What's new

Former French Foreign Minister: The War against Syria was Planned Two years

Syrian Lion

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Messages
7,264
Reaction score
3
Country
Syrian Arab Republic
Location
Syrian Arab Republic
Former French Foreign Minister: The War against Syria was Planned Two years before “The Arab Spring”




In an interview with the French TV station LCP, former French minister for Foreign Affairs Roland Dumas said:

‘’ I’m going to tell you something. I was in England two years before the violence in Syria on other business. I met with top British officials, who confessed to me that they were preparing something in Syria.

This was in Britain not in America. Britain was organizing an invasion of rebels into Syria. They even asked me, although I was no longer minister for foreign affairs, if I would like to participate.

Naturally, I refused, I said I’m French, that doesn’t interest me.’’

Dumas went on give the audience a quick lesson on the real reason for the war that has now claimed the lives of tens of thousands of people.

‘’This operation goes way back. It was prepared, preconceived and planned… in the region it is important to know that this Syrian regime has a very anti-Israeli stance.

Consequently, everything that moves in the region- and I have this from the former Israeli prime minister who told me ‘we’ll try to get on with our neighbours but those who don’t agree with us will be destroyed.

It’s a type of politics, a view of history, why not after all. But one should know about it.’’


Former French Foreign Minister: The War against Syria was Planned Two years before “The Arab Spring” | Global Research
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It was planned before September 11, 2001. The plan was called USA pivot into the Middle East and Muslim world, before the rise of another superpower like china or Russia. So that America could cement it's interest in the Middle East and Muslim world. 9/11 was a pre-approved attack to fool the public. It was planned by Necons they took over the government in the 2000 presidential elections with Bush.


Rise of superpowers like China and Russia after the world wars and the cold war is just inevitable. The rise of these powers would mean that they would create an Eastern block that includes much of the Middle east and the Muslim world. It would create a strong East Vs. West ( America and Western Europe).


The western plan was to go in to the Middle East before that happens. Of course they made lots of mistakes like in Iraq, and Afghanistan. They realize in order to win, they need to take out Iran. So, now all of their focus is on Iran. They have to weaken Syria, Lebanon and Iraq, and then go in for Iran.


The idea was "how do you sell all these wars to the public, how do you convince the American public that they need to send their sons and daughters to the Middle East to die??" They needed something really big and extravagant! and that was 9/11, forever cemented in people's mind and introduced the "war on terror" , thus the pivot into the Middle East and the Muslim world began.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha1rEhovONU
 
Tell that to the "I hate evil Assad" brigade .... Great Video's pretty much proves what i have been saying all along...
 
Tell that to the "I hate evil Assad" brigade .... Great Video's pretty much proves what i have been saying all along...

you see, facts like these, they ignore, they fear the truth, they just don't want to wake up to see the reality...
 
you see, facts like these, they ignore, they fear the truth, they just don't want to wake up to see the reality...

They know the reality...they are pretending to be asleep.... you can't wake these people up.... Americans and Saudis want FSA to win no matter what they do ... Its all about blocking Iranian influence in the region.... Morality be damned unfortunately
 
Roland Dumas to SANA: West was preparing attack on Syria before crisis started


Jul 01, 2013

20130701-171253_h490212.jpg


Former French Foreign Minister Roland Dumas revealed that there's a plot which was devised by several western countries – primarily Britain and France – to topple the Syrian the government even before the crisis started in Syria.

In an exclusive interview given to SANA's correspondent in Paris, Dumas said that while he was in Britain before the crisis began in Syria, he was invited to a party where two people an Englishman and a Frenchman, asked him if he would like to participate in preparations for an attack on Syria to topple the government in it.

He said he refused this offer, but events proved that they were serious about what they said at that evening.

Dumas voiced surprise over the French government's positions, saying that the paths chosen by the governments of former President Nicolas Sarkozy and current President Francois Holland aren't the right paths that lead to peace in Syria.

On the west's goals from toppling the Syrian state, Dumas said that he thinks the current international climate formed around the Syrian situation contentious the policies adopted several years ago to deal with the Arab world, stressing that the west's policies in such issues aren't policies of peace but rather of war, and that he personally is against war and supports the path that leads to peace.

Regarding the Syrian opposition, Dumas said that this opposition is multifaceted, and that countries like Qatar and Saudi Arabia are involved in the fighting taking place in Syria against the legitimate government.

"A peaceful solution isn't achieved by letting people fight," he said, stressing that sending weapons will not solve problems in Syria.

Dumas pointed out that the legitimate government in Syria is reclaiming areas which gunmen seized, which is a good sign, noting that France had been opposing the suggestion of holding an international conference on Syria in a manner contrary to its traditional political creed, but eventually it admitted that the conference must be held as soon as possible and its position on Iran's participation in the conference was altered.

He said that the most important point is the agreement between Russia and the US on holding this conference, noting that there mustn't be any preconceptions about the conference.

On the G8 meeting in Ireland, Dumas said that it wasn't the optimal place for discussing Syria because many countries interested in the Syrian issue weren't there, which is why the conference due to be held in Geneva is important.

Regarding France sending advanced weapons to terrorist groups in Syria, Dumas said that sending weapons contradicts peaceful solutions because weapons are made for war, adding that it's unfortunate that some sides want to send one side as this will prompt others to send weapons to the other side.

He noted that there were discussions on the issue of weapons because the west is concerned over who will receive the weapons, pointing out to Libya where weapons disappeared, asserting that sending weapons to Syria will exacerbate the conflict and make it more difficult to resolve.

Dumas said that international laws are only good for achieving peace when its time comes, and that there's no hope of ending the crisis in Syria without having all countries participate in an international conference for this purpose.

