What's new

Indian Space Capabilities

Recent technical achievements of China (may,17)
Chinese anti-aircraft gun breaks, kills 4 Indonesian soldiers in military exercise.

Keep it up and please don't make baseless and stupid comments anymore.
Try not to spoil this thread, try to keep it clean.

You mean like this misfiring?
http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/0...ers-feared-injured-during-misfiri_a_22109570/

Malfunction of ordnance leading to casualties isn't new for the Indian Army.

At least 16 soldiers including officers and members of the Defence Security Corps died when a fire broke out Central Ordnance Depot at Pulgaon in Maharashtra last July. Inquiries later showed that faulty anti-tank mines stored in the depot had caused the fire

http://sploid.gizmodo.com/russian-anti-aircraft-gun-malfunctions-almost-killing-e-1537110764

The same Tunguska you are using.
 
Recent technical achievements of China (may,17)
Chinese anti-aircraft gun breaks, kills 4 Indonesian soldiers in military exercise.

Keep it up and please don't make baseless and stupid comments anymore.
Try not to spoil this thread, try to keep it clean.

are you talking to me?
 
@ranadd
I'm not exactly pointing you.
I only want to people get away from comparing cities on the basis of their buildings. Just like a fool from somewhere else is doing here.

You mean like this misfiring?
1st. That's not what we can call a misfire, its actually a Malfunction and it usually occurred due to bad manufacturing quality.

2nd You guys are in too much hurry for replying without reading the whole content of the message.

In my last comment, I request you , Not to spoil this thread by sharing off-Topic and more stupid facts just to defend your scrap.
 
China is around 10 years ahead of India in almost all economical & technical achievements. So....
Loos like you forgot to add a zero or maybe two:haha:

After visiting Chennai, Mumbai and Bangalore, I think it's more like 25 years.
Judging by current development, in 25 years there might not even be an India. Just bunch of small poor third world countries fighting with each other instead.
 
DID YOU KNOW ?
The upper cryogenic stage of GSLV Mk-III is much more powerful than that of ESA's heavy lift Ariane 5 and Chinese Long March 3B.
18953558_1457592820985435_4677823948956086312_o.jpg
 
http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/sc...ro-chairman/article18957145.ece?homepage=true

‘We need to build capacities in the organisation and the country,’ says A.S. Kiran Kumar
For space-faring nations, a launch vehicle — such as the all-Indian GSLV-MarkIII that was first flown on June 5 — is a vital tool for placing spacecraft in the sky. For India, the MkIII can lift four-tonne satellites with double the power of the older MkII rocket.

In a short exchange over the phone, A.S. Kiran Kumar, Chairman, Indian Space Research Organisation, explains what the new big rocket’s success means and what lies next. Edited excerpts:

How important for you has been the maiden success of your new launcher, GSLV MkIII? Could you please explain it beyond its four-tonne-lifting power?
It is indeed a very significant development in the Indian space programme. It gives us a big push. We were short of this capacity for lifting our communication satellites. We had to go outside for our launches; and because of [the launch schedules of foreign space agencies] the pace at which we did our projects was getting affected. Cost was another deterrent for pushing things aggressively.

By achieving MkIII, we will be able to push confidently and launch many of our communication satellites faster and indigenously. We will do one more launch within a year and establish it systematically.

The cost benefit ?
I cannot give you the exact figures as they keep changing. But just to give you the example of last year’s INSAT-3DR, we were able to do both the satellite and launch it here for the cost of an earlier foreign launch.


What would be next in your launcher-related activities? What is their status, schedule and the funds they need?
First we need to consolidate the developments. Our immediate and main task remains how to streamline the realisation of our three launch vehicles PSLV, GSLV-MkII [two-tonne lifter] and the new GSLV-MkIII, sustain them and ensure the number of launchers we need to put the satellites in orbit. For MkII, our target is to do two launches a year. As it is, building its supply chain, managing it and ensuring the required supplies for it are all an effort. To that we will be adding the requirements for MkIII.

