What's new

IRAN : world's 4th cyber army

What does a classified info file have to do with the centrifuges :undecided:

I appreciate your attempts to understand my addition to @anonymus take but you got it wrong.

what a wacko :lol:

honey you think iranian centrifuges where connected to internet before the stuxnet attack ? :rofl::rofl:

seriously man you are much more fun than i thought :rofl::rofl::rofl:

come here guys @Ostad @rmi5 @kollang :lol:

when someone hacks into something and they steal sensitive info or they sabotage ; the target can be in a barrier too dumb a$$
 
@haman10 @Yzd Khalifa


Stuxnet is being regarded as a piece of art among programmers.



This is a short video on how stuxnet worked. The reason that Iranian centrifuge program was targeted was because they ran their computers on Windows XP. A unique operating sytem ( even a modified linux ) would have made it impossible to target unless someone leaks it's source code.

The introduction in Iranian intranet Stuxnet was done either by a careless scientist ( possible ) or a mole ( highly probable ).
 
I'd say a mole.
A Time to Betray


@haman10 @Yzd Khalifa


Stuxnet is being regarded as a piece of art among programmers.



This is a short video on how stuxnet worked. The reason that Iranian centrifuge program was targeted was because they ran their computers on Windows XP. A unique operating sytem ( even a modified linux ) would have made it impossible to target unless someone leaks it's source code.

The introduction in Iranian intranet Stuxnet was done either by a careless scientist ( possible ) or a mole ( highly probable ).
 
moles are eveywhere,,,, dr shakeel afridi in case of pakistan

Why do you call him a mole? All he did was taking DNA sample from a house, and i am sure he had no clue on the purpose behind it....
 
Why do you call him a mole? All he did was taking DNA sample from a house, and i am sure he had no clue on the purpose behind it....
i wish he would be that innocent,,,,my dear it was all a fake polio vaccination campaign and as a result the view of local people has been reinforced that polio campaigns are some kind of western conspiracies and all that crap,,,,not good for eradication of polio from pakistan
 
i wish he would be that innocent,,,,my dear it was all a fake polio vaccination campaign and as a result the view of local people has been reinforced that polio campaigns are some kind of western conspiracies and all that crap,,,,not good for eradication of polio from pakistan

I am not advocating what he did is right or wrong.... My point was only on calling him a "Mole"
 
I am not advocating what he did is right or wrong.... My point was only on calling him a "Mole"
working for a foreign spy agency inside your own country without knowledge of your government is a mole. and if not then you suggest a name?????
 
working for a foreign spy agency inside your own country without knowledge of your government is a mole. and if not then you suggest a name?????

Did he know in the first place whom he was working for? You think CIA would trust a doctor and disclose the purpose?
 
Did he know in the first place whom he was working for? You think CIA would trust a doctor and disclose the purpose?
maybe he didnt know that it was CIA but definately he knew it were foreigners/americans,,,,,,,
 
maybe he didnt know that it was CIA but definately he knew it were foreigners/americans,,,,,,,

Could be.... But when he doesnt know who is he working for, and when he doesnt know what is he working on.... How can you call him a mole.... Btw we are moving away from topic and we should take this discussion to some other thread....
 
NSA Claims Iran Learned from Western Cyberattacks

By Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald

Today at 6:02 PM

A top secret National Security Agency document from April 2013 reveals that the U.S. intelligence community is worried that the West’s campaign of aggressive and sophisticated cyberattacks enabled Iran to improve its own capabilities by studying and then replicating those tactics.

The NSA is specifically concerned that Iran’s cyberweapons will become increasingly potent and sophisticated by virtue of learning from the attacks that have been launched against that country. “Iran’s destructive cyber attack against Saudi Aramco in August 2012, during which data was destroyed on tens of thousands of computers, was the first such attack NSA has observed from this adversary,” the NSA document states. “Iran, having been a victim of a similar cyber attack against its own oil industry in April 2012, has demonstrated a clear ability to learn from the capabilities and actions of others.”