He said that the allegations of chemical weapons use in Syria are very dangerous as they bring to mind the discussions which took place about Iraq in the past, when the US alleged that Iraq possessed chemical weapons but none were found, stressing that in legal terms, evidence is procured through judicial channels, not through journalists carrying small bottles which they claim they procured in Syria, as those individuals aren't trustworthy.

Dumas went on to note that international law has items on destroying chemical weapons which raises concerns, saying it's best to have the UN send impartial and reliable experts to look into this matter.

On France's double standards in combating terrorists in Mali while supporting them in Syria, Dumas said that France says it will arm the "opposition" but it's unknown what will happen to these weapons, and that there's no way of knowing that these weapons won't be turned against France, adding "this is a great risk… when we enter a conflict we know it can spread."

He said that the traditional relations between Syria and France were good, particularly on the cultural level, but all that was undermined and now the two countries are enemies which doesn't make sense, adding "it's time to fix everything."

Dumas pointed out that some sides have a desire to destroy strong Arab states, like what happened in Iraq and Libya before and what is being attempted in Syria, particularly given Syria's special relations with Russia.

He said that Israel plays a role in what is happening in Syria, pointing out to the statements of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who said that if an agreement isn't reached, then Israel will attack and destroy the governments that stand against it.

On the possibility of France and the west changing their position on Syria, Dumas said that this is possible, and that France's position has shown some development recently which is a positive indicator and a move in the right direction.

Dumas stressed that there's massive propaganda being spread regarding events in Syria, with all news, reports and images coming from one source, causing the French public which sees these images every day to form a terrible impression that there are "bad guys" represented by the Syrian government who are killing the people as they allege, and on the other side there are "good guys" represented by the armed groups, causing them to think that the bad guys must go and the good guys must stay, adding "but one day, the truth will come out."

He said that conceptions must be corrected, and then those who support certain policies will see that they are mistaken, and then it's possible to put an end to these policies.

Dumas concluded by saying that Syria and the Syrian people are great and that they will emerge from this crisis, adding "we must hope that they do not emerge from it too late… we wish that Syria doesn't suffer many losses in lives and damages."
 
France and Britain did the same in Libya also. They are in ferocious drive of neocolonialism, because their states are on the terminal decline. They are not willing to accept their decline gracefully, and still think they should be world powers. Their arrogance will come back to bite them and their fall will be even harder.
They made the mistakes of their lifes, for the crimes they commited in Syria.
 
France and Britain did the same in Libya also. They are in ferocious drive of neocolonialism, because their states are on the terminal decline. They are not willing to accept their decline gracefully, and still think they should be world powers. Their arrogance will come back to bite them and their fall will be even harder.
They made the mistakes of their lifes, for the crimes they commited in Syria.
Well, Syria and Iran will stop them from thinking they are the Alphas of the Middle East, however there are some countries in the region who make them feel that they are...
 
Well, Syria and Iran will stop them from thinking they are the Alphas of the Middle East, however there are some countries in the region who make them feel that they are...

We are already stopping them bro. The Syrian Army is winning on the ground. Winning militarilly and the hearts of the people. Its why the West come out so desperate with their claims of WMD use, when UN investigation team confirms it was the terrorist rebels that used it. Desperation in its highest order!
 
It was planned before September 11, 2001. The plan was called USA pivot into the Middle East and Muslim world, before the rise of another superpower like china or Russia. So that America could cement it's interest in the Middle East and Muslim world. 9/11 was a pre-approved attack to fool the public. It was planned by Necons they took over the government in the 2000 presidential elections with Bush.


Rise of superpowers like China and Russia after the world wars and the cold war is just inevitable. The rise of these powers would mean that they would create an Eastern block that includes much of the Middle east and the Muslim world. It would create a strong East Vs. West ( America and Western Europe).


The western plan was to go in to the Middle East before that happens. Of course they made lots of mistakes like in Iraq, and Afghanistan. They realize in order to win, they need to take out Iran. So, now all of their focus is on Iran. They have to weaken Syria, Lebanon and Iraq, and then go in for Iran.


The idea was "how do you sell all these wars to the public, how do you convince the American public that they need to send their sons and daughters to the Middle East to die??" They needed something really big and extravagant! and that was 9/11, forever cemented in people's mind and introduced the "war on terror" , thus the pivot into the Middle East and the Muslim world began.

Wesley Clark ( US 4 Star General ) US will attack 7 countries in 5 years.(Posmedprod.com) - YouTube

Ever watch the Xfiles?
911 Conspiracy predicted in X-Files - YouTube

We knew it was going to happen.
 
We are already stopping them bro. The Syrian Army is winning on the ground. Winning militarilly and the hearts of the people. Its why the West come out so desperate with their claims of WMD use, when UN investigation team confirms it was the terrorist rebels that used it. Desperation in its highest order!
They are so desperate, they decide to arm TERRORISTS, their own people know it is wrong, and many are against arming the cannibals, but the west is losing badly they had to arm them... they even admit it with their statements of why arming the rebels, because they are losing ground...
 
They are so desperate, they decide to arm TERRORISTS, their own people know it is wrong, and many are against arming the cannibals, but the west is losing badly they had to arm them... they even admit it with their statements of why arming the rebels, because they are losing ground...

That be like saying Syria needs Hezbollah because its desperate. Notice the tide turned because of the involvement of Hezbollah?
 
That be like saying Syria needs Hezbollah because its desperate. Notice the tide turned because of the involvement of Hezbollah?
nah Hezbollah is different, Hezbollah only joined one battle, and Syria + Iran arms Hezbollah for a long time (before the conflict) , you are missing the point here...
 

Back
Top Bottom