What's new

Findings of Abbottabad Commission: How US reached Osama

I have two words

Establishment of Pakistan = "TATTOOO"
Govt of Pakistan = "PHEETHOO"

both TATTTO AND PHEETOO ARE ****** *****!

PAkistan External and Internal Foreign Policy "METI PAOOO" aur har baaar ma****waoo!
 
Abbottabad Commission report: Overhaul of spy outfits proposed
ISLAMABAD: The Abbottabad Commission has recommended restructuring and overhauling civil and military intelligence agencies through a parliamentary oversight and proposed a well-defined national security policy to ensure effective counter-terrorism performance.
While the government plans to convene an all-party conference to chalk out a consensus-based national security policy, the commission noted that despite the fact that Pakistan was the main victim of terrorism, there was no national security policy in the country to combat the menace. The classified report was leaked to Al-Jazeera news network– a copy of which is available on its website.
“The excessive powers and non-accountability of Pakistani intelligence establishment have posed the greatest threat of state failure to Pakistan,” the commission noted in its findings, adding, “The current defence policy and the joint strategic directive modality is a reflection of the military hegemony over the formulation of the National Security Policy (in unwritten form) which despite token civilian bureaucratic inputs, excludes serious civilian input.”
Analysts say the government might use the findings of the Abbottabad Commission to assert civilian authority on matters of national security in the upcoming APC.
The leaked report states that the National Assembly should set up an expert committee to look into the performance and mandate of the various civilian and military intelligence agencies.
“In particular, the failure of the intelligence community with respect to developments preceding and following the May 2 [2011] incident [Osama bin Laden raid] needs to be thoroughly looked into,” it reads.
The expert committee, the report says, should assess intelligence agencies work, culture, achievements and failure, their mandate and organisation, accountability, parliamentary oversight, among other things, and make appropriate recommendations consistent with civilian control and national security.
The violation of this democratic procedure was one reason for exclusive vigilance towards a border from where a developing threat was palpable, if not certain. As a result, no effective ‘pro-active’ policy planning took place and “we were left in our usual reactive policy mode in which policy options in a crisis are close to zero”.
Need for a National Security Council
The commission said a properly constituted National Security Council was necessary.
“Just as there is no national security policy, there is no NSC in the country. The Defence Committee of the Cabinet is not a substitute for a NSC. The NSC primarily should be a body that collects, collates and coordinates information and intelligence related to national security and submits regular policy paper and recommendations to the chief executive, i.e. the prime minister. These papers and recommendations should address long term, short term and immediate national security issues including crisis situations.”

It recommended that the core of the NSC will need to be a secretariat headed by a national security adviser of acknowledged analytical ability, having a deep understanding of the internal, regional and international situations and their trends.
The Abbottabad Commission recommended that the National Counter-Terrorism Authority needed to be made into a real rather than fictional body.
Corp commanders discuss implications of report
Also on Tuesday, the top military commanders informally discussed the likely implications of the leaked report of the Abbottabad Commission.
Chaired by Chief of Army Staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, the meeting was held at the General Headquarters in Rawalpindi.
An Inter-Services Public Relations statement said the routine corps commanders meeting undertook a comprehensive review of the prevalent internal and external security situation of the country.
However, sources confirmed that the top brass also discussed the findings of the commission.
A senior official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said although officially the report was not made public, the conclusions of the commission were nothing new. The official admitted that there was a ‘systematic failure’ at all levels.
He said the findings had made it clear that the slain al Qaeda kingpin Osama bin Laden had no institutional support from within Pakistan during his nine-year stay in the country.
When asked, he said the military would give its formal reaction once the report was officially made public.
(Read: Abbottabad leak)
Published in The Express Tribune, July 10th, 2013.
 
