What's new

Government achieves only four out of 89 targets

mr42O

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 15, 2009
Messages
6,178
Reaction score
4
Country
Pakistan
Location
Norway
SLAMABAD: In its first three years, the PML-N government could achieve only four out of 89 targets that it set in the election manifesto, as it has abandoned economic reforms and adopted measures that are more populist, reveals a report of an independent think tank.

In its report “Bad Economics is Bad Politics’, the Policy Research Institute of Market Economy (PRIME) stated that the ruling party has “obsessed itself with the cliché of developing infrastructure” by moving away from the sustainable economic reforms path.

The economy: All is not well

The report said the government’s economic policies were geared towards achieving goals that in its view would fetch votes in the next elections. It has dubbed the new fiscal year 2016-17 budget as an ‘election year budget’.

Although the PRIME scorecard showed poor economic performance of the government, yet critics like Ali Kemal – an economist working with the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics – said PRIME “overestimated the government’s performance and was generous” in giving scores.

The PRIME report tracked down the 89 targets set by the PML-N to achieve economic revival and energy security. It was the seventh report on the PML-N election manifesto that covered the period January-June 2016.

The report argues that the government has chosen not to follow promised reforms of privatisation, deregulation and liberalisation, and adopted popular economic measures underpinned by what it calls “development politics” and other populist economic measures.

Non-beneficial infrastructure projects

The report argued that most of the projects that the government was undertaking were neither beneficial in the long term nor would benefit majority of the country’s population. It concludes, “there are only very few infrastructure projects of the PML-N that can be declared beneficial for majority of the population and would give benefit in the long term.”

“The development politics of the PML-N is purely politically-driven and the local logic and infrastructural context does not justify rationale of most of the projects, big or small,” it said.

Ali Salman, Executive Director of PRIME, said after full three years, the PML-N’s cumulative progress card had only four targets that were achieved – one of them was for economic revival and the remaining three for energy security.

The indicators that showed progress were 28 for economic revival and eight for energy security.

There were 12 indicators, which saw no development at all. In addition, there were 23 indicators, for which the previous status had been maintained with no development either positive or negative.

Four of the indicators showed no progress, rather underwent reversal, and thus earned a score of zero. Ten indicators got a negative score.

Privatisation

According to the report, the government has stalled the privatisation programme in the energy sector. One of the immensely important pillars of the envisaged reforms was privatisation, which has been stalled last fiscal year.

PM stops privatisation of power companies

Three mammoth taxpayers’ money guzzlers, Pakistan Steel Mills, Pakistan International Airlines and Pakistan Railways were no more and nowhere on the list of SOEs to be privatised within the assigned timeframe, it added.

At the launch of the report, Minister for Planning Ahsan Iqbal insisted that the privatisation of energy sector would stall investment in power distribution companies in the transit period, endangering the government’s plan to add 10,000 megawatts of electricity by 2018.

Interestingly, the government realised this by spending Rs1.7 billion on hiring financial advisers for the privatisation of power sector companies and spending billions of rupees on pro-privatisation campaigns.

In the energy sector, whatever reforms had been introduced during the last three years, the process had been slow and was not conducive to bring any tangible results in the remaining period of the PML-N, it added.

The government could not eliminate the circular debt and there was no creation of the Ministry of Energy as the Prime Minister promised in his election manifesto.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 22nd, 2016.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/1146709/think-tank-report-government-achieves-4-89-targets/
 
Thread starter,does your leader have the balls to campaign for Kalabagh dam? If his stooges should keep quiet.
 
It is winning every election and PTI is not. PTI will lose its standing if it allies with PPP. PPP is B team of PMLN. Both are equally corrupt.

Imran cant seem to make right decisions at the right time. Timing in politics is everything. I have high hopes from PTI but its not doing well, I m afraid.
 
Imran cant seem to make right decisions at the right time.


Imran khan is not capable of making right decision .... period...

From taliban and zarb e azab to dharna to kpk government to panama leaks.... has he ever made the right choice??
 
SLAMABAD: In its first three years, the PML-N government could achieve only four out of 89 targets that it set in the election manifesto, as it has abandoned economic reforms and adopted measures that are more populist, reveals a report of an independent think tank.

In its report “Bad Economics is Bad Politics’, the Policy Research Institute of Market Economy (PRIME) stated that the ruling party has “obsessed itself with the cliché of developing infrastructure” by moving away from the sustainable economic reforms path.

