Or let's say.... IK's 100 days were not that exciting.... Let us do another Mumbai or Uri.... and oh yeah let us creative a narrative. before..... lol....
post is from Pakistani perspective.
I was aware of this response from you while I wrote down this piece but I didnt add possible Indian response or counter argument because I am talking from Pakistani side.
if god forbid such terror attack does happen that claims many innocent Indian lives then whether or not its staged or real wont change anything for the victims and their families.
using your response I would further add another complexity and difficulty for Pakistan.
the terror attack happens and India rejects Pakistani clarification/ condemnation or allegation (of false flag) stating that Pakistan already planned the attack together with the suggestion of false flag to get heat off itself.
terror attack has happened. India has blamed Pakistan immediately as the stories hit the mainstream media. India has already rejected the false flag suggestion in its initial reaction.
so I ask again.. from Pakistani point of view.
now what?
That's a misconception, igniting Pakistan issue do not win voters. Anti Pak rhetoric may have some effects in Jammu and Ladakh regions, but the Hindi belt largely ignores how deals with Pakistan goes given both Congress and BJP have a similar way of dealing with Pakistan. For Pakistan, history suggests Congress wasn't any good for the relation, they are very slow in decision making and execution.
India never staged a false terror attack. But terror attacks in India had clear links to Pakistan based organizations. JuD is just a front, the real ones are LeT, which operate with impunity in Pakistan. The sooner Pakistani establishment drop them and arrest their leaders the better for India and Pakistan. Also, India cannot push the US into doing anything. The US will have intelligence information on attacks, like the case of Mumbai, they didn't share enough information with us because of their own interests.
If the US ever sanction Pakistan for a terror attack, then it will be backed by ample proof. Not based on the narrative pushed by India. And if India ever do a false flag attack, it'll be thoroughly investigated we are not a military state and our intelligence agencies and police do not owe each other anything are largely independent bodies. That's why fake encounter of Ishrat Jahan, otoh she was a terrorist, was independently investigated and perpetuators were arrested.
thanks for your opinion. it pretty much end s the discussion if you pre decide that what your government feeds you is always right and you must reject Pakistan because its your enemy then it doesn't matter really if its a phony or a real terror attack.
the reason for writing this peace is simple that we have seen a symmetry in the action by Indians whenever the approval ratings are not going the ruling party way. LoC firing intensifies and so does the warmongering against Pakistan.
whether or not it affects the voting pattern of the Indian voter is debatable but the recent voting outcomes in the Indian states has stirred up this debate.
POPULATION... biggest problem... you cannot generate government jobs at the same pace as the population growth rate in India...
QUALITY OF EDUCATION... 2nd problem...
I have seen several people with MBA degree who can't give their intro properly... and score 8+ CGPA...
your entire analysis is based upon TV SHOWS... MUDRA LOANS did help in establishing and expanding businesses...
thanks for your post. tv shows a starting point (I should let him speak for himself) but then you check out news items publications and tabloids to check out what is the hot topic.
on side notes:
Diversions and false flags etc are often used by the governments from east to west to hide short comings or bury other bad news (that affect them negatively) under the rug. hence this controversial piece was written with the what if premise.
The probability of a miscalculation leading to a war has increased significantly. The other issue is to keep in mind is Modi's personality. He is a total antithesis of Imran Khan and he has a need to compensate for his personal insecurities.
this can be exploited by his military and intelligence leadership.
a weak leader is dangerous as it encourages other opportunists and lunatics who suggest outrageous actions to compensate for such insecurities and failures