What's new

India to suspend Indus water talks with Pak

Indika

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2015
Messages
3,327
Reaction score
-10
Country
India
Location
India
cold start, first shot?

India to suspend Indus water talks with Pak

NEW DELHI, September 27, 2016, DHNS
Govt to speed up hydroelectric, irrigation projects

572666_thump.jpg

India on Monday decided not to hold a meeting of the Permanent Indus Commission (PIC) with Pakistan as long as the neighbouring country does not stop exporting terror.

With New Delhi stepping up pressure on Islamabad in the wake of the Uri attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi chaired a meeting to review the 1960 Indus Water Treaty (IWT), which set up the Permanent Indus Commission to discuss issues related to the sharing of waters of cross-border rivers and manage implementation of the pact.

New Delhi also decided to speed up hydroelectricity and irrigation projects to reap full advantage of the rights accorded to India by the treaty on the rivers flowing into Pakistan.

The Uri attack triggered calls in the government and political circles to abrogate the bilateral Indus Water Treaty as a strong response to the neighbouring country’s policy of supporting cross-border terrorism. The meeting did not result in any decision on abrogating the treaty, but signalled that New Delhi is toughening its stand.

The sources quoted the prime minister as saying that “blood and water cannot flow together”. Modi, according to sources, also observed that India could go for the next meeting of the commission only when the “atmosphere” would be “free of terror”.

The government decided to constitute an inter-ministerial task force to review how India has utilised its rights over the last 60 years, and also decided to review the voluntary suspension of the Tulbul Navigation Project (Wullar Barrage), effected in 1987, after Islamabad raised objections. The PIC meets at least once a year or as and when either India or Pakistan proposes a meeting. The panel has met 112 times in the last six decades.

In the last meeting held in New Delhi in July, Pakistan’s commissioner threatened to seek arbitration by an international court if India did not alter the design of the 330 MW Kishanganga hydropower project on the Jhelum and the 850 MW Ratle hydropower project on the Chenab. Pakistan had in 2010 sought international arbitration to resolve the Kishanganga project dispute, but the Court of Arbitration based in The Hague ruled in India’s favour.

Signed on September 9, 1960, the IWT grants control over the three eastern rivers of Beas, Ravi and Sutlej to India, while Pakistan has control over the three western rivers of Indus, Chenab and Jhelum. India, however, was given the right to use 20% of waters of the western rivers despite being under the control of Pakistan.

Though India can generate as much as 18,600 MW of electricity from the western rivers, it has installed projects with a total capacity of just 3,034 MW. The projects, which are at present in different stages, will have a total capacity of 2,526 MW.
 
cold start, first shot?

India to suspend Indus water talks with Pak

NEW DELHI, September 27, 2016, DHNS
Govt to speed up hydroelectric, irrigation projects

572666_thump.jpg

India on Monday decided not to hold a meeting of the Permanent Indus Commission (PIC) with Pakistan as long as the neighbouring country does not stop exporting terror.

With New Delhi stepping up pressure on Islamabad in the wake of the Uri attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi chaired a meeting to review the 1960 Indus Water Treaty (IWT), which set up the Permanent Indus Commission to discuss issues related to the sharing of waters of cross-border rivers and manage implementation of the pact.

New Delhi also decided to speed up hydroelectricity and irrigation projects to reap full advantage of the rights accorded to India by the treaty on the rivers flowing into Pakistan.

The Uri attack triggered calls in the government and political circles to abrogate the bilateral Indus Water Treaty as a strong response to the neighbouring country’s policy of supporting cross-border terrorism. The meeting did not result in any decision on abrogating the treaty, but signalled that New Delhi is toughening its stand.

The sources quoted the prime minister as saying that “blood and water cannot flow together”. Modi, according to sources, also observed that India could go for the next meeting of the commission only when the “atmosphere” would be “free of terror”.

The government decided to constitute an inter-ministerial task force to review how India has utilised its rights over the last 60 years, and also decided to review the voluntary suspension of the Tulbul Navigation Project (Wullar Barrage), effected in 1987, after Islamabad raised objections. The PIC meets at least once a year or as and when either India or Pakistan proposes a meeting. The panel has met 112 times in the last six decades.

In the last meeting held in New Delhi in July, Pakistan’s commissioner threatened to seek arbitration by an international court if India did not alter the design of the 330 MW Kishanganga hydropower project on the Jhelum and the 850 MW Ratle hydropower project on the Chenab. Pakistan had in 2010 sought international arbitration to resolve the Kishanganga project dispute, but the Court of Arbitration based in The Hague ruled in India’s favour.

Signed on September 9, 1960, the IWT grants control over the three eastern rivers of Beas, Ravi and Sutlej to India, while Pakistan has control over the three western rivers of Indus, Chenab and Jhelum. India, however, was given the right to use 20% of waters of the western rivers despite being under the control of Pakistan.

Though India can generate as much as 18,600 MW of electricity from the western rivers, it has installed projects with a total capacity of just 3,034 MW. The projects, which are at present in different stages, will have a total capacity of 2,526 MW.
Bhai article ki link add kar do
 
Excellent step.

India should keep the IWT intact but refrain from any discussions until Pakistan it mends its adversary policy towards India.
 
These idiots do realize, by "stopping" water to Pakistan - they will flood IoK and Himachal Pradesh. If that wasn't the case, they would've stopped it a long time ago.
 
cold start, first shot?