On the launch technology side, we will be looking at how to reduce the cost further — by adopting new mechanisms, materials and new capabilities. Including the reusable launch vehicle concept.


You mentioned reusable technology to save costs. Where are we in that?
Last year, we tried out the RLV-TD experiment [Reusable Launch Vehicle Technology Demonstrator]. We got a small, plane-like model to vertically land on water. Next we will look at landing it on the ground with a landing gear system. We are conceiving systems to work on the air breathing propulsion technology that will use atmospheric oxygen. For the present launch vehicles, we will look at recovering [and reusing] some parts.

What is essential today for ISRO?
To build capacities within the organisation and the country to meet the demands.

We have a significant shortage of satellites in space. If we have to roughly double the capacity of the spacecraft, we have to do as many launches and cost effectively. That is the prime driver.

Also, it is essential for a space agency to build new capabilities, constantly get new skills to do complex jobs and to do routine things better.
 
DID YOU KNOW ?
The upper cryogenic stage of GSLV Mk-III is much more powerful than that of ESA's heavy lift Ariane 5 and Chinese Long March 3B.
I am sure it's true since Ariane is launching the next few GSATs and China is launching 14 tonnes to GTO.
 
I am sure it's true since Ariane is launching the next few GSATs and China is launching 14 tonnes to GTO.
both the Ariane 5 and long march 3b can put heavier payloads into orbit than GSLV Mk-III, that said GSLV Mk-III is within ballpark and perfectly suitable, with further testing and more launches to ensure safety, to be a manned rated launcher.
 
both the Ariane 5 and long march 3b can put heavier payloads into orbit than GSLV Mk-III, that said GSLV Mk-III is within ballpark and perfectly suitable, with further testing and more launches to ensure safety, to be a manned rated launcher.
Both Ariane 5 and LM 3B have achieved their full potential. The MK3 is a new rockets and hasnt achieved its full potential yet. Once the Semi-cryogenic engine is operational its LEO capacity will go upto 15 t.
 
Long March 3b has GTO Capacity of 5.5 Tons.
Don't pretend to be a literate dumb person
Why are you comparing to LM-3B? LM-5 is 14 tonnes, why are you afraid of the number? LOL.

Both Ariane 5 and LM 3B have achieved their full potential. The MK3 is a new rockets and hasnt achieved its full potential yet. Once the Semi-cryogenic engine is operational its LEO capacity will go upto 15 t.
Full potential, ISRO don't even dare to launch at 4 tonnes for this first launch. Why? Your next 3 tonnes plus is still gonna be launched by Ariane. LOL
 
What about copying Russian cryo engines, and paying for 'consultancy'?

We don't have the habit of copy past formula unlike our Chinese counterparts. So endorsing copyright and intellectual property law's or speaking about abiding by them is nothing but pure hypocrisy. Don't make your fool out of yourself anymore than you have already!
 
We don't have the habit of copy past formula unlike our Chinese counterparts. So endorsing copyright and intellectual property law's or speaking about abiding by them is nothing but pure hypocrisy. Don't make your fool out of yourself anymore than you have already!
Nah, you don't copy, you buy direct and then try to copy, when you fail, you pay money for Russian 'consultancy'. Such competence!
 
Long March 3b has GTO Capacity of 5.5 Tons.
Don't pretend to be a literate dumb person

He is just hyping the figure by 3 times let him enjoy.

Full potential, ISRO don't even dare to launch at 4 tonnes for this first launch. Why? Your next 3 tonnes plus is still gonna be launched by Ariane. LOL

See you dumb, Satellite was not made to match the capacity of Launcher but launcher launch a satellite much lighter that what it can actually carry. We had said that GSLV MKII had 2 ton capacity but the last satellite we launched wa 2238 KB of weight. All our space launch vehicle can actually carry much havier payload than what is advertised. Our GSLV MK III can easily carry 4.5 ton at this stage and later on it will carry over 5 ton when we optimize current vehicle. When we shall use semi cryo, the figure shall jump anywhere between 8 to 10 tons in next 3 to 4 years.
 
Back
Top Bottom