What's new

Homi bhaba's death- CIA

is this article real this guy is speaking like hes on drugs and abusing leaders and scientist of india as if they were his slaves and hes the Lord of the World

dats the norm...Dats how americans talk among demselves...Richard Nixon called Indira Gandhi an 'old witch'...what else do u expect frm a CIA guy...
 
This is old news, but good that you posted it. People need frequent reminders to bring them out of them complacency.

Recently Jewels worth £205,000 was found in Mont Blanc by a climber. They were from the same flight that carried Homi Baba.

mont_blanc_jewels.jpg


130926125014-air-india-crash-01-story-top.jpg


130926125139-air-india-crash-02-story-body.jpg


Above pics shows the diplomatic bag that was also found a few months back from the same plane 'crash'. They probably belonged to Homi Baba.

However India always knew about the US hand in death of Homi Baba and Shastri. This is one of the reason why the Indian polity do not trust the US. Well up till Indra Gandhi's time anyway.

Rajiv Gandhi however did irreparable damage to our Nuclear technology by ordering halting work on Nuclear weapon during the time he was PM. He even wen to the extend of asking other nations to destroy their own Nukes :lol: .............The damage done by this blundering idiot of an PM was immense and we took a decade to get back on our feet. This is a little known history ..... maybe in time of a non congress govt. all such little known facts will become well know and media will give it enough coverage.

Mysterious cache of jewels turns up atop French glacier - CNN.com
 
Lal Bahadur Shastri's Death is well recognized as a Political Murder. I am piecing together a few bits to give readers a better idea as to how the whole murder went down...

lal-bahadur.jpg


The fatal poisoning of a prime minister, a cover-up at the highest levels, stoic silence when questions were asked, conspiracy theories involving international players and national figures, mysterious accidents that claimed the lives of witnesses who could have shed more light on the matter, parliamentary inquiries that have vanished from the library.

This is not a plot from a Robert Ludlum thriller or a film sequel to Bourne Identity, but a real chapter from Indian history that has been buried and forgotten.

As we pieced together the strange circumstances of Shastri’s death through family accounts and on the basis of RTI applications, we can only conclude that the mystery deepens and some answers must be found. What is also significant is that in spite of RTI applications, the PMO has refused to declassify information about the former PM’s death in Tashkent 46 years ago. Anuj Dhar, moderator of a transparency website, had filed an RTI application in 2009 seeking the correspondence between the Indian embassy in Moscow and the external affairs ministry and between the two countries after the premier’s death. Shastri had gone to Tashkent for a summit with then Pakistan president Ayub Khan after the 1965 Indo-Pakistan war. He died hours after signing the joint declaration. His family has always maintained that he was poisoned and his death hushed up.

There are certainly unanswered questions. For instance, press reports of the incident show that the authorities in Tashkent immediately arrested a Russian cook. He was released after five hours of questioning. However, in spite of the initial suspicion of poisoning, no post-mortem was done, either in Russia or in India. His late wife kept trying to raise questions about his death, but nothing was ever investigated. The couple had six children, of whom only two, Anil and Sunil Shastri, survive. Both are members of the Congress, although the latter had joined the BJP briefly. Grandson Siddhartha Nath Singh (son of Shastri’s late daughter Suman) is in the BJP. But regardless of political affiliations, there is a unanimity within the family that Shastri was poisoned and the case was never investigated.

Adding grist to the rumour mill is the extraordinary secrecy over the case. For instance, various RTI applications over the years have sought information both on what documentation is available on the matter and if the government could kindly declassify it. In 2009, the PMO had replied that it had only one document relating to Shastri’s death but refused to declassify it under a clause that would “prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of the country, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the state, relation with foreign state or lead to incitement of an offence”. (MMS deep love for US :lol:)

Both the facts are strange. First, it defies logic that there can be only one document relating to the death of a prime minister in a foreign country. The correspondence between the MEA and the Indian embassy in Moscow too remains classified. Under ordinary circumstances, there should have been several reports from the embassy on the incident. They should have included an assessment by the Indian ambassador, T.N. Kaul at that time. Surely these should be ordinary routine documents, not dark secrets of state.

