What's new

Hari Singh Nalwa's defeat at Nara (1824 A.D) at the hands of Mashwanis and Said Khanis

Samandri

BANNED
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
1,959
Reaction score
-10
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
In 1824 A.D Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa turned his attention to the Gandgar hills, where Muhammad Khan Tareen and a number of other recalcitrant chiefs had taken refuge. In 1822 the Sikhs, after winning a hard-fought battle at Sari at the base of range, had been defeated in an endeavor to reduce Srikot. They now. in 1824, again made the attempt , and again failed. At Nara which stands at the mouth of a path leading up to Srikot, the Mashwanis and Saidkhani Utmanzais made a gallant stand, repulsed the Sikh force , which was 8,000 strong and sent it back to Haripur with a loss of 500 men. A white pillar , erected at later date by Major Abbot , and conspicuous from afar, commemorates the scene of their victory. Hari Singh himself was struck down by a stone hurled from the walls of the village , and rolled into the ravine below , where he lay for a long time senseless and undiscovered. It was reported , indeed , that he was dead, but in short time , having recovered from his wounds, he confuted the rumour by surprising the village of Bagra, where number of rebels had collected , and putting to the sword every armed man that he found there.

Ranjeet Singh visits Hazara
Alarmed at the news of Hari Singh's defeat at Nara, Ranjeet Singh hastened up to Hazara with large reinforcements. Arrived there he sent for all the chiefs and leading men who had taken refuge at Srikot. The Tareen Muhammad Khan , Sarbuland Khan the Tanoli , and Shah Muhammad, the head of Mashwanis, were the only ones to obey his summons. He then attacked the Srikot hills at a number of points simultaneously, driving all opposition before him , and, after staying two nights at Srikot , marched onto Tarbela. Wile halted at the latter place, he mounted an elephant and went-down to the river-side , whereupon the Utmanzais of Khabbal on the opposite bank opened fire on him. Enraged at this, he made his cavalry swim across the river early next at a point lower , and destroyed the villages of khabbal and Kaya , their inhabitants having taken to the hills. He them marched through Yusufzai and Back Lahore-wards via Serai kala, taking Muhammad Khan Tareen with him. The Srikot hills were secured by the building of a fort , which was garrisoned with 500 men.

Hari Singh's drastic measures against Tareen chiefs and Mashwanis (1825)
After Ranjit Singh's departure , Karrals submitted to Hari Singh without fighting, their chief Hassan Ali khan was given a large Jagir and a fort was built at Nara. The sardar then departed for lahore , leaving Mahan Singh behind him as his deputy governor. He had not long gone when Bostan Khan Tareen , the nephew of Muhammad Khan Tareen, who was imprisoned at lahore raised a new disturbance in the Srikot hills. Returning to Hazara, hari Singh had little difficulty in quelling the outbreak , and to prevent a recurrence of any thing of the kind , he took very drastic measures. Muhammad Khan Tareen , whose person he had purchased from Ranjeet Singh for 55,000 Rupees , he caused to be poisoned; Bostan Khan Tareen , the two principle Mashwani headmen , and one or two other leading men , were blown away from guns; and the Mashwanis were evicted from Srikot and forced to live in exile trans-indus till the year 1830 , when they obtained permission to return. The 55,000 rupees which Hari singh had paid for Muhammad Khan were recovered by levy of a tax of two and half rupees per house from most of the villages in Hazara.

Source: Gazetteer of the Hazara district, 1907 , Hubert Digby Watson

Mashwanis
Mashwanis numbered 3992 souls in 1901 census. They inhabit the villages of Srikot, Kundi, AmarKhana and Gadwalian at the north-east end of the Gandgar range. They appear to be syed in origin, Mashwani, their progenitor , being one of the four sons of Syed muhammad Gisu-daraz. He is said to have married daughter or grand-daughter of Kakar , and to have been adopted by Danai, Kakar's father. His descendents consequently have some Kakar blood in them. Other Syeds do not admit the Mashwani's Syed origin and do not intermarry with them. They are a sturdy lot, industrious, well-behaved, and more honest and truthful than most.
They fought manfully against the Sikhs , with varying success, up to the year 1825, when Hari Singh evicted them from the country for five years, and Major Abbot found in them his staunchest supporters in 1848. 'One of the bravest races in the world', he enthusiastically calls them. In their black garments , with their ancient matchlocks , swords, and targes , their tribal banner and their wild music , they are a picturesque sight as they crown the heights of Srikot to greet their vistor or make the hills resound with their mimic warfare. Of all the tribes in Hazara, their history and character appeal most to the Englishmen (Gazetteer of The Hazara District 1907 page 28)
mishwa.png


