What's new

India is the Last BRIC standing

Why would Chinese hate Manchu? The imperial court and troops are run by Chinese. Manchu officials and emperor don't even speak Manchu by 17th century. All speak Chinese.

Sun Yat Sun era was in 19th century, 200 years later. Why would chinese hate manchu?

Nice whitewashing Fattyacids, you won't giveup your old habit. :rolleyes:
 
Sanskrit derived Cina from Qin dynasty. It's our own word. China is a Portuguese word, derived from Qin dynasty. We call ourselves Zhongguo

The word India is coined by Persian, named after Indus river. Does it mean Persia gave you identity? Btw, Indus river is in Pakistan, not India.

Wrong - the references to Cina in Sanskrit literature predates the Qin dynasty. Remember in BC chronology and numbers are in opposite directions (year 1BC is AFTER year 2BC).

On your 2nd point about Indus & India - are you claiming then that Pakistan should change its name to India? I don't think they want to
 
As you know, after hundreds of years of unity under a particular dynasty, that dynasty will eventually fall. And thus the nation will be broken for a short period of time.

However, the winner of the ensuing civil war will become the next dynasty, and claim succession from the previous one, including the right to rule the country of China.

India was just thrown together by the British, that's why you have no natural demographic majority, like most natural countries. Your government system was just a copy and paste job from the British. That's what succession is to you.
But qing and yuan were different ;)
 
As you know, after hundreds of years of unity under a particular dynasty, that dynasty will eventually fall. And thus the nation will be broken for a short period of time.

However, the winner of the ensuing civil war will become the next dynasty, and claim succession from the previous one, including the right to rule the country of China.

India was just thrown together by the British, that's why you have no natural demographic majority, like most natural countries. Your government system was just a copy and paste job from the British. That's what succession is to you.

I have read about which empires have ruled over China and what region. So stop making nonsense that China was united throughout history under a single empire. :lol::lol:
 
But qing and yuan were different ;)

Like I said, the Manchus themselves decided to change their language, their culture and their customs to those of the Han. Nowadays they are indistinguishable from other Chinese, they did that themselves.

Whereas that did not happen with Britain after it created India.

In fact, it's India who has English as their de facto national language. Whereas most British wouldn't understand a word of Tamil or Bengali, whatever your language is.
 
The word India is coined by Persian, named after Indus river. Does it mean Persia gave you identity? Btw, Indus river is in Pakistan, not India.

History fail again, the name India was given by Greeks and fully explained by Greek ambassador Megasthenes by 300BC in his book Indica that India is the land East of Indus between Himalayas and seas of the south. Alexander already knew India expanded until Gangaridai(Bengal).
 
Nice whitewashing Fattyacids, you won't giveup your old habit. :rolleyes:

Empty comment, as always.

It is clear crystal to all that you are distorting Chinese history using twisted logic and unreliable source, driven by your butthurt that India don't have a history and empire like China.

You have been Banned many times in Chinese section for propaganda against China!
 
Like I said, the Manchus themselves decided to change their language, their culture and their customs to those of the Han. Nowadays they are indistinguishable from other Chinese, they did that themselves.

Whereas that did not happen with Britain after it created India.

In fact, it's India who has English as their de facto national language. Whereas most British wouldn't understand a word of Tamil or Bengali, whatever your language is.
than why anti qing sentiments exist in china??
Anti-Qing sentiment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and what about the ponytails they forced on you :lol:

queue.gif
 
What are you referring to my Tang Chinese pal. I didn't get you.


So any one who do not agre with the Indian revisionist history is a Chinese. The whole world outside of India are Chinese by your definition.
 
than why anti qing sentiments exist in china??
Anti-Qing sentiment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and what about the ponytails they forced on you :lol:

queue.gif

That is centuries old history.

Why don't you come to China, find someone of ethnic Manchu descent, and ask them. :lol:

Today they are as Chinese as the Han. They speak Chinese, follow Chinese culture, and Chinese customs.

They believed in this country. Now what about the British with regards to India? They won't even bother to learn a few words from your language.

Just look at all your borders. They were drawn and named after white British men. Like "MacMahon".

The British created you, but they still slander you guys constantly with their media. Making India famous for poverty and rape, and nothing else.
 
Wrong - the references to Cina in Sanskrit literature predates the Qin dynasty. Remember in BC chronology and numbers are in opposite directions (year 1BC is AFTER year 2BC).

On your 2nd point about Indus & India - are you claiming then that Pakistan should change its name to India? I don't think they want to

Sanskrit was passed orally, written form is abt 2000 years. And why Cina out of nothing? You name people or country based on something. India=Indus river. Read up on historian's take on Cina =Qin

2nd point, or India should change its name? I'm showing that joker, you don't give another country an identity simply by coining their country name.
 
That is centuries old history.

Why don't you come to China, find someone of ethnic Manchu descent, and ask them. :lol:

Today they are as Chinese as the Han. They speak Chinese, follow Chinese culture, and Chinese customs.

They believed in this country. Now what about the British with regards to India? They won't even bother to learn a few words from your language.

Just look at all your borders. They were drawn and named after white British men. Like "MacMahon".

The British created you, but they still slander you guys constantly with their media. Making India famous for poverty and rape, and nothing else.
Toady, even uighurs and tibetans are chinese but it won't remain for long.
History speaks for itself, native chinese were never been able to rule present day china.
 
Toady, even uighurs and tibetans are chinese but it won't remain for long.
History speaks for itself, native chinese were never been able to rule present day china.

Actually we were able to, and are. :D Uyghurs and Tibetans combined are only 1% of China's population, even in their own native provinces they have Han majorities.

India on the other land has to fight and lose wars over lines drawn by white British men like "Sir Henry McMahon". :cheesy:

But don't worry, Partition 2.0 will save you. And you know it's inevitable, just like Indians themselves know that India was created by the British, but will only admit it to each other. And India has the 2nd largest Muslim population in the world, which is growing at an exponential rate.
 

Back
Top Bottom