What's new

India officially confirms Cold start doctrine

India understands Pakistan's position very clearly. It was explained to them very well by Secretary James Baker ie India can fire as much shit across the border as it wants but cross into Pakistani territory and we will use nukes. The Indians understood what Secretary Baker said because nothing much happened after that.
 
Do you know a city called Lahore? It is one of only two major cities of Pakistan.
You can throw a stone at Lahore district from the India's border in Punjab.

Now, how long do you think it will take for forces to enter Pakistan's urban areas?

Pakistan's missile NASR is designed to be used when Indian forces defeat Pakistan Army and enter Pakistan. Guess where the missile lands?

It took more then 13 days to Indian Forces to Reach Barki a village of Lahore which is 30 Km away and don't forget India also have major City of Amritsar just close to Border

It's not like one day Indian army decided and you are in Lahore for SHAM KI CHAI
your General already tried to do so..

Now Having Armed Drones with one can see the cross border movement with ease... and fire at them
 
No, sir, no. Firstly, nuke is a weapon of last resort, not first resort within a couple of hours. Secondly, the path of CS would be through populated areas. Thirdly,, it will be equipped with NBC protection. Fourthly, it will have SAMs (Aakash, Barak 8 or even who knows s-400).

The only way to stop CS is to make conventional weapons potent.

India of talking about how India is going to invade others, India should follow the example of Gandhi and make peace. Gandhi would be rolling in his graves if he see how Indians are today. He would regret begging for independence.
 
It is prudent for Indian army head to avoid media. There is no need to reignite things when things are cooling down. If India has a strategy such as cold start it is better to keep it under wraps than say it publicly.
 
India of talking about how India is going to invade others, India should follow the example of Gandhi and make peace. Gandhi would be rolling in his graves if he see how Indians are today. He would regret begging for independence.
Certainly. But, one condition: India must not be a victim of Pakistan sponsored terrorism.
 
India of talking about how India is going to invade others, India should follow the example of Gandhi and make peace. Gandhi would be rolling in his graves if he see how Indians are today. He would regret begging for independence.

I think you should have posted in the "Funny" section !

Hint : Two Nuclear Armed "Peaceful" Neighbors
 
Indian cannot surprise Pakistan when ever there is movement in Indian army Pakistan gets the info and their attack plan in advance and Pakistan strike core is very close to border .
 
Certainly. But, one condition: India must not be a victim of Pakistan sponsored terrorism.


India has never been a victim of Pakistani States' sponsoring of terrorism. In fact every country in South Asia has been a victim of India's sponsoring of terrorists. Any Sri Lankan will tell you that. Modi admitted India's supportof Mukti Bahini, then there is the TTP and so on and so forth. India is the problem in South Asia not Pakistan.
 
Certainly. But, one condition: India must not be a victim of Pakistan sponsored terrorism.

Certainly. But there are no state sponsor terrorism if Pakistan is also the victim. Can Pakistan also claim that its India that supported the terror groups that plague Pakistan without any proof? Of course not. These accusations require proof.
 
Do you know a city called Lahore? It is one of only two major cities of Pakistan.
You can throw a stone at Lahore district from the India's border in Punjab.

Now, how long do you think it will take for forces to enter Pakistan's urban areas?

Pakistan's missile NASR is designed to be used when Indian forces defeat Pakistan Army and enter Pakistan. Guess where the missile lands?

Mike Tyson was once told that Tyson's next opponent can hit the punching bag harder than Tyson.

Tyson replied that punching bags don't hit back.

So, just remember that "stones" can come from the other side as well.
 
I think you should have posted in the "Funny" section !

Hint : Two Nuclear Armed "Peaceful" Neighbors

Pakistan is nuclear armed because of India. India should get rid of its nukes first.
 
As i said, to take such a big decision to elevate a war to nuke level within a few hours is impossible. By the time such decision is taken, IA will be there in urban centres as per CS.
Our strategic command isnt under the pm or civilians .
 
But there are no state sponsor terrorism if Pakistan is also the victim
No doubt, Pak is a victim of terror. But, she is a victim of the terror created by herself. India, on the contrary, is a victim of Pak created terror. Here, is the difference.

Secondly, if Pak is now unable to eliminate that terror infrastructure, Pak then should give India a free hand to destroy those terror networks inside Pakistan and join hands with India. The continuous efforts of Pak to shield UN designated terrorists make Pak a sponsor of terror.
 
NASR Hatf IX put the cold start doctrine in a cold storage for forever. The moment India will bring it out of the deep freezer NASR will melt and charr it in microseconds.

NASR is not first option against Cold Start it's the last one, there are many measure taken by military to counter Cold Start with conventional force.
 
There is no need for ground invasion, just do operations like operation Python and operation trident and destroy their harbours..the harbour destruction caused them 3 billion$ in 1971, it will cost much more now when we destroy karachi and gwadar harbour...then do some air strikes of nuke facilities,air bases, industrial hubs, every infrastructure of economical significance and then and then bomb every insurgency related infrastructure by artillery and MBRLs in their kashmir and gilgit..
There is no need for ground invasion.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom