What's new

History of China

Comparative history :

201034NAC119.gif
 
Im quite shocked when see the GDP of China and Britain are till the same during the weakest stage of China 1900.
 
How did the Economist and Angus Maddison get their GDP figures from year AD1 to 1900? I doubt there are reliable historical economic data available for most of the countries listed from AD1 to 1700.

You know,they are just a bunch of "profesional" work to feed their family.So dont get too tight with those data.
 
Chinese history is also a mixture of glory and shame, brilliance and darkness – it is nevertheless very unique and distinct in this world.

To give a systematic view of Chinese history, I believe the following timeline table is useful. Details see Timeline of Chinese history - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Many of you may be interested in correlating dynasties in West or Mideast or Arabic or anywhere with those in China...

---- Dynasty --------------------------- Years

Three Sovereigns and the Five Emperors 三皇五帝 sān huáng wǔ dì before 2070 BC 628+
Xia Dynasty 夏 xià 2070–1600 BC 470
Shang Dynasty 商 shāng 1600–1046 BC 554
Western Zhou Dynasty 西周 xī zhōu 1046–771 BC 275
Eastern Zhou Dynasty 東周 / 东周 dōng zhōu 770–256 BC 514
Traditionally divided into
Spring and Autumn Period 春秋 chūn qiū 722–476 BC 246
Warring States Period 戰國 / 战国 zhàn guó 475–221 BC 254
Qin Dynasty 秦 qín 221–206 BC 15
Western Han Dynasty 西漢 / 西汉 xī hàn 206 BC–9 AD 215
Xin Dynasty 新 xīn 9–23 14
Eastern Han Dynasty 東漢 / 东汉 dōng hàn 25–220 195
Three Kingdoms 三國 / 三国 sān guó 220–265 45
Western Jin Dynasty 西晉 / 西晋 xī jìn 265–317 52
Eastern Jin Dynasty 東晉 / 东晋 dōng jìn 317–420 103
Southern and Northern Dynasties 南北朝 nán běi cháo 420–589 169
Sui Dynasty 隋 suí 581–618 37
Tang Dynasty 唐 táng 618–907 289
Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms 五代十國 / 五代十国 wǔ dài shí guó 907–960 53
Northern Song Dynasty 北宋 běi sòng 960–1127 167
Southern Song Dynasty 南宋 nán sòng 1127–1279 152
Liao Dynasty 遼 / 辽 liáo 916–1125 209
Jin Dynasty 金 jīn 1115–1234 119
Yuan Dynasty 元 yuán 1271–1368 97
Ming Dynasty 明 míng 1368–1644 276
Shun Dynasty &#38918; sh&#249;n 1644 <1
Qing Dynasty &#28165; q&#299;ng 1644&#8211;1911 268
Empire of China &#20013;&#21326;&#24093;&#22269; Zh&#333;nghu&#225; D&#236;gu&#243; (Yuan Shikai) 1915&#8211;1916 <1

-----------------------

Following diagram is very rough: even in one dynasty, the torritory was always changing.


Territories_of_Dynasties_in_China.gif

Excellent post. I like the Yuan dynasty for its massive land size and the Ming dynasty for its naval technology and explorations.:china:
 
How did the Economist and Angus Maddison get their GDP figures from year AD1 to 1900? I doubt there are reliable historical economic data available for most of the countries listed from AD1 to 1700.

Its all a speculation. No real facts to back it up.
 
it bothers to me that there is a stereotype that even most chinese dont know that in ancient times Chinese soldier dont use ‘&#21073;’ jian in battlefield, only general carrying them as for ceremonial purpose and a sign of social status``but in real battle fields after Western Han dynasty they replaced &#65307;‘&#21073;’ jian (double edged swords) with ‘&#20992;’ dao (single edged swords) as it was more powerful and resilient..

here are some examples of the REAL chinese swords during 600-900

Tang dynasty swords
1303680399_4653.jpg

1303680354_1625.JPG

1303680347_4834.JPG


and this is most popular and well known STEREOTYPED Chinese 'traditional' swords by most chinese or hollywood movies
1303680517_4090.jpg
 
In old times Jian was mainly a status symbol for nobles and aristocrats, and for personal defense by higher class people.
 
A straight sword will fly right off your hand if you try to slice a target with it on horseback at full gallop.
 
How did the Economist and Angus Maddison get their GDP figures from year AD1 to 1900? I doubt there are reliable historical economic data available for most of the countries listed from AD1 to 1700.

Like most economists, they will first build a closed form model based on population, productivity, technology, multiplier effects, etc... Their historical estimates for these factors will be just that, estimates.
I think India must have had a larger population than China in 1 AD or they've developed some comparative advantage like the water wheel.

If you've ever played a video game like civilization, that's pretty similar.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom