What's new

Iran Dumps Dollar in Foreign Oil Sales

Hasbara Buster

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
4,612
Reaction score
-7
Iran Dumps Dollar in Foreign Oil Sales

Iran has switched to euro in its foreign oil trade, in a bid to cut reliance on the US dollar. After the removal of sanctions, Tehran would also want to recover in euros some of its previously frozen assets.

Iran has turned away from the US dollar in oil trade and is denominating in euros all new and outstanding oil contracts with companies, including French oil and gas giant Total, Spanish refiner Cepsa and Litasco, the trading arm of Russia’s Lukoil, a source at National Iranian Oil Co told Reuters.

"In our invoices we mention a clause that buyers of our oil will have to pay in euros, considering the exchange rate versus the dollar around the time of delivery," the source said.

Lukoil and Total declined to comment, and Cepsa did not respond to a request to comment.

Iran has also told its trading partners who owe it billions of dollars that it wants to be paid in euros rather than US dollars.

The source explained that Iran’s central bank adopted a policy to carry out foreign trade in euros while the country was under sanctions.

"Iran shifted to the euro and cancelled trade in dollars because of political reasons," the source underscored.

Iran was allowed to recover some of the funds frozen under US sanctions in currencies other than dollars, including the Omani rial and UAE dirham.

According to US officials, nearly $100 billion of Iran’s assets were frozen abroad, and around 50 percent of them Tehran was able access after the removal of sanctions.

Sanctions against Iran were lifted on January 16, by both the US and the European Union. The move came amid oversupply in the global oil market, with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) refusing to cut down its daily output.

It is not clear how much of the funds are oil dues that Iran wants back in euros. For instance, India owes Tehran around $6 billion for oil supplied during the sanctions years.

"Ditching the dollar, Iran and India have agreed to settle all outstanding crude oil dues in rupees in preparation to future trade in their national currencies. The dollar dues […] would be deposited in National Iranian Oil Co account with Indian banks," The Indian Express recently reported.

For many years, Iran has pushed to replace dollar with euro in international oil trade. In 2007, Tehran failed to persuade OPEC to switch away from the US dollar which then-president President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called a "worthless piece of paper."

Switching oil sales to the euro makes sense for Iran since Europe is its major trade partner. In late January, The Wall Street Journal reported that Iran had agreed to lower price of its crude for Europe, following a similar move by Saudi Arabia. At the same time, Tehran increased crude prices for Asia.

Read more: http://sputniknews.com/business/20160206/1034326281/iran-oil-euro.html#ixzz3zPMHTaSv
 
Every country who are against US hegemony should follow such course. Iran has done a favour to India by accepting Indian Rupees as payment.
 
And so are Saddam and Qaddafi for similar moves. Iran needs to be careful.

America will be busy for another 5 years or so with ISIS. But after that they'll start looking for a target to attack. America never goes 10 years without a war.

If a republican gets into office all bets are off, they might decide to take on ISIS and Iran in one giant offensive. That's how crazy and hawkish some of those Republicans are (ie Ted Cruz, Trump).

Every country who are against US hegemony should follow such course. Iran has done a favour to India by accepting Indian Rupees as payment.

What's the alternative to US hegemony?

We've tried a multipolar world before (in world war 1, and world war 2 for example), it didn't work and the world was nearly destroyed because of it. We can't live in peace unless there's a superpower to hold everyone into line. As soon as there's no clear world leader countries start to fight each other trying to claim the superpower crown.

Sure American is not perfect, they're an empire trying to protect its own interests after all, but they have improved the living standards of billions across the globe and ushered in a period of relative peace.
 
What's the alternative to US hegemony?

We've tried a multipolar world before (in world war 1, and world war 2 for example), it didn't work and the world was nearly destroyed because of it. We can't live in peace unless there's a superpower to hold everyone into line. As soon as there's no clear world leader countries start to fight each other trying to claim the superpower crown.

Sure American is not perfect, they're an empire trying to protect its own interests after all, but they have improved the living standards of billions across the globe and ushered in a period of relative peace.

There are no more wars between major powers because of nuclear weapons, that's it.

Why do you think America runs away crying from North Korea, while they were happy to invade 3 non-nuclear countries in the past decade alone?

Their appetite for war suddenly diminishes when other people can fight back. :lol:
 
America will be busy for another 5 years or so with ISIS. But after that they'll start looking for a target to attack. America never goes 10 years without a war.

If a republican gets into office all bets are off, they might decide to take on ISIS and Iran in one giant offensive. That's how crazy and hawkish some of those Republicans are (ie Ted Cruz, Trump).



What's the alternative to US hegemony?

We've tried a multipolar world before (in world war 1, and world war 2 for example), it didn't work and the world was nearly destroyed because of it. We can't live in peace unless there's a superpower to hold everyone into line. As soon as there's no clear world leader countries start to fight each other trying to claim the superpower crown.

Sure American is not perfect, they're an empire trying to protect its own interests after all, but they have improved the living standards of billions across the globe and ushered in a period of relative peace.
On contrary they have unleashed a havoc on Middle East and South Asia. You do not realize the effect of US's foreign policy until you're at the receiving end.
 
On contrary they have unleashed a havoc on Middle East and South Asia. You do not realize the effect of US's foreign policy until you're at the receiving end.

The havoc we see in the Middle East is insignificant to what happens when you have great powers fighting each other in a multi polar world.

The last time we had a multi polar world the world was nearly destroyed in a nuclear holocaust.

Prior to that (WW2 era) 60 million died in a world war that could have been placed us all under the control of a tyrannical dictatorship that would make North Korea seem pleasant.

The Napoleonic era. Same story.

It goes on and on.

The records of history show us that having hegemony brings stability. As it did when Great Britain ruled the waves and as it does now with the US.

So sure US hegemony has a body count but it pales in comparison to the multi polar eras.
 
What's the alternative to US hegemony?

We've tried a multipolar world before (in world war 1, and world war 2 for example), it didn't work and the world was nearly destroyed because of it. We can't live in peace unless there's a superpower to hold everyone into line. As soon as there's no clear world leader countries start to fight each other trying to claim the superpower crown.

Sure American is not perfect, they're an empire trying to protect its own interests after all, but they have improved the living standards of billions across the globe and ushered in a period of relative peace.[/QUOTE]

Not peace in the middle east or Afghanistan where thousands upon thousands have died.
 
The havoc we see in the Middle East is insignificant to what happens when you have great powers fighting each other in a multi polar world.

The last time we had a multi polar world the world was nearly destroyed in a nuclear holocaust.

Prior to that (WW2 era) 60 million died in a world war that could have been placed us all under the control of a tyrannical dictatorship that would make North Korea seem pleasant.

The Napoleonic era. Same story.

It goes on and on.

The records of history show us that having hegemony brings stability. As it did when Great Britain ruled the waves and as it does now with the US.

So sure US hegemony has a body count but it pales in comparison to the multi polar eras.


Basically this.It's far from a perfect world with the US as a hegemon but it's the best we can get.The alternatives,(Russia,China as hegemons/a truly multipolar world) would be a horror story for humankind.
 

Back
Top Bottom