There is a fascinating story he recounts, something that was an obsession with his late mother who was the last family member to speak to Shastri. She was on the phone with her father, as her husband, V.N. Singh, an employee of the State Trading Corporation, was travelling to Cairo on work where Shastri too was headed. Shastri therefore told his daughter to ensure that her husband carried Indian newspapers to Cairo. His last words to her were—“I’m going to have a glass of milk and sleep.” The line got disconnected and Suman tried again. However, when she got through 15 minutes later, she was told her father was dead.

Now from a separate source ........

The most vivid account is The Critical Years by veteran Indian journalist Kuldip Nayar. He was part of the prime minister's travelling press corps to Tashkent.

Mr Nayar writes that the Indian prime minister was already a heart patient, having suffered two attacks. He had had a hectic day, holding talks with the Russian premier, Alexey Kosygin - the Russians having brokered the pact - and his officials and had had very little sleep.

"That evening," writes Mr Nayar, "I met by chance his personal physican Dr RN Chugh, who accompanied him. I asked him how Shastri was standing the strain. He looked up to the sky and said: 'Everything is in the hands of God'." Mr Nayar does not elaborate.

Mr Nayar then proceeds to describe the fateful night in Agatha Christie-like detail. Since he was to travel in the prime minister's airplane early next morning to Kabul en route to Delhi, he retired to bed early an hour before midnight. "I must have been dozing when someone knocked at my door and said: 'Your prime minister is dying.' A Russian lady was waking up all the journalists," writes Mr Nayar.

A group of journalists then sped to Mr Shastri's dacha from the hotel. On arriving, Mr Nayar found a grief-stricken Mr Kosygin standing on the verandah. "He could not speak and only lifted his hands to indicate Shastri was no more."

When Mr Nayar went in, he found Dr Chugh being questioned by a group of Soviet doctors through an interpreter. In the next room Mr Shastri lay still on his bed. The journalists emptied the flower vases in the room and spread them on the prime minister's body. Mr Nayar also noticed an overturned thermos flask on a dressing table some 10 feet away from Mr Shastri's bed and wondered whether the prime minister had struggled to get to open it to get water. "His slippers were neatly placed near the bed; it meant that he walked barefoot up to the dressing table in the carpeted room," Mr Nayar writes.

Mr Nayar then pieces together the events leading up to Mr Shastri's death - of how the prime minister reached the dacha around 10 pm after a reception, chatted with his personal staff and asked his cook Ram Nath to bring him food "which was prepared in the dacha by the Russians". It gets more interesting from here. "In the kitchen there was a Soviet cook helped by two ladies - both from the Russian intelligence department - and they tasted everything, including water, before it was served to Mr Shastri," Mr Nayar writes. Remember this was at the height of the Cold War and India-Pakistan hostilities and the security paranoia was extreme.

As Mr Shastri tucked into a frugal spinach and potato curry meal, he received a call from a personal assistant in Delhi and sought the reaction to the Tashkent agreement back home. Then he spoke to his family in Delhi. He asked his eldest daughter, Kusum, about how she had found the peace pact. "She replied, 'we have not liked it'," writes Mr Nayar. "He asked 'what about her mother?' She too had not liked the declaration, was the reply given." A crestfallen Mr Shastri, according to Mr Nayar, then remarked: "If my own family has not liked it, what will the outsiders say?"

This upset Mr Shastri. "He began pacing up and down the room... For one who had had two heart attacks earlier, the telephone conversation and the walking must have been a strain," he writes. Then his staff gave him milk and some water in the flask. Around 1.30 am, his personal assistant Sahai, according to Mr Nayar, saw Mr Shastri at his door, asking with difficulty, "Where is the doctor?"

The staff woke up Dr Chugh, while the prime minister's staff, assisted by Indian security men, helped Mr Shastri walk back to his room. "If it was a heart attack - myocardiac infarction, and obstruction of blood supply to the heart muscles, as the Soviet doctors said later - this walk," writes Mr Nayar, "must have been fatal."

