What's new

Iran: Russia Has Stopped Using Iran Base for Syria Strikes

Russia has stopped using an Iranian air base for launching airstrikes on Syria for the time being, Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman said Monday, just hours after the Iranian defense minister criticized Moscow for having "kind of show-off and ungentlemanly" attitude by publicizing their actions.

There was no immediate response from Moscow, which had used the Shahid Nojeh Air Base to refuel its bombers striking Syria at least three times last week.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Bahram Ghasemi told reporters in Tehran that the Russian airstrikes on militants in Syria were "temporary, based on a Russian request."

"It is finished, for now," Ghasemi said, without elaborating.

Last week, Russia announced it used the airfield, located some 50 kilometers (31 miles) north of the Iranian city of Hamedan. Iranian officials only confirmed Russia's presence a day later.

Earlier Monday, state TV quoted Iran's defense minister as saying that Russia "will use the base for a very short and fixed span." The comments by Gen. Hossein Dehghan came after he chastised parliament this weekend for asking questions about Russia using the base.

Responding to a question about why Iran didn't initially announce Russia's presence at the airfield, Dehghan appeared prickly on the state TV broadcast.

"Russians are interested to show they are a superpower to guarantee their share in political future of Syria and, of course, there has been a kind of show-off and ungentlemanly (attitude) in this field," he said.

His remarks also suggest Russia and Iran initially agreed to keep Moscow's use of the air base quiet. Its announcement likely worried Iran's Sunni-ruled Mideast neighbors, which host American military personnel.

For Iran, allowing Russia to launch strikes from inside the country is likely to prove unpopular. Many still remember how Russia, alongside Britain, invaded and occupied Iran during World War II to secure oil fields and Allied supply lines. But while Britain withdrew, Russia refused to leave, sparking the first international rebuke by the nascent United Nations Security Council in 1946.

Analysts have suggested Russia potentially leveraged Iran into allowing it to use the airfield over either economic or military interests, such as Tehran wanting to purchase Sukhoi-30 fighter jets or its deployment of Russian S-300 air defense missile systems. Russia initially held off on supplying the missile system to Tehran amid negotiations over Iran's contested nuclear program.

Over the weekend, photographs of President Hassan Rouhani were published in Iranian state media near a Bavar-373 missile defense system. That system is designed to be the local equivalent of the S-300 — perhaps an Iranian signal back to Moscow that it's capable of defending itself without the Russian missile system.

In his comments Monday, Dehghan said the Bavar-373 can hit targets at the height of 27 kilometers (16.7 miles) — the same height the S-300 can reach.

"When we make Bavar-373 operational, we will not need to purchase another high-altitude and long-range air defense system," he said.

ABCnews


I don't know what made Iran or Russia to change, but I'm still wondering how could Iran allow these communist Russians who once attacked and bombed Imam Ridha shrine in Mashhad to use an Iranian base to bomb Syrians?
Its halted for short period of time. As per Russian paper, these strikes will restart if needed for Iran base again.
 
Nope, Russia revealing they have a base in Iran from which they can launch airstrikes into Syria won't change much. Since nobody will target them there in the first place . THERE IS NOTHING SPECIAL IN THAT. It just means it's easier for Russia's strategic bombers to operate in such an Iranian airfield than from a syrian one, giving the logistics supplies and infrastructure available in Iran. So it means they can bring in more firepower to Bob the crap outta Syrian opposition targets.
So Iranian authorities trying to hide this news has nothing much to do with 'war plans' or whatever, it's just because after the mullahs rhetorics about western imperialists using bases in the middle East for strikes, the Mullahs didn't want their audience and other public in the middle East to know they also allow 'Russian imperialist' access to Iranian bases from where they can bomb Syria. Simple as that. :D

Don't get me wrong though, I don't think there is anything wrong with Iran allowing Russia to have access to military bases on its soil. As long as it serves Iran's interests, then so be it, who cares? . At the end of the day, the end justifies the means .:bounce:

Due to the USSR agreement with western powers during cold war Tu-22 refueling pod was removed to prevent it from becoming a long range bomber, besides this bird needs a long runway to take off which Hammin airfield in Syria lacks such a operational compatibility to offer due to short runway ... moreover as you mentioned using Hamadan airfield could shorten the distance to 60% which means more firepower ... so at the best it's a temporary cooperation and has got nothing with giving military base to another country ...
 
So Russia never used your country's military bases to launch attacks in Syria??lool

Using a base for refueling/rerouting is NOT called establishing a base in Iran. The base is operated by Iran, not Russia. I hope you can see the difference here. Based on constitution, no foreign military base can be established inside Iran.

If Russian authorities didn't say the truth publicly they will still be using military bases in your country. At least the Russians were open about tis, why hide it? :D

Anyway if you and your angry foreign ministry spokesman say there is none, then so be it. :meeting:

Iran didn't prefer media focus on this issue. The whole point was that, Russians shouldn't have released pics themselves why they were asked not to.
 
Thank Allah we have an Airforce of our own so we dont beg others for theirs.
Weaklings.
 
Iran didn't prefer media focus on this issue. The whole point was that, Russians shouldn't have released pics themselves why they were asked not to.

Well it would have been found out anyways. But allowing foreign forces operating in Iran is probably still considered taboo and the Iranian govt. knows that. Even you guys know that.
 
Well it would have been found out anyways. But allowing foreign forces operating in Iran is probably still considered taboo and the Iranian govt. knows that. Even you guys know that.

Of course it was going to be found, no one can hide Tu-22 bombers flying out of airbase. The point was that Russia shouldn't have revealed it first hand per agreement.

Again no foreign forces operating in Iran, just airplane refueling/rerouting. For me personally, it's not a problem or a taboo. A permanent or even non-permanent military base that is 'run by foreigners' is indeed a problem though, for every Iranian.
 
Thank Allah we have an Airforce of our own so we dont beg others for theirs.
Weaklings.
Dude we are working on our own made fighter jet, jet engine , radars , air defense systems , submarines and SLVs , laser , tanks ... what about you ? do you even have an indigenous military industry to start with?
Yeah thanks to God despite having all these fancy weapons purchased from uncle sam you still struggling in Yemen after 1 and half year and none of your goals has achieved ...
 
I think leaking out the news did more harm than good for Iran. With Iraqi and Syrian forces and governments in Tehran's ambit, they could have maintained silence over the issue and kept on bombing as long as they would have liked. I still believe Russians would continue using the safe Irani bases but form this day onward, the things will be done in complete hush.
 
Tu-22M3 had their inflight refueling probes removed per SALT agreement with the US. With a combat radius of 2410 km, it does not have the range to attack Syria from southern Russia. That is why Tu-22M3 use Iran base for refueling. They fly from southern Russia to Iran. Refuel. Then continue to Syria. Then land in Iran. Refuel. Return to southern Russia.

Su-34, of course, have inflight refueling and do not need to use Iran base for refueling on the way to attack Syria.

Thank Allah we have an Airforce of our own so we dont beg others for theirs.
Weaklings.


Saudi Arabia can't build planes. And don't matter how many times you pray to Allah. It ain't gonna work.
 

Back
Top Bottom