The economy: All is not well

The report said the government’s economic policies were geared towards achieving goals that in its view would fetch votes in the next elections. It has dubbed the new fiscal year 2016-17 budget as an ‘election year budget’.

Although the PRIME scorecard showed poor economic performance of the government, yet critics like Ali Kemal – an economist working with the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics – said PRIME “overestimated the government’s performance and was generous” in giving scores.

The PRIME report tracked down the 89 targets set by the PML-N to achieve economic revival and energy security. It was the seventh report on the PML-N election manifesto that covered the period January-June 2016.

The report argues that the government has chosen not to follow promised reforms of privatisation, deregulation and liberalisation, and adopted popular economic measures underpinned by what it calls “development politics” and other populist economic measures.

Non-beneficial infrastructure projects

The report argued that most of the projects that the government was undertaking were neither beneficial in the long term nor would benefit majority of the country’s population. It concludes, “there are only very few infrastructure projects of the PML-N that can be declared beneficial for majority of the population and would give benefit in the long term.”

“The development politics of the PML-N is purely politically-driven and the local logic and infrastructural context does not justify rationale of most of the projects, big or small,” it said.

Ali Salman, Executive Director of PRIME, said after full three years, the PML-N’s cumulative progress card had only four targets that were achieved – one of them was for economic revival and the remaining three for energy security.

The indicators that showed progress were 28 for economic revival and eight for energy security.

There were 12 indicators, which saw no development at all. In addition, there were 23 indicators, for which the previous status had been maintained with no development either positive or negative.

Four of the indicators showed no progress, rather underwent reversal, and thus earned a score of zero. Ten indicators got a negative score.

Privatisation

According to the report, the government has stalled the privatisation programme in the energy sector. One of the immensely important pillars of the envisaged reforms was privatisation, which has been stalled last fiscal year.

PM stops privatisation of power companies

Three mammoth taxpayers’ money guzzlers, Pakistan Steel Mills, Pakistan International Airlines and Pakistan Railways were no more and nowhere on the list of SOEs to be privatised within the assigned timeframe, it added.

At the launch of the report, Minister for Planning Ahsan Iqbal insisted that the privatisation of energy sector would stall investment in power distribution companies in the transit period, endangering the government’s plan to add 10,000 megawatts of electricity by 2018.

Interestingly, the government realised this by spending Rs1.7 billion on hiring financial advisers for the privatisation of power sector companies and spending billions of rupees on pro-privatisation campaigns.

In the energy sector, whatever reforms had been introduced during the last three years, the process had been slow and was not conducive to bring any tangible results in the remaining period of the PML-N, it added.

The government could not eliminate the circular debt and there was no creation of the Ministry of Energy as the Prime Minister promised in his election manifesto.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 22nd, 2016.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/1146709/think-tank-report-government-achieves-4-89-targets/

Utter rubbish, you people don't appreciate good performance
 
It is winning every election and PTI is not. PTI will lose its standing if it allies with PPP. PPP is B team of PMLN. Both are equally corrupt.

Imran cant seem to make right decisions at the right time. Timing in politics is everything. I have high hopes from PTI but its not doing well, I m afraid.

Calm Down

What did you expect? The sitting Government always wins these By-Elections and these periphery elections in GB and AJK. PPP won more than 95% By Elections during 2008-2013 for both Provincial and National Assembly Seats. They were facing the worst accusations of corruption during 2011 but still managed to sweep the elections in AJK. Even up till 2012 they were still winning Provincial Elections in Punjab. PML-N has won not nearly as many By Elections as PPP did during 2008-2013. People always tend to vote for the Sitting Government, and the Sitting Government always has the resources in terms of Patwari and Police who can mobilize the resources and bring out the voters. The voters know that if they don't vote for the ruling party, the ruling party will punish their constituency. Just ask the people of Lodhran, who were promised 2.5 Billion Rupees in Development Funds, but after JKT Thumping Win not a single penny was given to them.

PTI is on the right path finally. They are finally focusing on fixing their party infrastructure, and the postponement of Internal Party Elections after 2018 GE Elections is a Good Decision. They need to finalize their Party Structure, and let these people focus on their own constituencies.
 
I agree that Government should be brutal while pushing for reforms. NS trying to please Opposition parties by slowing/halting privatization is a suicide. Federal government should ultimately reduce its role to taxation, foreign policy and defence. Rest everything should be passed over to respective provinces . We are living in 21st century where the governments don't run business enterprises.
 