Mr Nayar writes - presumably from an eyewitness account by the personal assistant - that Mr Shastri began coughing "rockingly", touched his chest and became unconscious. Dr Chugh arrived soon after, felt the prime minister's pulse, gave an injection into the heart, tried mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, but to no avail. More doctors arrived. They found Mr Shastri dead. The time of the death was 1.32 am.

Talk about foul play began as soon as the body arrived in Delhi. Mr Nayar says the prime minister's wife asked him why Mr Shastri's body had turned blue. He told her that when "bodies are embalmed" they turn blue. Mrs Shastri was not convinced. She asked about "certain cuts" on Mr Shastri's body. Mr Nayar told her he hadn't seen any.


PS: My bet is that the poison was in the flask which had the milk.
 
In hindsight its fairly easy to conclude that at the height of the cold war, it was Russia who was chosen to broker a peace between pakistan (an US ally) and India in Tashkent.

Shastri's murder was a lesson to India as well as to the USSR. ..... killing two birds with one stone kind of scenario.

Lesson to India was to show the reach of the USA and to remind us of their power.

Lesson to USSR was to shame them and demonstrate their weakness in protecting their guests in their own house.
 
But this is not the first time evidence of US/UK hand in attempting to weaken India has come out.

Their hand in the Khalistani movement is pretty well know. Here is something that has been published in newspapers before ...but might be new to some readers here. Its regarding the Bombing of Air India flight by Khalistani Sikh terrorist in Canada.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/05/03/bartleman-airindia.html

I warned RCMP days before Air India disaster: Bartleman
Last Updated: Thursday, May 3, 2007 | 8:16 PM ET
CBC News

Ontario Lt.-Gov. James Bartleman says he was scolded by an RCMP officer several days before the Air India disaster when he showed him a document suggesting a flight would be targeted on the weekend of the attack.

Ontario Lt.-Gov. James Bartleman, at the Air India inquiry Thursday, was in charge of the intelligence analysis and security branch of the Department of External Affairs when Air India Flight 182 blew up in 1985.Ontario Lt.-Gov. James Bartleman, at the Air India inquiry Thursday, was in charge of the intelligence analysis and security branch of the Department of External Affairs when Air India Flight 182 blew up in 1985.

Bartleman was in charge of the intelligence analysis and security branch of the Department of External Affairs when the plane blew up on June 23, 1985, killing all 329 people on board.

In testimony Thursday at the inquiry into the bombing in Ottawa, Bartleman said he found the document in his daily package of intelligence briefings in the week of June 18.

"I saw in there a document that indicated Air India was being targeted that weekend — specifically the weekend of the 22-23," said Bartleman.

"It was raw, unevaluated information. There had been so many alarms raised over the previous year about potential attacks … that I suppose it would be possible for someone to say this is just another one of these cry wolf events."

Bartleman said he personally delivered the document to a committee meeting on Sikh extremism that was going on at the same time.

When he showed the document to the senior RCMP officer at the meeting, Bartleman said he was "startled" by the reaction he got.

"He flushed and told me that of course he'd seen it, and that he didn't need me to tell him how to do his job," he said.

"That confirmed that he had seen it and that the RCMP would take that into consideration and do what was necessary. The next thing … in my memory is the downing of the aircraft."

When asked why he recalled that incident so clearly, Bartleman said he had never been "hissed at" in such a way during his career and that it made a "searing impression."

"I know what I saw and I know what happened," Bartleman said.


Bartleman said he didn't reveal the information until the inquiry was established because he assumed the matter was investigated during one of the internal reviews by the RCMP.

Family lawyer finds testimony 'astounding'

Jacques Shore, one of the lawyers for the families of the Air India victims, called the testimony "astounding." He congratulated Bartleman on his decision to go public, even if it was belated.

"I think the lieutenant-governor being here today demonstrated his courage," Shore said. "(He) recognized there was something that was left undone, in his mind, and that this was a part of the story that needed to be told."

Also testifying Thursday was former CSIS officer Lynn Jarrett, who tracked two men who would later be implicated in the attack — Talwinder Singh Parmar and Inderjit Singh Reyat.

Three weeks before the Air India bombing, she and another CSIS officer followed two men into the woods on Vancouver Island and heard a loud noise.

"There was an extremely loud bang," Jarrett testified. The officers thought it might be the men undergoing firearm training.

