What's new

Infographic: How China Manipulates Its Currency

JayAtl

BANNED
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
8,812
Reaction score
-14
It is clever of the Chinese and actually really good for them to an extent , but it destroys every other countries economy they to trade with- yup including its fair weather friend Pakistan , where their ( Pak) traders have been increasingly vocal.

Here is a snapshot, via Google Finance, of the value of the Chinese RMB against the U.S. dollar. For a time before 2006, the exchange resembled a flat line. Ditto between 2008 and 2010. This is what a fixed exchange rate looks like.

China%20manipulates%20currency-thumb-590x185-46281.png


But how does China accomplish this, exactly? Jim Fallows explained the "voyage of a dollar" in five easy steps in a 2008 Atlantic article. I've translated that passage into an infographic. Jim's original passage appears below. I've inserted numbers to help you follow the picture.

how%20china%20controls-thumb-561x641-46292.png


1) Let's say you buy an Oral-B electric toothbrush for $30 at a CVS in the United States. I choose this example because I've seen a factory in China that probably made the toothbrush. Most of that $30 stays in America, with CVS, the distributors, and Oral-B itself. Eventually $3 or so--an average percentage for small consumer goods--makes its way back to southern China.

2) When the factory originally placed its bid for Oral-B's business, it stated the price in dollars: X million toothbrushes for Y dollars each. But the Chinese manufacturer can't use the dollars directly. It needs RMB--to pay the workers their 1,200-RMB ($160) monthly salary, to buy supplies from other factories in China, to pay its taxes. So it takes the dollars to the local commercial bank--let's say the Shenzhen Development Bank. After showing receipts or waybills to prove that it earned the dollars in genuine trade, not as speculative inflow, the factory trades them for RMB.

3) This is where the first controls kick in. In other major countries, the counterparts to the Shenzhen Development Bank can decide for themselves what to do with the dollars they take in. Trade them for euros or yen on the foreign-exchange market? Invest them directly in America? Issue dollar loans? Whatever they think will bring the highest return. But under China's "surrender requirements," Chinese banks can't do those things. They must treat the dollars, in effect, as contraband, and turn most or all of them (instructions vary from time to time) over to China's equivalent of the Federal Reserve Bank, the People's Bank of China, for RMB at whatever is the official rate of exchange.

With thousands of transactions per day, the dollars pile up like crazy at the PBOC. More precisely, by more than a billion dollars per day. They pile up even faster than the trade surplus with America would indicate, because customers in many other countries settle their accounts in dollars, too.

4) The PBOC must do something with that money, and current Chinese doctrine allows it only one option: to give the dollars to another arm of the central government, the State Administration for Foreign Exchange. It is then SAFE's job to figure out where to park the dollars for the best return: so much in U.S. stocks, so much shifted to euros, and the great majority left in the boring safety of U.S. Treasury notes.

5) And thus our dollar comes back home. Spent at CVS, passed to Oral-B, paid to the factory in southern China, traded for RMB at the Shenzhen bank, "surrendered" to the PBOC, passed to SAFE for investment, and then bid at auction for Treasury notes, it is ready to be reinjected into the U.S. money supply and spent again--ideally on Chinese-made goods.
 

You claimed that US govt had 'declared' China as a non-manipulator, in fact both your links have nothing of that sort.
All it says is this :
The Obama administration on Friday declined to cite China for manipulating its currency to gain trade advantages against the United States.
Further:
But like his predecessors, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner has tried to resolve the issue through diplomatic channels - criticizing Chinese policy and urging them to make changes without formally invoking U.S. law.
That means that refusal to cite is just letting China of the hook by not acting legally against them.

Also note:

In refusing to cite China, Treasury said Chinese President Hu Jintao had assured President Barack Obama during a visit to Washington last month that China would intensify its efforts to "further enhance exchange rate stability."

Thats clearly an admittance by Chinese govt to address currency manipulation using the euphemism "further enhance exchange rate stability".

How you are bandying about a report that contains nothing of the sort you are claiming, otoh is an acceptance of manipulation by China, is beyond me.

People like Bernard Madoff are the real manipulators.

Ol' Bernie was a Currency manipulator? Maybe in your fit of wall street bashing you have exchanged facts for fantasies.
 
Citing a source that reference the same source you originally posted does not make a consensus. Yahoo News is not a legitimate 'news' service. Anyway...The current US administration declined to cite China as a currency manipulator. That does not mean China is not such a currency manipulator by available evidences. Citing China as a currency manipulator would have political consequences in the US Congress and that is what this administration is trying to avoid.
 
Anyway...The current US administration declined to cite China as a currency manipulator. That does not mean China is not such a currency manipulator by available evidences. Citing China as a currency manipulator would have political consequences in the US Congress and that is what this administration is trying to avoid.

Sure. It is the same thing in the end. :azn:

America was the only real driving force behind this currency initiative, the G20 wanted nothing to do with it.

So if as you say, the US government is too worried about consequences to do anything about it... then the entire initiative is dead in the water.
 
The American Government has already declared that China is NOT a currency manipulator. :wave:

ask your english teacher to comprehend that article within the link you pass every time. It has been debunked as - the Chinese on PDF don't comprehend written English well!

Govt did not declare you are NOT manipulators, it said it chose not to CITE you as one before an important meeting.
 
Chine believes in stability.

During the Asian economic crises in 1997, China too firmly hold the Yuan stable against a very strong devaluation press from the market. The current deviation from some called 'equilibrium' is just the inertia of the history and bureaucracy in the Central Bank.

When the world finance crises bursted out 2 years ago China natually had more intention to hold a stable exchange rate environment.
 
Fed actually did the same thing by carrying out the "Quantitative Easing" to save the wall street but at the cost of world inflation. It is manipulation as well by your definition.
 
you cant even companre the two---Fed did a quick short injection vs. level of manupilation of China which it has continued to do years! ... and that small blip is nowjere close to a rightful adjustment.
 
I best if China supplied oil to the US it would be a different story. Ultimately the US screwed up and it did it big time, if a country sold you something cheap and invested in your economy it could be advantageous to the country if it used that competitive advantage to enhance their country further. During the good years the US should have invested in things like
1. Public Transportation
2. Compact housing
3. Work efficiencies

Instead it chooses to
1. Build more road for cars
2. Encourage crazy consumption (look at Wal Mart)
3. Let the banking sector go crazy
4. Continues support of inefficient unions

Now that the bubble has burst they start pointing fingers at China, the US public should really start to look at their own misguided politicians about what is going on.

The RMB should be pegged to the the weight of gold and then get the US to pay back in bullion. No more of this printing toilet paper nonsense
 
I believe a fair comment would be to say - Each country cares more about itself than others. China cares more about itself and so does America.
 

Back
Top Bottom