The document was provided to The Intercept by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, and was prepared in connection with a planned meeting with Government Communications Headquarters, the British surveillance agency. The document references joint surveillance successes such as “support to policymakers during the multiple rounds of P5 plus 1 negotiations,” referring to the ongoing talks between the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, Germany and Iran to forge an agreement over Iran’s nuclear program.

The document suggests that Iran has become a much more formidable cyberforce by learning from the viruses injected into its systems—attacks which have been linked back to the United States and Israel.

In June 2012, The New York Times reported that from “his first months in office, President Obama secretly ordered sophisticated attacks on the computer systems that run Iran’s main nuclear enrichment facilities, significantly expanding America’s first sustained use of cyberweapons, according to participants in the program.” As part of that plan, the U.S. and Israel jointly unleashed the Stuxnet virus on Iranian nuclear facilities, but a programming error “allowed it to escape Iran’s Natanz plant and sent it around the world on the Internet.” Israel also deployed a second virus, called Flame, against Iran.

Obama ordered cyberattacks despite his awareness that they would likely unleash a wholly new form of warfare between states, similar to the “first use of atomic weapons in the 1940s, of intercontinental missiles in the 1950s and of drones in the past decade,” according to the Times report. Obama “repeatedly expressed concerns that any American acknowledgment that it was using cyberweapons—even under the most careful and limited circumstances—could enable other countries, terrorists or hackers to justify their own attacks.”

The NSA’s concern of inadvertently aiding Iran’s cyberattack capabilities is striking given the government’s recent warning about the ability of adversaries to develop more advanced viruses. A top official at the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s (DARPA) appeared on 60 Minutes this Sunday and claimed that cyberattacks against the U.S. military are becoming more potent. “The sophistication of the attacks is increasing,” warned Dan Kaufman, director of DARPA’s Information Innovation Office.

The NSA document suggests that offensive cyberattacks on other states do not merely provoke counterattacks—those attacks can teach adversaries how to launch their own. “Iran continues to conduct distributed denial-of-service (DDOS) attacks against numerous U.S. financial institutions, and is currently in the third phase of a series of such attacks that began in August 2012,” the document says. “SIGINT indicates that these attacks are in retaliation to Western activities against Iran’s nuclear sector and that senior officials in the Iranian government are aware of these attacks.”

This would not be the first time the U.S. has inadvertently assisted Iran’s attack capabilities. Last month, former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling was convicted of multiple felony counts for telling New York Times reporter James Risen about an agency program designed to feed Iran false data about nuclear engineering in order to create setbacks, but which instead may have provided useful information the Iranians were able to exploit to advance their nuclear research.

As of 2013, the NSA said that while it had no indications “that Iran plans to conduct such an attack against a U.S. or UK target, we cannot rule out the possibility of such an attack, especially in the face of increased international pressure on the regime.”

The NSA “can’t comment or speculate on the motivations of those who aim to harm the United States or our allies,” a spokesperson for the agency said. “The National Security Agency works with foreign partners to protect our interests and citizens in cyberspace.”

NSA Claims Iran Learned from Western Cyberattacks - The Intercept
 
About Iranian Operation Cleaver:

c1.jpg


c2.jpg


c3.jpg


c5.jpg


Whole report is here: http://www.cylance.com/assets/Cleaver/Cylance_Operation_Cleaver_Report.pdf

"The single biggest existential threat that's out there, I think, is cyber."
Admiral Michael Mullen of the U.S Navy
 
Last edited:
Does the Iranian Operation Cleaver exist or is this a new fake WMD charge that will be used against Iran as a threat to critical 'world' infrastructure - the same way it was used against Iraq in early 2000s? I am sensing the latter as the demonizing campaign against Iran is picking up now disproportionately.
 
Back
Top Bottom