(Indian) Man pleads guilty to threatening to kill Queen Elizabeth II in 2021

[khansaheeb]

Indian media and Zion poodles very quite about this:-

Man pleads guilty to threatening to kill Queen Elizabeth II in 2021 | CNN

A British man has pleaded guilty to threatening to assassinate the late Queen Elizabeth II on Christmas Day 2021, police have said.

www.cnn.com

Man pleads guilty to threatening to kill Queen Elizabeth II in 2021​

By Charlotte Banks, CNN
Published 9:15 AM EST, Fri February 3, 2023

The man was spotted on Christmas Day 2021 wearing black clothes and a metal mask within the grounds of Windsor Castle, seen here in February 2022.
Justin Tallis/AFP/Getty Images
LondonCNN —
A British man has pleaded guilty to threatening to assassinate the late Queen Elizabeth II on Christmas Day 2021, police have said.
Jaswant Singh Chail, 21, pleaded guilty to three charges, including treason and possession of an offensive weapon, at a hearing at London’s Old Bailey court on Friday following an investigation by the London Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command.
Two officers spotted Chail within the grounds of Windsor Castle, where the Queen was staying at the time, at around 8:10 a.m. on December 25, 2021, wearing black clothes and a metal mask, according to a statement issued by the police force.
Chail, who appeared at the trial via videolink from Broadmoor high-security psychiatric hospital, was carrying a crossbow “loaded with a bolt, with the safety catch off and ready to fire.” He told a police protection officer, “I am here to kill the Queen,” before being arrested, the UK’s PA Media news agency reported.

This undated photo, released by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) on February 3, shows the crossbow that Chail was carrying when he was arrested.
Crown Prosecution Service/AP
Chail was thought to have scaled the perimeter of the grounds with a nylon rope ladder beforehand.
He is understood to have sent a video to about 20 people “claiming he was going to attempt to assassinate the Queen.”
Chail was charged with the offenses on August 2, 2022 and is due to be sentenced at the Old Bailey on March 31, according to the Metropolitan Police statement.
London Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command Commander Richard Smith said “this was an extremely serious incident.”

The mask which Chail wearing when he was caught in the grounds of Windsor Castle, in a photo released by the CPS on Friday.
Crown Prosecution Service/AP
The police statement went on to say that prosecutors alleged Chail “harbored ill-feeling towards the British Empire for its past treatment of Indian people.”
Detectives found via surveillance video that Chail had also traveled to Windsor Castle two days before the incident on December 23, it added.
He had previously applied to join the Ministry of Defense Police and the Grenadier Guards to get close to the royal family, PA Media reported.

He has been charged with treason and rightly so.

 

[FuturePAF]

Was he born in the UK or came to the UK as a child vs. did he come to the UK as an adult with these beliefs with him?

 

[Maula Jatt]

That man's a hero, he should be celebrated

He wanted revenge for jalliwnwalla massacre

 

[INS_Vikrant]

She had nothing to do with Jalianwala Baug massacre, she wasn't even born then. Guy was insane.

 

[khansaheeb]

Was he born in the UK or came to the UK as a child vs. did he come to the UK as an adult with these beliefs with him?

OK he is of Indian descent.

Meanwhile instead of looking into Indian and Hindutva terrorism the Indian descent controlled government focus to provoke Muslims more :-


https://www.ft.com/content/4cf00e98-92bb-4820-8ac7-4e4c44251481

Suella Braverman pledges ‘major reform’ of UK counter-radicalisation scheme Too much focus on rightwing ideology rather than Islamist extremism, review says Suella Braverman has promised to adopt the review’s 34 recommendations © UK Home Office Suella Braverman pledges ‘major reform’ of UK counter-radicalisation scheme on twitter (opens in a new window) Suella Braverman pledges ‘major reform’ of UK counter-radicalisation scheme on facebook (opens in a new window) Suella Braverman pledges ‘major reform’ of UK counter-radicalisation scheme on linkedin (opens in a new window) Save current progress 98% William Wallis in Lewes FEBRUARY 8 2023 Print this page Receive free Terrorism in UK updates We’ll send you a myFT Daily Digest email rounding up the latest Terrorism in UK news every morning. Suella Braverman, the home secretary, has said she will shake up the UK’s anti-radicalisation policy, called Prevent, after a review found it was “out of kilter” with the counter-terrorism system and too focused on ideology of the extreme right. Following publication of the independent review on Wednesday, Braverman said she would adopt its 34 recommendations “wholeheartedly”, promising “major reform” to “better understand the threats we face and the ideology underpinning them”. The report’s author, William Shawcross, a journalist and commissioner for public appointments, commended the counter-radicalisation programme for saving lives. But he criticised what he called its “double standards when dealing with rightwing extremism and Islamism”, calling for the restoration of its “overarching objective: to stop individuals from becoming terrorists”. He also took aim at what he said was funding towards civil society organisations who were themselves promoting extremist narratives and caricaturing the counter-radicalisation programme as discriminatory against Muslims. “Prevent takes an expansive approach to the extreme rightwing, capturing a variety of influences that, at times, has been so broad it has included mildly controversial or provocative forms of mainstream, rightwing leaning commentary,” he said. By contrast, “with Islamism, Prevent tends to take a much narrower approach centred around proscribed organisations, ignoring the contribution of non-violent Islamist narratives and networks to terrorism”, he wrote. The Prevent strategy was launched after the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the US and 2005 bombings in London, in an effort to both educate communities at risk of radicalisation and to avert future terrorist acts. The policy makes it a statutory duty for schools, local authorities, prisons and NHS trusts to report any concerns about individuals potentially under the influence of extremist ideologies. To underline his points, Shawcross cited figures from 2020-21, when 46 per cent of 688 cases that referred to the “channel” part of the Prevent programme, which handles individual cases, were the result of concerns about extreme rightwing radicalisation. About 22 per cent related to Islamist extremism. By contrast, he wrote “80 per cent of the counter-terrorism police network’s live investigations are Islamist while 10 per cent are extreme rightwing”. Shawcross’s findings were criticised by rights groups, 17 of which joined many UK Muslim associations in boycotting the report after it was set up. The review was launched in 2021 in a bid to address resentment of the programme, which was undermining its legitimacy particularly among Muslim groups. However, the appointment of Shawcross, formerly head of the Charity ommission, to lead the review inflamed tensions. Ilyas Nagdee, Amnesty International’s racial justice director, said on Wednesday the review had no legitimacy and that Shawcross’s history of “comments on Muslims and Islam” should have precluded his involvement. It was “riddled with biased thinking, errors and plain anti-Muslim prejudice”, he said, adding that it had passed over the “disastrous” consequences Prevent was having for freedom of expression, activism and civil rights. “A proper independent review of Prevent should have looked at the host of human rights violations that the programme has led to — but these have largely been passed over in silence.” Detective chief superintendent Maria Lovegrove, counter-terrorism policing’s national co-ordinator for Prevent, welcomed the report’s recognition of the work of the programme in reducing the risk of violent extremism. “We will now work alongside the Home Office to respond to the recommendations, and continue our contribution to the government’s . . . strategy,” she said.