SLAMABAD: In its first three years, the PML-N government could achieve only four out of 89 targets that it set in the election manifesto, as it has abandoned economic reforms and adopted measures that are more populist, reveals a report of an independent think tank.

In its report “Bad Economics is Bad Politics’, the Policy Research Institute of Market Economy (PRIME) stated that the ruling party has “obsessed itself with the cliché of developing infrastructure” by moving away from the sustainable economic reforms path.

The economy: All is not well

The report said the government’s economic policies were geared towards achieving goals that in its view would fetch votes in the next elections. It has dubbed the new fiscal year 2016-17 budget as an ‘election year budget’.

Although the PRIME scorecard showed poor economic performance of the government, yet critics like Ali Kemal – an economist working with the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics – said PRIME “overestimated the government’s performance and was generous” in giving scores.

The PRIME report tracked down the 89 targets set by the PML-N to achieve economic revival and energy security. It was the seventh report on the PML-N election manifesto that covered the period January-June 2016.

The report argues that the government has chosen not to follow promised reforms of privatisation, deregulation and liberalisation, and adopted popular economic measures underpinned by what it calls “development politics” and other populist economic measures.

Non-beneficial infrastructure projects

The report argued that most of the projects that the government was undertaking were neither beneficial in the long term nor would benefit majority of the country’s population. It concludes, “there are only very few infrastructure projects of the PML-N that can be declared beneficial for majority of the population and would give benefit in the long term.”

“The development politics of the PML-N is purely politically-driven and the local logic and infrastructural context does not justify rationale of most of the projects, big or small,” it said.

Ali Salman, Executive Director of PRIME, said after full three years, the PML-N’s cumulative progress card had only four targets that were achieved – one of them was for economic revival and the remaining three for energy security.

The indicators that showed progress were 28 for economic revival and eight for energy security.

There were 12 indicators, which saw no development at all. In addition, there were 23 indicators, for which the previous status had been maintained with no development either positive or negative.

Four of the indicators showed no progress, rather underwent reversal, and thus earned a score of zero. Ten indicators got a negative score.

Privatisation

According to the report, the government has stalled the privatisation programme in the energy sector. One of the immensely important pillars of the envisaged reforms was privatisation, which has been stalled last fiscal year.

PM stops privatisation of power companies

Three mammoth taxpayers’ money guzzlers, Pakistan Steel Mills, Pakistan International Airlines and Pakistan Railways were no more and nowhere on the list of SOEs to be privatised within the assigned timeframe, it added.

At the launch of the report, Minister for Planning Ahsan Iqbal insisted that the privatisation of energy sector would stall investment in power distribution companies in the transit period, endangering the government’s plan to add 10,000 megawatts of electricity by 2018.

Interestingly, the government realised this by spending Rs1.7 billion on hiring financial advisers for the privatisation of power sector companies and spending billions of rupees on pro-privatisation campaigns.

In the energy sector, whatever reforms had been introduced during the last three years, the process had been slow and was not conducive to bring any tangible results in the remaining period of the PML-N, it added.

The government could not eliminate the circular debt and there was no creation of the Ministry of Energy as the Prime Minister promised in his election manifesto.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 22nd, 2016.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/1146709/think-tank-report-government-achieves-4-89-targets/

instead of enlightened us on what targets PML N achieved or not, please enlightened us, what are the Targets of PTI and what they achieved??
 
I agree that Government should be brutal while pushing for reforms. NS trying to please Opposition parties by slowing/halting privatization is a suicide. Federal government should ultimately reduce its role to taxation, foreign policy and defence. Rest everything should be passed over to respective provinces . We are living in 21st century where the governments don't run business enterprises.

Reforms and Nawaz Sharif! Cant improve on this!

Imran khan is not capable of making right decision .... period...

From taliban and zarb e azab to dharna to kpk government to panama leaks.... has he ever made the right choice??

Much better than anyone else actually. His view on Taliban and Zarb e Azb were political. If he was uttering those things while in govt, he would have been what you have characterized.

While he was saying all those things, govt of 'experienced' PM was mum. In fact govt was the one negotiating with Taliban until military stepped in. Govt provides leadership. If Imran was wrong, govt of Sharif did not provide any counter narrative. It was govt which leads not the opposition leader.
 
instead of enlightened us on what targets PML N achieved or not, please enlightened us, what are the Targets of PTI and what they achieved??
The target is tabdili and they will probably achieve this in 2018 after being replaced by ANP again.
 

Back
Top Bottom