After the Air India bombing, the officers returned to the woods and found evidence that the noise had actually been an explosives test.

Parmar, the suspected mastermind of the Air India bombing, was arrested in November 1985 on weapons, explosives and conspiracy charges, but the charges were dropped for lack of evidence. He died in India in 1992 in what officials said was a shootout with police.

Reyat, a bomb maker, was imprisoned for manslaughter in a 2003 plea bargain.
Plane came down near Ireland

Two other men, Ripudaman Singh Malik and Ajaib Singh Bagri, were acquitted of all charges in 2005 after the costliest investigation and prosecution in Canadian history.

Of the 329 people on Air India Flight 182, 280 were Canadian citizens and 82 were children. The bombing brought the plane down over the Atlantic Ocean off the west coast of Ireland.

A separate luggage bomb destined for a second Air India flight killed two Japanese baggage handlers at Tokyo's Narita airport.

The inquiry into the disaster, headed by retired Supreme Court justice John Major, resumed Monday with a focus on leads, tips and warnings that surfaced before the disaster.
 
Since 2nd Oct was the 109th Birth Aniversary of Lal bahadur Shastri .......... let me posts something more about this great son of India. (..and murdered by the CIA)

SILICONEER | COVER STORY: The People’s Prime Minister: A Tribute to Lal Bahadur Shastri | JANUARY 2010 | Celebrating 11 Years

Lal Bahadur Shastri was Born in Ram Nagar, Mughal Sarai near Varanasi on Oct. 2, 1904, he lost his father when he was only one and half years old. And his mother was forced to live with her own father, taking him and his two sisters to be raised. He never forgot the sacrifices that his mother had to make. He suffered poverty to the extent that several times he had to swim across the river Ganges because he could not afford the little sum needed to pay to the boatman. And it was his mother’s deep religious convictions that sustained the family.

When he was ten years old he was sent to his mother’s brother’s house in Varanasi, so he could get his high school education. It was there that at the age of eleven he heard Gandhiji’s speech in 1915, and he vowed to dedicate his life to the national cause. He participated in the non-corporation movement in 1921 and was arrested at the age of 16. After he came out of prison he joined Kashi Vidyapith, an institution inaugurated by Gandhiji in 1921 for those students who boycotted the English system. Kashi Vidyapith’s first vice-chancellor Bhagwan Das was a great philosopher, thinker, social worker and humanist, who combined Indian spirituality and modern sciences in the education system. He was secular minded. It was here that Lal Bahadur studied works of many Western philosophers, such as Kant, Hegel, Bertrand Russell, Aldous Huxley , Marx and Engels. He also studied Indian philosophers and was greatly influenced by the works of Vivekananda and Ramakrishna. He translated the biography of Madam Curie in Hindi.

But it was the simple living and high thinking way of life of the vice-chancellor of the institution that influenced Lal Bahadur the most. It was also the spiritual and humanistic elements of the Bhakti movement, so much part of Varanasi’s life, that moved Lal Bahadur. He greatly admired Vinaya Patrika of Tulsidas, as well as the rebellious nature of Kabir’s poetry. Vinaya Patrika made him humble, while Kabir taught him not to tolerate any kind of bigotry. That is why he always remained far from the ritualism of Varanasi, but lived harmoniously in a home with religious atmosphere, far from sadhus and astrologers.

In 1926 he graduated from Kashi Vidyapith and earned his Shastri degree. In 1927 he got married to Lalita Devi from Mirzapur. Being a Gnadhian, he accepted a charkha and a few yards of Khadi as dowry.

It was in 1925 that Lala Lajpat Rai enlisted him as a life member in Lok Sevak Mandal, which meant to serve society for at least 20 years and not to seek any elective office for at least 10 years. He dutifully fulfilled his pledge. He was paid Rs. 80/- per month for his services. He worked promoting Khadi, carrying bundles of Khadi clothes on his head and selling them from door to door. It was also at this time when they built a huge beautiful hostel, named Kumar Ashram, in Meerut for dalit students, who lived there. Money was also raised to award students fellowships. This Ashram, which is near our house in Meerut, still flourishes. It has also become a symbol of equality and brotherhood for the community, where people of all walks of life gather to celebrate national festivals.