Abbottabad Commission report: Military faults local police
ISLAMABAD:
In their briefing to the Abbottabad Commission, Pakistan’s military passed the buck to the local police for not spotting the house Osama Bin Laden and his family had been living in for years.
Army’s board of inquiry, established under Lt-Gen Javed Iqbal, told the commission that the local Nawan Shehar police station was located close to Bin Laden’s compound; but the police failed to observe anything unusual about the place and no report on anything suspicious was ever filed neither by the police nor special branch, which were responsible to maintain a close watch on the area. This is according to the Abbottabad Commission report leaked to Arab news network Al Jazeera, a copy of which is available on its website.
The board of inquiry maintained that the police ignored or failed to take note of even the visible violation of cantonment regulations in the shape of construction of a third storey at the compound. “They also did not detect anything strange or noteworthy in the manner or the activities of the two brothers; while the special branch had the responsibility to keep an eye on all unusual activities, behaviours or visits to the area due to its proximity to Pakistan Military Academy (PMA), the board stated.”
“Since high-profile personalities regularly visited the PMA, sweeps were regularly carried out to ensure against any untoward incident. However, the special branch was understaffed and underequipped to do a proficient job,” the board stated. According to the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI)’s estimates and Bin Laden’s diary, he had moved to the areas in August 2005 and had maintained a low profile. “And as the house was located within the Abbottabad cantonment; it was least expected to draw any attention as a possible terror hideout,” the board said.
The board maintained that due to the presence of a plethora of security and intelligence agencies and civil and military organisations, it was difficult to coordinate and share information. Poor coordination among agencies, duplication of work, qualitative and quantitative inadequacies of training, skills and equipment were among the reasons that made it possible for Bin Laden to evade detection in Abbottabad, the board told the commission
Speaking before the commission, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) said that the American CIA had rented a number of houses in Islamabad, a development that had been reported to the government.
The spy agency said Bin Laden was not operational since 2005 and his Egyptian deputy Ayman al Zawahiri was running al Qaeda’s affairs; therefore, everyone, including the US, thought that Bin Laden was dead.
The commission rejected the ISI’s assertion, saying that the US had never called off its search for Bin Laden, they had just stopped sharing information with the ISI. The commission said the ISI abandoned its search as soon as it thought the US had stopped looking for Bin Laden.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 10th, 2013.

Osama bin Laden: How not to lose a fugitive in 10 long years
KARACHI:
The Guardian newspaper notes that Osama bin Laden hid from spy satellites under a cowboy hat, did not pay property taxes and had a run-in with a traffic policeman in Swat.

1. According to the Abbottabad commission “collective incompetence and negligence” by the intelligence agencies was the main reason why the al Qaeda chief remained undetected for so long. Thankfully for us, this proves Pakistani army not housing the terrorist.

2. A traffic policeman in Swat could have ended the hunt for the world’s most wanted man soon after 2001 had he not “quickly settled the matter,” when he pulled over a car for over-speeding, carrying a clean-shaved Osama. This was when Bin Laden was being smuggled into the country.

3. America’s number one enemy used to wear a cowboy hat and stand under grape trellis to avoid being seen by US spy satellites.

4. Osama was a man of frugal tastes. Before coming to Abbottabad, he had just six pairs of shalwar qameez. His lack of possessions made neighbours believe that Bin Laden moved between locations.

5. Pakistan suffers from “governance implosion syndrome”. The ISI was unwilling to share important intelligence with the police.”

6. Since the children were never allowed to leave the premises of the house, Bin Laden tried to entertain his grandchildren by encouraging them to compete against each other in tending their vegetable patches. When the neighbour’s daughter recognised from TV that the ‘poor uncle’ who lived upstairs was world’s most wanted man, she could not watch television anymore.

7. Although a garrison town, the prime reason that Abottabad is free of terrorist attacks is that so many terrorist families live there. Bin Laden’s band of brothers who also dwelled in the suburban city included another top al Qaeda operative, Abu Faraj al-Libi and a Bali bomber, Umar Patek.

8. The property was bought using a fake national ID card, the third floor was built illegally and the occupants did not pay taxes.

9. Pakistan’s spies deeply distrust their US counterparts. According to Pasha, the “main agenda of the CIA was to have the ISI declared a terrorist organisation”. The CIA refused to share intelligence with the ISI because the CIA wanted to deny Pakistan the credit for nabbing the world’s most wanted man.

10. The CIA was very active in Abbottabad and there were “ground assets” to aid the raid on Bin Laden. “Suspicious activities” included the cutting down of trees to clear the approach of the helicopters and the renting of a nearby house for people supposedly working for the USAID.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 10th, 2013.
 
I am not sure what you're trying to prove here. Can you provide any evidence for the fantastic conspiracy theories mentioned by yourself or in western media?

Thanks for using more civilized words this time. I am not trying to prove anything, neither I am here to win an internet war. But this is what the western world thinks about the whole incident...it is a different issue if Pakistan care a damn about what outside world thinks about her.