Utmanzais
Utmanzais numbered 2,564 souls in 1901 census (in Hazara). They were invited across the river by Gujjars, who were being dispossessed by the Tanolis , Tareens and others, and they gradually acquired much of the Gujar's own territory. They are subdivided into Allazais, Akazais, and Kanazais. Of these Allazais are the most numerous in Hazara, and are spit up into three sections - the Tarkhelis, the Said Khanis, and the Khushal Khanis.(Gazetteer of The Hazara District 1907 page 24)

utmanzais.png


Hari Singh Nalwa's defeat at the hands of Mashwanis and Saidkhanis | History of Pashtuns
 
Nice pictures. Although they can't be called "pashtuns". They're called hindkowan, hazarewal or Pathan.

As for Karrals, they didn't "surrender" without a fight. They killed Amar Singh Majithia, the first Sikh commander sent against them. They also tried an insurrection against British Raj in 1857, allied with the Dhund abbasis, but failed due to an insider's betrayal. They also had a long lasting war with the Gakhars of Khanpur, and in late 1870s they were defeated by the Gakhars. In those clashes, the British did not interfere.
 
Nice pictures. Although they can't be called "pashtuns". They're called hindkowan, hazarewal or Pathan.

.
Mashwanis of Haripur are Pashto-speakers, strong adherent of Pashtunwali, they associate themselves with Pashtuns. Their villages in Haripur are the only ones where Pashto is spoken. I have interacted with lot of them, and i find them very different from Hindko-speaking pathans like Tareens or Jaduns.
Gazetter of Hazara 1907, on page 41, says that Beside Mashwanis, Utmanzais of tarbela and Khalsa , and Tarkhelis can also talk Pashto. And that it is ordinary hard pashto of the Peshawer border.

So Said Khanis (Utmanzais) and Mashwanis who fought Sikhs in 1824, were linguistically as well as culturally full Pashtuns.
 
Last edited:
True that Karrals killed Amar Singh Majithia but they surrendered to Hari Singh nalwa without fighting as mentioned in Hazara gazetteer. Karral chief not only surrendered to Hari Singh, but he also acquired a Jagir from Sikhs. Hari Singh was on whole another level in terms of military capabilities and ferocity. Before defeat at Nara, Hari Singh managed to defeat 25,000 strong Lashkar of Jadoons and Tanolis at Mangal, that victory convinced Ranjeet Singh to make him governor of Hazara. As evident from above article, he was ready to go to any level to defeat rebellion even if it means buying prisoner Muhammad Khan Tareen from Ranjeet singh and poisoning him. Blowing Tareen and Mashwani chiefs from cannons worked like magic so i am changing my previous opinion about him, he was bad ruler but sharp military commander.
@Jaggu
 
True that Karrals killed Amar Singh Majithia but they surrendered to Hari Singh nalwa without fighting as mentioned in Hazara gazetteer. Karral chief not only surrendered to Hari Singh, but he also acquired a Jagir from Sikhs. Hari Singh was on whole another level in terms of military capabilities and ferocity. Before defeat at Nara, Hari Singh managed to defeat 25,000 strong Lashkar of Jadoons and Tanolis at Mangal, that victory convinced Ranjeet Singh to make him governor of Hazara. As evident from above article, he was ready to go to any level to defeat rebellion even if it means buying prisoner Muhammad Khan Tareen from Ranjeet singh and poisoning him. Blowing Tareen and Mashwani chiefs from cannons worked like magic so i am changing my previous opinion about him, he was bad ruler but sharp military commander.
@Jaggu

Unlike Hari Singh Nalwa who was killed in battle, Amar Singh Majithia was not killed in such a way. He was governor for 2 years before he was killed. He had many similarities to Hari Singh Nalwa. The both were good generals, both were known for their sheer physical strength. Amar Singh was an excellent archer. Of Amar Singh it is said that when an arrow would leave his bow, the arrow would literally pierce and go through a tree. He was assassinated. One day he was gone to the river to bath and while bathing he was attacked and killed. Had he not been assassinated, then he would have remained governor instead of Hari Singh Nalwa.
 

Back
Top Bottom