Lal Bahadur Shastri participated in every movement launched for the freedom of India. He was jailed again and again for his participation. in the 1930 salt satyagraha, the 1940 vyaktigat satyagraha, the 1942 “Quit India” movement. All in all he spent more than nine years in jail..

He was elected the president of the Allahabad District Congress Committee in 1930. In 1931 he was appointed the secretary of the U.P. State Congress Committee. He was also chosen a member of All India Congress Committee. In 1951 he became the general secretary of the All India Congress Committee, when he was responsible for organizing the election machinery for the Congress Party.

In 1937, when the first national governments came to power in various states, he worked as an organizing secretary of the Parliamentary Board for the Congress. He was elected to the U.P. Legislative Assembly the same year. He served as a parliamentary secretary to Govind Ballabh Pant who was the first chief minister of U.P. Later he became the minister of police and transport. He appointed the first woman conductor for U.P., roadways. He often traveled by buses. In 1951 he was elected to the upper house of Indian Parliament, the Rajya Sabha. He served as a Minister for Railways and Transport from 1951 to 1956 and again in 1961. After the death of the iron man Govind Ballabh Pant he was appointed home minister in 1961. When Jawaharlal Nehru died on May 27, 1964, Lal Bahadur Shastri was the unanimous choice to become the second prime minister of India. He served in this post from June 9, 1964, till Jan. 11, 1966, when he suddenly died of a heart attack in Tashkent.

Lal Bahadur Shastri was not as charismatic as Nehru, nor was he considered an iron man like Sardar Patel or Govind Ballabh Pant as a home minister. He was not very tall. He was slim, did not weigh much. So many people considered him a weak person to be appointed as a home minister or the prime minister. Besides, he spoke softly and never used angry words. He himself said, “Perhaps due to my being small in size and soft of tongue, people are apt to believe that I am not able to be very firm. Though not physically strong I think I am internally not so weak.” Indeed, Lal Bahadur Shastri never sought power, never was keen to stick to power. Twice he resigned from his post. Once when a railway accident occurred and he took the moral responsibility, second time to build the party organization. It was his nature of being ajatshatru (a man without an enemy) and his capability to remain friendly to people whose views he opposed such as Nehru and Purushottam Das Tandon meant he was also favored by opposite camps. He never said a word even in jest which could hurt someone. He spoke in simple sentences. It was these qualities that made him dear to all. But when the test came, he never failed.

And they came soon enough. On August 31, 1965, when war broke out between India and Pakistan, and he was woken at 3 a.m. in the morning to be told that Pakistan’s army was marching toward Chamb area, it did not take him even five minutes to give the Indian army a free hand to retaliate with full force and open a new front to occupy Lahore. Scholars had their doubts if Nehru would have given orders to cross borders in this case. When after the ceasefire a conference between him and President Ayub Khan of Pakistan was organized in Tashkent, he insisted that a clause should be added in the peace agreement that never again would force be used to settle problems. When Ayub seemed reluctant to agree to that, he replied, “Then you have to find another PM to negotiate with.” This clause was added at the last minute, when Ayub wrote that in his own handwriting.Ayub’s hand-written assurance is still preserved in Indian archives.


His other test came in handling India’s food crisis in 1965. He was supposed to visit the U.S. The date was fixed, but President Lyndon Johnson decided that he would like Shastri’s visit to coincide with Ayub’s visit. That Shastri refused. He also refused to cancel his visit to Canada which was scheduled to take place at the same time. He visited Canada, but cancelled his visit to the U.S. He also refused to be pressured to accept wheat of inferior quality under PL 480 that the U.S. was to send to India. Instead he appealed to the nation that all its citizens should have one meal less per day so the poor could be fed. Before announcing that to the nation he asked his wife not to cook the evening meal. He also asked people to grow food even in their houses.

