India has NEVER been a unified entity.

[Fattyacids]

Indian subcontinent with common culture and Dharmic principles existed for 1000's of years, even unified before china was unified. Like any other big country India is also divided at times and unified at times.

So better stop your B.S and CCP propaganda here.

There was no division or unification, India has always been united since it's creation in 1947. Before 1947, there was no country called India.

 

[Sugarcane]

There was no division or unification, India has always been united since it's creation in 1947

Many princely states joined union after 47

 

[Fattyacids]

Many princely states joined union after 47

Another proof that India was never one country

 

[Srinivas]

Another proof that India was never one country

As if china was united through out its history.....

 

[pk_baloch]

@Srinivas some baloch ,pashtuns and even punjabis speak brohi language ,does it make them dravidian??even some brohis are fair-skinned people and speak more than 1 language
south indians and brohi both are different people ,have different languages and gentically they are different people ....

 

[Fattyacids]

As if china was united through out its history.....

Since 220 BC

 

[Srinivas]

Since 220 BC

China in 220 B.C

Where are Tibet, Xinjiang, Yunan, mongolian provinces??? Chinese logic defies all.

China in 100 B.C

China 100 A.D

China during ming dyansty

China during Tang Dyansty

In between the times of rise an fall of empires china also consisted of small kingdoms. Today's china actually is much bigger entity what real china is.

 

[Ayush]

height of knowledge

thanks. use google. u will reach my heights too

 

[Srinivas]

@Srinivas some baloch ,pashtuns and even punjabis speak brohi language ,does it make them dravidian??even some brohis are fair-skinned people and speak more than 1 language
south indians and brohi both are different people ,have different languages and gentically they are different people ....

Don't get me wrong, genetics has nothing to do with language group. As long as people speak dravidian languages they are called Dravidians.

My native language is Telugu and in our state any one irrespective of genetics who has telugu language as mother tongue is called a dravidian and a Teluguiite.

 

[Vinod2070]

There was no division or unification, India has always been united since it's creation in 1947. Before 1947, there was no country called India.

And there was no Han without a Q hairstyle some decades back.

So?

 

[Fattyacids]

China in 220 B.C

Territorial size changes throughout history, but the concept of sovereignty does NOT. There's only one emperor that rules china, "The mandate of heaven." If it is too complex for you to understand, go attend a history course.


Why post fake map? Where was never a Uyghur State, LOL. Tibet half the size of entire China? LOL,

Even during the warring period, there is still a ruling emperor. No warlord or duke or general dare declare himself emperor. Don't understand, read or watch, Three Kingdoms.

China 100 A.D

China during ming dyansty

China during Tang Dyansty

In between the times of rise an fall of empires china also consisted of small kingdoms. Today's china actually is much bigger entity what real china is.

 

[Srinivas]

Territorial size changes throughout history, but the concept of sovereignty does NOT. There's only one emperor that rules china, "The mandate of heaven." If it is too complex for you to understand, go attend a history course.
Why post fake map? Where was never a Uyghur State, LOL. Tibet half the size of entire China? LOL,

Even during the warring period, there is still a ruling emperor. No warlord or duke or general dare declare himself emperor. Don't understand, read or watch, Three Kingdoms.

Dude you are quoting wrong again, there is never been a single emperor even in the Bigger kingdom in china continuously. Empires rise and fall and every time an empire falls the kingdom is broken into pieces. This happened through out history of China.

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

@Srinivas some baloch ,pashtuns and even punjabis speak brohi language ,does it make them dravidian??even some brohis are fair-skinned people and speak more than 1 language
south indians and brohi both are different people ,have different languages and gentically they are different people ....

Actually Srinivas is right, Brahui speak Dravidian language. But that doesn't make Brahui genetically similar to South Indians, far from it.

They have lowest ASI genes out of any South Asian group, at 12%. Next lowest is Baloch people with around 15%.

 

[Fattyacids]

Dude you are quoting wrong again, there is never been a single emperor even in the Bigger kingdom in china continuously. Empires rise and fall and every time an empire falls the kingdom is broken into pieces. This happened through out history of China.

There's always one emperor at any one time. Go find out what is "mandate of heaven,"
China is one empire, the different dynasties are subset of the empire. Dynasty changes but empire does not. Stop embarrassing yourself.

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

Don't get me wrong, genetics has nothing to do with language group. As long as people speak dravidian languages they are called Dravidians.

My native language is Telugu and in our state any one irrespective of genetics who has telugu language as mother tongue is called a dravidian and a Teluguiite.

Hopefully @INDIC read your post. lol 

There was no division or unification, India has always been united since it's creation in 1947. Before 1947, there was no country called India.

Indians always love to post Maurya empire map, which expanded through military conquest and only lasted 100 years. It doesnt mean culture of Afghanistan and Tamil Nadu is similar.

Get this through your head Indians, military conquests in ancient times doesn't mean one nation or similar culture.