 

[Redbeanpaste]

Wonder if Charlie hired him ?

 

[Imran Khan]

 

[FuturePAF]

OK he is of Indian descent.

Meanwhile instead of looking into Indian and Hindutva terrorism the Indian descent controlled government focus to provoke Muslims more :-


https://www.ft.com/content/4cf00e98-92bb-4820-8ac7-4e4c44251481

Suella Braverman pledges ‘major reform’ of UK counter-radicalisation scheme Too much focus on rightwing ideology rather than Islamist extremism, review says Suella Braverman has promised to adopt the review’s 34 recommendations © UK Home Office Suella Braverman pledges ‘major reform’ of UK counter-radicalisation scheme on twitter (opens in a new window) Suella Braverman pledges ‘major reform’ of UK counter-radicalisation scheme on facebook (opens in a new window) Suella Braverman pledges ‘major reform’ of UK counter-radicalisation scheme on linkedin (opens in a new window) Save current progress 98% William Wallis in Lewes FEBRUARY 8 2023 Print this page Receive free Terrorism in UK updates We’ll send you a myFT Daily Digest email rounding up the latest Terrorism in UK news every morning. Suella Braverman, the home secretary, has said she will shake up the UK’s anti-radicalisation policy, called Prevent, after a review found it was “out of kilter” with the counter-terrorism system and too focused on ideology of the extreme right. Following publication of the independent review on Wednesday, Braverman said she would adopt its 34 recommendations “wholeheartedly”, promising “major reform” to “better understand the threats we face and the ideology underpinning them”. The report’s author, William Shawcross, a journalist and commissioner for public appointments, commended the counter-radicalisation programme for saving lives. But he criticised what he called its “double standards when dealing with rightwing extremism and Islamism”, calling for the restoration of its “overarching objective: to stop individuals from becoming terrorists”. He also took aim at what he said was funding towards civil society organisations who were themselves promoting extremist narratives and caricaturing the counter-radicalisation programme as discriminatory against Muslims. “Prevent takes an expansive approach to the extreme rightwing, capturing a variety of influences that, at times, has been so broad it has included mildly controversial or provocative forms of mainstream, rightwing leaning commentary,” he said. By contrast, “with Islamism, Prevent tends to take a much narrower approach centred around proscribed organisations, ignoring the contribution of non-violent Islamist narratives and networks to terrorism”, he wrote. The Prevent strategy was launched after the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the US and 2005 bombings in London, in an effort to both educate communities at risk of radicalisation and to avert future terrorist acts. The policy makes it a statutory duty for schools, local authorities, prisons and NHS trusts to report any concerns about individuals potentially under the influence of extremist ideologies. To underline his points, Shawcross cited figures from 2020-21, when 46 per cent of 688 cases that referred to the “channel” part of the Prevent programme, which handles individual cases, were the result of concerns about extreme rightwing radicalisation. About 22 per cent related to Islamist extremism. By contrast, he wrote “80 per cent of the counter-terrorism police network’s live investigations are Islamist while 10 per cent are extreme rightwing”. Shawcross’s findings were criticised by rights groups, 17 of which joined many UK Muslim associations in boycotting the report after it was set up. The review was launched in 2021 in a bid to address resentment of the programme, which was undermining its legitimacy particularly among Muslim groups. However, the appointment of Shawcross, formerly head of the Charity ommission, to lead the review inflamed tensions. Ilyas Nagdee, Amnesty International’s racial justice director, said on Wednesday the review had no legitimacy and that Shawcross’s history of “comments on Muslims and Islam” should have precluded his involvement. It was “riddled with biased thinking, errors and plain anti-Muslim prejudice”, he said, adding that it had passed over the “disastrous” consequences Prevent was having for freedom of expression, activism and civil rights. “A proper independent review of Prevent should have looked at the host of human rights violations that the programme has led to — but these have largely been passed over in silence.” Detective chief superintendent Maria Lovegrove, counter-terrorism policing’s national co-ordinator for Prevent, welcomed the report’s recognition of the work of the programme in reducing the risk of violent extremism. “We will now work alongside the Home Office to respond to the recommendations, and continue our contribution to the government’s . . . strategy,” she said.

This is what needs to be looked at. It’s basically Islamophobia industrial complex trying to continue. Muslims need to organize and challenge this at each and every step, globally. One lone ethnically Indian origin nut is a job for the police.