Many Pakistani PDF members have mentioned in several posts that there are sympathizers of A-Q, jihadists, wahabis, & even TTP within Pakistani military & ISI who are pursuing their own agenda. If this is true, then there are three possibilities:

1. OBL was protected within Pakistan as a state policy to maintain good relations with Taliban, ensure political control of Afganistan, while showing US that Pakistan is with them on WoT and extract benefits from the US.
2. OBL was protected by a section of sympathizers within ISI & military without the knowledge of the Govt. for the above-mentioned reasons, as they felt it would be beneficial for Pakistan in the long-run.
3. Entire Pakistani intelligence network truly failed and someone of the importance of OBL was successful to remain unnoticed for nine long years within Pakistan.

Now, any of the three possibilities are bad news for Pakistan and her future, and also for India. The last thing we Indians want is a terrorist infested Pakistan, or a Talibanized Pakistan. And if you ask me, then the third possibility is the worst & most dangerous of all three.
 
Thanks for using more civilized words this time. I am not trying to prove anything, neither I am here to win an internet war. But this is what the western world thinks about the whole incident...it is a different issue if Pakistan care a damn about what outside world thinks about her.

Many Pakistani PDF members have mentioned in several posts that there are sympathizers of A-Q, jihadists, wahabis, & even TTP within Pakistani military & ISI who are pursuing their own agenda. If this is true, then there are three possibilities:

1. OBL was protected within Pakistan as a state policy to maintain good relations with Taliban, ensure political control of Afganistan, while showing US that Pakistan is with them on WoT and extract benefits from the US.
2. OBL was protected by a section of sympathizers within ISI & military without the knowledge of the Govt. for the above-mentioned reasons, as they felt it would be beneficial for Pakistan in the long-run.
3. Entire Pakistani intelligence network truly failed and someone of the importance of OBL was successful to remain unnoticed for nine long years within Pakistan.

Now, any of the three possibilities are bad news for Pakistan and her future, and also for India. The last thing we Indians want is a terrorist infested Pakistan, or a Talibanized Pakistan. And if you ask me, then the third possibility is the worst & most dangerous of all three.

Since there is no solid proof to prove 1 or 2, and US has not made such claims either, let's go with 3. I don't see how 3 is any worse than, say, US allowing 9/11 to happen on their soil. That was just as much a failure arguably.
 
About our media

DGISImedia_zpsd27b4c11.jpg


About fencing the Afghan - Pakistan border

exitentryofforeigners_zps7bbc112e.jpg


exitentryofforeigners2_zps3028479f.jpg
 
Pakistan a failing state

DGISIpakfailed_zps8a9e849a.jpg


The stand of Pakistani government and the violation of the constitution by the government

violationofconstitution_zpsff68ff41.jpg


lawministry_zps02d1f351.jpg


Where is Pakistan heading?

settingpriorities_zps9fc36cb0.jpg


problems_zps1a0556c4.jpg
 
COMMISSION REPORT REQUIRES SCRUTINY:

The Commission framed several un-necessary questions but one very
important question was not framed: "WHAT COULD BE THE CONSEQUENCES IF
PAK ARMED FORCES HAD INTERCEPTED THE HELICOPTERS IN ABBOTABAD DURING
OPERATION NAPTUNE SPEAR". Deliberate and form an opinion.

2. The statements of ladies companions were not to be discussed beyond
the limit that too of operation account only. What was the wisdom in
discussing the previous details and its reproduction in Commission
Report.
I am studying the commission report. I will submit my detailed
comments for the assistance of Forum. Till date I feel it is a charge
sheet for registration of a case for High Treason and mutiny.
SMIQBAL.
 
Maybe now people will come to know that the intel agencies aren't eating laddus after all!

Please allow me to highlight the bullet points of the report.
This should shut the traps of those who only blame the one Agency of the country, but here the official verdict, and this is what me and @F.O.X have been saying all along, local LEA needs to place its rule. without their role it is impossible to eradicate the terrorism at grass root level.

And before we move further, if we want to old Establishment accountable for hiding OBL, than we need to hold all these people accountable too, the Inspector propterty tax Cantt Abottabad, the staff at revenue department, and the local police.....

When ISI Abbottabad detachment was able to find Omar Parekh, Indonesian most wanted man, which shows ISI had/has elaborative network in abbottabad then how a fort like structure near PMA skipped from their eyes?

That's why ISI being blamed very much, afterall area around PMA comes under Military police/Garrison security force right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Back
Top Bottom