What's new

Indian General Elections - 2014

Whom will you Vote for in 2014 General Elections??


  • Total voters
    129
12400.jpg
 
Without BJP Nitish Kumar can not make a gov at home.

Bihar Assembly Election 2010 Data | TwoCircles.net

Never seen such a thorough data anywhere.

Great analysis. the numbers in both Bihar and Gujarat show that Muslims are not averse to BJP. BJP's strike rate in Muslim majority constituency is impressive.

If only the "Secular" indian Media realises this thing and stops their hate NaMO campaign
 
Govt vetted coal scam report, CBI will tell Supreme Court - Indian Express

The UPA government could be in for some major embarrassment in the coal blocks allotment scandal as the CBI is learnt to be inclined to inform the Supreme Court that the controversial probe status report it submitted last month had been vetted by Law Minister Ashwani Kumar and Prime Minister's Office officials.

Sources told The Indian Express that senior CBI officials, including director Ranjit Sinha, were summoned by Kumar days before the status report was filed.

During the lengthy meeting, also attended by some officials of the law ministry, several amendments in the status report were suggested and some also incorporated by the CBI.

"We resisted as much as we could, but yes, some toning down was done following the meeting," a CBI officer present at the meeting in Shastri Bhavan said.

Sources also told The Indian Express that the CBI's status report was similarly "vetted'' by senior PMO officials. During that meeting, a team of CBI officers, which did not include Sinha, was present although it is not clear whether more changes were made in the report at this meeting.

The CBI's stand in the report, submitted to the apex court on March 8, differs from that of the government. The report pointed out irregularities in coal blocks allotment made in 2006-09 during UPA-1, and said it was done without verifying the credentials of companies which allegedly misrepresented facts about themselves.

The government had refuted the CBI's findings in the court on March 12, with Attorney General G E Vahanvati saying the CBI could not be the "final word" on it.

But in an unprecedented move, the Supreme Court had asked Sinha to clarify through an affidavit if the status report had been examined by the government as Vahanvati, when asked, told the court he had not gone through the report.
---------


shame shame corrupt congress....openly interfering in the enquiry process and watering down the charges.......but dont worry...they give us secularism.....:hitwall:
 
JD(U) opposes Modi as PM, rules out tie-up with Congress

NEW DELHI: Citing his failure to check the post-Godhra riots, NDA constituent JD(U) on Saturday made clear its opposition to Narendra Modi's projection as prime ministerial candidate but ruled out the possibility of aligning with "enemy" Congress at the cost of "friend" BJP.

Taking stock of the political scenario in the country against the growing clamour in the BJP for pitting Modi as the prime ministerial candidate, the JD(U) executive, which met here, criticised the chief minister saying that he "failed in discharging his duties as the head of the state to check communal riots in Gujarat in 2002".

While JD(U) leaders have made public statements expressing their antipathy to Modi, this is the first time the party has made its position formally clear through a conclave - the national executive meeting.

Amid speculation over Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar also being in the prime ministerial race, party spokesperson K C Tyagi said emphatically said thrice "Nitish Kumar is not a PM candidate."

While making it clear that it was opposed to Modi's projection as the prime ministerial candidate, JD(U), however, said it will not set any deadline for the BJP to decide on who would be its prime ministerial face.

Responding to a volley of questions on whether JD(U) will oppose Modi's projection in the BJP for the top job, Tyagi, "as long as the Parliamentary Board of the BJP does not categorically say who is its prime ministerial candidate, why should we talk about it."

But in an apparent scaling down of its rhetoric, the party dismissed contentions of fixing any timeline for BJP to declare its prime ministerial candidate before next Lok Sabha elections but felt "it will be good" if the major ally in the NDA chose to do it as "they had done it earlier also".

To a question whether any leader said in the meeting that JD(U) should snap ties with the BJP if Modi is projected, Tyagi said, "No, nobody said any such thing."

At the same time, he said there was no dilution of its views on the issue and the party maintains the same stand.

He also gave enough indications that JD(U) does not have reservations against any other BJP leader including L K Advani. "We have earlier also fought elections under the leadership of L K Advani. So how can we say now that it was wrong," was his refrain.

On the possibility of any tie-up with the Congress in future, Tyagi said, "Congress is an enemy party. There is no such possibility (of joining hands with Congress). Neither did this possibility exist earlier nor does it now, not even remotely."

Responding to questions about JD(U) either joining hands with Congress before Lok Sabha election or forming a government with its support, Tyagi said, "Our experience of forming government with the help of Congress has been bad. God save us from them".

Alluding to the 1984 anti-Sikh riots after assassination of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, Tyagi said that the Congress has no right to raise the issue of 'Rajdharma' of Modi vis a vis Gujarat riots because "the same mass killings happened in Delhi at that time."

"Why will we ally with Congress. Ours is an alliance with BJP for a long time. Congress is not a friendly party to us," he said.

Tyagi also had a dig at Congress' "dynastic" politics saying "it is a decided fact in Congress for last 50 years that only a member of the (Gandhi) family will become the Prime Minister".

Congress was apparently hopeful of JD(U) switching sides after the recent overtures of Nitish Kumar praising the central government's steps to facilitate special status to Bihar. Tyagi, however, made it clear that this was the "right" of the state.

Affirming JD(U)'s "commitment to secularism" at the same time, he reminded that it was a government of erstwhile Janta Dal in Bihar, which had arrested L K Advani, when the latter had carried out a Rath Yatra and as a result lost the government headed by V P Singh at the Centre in 1990.

He also dismissed reports that JD(U) has given a timeline of six months to the BJP to make up its mind on its prime ministerial candidate, asking "Have you you ever given such a six-month deadline to your friend, which you want us to do our friend".

Proclaiming "love" for "friend" BJP, Tyagi recalled the old association between the two parties saying when the first NDA government was formed in 1998, signatories to its Common Minimum Programme included Atal Behari Vajpayee, Sharad Yadav, George Fernandes and Nitish Kumar.

Fernandes and Kumar were then in the Samta Party.

The government had been formed then only when BJP decided to drop its three contentious issues of Ram Temple, abrogation of Article 370 and its demand for Uniform Civil Code, Tyagi said, stressing that "JD(U) is a secular party. It will not do any such work, which affects its secular image."

He also rejected suggestions that JD-U has forgotten its earlier anti-Modi stance, saying "the agenda of the meeting today is not Modi."

Tyagi also downplayed BJP's remarks holding Modi as "secular" and said, "He (Modi) is their party's Chief Minister. They should be saying it."

He, however, significantly added, "being popular is a different thing and becoming Prime Minister is another," when pointed out that the BJP chief Rajnath Singh's remarks that Modi is the most of popular leader in the party.

JD(U) opposes Modi as PM, rules out tie-up with Congress - The Times of India

__________________________________________________________________________________
Good Riddance for NDA? One pseudo secular out of fold, perhaps there now is less complication for NDA to generate consensus on Modi.
 
I proposed in a different thread to put forward our choices for Cabinet minsters we wish to see on improtant portfolios like Finance, Home, Defence, Foreign affairs, telecom, HRD. We can start by proposing a name, his/her credentials and why we think the person suits the post the most.

@ arp2041 @samantk @Dillinger @kurup @Koovie @Joe Shearer @Ayush @Bang Galore @JanjaWeed @ Rangila @ krait
Modi PM
Sushma Swaraj Deputy PM and home
( these two can be interchanged based on number of seats BJP gets. If more than 180 then Modi as PM between 150 -180 Sushma as PM)
Arun Jaitely law
Yashwant Sinha Finance
Jaswant Singh External Affairs
Rajnath Singh defence
 

Back
Top Bottom