India to suspend Indus water talks with Pak

NEW DELHI, September 27, 2016, DHNS
Govt to speed up hydroelectric, irrigation projects

572666_thump.jpg

India on Monday decided not to hold a meeting of the Permanent Indus Commission (PIC) with Pakistan as long as the neighbouring country does not stop exporting terror.

With New Delhi stepping up pressure on Islamabad in the wake of the Uri attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi chaired a meeting to review the 1960 Indus Water Treaty (IWT), which set up the Permanent Indus Commission to discuss issues related to the sharing of waters of cross-border rivers and manage implementation of the pact.

New Delhi also decided to speed up hydroelectricity and irrigation projects to reap full advantage of the rights accorded to India by the treaty on the rivers flowing into Pakistan.

The Uri attack triggered calls in the government and political circles to abrogate the bilateral Indus Water Treaty as a strong response to the neighbouring country’s policy of supporting cross-border terrorism. The meeting did not result in any decision on abrogating the treaty, but signalled that New Delhi is toughening its stand.

The sources quoted the prime minister as saying that “blood and water cannot flow together”. Modi, according to sources, also observed that India could go for the next meeting of the commission only when the “atmosphere” would be “free of terror”.

The government decided to constitute an inter-ministerial task force to review how India has utilised its rights over the last 60 years, and also decided to review the voluntary suspension of the Tulbul Navigation Project (Wullar Barrage), effected in 1987, after Islamabad raised objections. The PIC meets at least once a year or as and when either India or Pakistan proposes a meeting. The panel has met 112 times in the last six decades.

In the last meeting held in New Delhi in July, Pakistan’s commissioner threatened to seek arbitration by an international court if India did not alter the design of the 330 MW Kishanganga hydropower project on the Jhelum and the 850 MW Ratle hydropower project on the Chenab. Pakistan had in 2010 sought international arbitration to resolve the Kishanganga project dispute, but the Court of Arbitration based in The Hague ruled in India’s favour.

Signed on September 9, 1960, the IWT grants control over the three eastern rivers of Beas, Ravi and Sutlej to India, while Pakistan has control over the three western rivers of Indus, Chenab and Jhelum. India, however, was given the right to use 20% of waters of the western rivers despite being under the control of Pakistan.

Though India can generate as much as 18,600 MW of electricity from the western rivers, it has installed projects with a total capacity of just 3,034 MW. The projects, which are at present in different stages, will have a total capacity of 2,526 MW.
Barking Dogs seldom Bite
 
They cannot break IWT.
It would lead to UN sanctionz..

Another moodi bluff... he will come off it in a week or so...let him consult experts
 
Excellent step.

India should keep the IWT intact but refrain from any discussions until Pakistan it mends its adversary policy towards India.

Good Idea you people can refrain untill hell freezes over.

All i can say about this indian move is

Jithay di Khoti uthay aa khaloti

After debating about how to block water ways to Pakistan they finally decided to not talk about it :rofl:
 
These idiots do realize, by "stopping" water to Pakistan - they will flood IoK and Himachal Pradesh. If that wasn't the case, they would've stopped it a long time ago.
Wrong. India can divert the water into Harike bridge to the Indira gandhi canal and flood the deserts of Rajasthan. The sand will soak all the water and if needed it can run till ran of kutchh.
 
So from breaking the IWT they've now gone down to suspending talks......Like always, all they have is "mein nai bolta", "mein nai khelta", "mein nai manta".......
 
It would lead to UN sanctionz..
whos UN ? how will they sanction India? Do you even think before posting. No body would care to give a damn if pakistan does not get water. All that they can do is pass resolutions. IWT is not NPT or trade agreement. It is adhered to voluntarily by countries involved. UN could not even ask pakistan to vacate kashmir. Pakistan can only declare war which will be a invitation for India to take things into our hands. Another invasion another epic disaster :tup:.
 
whos UN ? how will they sanction India? Do you even think before posting. No body would care to give a damn if pakistan does not get water. All that they can do is pass resolutions. IWT is not NPT or trade agreement. It is adhered to voluntarily by countries involved. UN could not even ask pakistan to vacate kashmir. Pakistan can only declare war which will be a invitation for India to take things into our hands. Another invasion another epic disaster :tup:.


If you dont know the law ...shut up...like your pm...
This is even worse nightmere than surgical strikes...
Pakistan has inherent right to all 6 rivers... we gave up right to 3 ....world bank is party to agreement which actually says no party can revoke agreement unilaterally...

Revike agreement ...we than have right to all 6 rivers ...stop rivers.... face UN sanctions...

Its similar to how afghanistan has access to ports in pakistan and we cannot stop its trade even if we want to
 
If you dont know the law ...shut up...like your pm...
Pakistan has inherent right to all 6 rivers... we gave up right to 3 ....world bank is party to agreement which actually says no party can revoke agreement unilaterally...
yeah its an agreement not law, do u know the difference ? What will the world bank do ? impose sanctions like they impose sanctions on pakistan for hosting masood azhar who got released in plane hijack.

you can live in your own bubble.
 
yeah its an agreement not law, do u know the difference ? What will the world bank do ? impose sanctions like they impose sanctions on pakistan for hosting masood azhar who got released in plane hijack.

you can live in your own bubble.


Law is by the UN which governs all rivers in the world and gives rights to down stream states to water... nearly all rivers in the worls flow through many countries...

Ok. Live in modi' s bubble...

Come back and tag me on the day treaty is broken.... i cannot hace arguemenent with ignorant rants
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom