Did PML (N) just betrayed Kashmir?

[PAKjunoon]

Is this true?

 

[Bahadur_1]

All Pakistani leaders until 1965 betrayed Kashmir, if there was any hope of a plebiscite. After 1965 sneaky attack by the Pak Army, India decided to change the game which resulted in Simla Agreement of 1971 and creation of Bangladesh.
Until Simla Agreement is in place, there is no hope for Pakistan to internationalize this issue.

 

[hazzam]

All Pakistani leaders until 1965 betrayed Kashmir, if there was any hope of a plebiscite. After 1965 sneaky attack by the Pak Army, India decided to change the game which resulted in Simla Agreement of 1971 and creation of Bangladesh.
Until Simla Agreement is in place, there is no hope for Pakistan to internationalize this issue.

kashmir has cost half pakistan to them , still they are suffering from terrorism becaiuse of kashmir .
better if they can develop azad kashmir better than indian kashmir . then they can lay claim on kashmir .

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

kashmir has cost half pakistan to them , still they are suffering from terrorism becaiuse of kashmir .
better if they can develop azad kashmir better than indian kashmir . then they can lay claim on kashmir .

Even without the Kashmir issue, your hatred would never die. Don't flatter yourself. You don't have any mercy in your heart for anyone or anything.

 

[Corona]

Even without the Kashmir issue, your hatred would never die. Don't flatter yourself. You don't have any mercy in your heart for anyone or anything.

Take away the Kashmir issue, find a common ground to unite in and give us a couple of generations and we will find peace between us.
Besides, even now it's not like Pakistanis and Indians resort to fistfights whenever they actually do meet each other.

 

[Azadkashmir]

kashmir has cost half pakistan to them , still they are suffering from terrorism becaiuse of kashmir .
better if they can develop azad kashmir better than indian kashmir . then they can lay claim on kashmir .

Azad Kashmir is doing well mind you.

 

[Hamza913]

After 1965 sneaky attack by the Pak Army.

You seem to forget that this action was not unprovoked.

kashmir has cost half pakistan to them.

Oh please, Bangladesh was nothing more than a glorified colony. It was as much of a tragedy as it was when the British Empire lost it's South Asian territories, i.e it sucked but it wasn't a deal breaker.

 

[BATMAN]

Is this true?View attachment 482616

Of course true... but why Imran Khan kept quite... ?

 

[undercover JIX]

kashmir has cost half pakistan to them , still they are suffering from terrorism becaiuse of kashmir .
better if they can develop azad kashmir better than indian kashmir . then they can lay claim on kashmir .

if talking about the past, in how many halves Maha Akhant Bharat has been divided? and still breaking slowly but surely.

 

[Indus Priest King]

The only traitors to Kashmir are Kashmiri politicians themselves.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

Take away the Kashmir issue, find a common ground to unite in and give us a couple of generations and we will find peace between us.
Besides, even now it's not like Pakistanis and Indians resort to fistfights whenever they actually do meet each other.

Who is stopping you from doing that right now? Take a break from your holy war to recover your humanity and civility.

We are neighbors, and we don't have to be enemies, even if we are two completely different civilizations.

 

[Psychic]

All Pakistani leaders until 1965 betrayed Kashmir, if there was any hope of a plebiscite. After 1965 sneaky attack by the Pak Army, India decided to change the game which resulted in Simla Agreement of 1971 and creation of Bangladesh.
Until Simla Agreement is in place, there is no hope for Pakistan to internationalize this issue.

Did you read the OP?
I doubt you could read urdu.


It says we gave more rights and freedoms to Azad Kashmir...That's betrayal?
It might be a bad decision for Pakistan but certainly it gave more freedom to Azad Kashmir.

Until Simla Agreement is in place, there is no hope for Pakistan to internationalize this issue.

UN resolutions are non-binding. So who got fooled?
Plus it already is internationalized.

 

[Corona]

Who is stopping you from doing that right now? Take a break from your holy war to recover your humanity and civility.

We are neighbors, and we don't have to be enemies, even if we are two completely different civilizations.

Step 1 is in the way. If you have a solution to the Kashmir issue where both India, Pakistan and Kashmiris come out winners, I'm all ears.
Just bear in mind that India simply giving up Kashmir is not a win-win situation, as some posters here might think. To quote Roosevelt, we need a 'new deal'.

 

[hazzam]

if talking about the past, in how many halves Maha Akhant Bharat has been divided? and still breaking slowly but surely.

it is a dangerous game in which pakistan has not gained anything . because of kashmir programme pakistan is losing on development fronts .

 

[hazzam]

Azad Kashmir is doing well mind you.

doing well is not sufficient it should be done better than indian kashmir .

Step 1 is in the way. If you have a solution to the Kashmir issue where both India, Pakistan and Kashmiris come out winners, I'm all ears.
Just bear in mind that India simply giving up Kashmir is not a win-win situation, as some posters here might think. To quote Roosevelt, we need a 'new deal'.

best option was given by musharraf .