But Shastri’s legacy is not in his rule. Shastriji stands for austerity, simplicity and integrity. He never sought power to be rich. There are so many tales told by those who were close to him. Sumangal Prakash, a Gandhian who marched with Gandhiji during the Salt satyagraha, tells us how even as a prime minister he could not afford a decent coat in winter. Once he had to go some event in Bihar and he did not have a coat. He asked a tailor to take four of his old coats — all made of Khadi — and make into one. He could not afford to get new sets of teeth or a new pair of glasses. He never let his children use his name to gain favor from anyone. He never let them use the official car for private use. His son Anil had to use public transportation to go to school.

My brother told me an incident. He went to Lucknow once when Shastriji was a minister in the U.P. Government. He phoned Shastriji. Shastriji invited him but with a warning, “Your bhabhi (sister-in-law) is not at home today, so you will not get a cooked meal. You have to make do with whatever there is.” How many ministers are there whose wives cook their own meal? And how many prime ministers are there who washed their own clothes every day and polished their own shoes? Once Shastri was visiting Varanasi to attend an event in the winter. The famous Hindi poet Mahadevi Varma noticed that he had no socks. She asked him, “Don’t you feel cold?” He replied, “I have only two pairs of heavy woolen foreign socks, which I wear when I have to go to a cold country like Russia.” Nehru had to lend him a mink coat when as a home minister, he was sent to Kashmir in winter.

And yet, he arranged to send a helicopter to shower flowers on a newly wed couple in a village, where the bride was the daughter of one of his poor friends, who spent time with him in prison during the freedom movement. Shastri was the only home minister without a home of his own.

PAGE-LEAD08-LBSinOffice.jpg
 
Ahem...Ahem...Ahem...first ISI now CIA, whats next in indian obsession list?


CIA is said to be behind the assassination of Indira Gandhi and rajiv gandhi too as a emerging of a strong leadership and strong India in those era of cold war was seen as threat to US o A's bulling.

They can't digest the facts that the beggar India now have became independent after green revolution, operation flood, a nuclear power, started its own missile program, taken on the super power and divided its ally pakistan into half and doing special forces operation beyond its border like Sri Lanka and Maldives. The list is long.
 
Further proof certain members of Congress and the Gandhi family are corrupt and tainted. I am very sure that Sonia and her family are controlled by foreign interests. Knew this for a long time. I have said it before. I even remember a certain member AXISOFEVIL stating HOMI was killed on purpose. Even now you see all these killings in AP that involve our defence scientists and weapon designers in not some mere accident but being done on purpose.
 
When these incidents happened 45 odd years ago, India did not have a very good relationship with US.Why did then, the government not raise a voice or accuse the US?? What were de afraid of?? The Soviet was with us. If ppl can find out so much from the net, surely our government knew more...Why did de just accept things like morons???
 
Since 2nd Oct was the 109th Birth Aniversary of Lal bahadur Shastri .......... let me posts something more about this great son of India. (..and murdered by the CIA)

SILICONEER | COVER STORY: The People’s Prime Minister: A Tribute to Lal Bahadur Shastri | JANUARY 2010 | Celebrating 11 Years

Lal Bahadur Shastri was Born in Ram Nagar, Mughal Sarai near Varanasi on Oct. 2, 1904, he lost his father when he was only one and half years old. And his mother was forced to live with her own father, taking him and his two sisters to be raised. He never forgot the sacrifices that his mother had to make. He suffered poverty to the extent that several times he had to swim across the river Ganges because he could not afford the little sum needed to pay to the boatman. And it was his mother’s deep religious convictions that sustained the family.

When he was ten years old he was sent to his mother’s brother’s house in Varanasi, so he could get his high school education. It was there that at the age of eleven he heard Gandhiji’s speech in 1915, and he vowed to dedicate his life to the national cause. He participated in the non-corporation movement in 1921 and was arrested at the age of 16. After he came out of prison he joined Kashi Vidyapith, an institution inaugurated by Gandhiji in 1921 for those students who boycotted the English system. Kashi Vidyapith’s first vice-chancellor Bhagwan Das was a great philosopher, thinker, social worker and humanist, who combined Indian spirituality and modern sciences in the education system. He was secular minded. It was here that Lal Bahadur studied works of many Western philosophers, such as Kant, Hegel, Bertrand Russell, Aldous Huxley , Marx and Engels. He also studied Indian philosophers and was greatly influenced by the works of Vivekananda and Ramakrishna. He translated the biography of Madam Curie in Hindi.

