ERIEYE VS BOEING 737 AEW&C

[was]

Embraer EMB145 ERIEYE vs BOEING 737 AEW&C AWACs - Truveo Video Search

 

[Imran Khan]

ok now you see f-16 vs j10

 

[Myth_buster_1]

pakistan made a smarter decision selecting turbo prop Saab-2000 (sort of STOL) over more expensive Embraer EMB145 and in result had more money to spend on avionics and electronic suites..

--------saab-2000 erieye------EMB Erieye
---full 360 degree coverage----60-80 degree blind spot
---9+ flying hours--------------7 hours

 

[Imran Khan]

you can see what happen if f-22 vs j-10

 

[IceCold]

you can see what happen if f-22 vs j-10


hTa697yCgKU[/media] - F22 VS J-10

What in the bloody hell...... So the americans were shown as pigs lolzzzzz.

 

[Munir]

Saab2000 has nearly 360 degrees (just as much as 737) and also 450+ km. It has a radar that works a lot better in hostile environment compared to that 737 Wedgy. The normal flight time is around 9 hours and it is possible to add some more fuel. Saab needs shorter runway, will perform better in hot and high conditions, needs less spare parts, and can loiter a lot longer in certain area (slower stall speed). no refueling though but I would not add refeuling to 9+ hours... A crew must be changed (even if they have spare crew onboard) and CAP planes need to replaced sooner or later.