What's new

INDIA- Strategic Command to acquire 40 nuclear capable fighters

lilaspr

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Apr 14, 2009
Messages
335
Reaction score
0
With an aim of increasing its lethal power, India's tri-services strike force is planning to acquire 40 fighter planes capable of delivering nuclear weapons. The Strategic Forces Command (SFC) has submitted a proposal to the Defence Ministry for setting up two dedicated squadrons of fighter aircraft which will act as "mini-Air Force", ministry sources said.

This will be the first time that SFC, which at present depends on the Indian Air Force for delivering nuclear weapons under its command, will have its own aerial assets, they said.

The SFC does not want untested fighters but the ones which are battle proven and have capabilities to deliver nuclear-tipped missiles, the sources said.

The aircraft planned to be procured are part of efforts to strengthen the nuclear delivery system which right now is based on land-based ballistic missiles such as the Agni and Prithvi and nuclear-capable fighters such as the Mirage 2000, Su-30 MKI and Jaguars.

Created in January 2003, the SFC is part of the Nuclear Command Authority (NCA) and is responsible for the management and administration of the country's tactical and strategic nuclear weapons stockpile.

Attempts are underway to complete the nuclear triad by developing the indigenous Arihant class nuclear submarine and under-sea launched versions of the existing ballistic missile systems.

India's nuclear doctrine envisages building a credible minimum deterrent for maintaining a 'second strike capability' which will be massive and designed to induce unacceptable damage on the enemy.

The SFC is headed by a three-star officer from any of the three services and is responsible for implementing directives of the NCA. At present, the force is headed by Lieutenant General B S Nagal.

The force manages and administers all strategic forces by exercising complete command and control over nuclear assets, and producing all contingency plans as needed to fulfil the required tasks.

The operational missile groups of the Army are armed with the 150-250 km short-range Prithvi missiles and the others with the Agni missiles of ranges above 1,5000 km form the nucleus of SFC.

Link>>
 
so does that mean thta the SSBN's of India will b controlled by SFC rather than IN
 
looks like that the army is the only entity that is not having fighter aircrafs.....
airforce
navy has its own fighters
now sfc will have two squads...wow......i hope all these are not always nuclear armed coz prospects of nuke war is low so might as well use them in conventional role
 
who knows oneday the army may announce "we will be acquiring two suadrons of fighter aircraft for anti-terrorist opperations":devil:
 
Any guess how much money our dirtbag politicians will launder from this deal ?

My guess is 300% of the actual aircraft value
 
PTI: India's Joint Nuclear Command Wants 40 Nuclear Strike Jets

A befuddling report on the wires. The Press Trust of India, reports that India's joint nuclear command -- the Strategic Forces Command -- is looking to procure 40 fighters for two dedicated strategic strike squadrons. The report indicates that while the Indian Air Force's Mirage-2000s, Jaguars and Su-30MKIs have so far been earmarked for the nuclear strike profile, the SFC wants two squadrons of its own. The report says nothing more.

If this report is accurate, the obvious questions would be: (a) Why does the SFC need its own fighters -- why can't it continue to depend on available IAF assets? (b) Why the need to ramp up the air-delivered leg of the nuclear triad when Indian doctrine points to more substantive deterrence from strategic land-based missiles and an SSBN fleet, and far less on air-delivered deterrence? (c) Why does a nuclear strike fleet need as many as 40 aircraft? (d) Does India have the kind of stand-off nuclear weapon capability to justify such a fresh induction of assets? (e) If the SFC were to get its own "mini air force", would these still be operated by the IAF? (f) In which case, what difference would it make?

A totally separate but tantalizing coincidence -- in June, Dassault offered the IAF a fast-track sale of 40 Rafales to shore up squadron strength ahead of the MMRCA induction. The Rafale is also the only aircraft explicitly described in its bid document as a nuclear capable strike fighter. Answers to those questions above and more details later this evening.


Livefist - The Best of Indian Defence: PTI: India's Joint Nuclear Command Wants 40 Nuclear Strike Jets
 
This is very interesting...

France has offered 40 fly away Rafale's in the recent past.

Strategic Forces Command wants 40 exact fighters for nuclear capability role.

Rafale is also the only aircraft explicitly described in MMRCA.






Pure "co incidence " indeed
 
Hard to imagine that SFC will not have the MKI's. They are planes with the longest endurance in our air force. Any deep penetration in China and MKI is the only option.
 
I like this kind of coincidence.
rafale_c.jpg
 
Why Strategic Forces Command want the aircraft instead of a heavy/medium bomber?
 
Why Strategic Forces Command want the aircraft instead of a heavy/medium bomber?

Perhaps they consider strategic bombers to be too vulnerable against enemy air defence? Very few nations operate strategic/fighter bombers these days.
 
Back
Top Bottom