But it was the simple living and high thinking way of life of the vice-chancellor of the institution that influenced Lal Bahadur the most. It was also the spiritual and humanistic elements of the Bhakti movement, so much part of Varanasi’s life, that moved Lal Bahadur. He greatly admired Vinaya Patrika of Tulsidas, as well as the rebellious nature of Kabir’s poetry. Vinaya Patrika made him humble, while Kabir taught him not to tolerate any kind of bigotry. That is why he always remained far from the ritualism of Varanasi, but lived harmoniously in a home with religious atmosphere, far from sadhus and astrologers.

In 1926 he graduated from Kashi Vidyapith and earned his Shastri degree. In 1927 he got married to Lalita Devi from Mirzapur. Being a Gnadhian, he accepted a charkha and a few yards of Khadi as dowry.

It was in 1925 that Lala Lajpat Rai enlisted him as a life member in Lok Sevak Mandal, which meant to serve society for at least 20 years and not to seek any elective office for at least 10 years. He dutifully fulfilled his pledge. He was paid Rs. 80/- per month for his services. He worked promoting Khadi, carrying bundles of Khadi clothes on his head and selling them from door to door. It was also at this time when they built a huge beautiful hostel, named Kumar Ashram, in Meerut for dalit students, who lived there. Money was also raised to award students fellowships. This Ashram, which is near our house in Meerut, still flourishes. It has also become a symbol of equality and brotherhood for the community, where people of all walks of life gather to celebrate national festivals.

Lal Bahadur Shastri participated in every movement launched for the freedom of India. He was jailed again and again for his participation. in the 1930 salt satyagraha, the 1940 vyaktigat satyagraha, the 1942 “Quit India” movement. All in all he spent more than nine years in jail..

He was elected the president of the Allahabad District Congress Committee in 1930. In 1931 he was appointed the secretary of the U.P. State Congress Committee. He was also chosen a member of All India Congress Committee. In 1951 he became the general secretary of the All India Congress Committee, when he was responsible for organizing the election machinery for the Congress Party.

In 1937, when the first national governments came to power in various states, he worked as an organizing secretary of the Parliamentary Board for the Congress. He was elected to the U.P. Legislative Assembly the same year. He served as a parliamentary secretary to Govind Ballabh Pant who was the first chief minister of U.P. Later he became the minister of police and transport. He appointed the first woman conductor for U.P., roadways. He often traveled by buses. In 1951 he was elected to the upper house of Indian Parliament, the Rajya Sabha. He served as a Minister for Railways and Transport from 1951 to 1956 and again in 1961. After the death of the iron man Govind Ballabh Pant he was appointed home minister in 1961. When Jawaharlal Nehru died on May 27, 1964, Lal Bahadur Shastri was the unanimous choice to become the second prime minister of India. He served in this post from June 9, 1964, till Jan. 11, 1966, when he suddenly died of a heart attack in Tashkent.

Lal Bahadur Shastri was not as charismatic as Nehru, nor was he considered an iron man like Sardar Patel or Govind Ballabh Pant as a home minister. He was not very tall. He was slim, did not weigh much. So many people considered him a weak person to be appointed as a home minister or the prime minister. Besides, he spoke softly and never used angry words. He himself said, “Perhaps due to my being small in size and soft of tongue, people are apt to believe that I am not able to be very firm. Though not physically strong I think I am internally not so weak.” Indeed, Lal Bahadur Shastri never sought power, never was keen to stick to power. Twice he resigned from his post. Once when a railway accident occurred and he took the moral responsibility, second time to build the party organization. It was his nature of being ajatshatru (a man without an enemy) and his capability to remain friendly to people whose views he opposed such as Nehru and Purushottam Das Tandon meant he was also favored by opposite camps. He never said a word even in jest which could hurt someone. He spoke in simple sentences. It was these qualities that made him dear to all. But when the test came, he never failed.

