicine that the Al-Qaeda goons received in the 2000's and the Houthi sect.

Death and humiliation and more of that.

Or this after a trial:



This goes for anyone that wants to do the holy land harm. Allah (swt) is protecting Makkah and Madinah from any harm at all times and its people.​



KSA or any country in name of Arabia or... did not exist before 1933. And places like hijaz and Yemen ruled by Ottamans for many decades.

713px-Arabia_1914.png
 
Its the same case of growing snakes in the backyard that our neighbor tasted. Fuel inurgent groups to gain strategic advantage and in a couple of years they bite back - zaineeath hi aisi hai dono chele ki or unke masters ki.

:lol:

ISIS is headed by Iraqi former Ba'athists turned into opportunistic Jihadists. They are deciding everything. The few hundred, at most 2.000-4.000 foreigners, (of which the majority are Chechens) from across the world are mainly used as cannon fodder especially if they are young (18-25) and inexperienced in wars which most are.

KSA has not supported any groups other than FSA and the Syrian opposition groups that are recognized as the legitimate opposition across the entire world.

There might be a few hundred private donors at most but they act outside of the state.

Besides there will be no blowback and there have never been any blowback in KSA. It's simply too strong, there is close to no support for that FOREIGN entity and the KSA military will deal with them in no time.

1 ancient Arab clan in the Northern Borders Region could destroy them if armed properly.

Also English. Nobody understand what you are saying lastly who are not from South Asia.

@MOHSENAM

The vast majority of KSA was never ruled by any foreigners. People from KSA ruled others and people from KSA also founded 4 of the largest empires in human history. More than any other people. The legacy is the entire Arab world. From Morocco in the West next to the Atlantic Ocean to Oman in the East near the Arabian Sea and from Syria to the Comoros in the Southern Hemisphere.

Local rulers ruled btw, that gave their alliance to the Ottoman Sultan's. Back then nationalism did not exist and Ottoman Turkish was for instance more Arabic than Turkish, they used the Arabic alphabet, ruled an Arab system (Caliphate) used Arab titles (Sultan and Caliph) and that is why most Arabs supported them. Even during the Arab Revolt many Arabs (despite the prospect of becoming independent) fought with the Ottomans.

I am not talking about all those Arab Sultanates, Kingdoms, Emirates, Sheikdoms etc. who never were part of the Ottoman Empire and who were regional powers of the time of their own such as the Kingdom of Morocco, Sultanate of Oman, Kingdom of Najd, The Kingdom in Egypt etc.

In any case Makkah and Madinah are protected by Allah (swt) and same with its people.

You can have your daydreaming. I predict that a few rag-tag Baluch rebels will invade all of Iran. That's more probable.:lol:
 
Last edited:
:lol:

ISIS is headed by Iraqi former Ba'athists turned into opportunistic Jihadists. They are deciding everything. The few hundred, at most 2.000-4.000 foreigners, (of which the majority are Chechens) from across the world are mainly used as cannon fodder especially if they are young (18-25) and inexperienced in wars which most are.

KSA has not supported any groups other than FSA and the Syrian opposition groups that are recognized as the legitimate opposition across the entire world.

There might be a few hundred private donors at most but they act outside of the state.

Besides there will be no blowback and there have never been any blowback in KSA. It's simply too strong, there is close to no support for that FOREIGN entity and the KSA military will deal with them in no time.

1 ancient Arab clan in the Northern Borders Region could destroy them if armed properly.

Also English. Nobody understand what you are saying lastly who are not from South Asia.

@MOHSENAM

The vast majority of KSA was never ruled by any foreigners. People from KSA ruled others and people from KSA also founded 4 of the largest empires in human history. More than any other people. The legacy is the entire Arab world. From Morocco in the West next to the Atlantic Ocean to Oman in the East near the Arabian Sea and from Syria to the Comoros in the Southern Hemisphere.

Local rulers ruled btw, that gave their alliance to the Ottoman Sultan's. Back then nationalism did not exist and Ottoman Turkish was for instance more Arabic than Turkish, they used the Arabic alphabet, ruled an Arab system (Caliphate) used Arab titles (Sultan and Caliph) and that is why most Arabs supported them. Even during the Arab Revolt many Arabs (despite the prospect of becoming independent) fought with the Ottomans.

I am not talking about all those Arab Sultanates, Kingdoms, Emirates, Sheikdoms etc. who never were part of the Ottoman Empire and who were regional powers of the time of their own such as the Kingdom of Morocco, Sultanate of Oman, Kingdom of Najd, The Kingdom in Egypt etc.

In any case Makkah and Madinah are protected by Allah (swt) and same with its people.

You can have your daydreaming. I predict that a few rag-tag Baluch rebels will invade all of Iran. That's more probable.:lol:


loll......Lets see.

chickens come home to roost and nowadays they come back to haunt within a year or two.
 
loll......Lets see.

chickens come home to roost and nowadays they come back to haunt within a year or two.

Well, being an Indian I guess you have your own giant problems starting with the biggest amount of poor on the planet, sanitation (600 million of you do not even have toilets), crime, terrorism (I think that India has the highest number of terror attacks yearly) and dozens of other problems.

You don't have to worry about the Holy Land. You will just become disappointed.

So please, comment on something that you have knowledge about. Too many wannabe professors on PDF that want their 1 minute of fame writing about topics that they have no clue about at all.
 
Well, being an Indian I guess you have your own giant problems starting with the biggest amount of poor on the planet, sanitation (600 million of you do not even have toilets), crime, terrorism (I think that India has the highest number of terror attacks yearly) and dozens of other problems.



Too rude.
 

Back
Top Bottom