Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia and Kazakhstan may have good relations with China as is the case with most nations including India, but they're hardly 'good friends'. Disputes have resolved with Russia, that also doesn't mean you guys are now 'friends'. Russia and India are 'good friends'. As is Israel, most of the West, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Nepal etc
Your ignorant of international politics has no boundaries. Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia are staunch ally of China. It is Not the case with India. Stop embarrassing yourself. Read up before you speak. Sri Lanka doesn't have good relationship with India. Among all your neighbours, only Nepal has good ties. But the new communist government has more pro-china policy.
US Government Bonds are not currency, they are simply a promise from the US Government to pay you that sum of money at some point in the future. If they decide to simply default, there really won't be much China can do, most credit rating agencies will only downgrade the US a couple of notches. Their economy will thank the GoUS for it, your economy however will tank, as much of those bonds are used as backing for Chinese internal debt.
Your ignorance extends to international economics as well. Obviously, you didn't know you have to first convert your currency into USD, before you can buy US bond, so in effect you are exposed to currency fluctuation.
The chance of US as the world's largest economy defaulting is as good as India become the world's largest economy. Get that in your head! The 2nd and 3rd largest economy, China and Japan, both put money in US bond. Surely they're smarter than some australian indian kid who doesn't even know USD is required to buy US bond.
Those same 'international defense analyst' also agree that China does have an undeclared military budget/s.
I'm beginning to lose my respect for you, show me the source, otherwise you're just another jealous indian troll. Baseless accusation is all that you're capable of?
And yes, I agree, no nation is going to dump their arsenal, or stop modernization because of a lack of an immediate threat. This applies to China as well as India.
You have problem with reading and comprehension? That was my answer to you why CHinese still maintain the nuclear arsenal. I'm Not talking about India, you don't even have half of the arsenal that China has.
India has been a sovereign country (albeit occupied) for much of the British era as well as the 66 years following. Prior to that the concept of a nation-state was alien to much of Asia and was limited mostly to the USA and Western Europe. However there were multiple instances in history where India was united under a single ruler/kingdom. The land of Bharat has long been a solid concept.
There was no India before in 1947. British colonized the entire subcontinent, India was a modern British creation in 1947. Otherwise, you go back to Mughals and a few other kingdoms.
The notion of one country is not just about nation-state. Ancient Korea, Japan and Vietnam were one country. Simply because there's one overall ruler who rule the land. You cannot 5 kings here, 6 emperors there, and call yourself ONE sovereign country. India was never one country!
Bharat was a religious concept, it never existed in reality. Get real!
I have no reason to make up stories. This will be my final reply on this thread
Ciao
But you just made up a bunch of weird logic to justify your argument from US bond to sovereign India. Didn't you say Nationalism is not the same as patriotism, please look into the mirror.
have some shame....