And they came soon enough. On August 31, 1965, when war broke out between India and Pakistan, and he was woken at 3 a.m. in the morning to be told that Pakistan’s army was marching toward Chamb area, it did not take him even five minutes to give the Indian army a free hand to retaliate with full force and open a new front to occupy Lahore. Scholars had their doubts if Nehru would have given orders to cross borders in this case. When after the ceasefire a conference between him and President Ayub Khan of Pakistan was organized in Tashkent, he insisted that a clause should be added in the peace agreement that never again would force be used to settle problems. When Ayub seemed reluctant to agree to that, he replied, “Then you have to find another PM to negotiate with.” This clause was added at the last minute, when Ayub wrote that in his own handwriting.Ayub’s hand-written assurance is still preserved in Indian archives.


His other test came in handling India’s food crisis in 1965. He was supposed to visit the U.S. The date was fixed, but President Lyndon Johnson decided that he would like Shastri’s visit to coincide with Ayub’s visit. That Shastri refused. He also refused to cancel his visit to Canada which was scheduled to take place at the same time. He visited Canada, but cancelled his visit to the U.S. He also refused to be pressured to accept wheat of inferior quality under PL 480 that the U.S. was to send to India. Instead he appealed to the nation that all its citizens should have one meal less per day so the poor could be fed. Before announcing that to the nation he asked his wife not to cook the evening meal. He also asked people to grow food even in their houses.

But Shastri’s legacy is not in his rule. Shastriji stands for austerity, simplicity and integrity. He never sought power to be rich. There are so many tales told by those who were close to him. Sumangal Prakash, a Gandhian who marched with Gandhiji during the Salt satyagraha, tells us how even as a prime minister he could not afford a decent coat in winter. Once he had to go some event in Bihar and he did not have a coat. He asked a tailor to take four of his old coats — all made of Khadi — and make into one. He could not afford to get new sets of teeth or a new pair of glasses. He never let his children use his name to gain favor from anyone. He never let them use the official car for private use. His son Anil had to use public transportation to go to school.

My brother told me an incident. He went to Lucknow once when Shastriji was a minister in the U.P. Government. He phoned Shastriji. Shastriji invited him but with a warning, “Your bhabhi (sister-in-law) is not at home today, so you will not get a cooked meal. You have to make do with whatever there is.” How many ministers are there whose wives cook their own meal? And how many prime ministers are there who washed their own clothes every day and polished their own shoes? Once Shastri was visiting Varanasi to attend an event in the winter. The famous Hindi poet Mahadevi Varma noticed that he had no socks. She asked him, “Don’t you feel cold?” He replied, “I have only two pairs of heavy woolen foreign socks, which I wear when I have to go to a cold country like Russia.” Nehru had to lend him a mink coat when as a home minister, he was sent to Kashmir in winter.

And yet, he arranged to send a helicopter to shower flowers on a newly wed couple in a village, where the bride was the daughter of one of his poor friends, who spent time with him in prison during the freedom movement. Shastri was the only home minister without a home of his own.

PAGE-LEAD08-LBSinOffice.jpg



Excellent article indeed!!!!!
I believe he is one of the greatest PMs weve had....and he was in office for 1.5 years!!Great man!
 
When these incidents happened 45 odd years ago, India did not have a very good relationship with US.Why did then, the government not raise a voice or accuse the US?? What were de afraid of?? The Soviet was with us. If ppl can find out so much from the net, surely our government knew more...Why did de just accept things like morons???



Vicky read the article again....the CIA officer made it clear to th reporter that after the death of Homi Bhaba....they made it clear to certain members of government that there is more coming .....who were these ppl in India? Like I said long ago.....democracy is a farce in India and the rest of the world..... ...colonialists didn;t leave willingly and when they did leave...they made sure they did everything to preserve their control and power in subtle ways.....controlling a country or nations involved not subjugating ppl but controlling the ruling class......blackmail, cercion, corruption, black money, sex...etc.....India will never shine unless we get rid of both shitty governments..
 
The fact dat CIA didnt care about 100 odd innocent ppl going down along with bhabha proves dat they re nt any better dan ISI. CIA covers up well,

Huh? but Indians on this forum claim C.I.A is the best spy agency :offpost:

On topic: I'm sorry to hear about what happened to Homi Bhaba but try not to drag I.S.I into this thread.
 

Back
Top Bottom