What's new

December 1971 to December 2016

Lol.........Punjabi Pakistanis have as much in common with bengalis as they do with Sub-Saharan Africans. That's the reality. It can be clearly seen. In fact the Pakistani Punjabis have far more on common with Iranians and Turks yet we are still not forming a nation with Iran or Turkey. Historical facts will also confirm that there was huge amount of interaction and interbreeding between the people of modern day Pakistan and Iranians, Turks and other Middle Eastern peoples. It also explains the physical traits of Pakistanis. We NEVER EVER shared this type of contact with bengalis or other groups east of us.

Your Punjabis are as Indic as our Pubjabis.

Inter-breeding doesn't a race make.

My post was about different races not being able to come together to form a nation.
 
The actual fighting was going on in East Pakistan with regular border skirmishes throughout 71. The threat from india was much much higher there...yet Pakistan attacked Indian airfields in the NW which was very far from East Pakistan. I couldn't figure out why? Were they hoping to gain Kashmir from that? Nothing good came from it, instead india took it as provocation and invaded east Pakistan.....we were separated from Pakistan two weeks later. And neither did Pakistan gain Kashmir. In their bid to gain Kashmir they forgot about what they already had- East Pakistan



The creation of East Pakistan was enivateable. The bengalis and Pakistanis could NEVER EVER form a sustained nation together as they were 1000 of kms apart and were completely different to one another in every way possible. Weather in 1971, earlier or later, bangladesh would have eventuslly been created. It is the same reason why Pakistan was formed in 1947.
 
The creation of East Pakistan was enivateable. The bengalis and Pakistanis could NEVER EVER form a sustained nation together as they were 1000 of kms apart and were completely different to one another in every way possible. Weather in 1971, earlier or later, bangladesh would have eventuslly been created. It is the same reason why Pakistan was formed in 1947.
Actually Bengalis played it smart. They knew that if they did not sided with Pakistan they could never ever get independence from India as India has border with them. On the other hand Pakistan does not. Knowing the Indo Pak rivalry they knew once they get separated from India, getting separated from Pakistan wont be a big deal as India would than help them out and the way this whole demarcation was done, it was in no way possible for Pakistan to keep control over an area that is separated by hostile territory.
 
Your Punjabis are as Indic as our Pubjabis.

Inter-breeding doesn't a race make.

My post was about different races not being able to come together to form a nation.


Reality says otherwise. Even your assumption will not suffice. Pakistani Punjabis make up between 55-60% of Pakistan's population but indian Punjabis make up no more than 2.5% of india's population. So even if you were correct than at least 97.5% of india's population has nothing in common with 100% of Pakistan's population whatsoever. That sounds about right.

Your post portrays desperate indian propaganda attempts to claim Pakistanis as being of the same race as indians. Which is completely false, laughable & ridiculous.

PS: Race mixing with other Muslim communities has COMPLETELY & FOREVER changed the racial admixture of Pakistani Punjabis compared to indian Punjabis. The term "Punjabi" now is more a linguistic connection than anything else.

Actually Bengalis played it smart. They knew that if they did not sided with Pakistan they could never ever get independence from India as India has border with them. On the other hand Pakistan does not. Knowing the Indo Pak rivalry they knew once they get separated from India, getting separated from Pakistan wont be a big deal as India would than help them out and the way this whole demarcation was done, it was in no way possible for Pakistan to keep control over an area that is separated by hostile territory.



EXACTLY. But the crux of the matter was that both Pakistan & bangladesh NEVER EVER wanted to be under indian occupation or rule. That was the ONLY thing that united them in the 1st place.
 
The creation of East Pakistan was enivateable. The bengalis and Pakistanis could NEVER EVER form a sustained nation together as they were 1000 of kms apart and were completely different to one another in every way possible. Weather in 1971, earlier or later, bangladesh would have eventuslly been created. It is the same reason why Pakistan was formed in 1947.
Yes Bangladesh shouldn't have been part of Pakistan in the first place. Bengali Muslims never thought of joining Pakistan in the pre-Partition era. Infact Pakistan never included Bengal. Our interests would never align. We had ZERO benefits of joining Pakistan- no trade, no geographical continuity with other provinces.

Funny thing Pakistanis didn't want us yet when we declared ourselves autonomous in '71 they launched Operation Searchlight to stop it, turned Bihari Muslims against us labelling us RAW agents, and killed thousands of Muslims in our province. Funny Pakistanis
 
Yes Bangladesh shouldn't have been part of Pakistan in the first place. Bengali Muslims never thought of joining Pakistan in the pre-Partition era. Infact Pakistan never included Bengal. Our interests would never align. We had ZERO benefits of joining Pakistan- no trade, no geographical continuity with other provinces.

Funny thing Pakistanis didn't want us yet when we declared ourselves autonomous in '71 they launched Operation Searchlight to stop it, turned Bihari Muslims against us labelling us RAW agents, and killed thousands of Muslims in our province. Funny Pakistanis


Even though they killed bengalis it doesn't hide the absolute fact that we have as much in common with you as we do with the Sub-Saharan Africans.

PS The killings were in response to bengalis launching attacks against Pakistan military personnel and non bengalis stationed there.
 
Even though they killed bengalis it doesn't hide the absolute fact that we have as much in common with you as we do with the Sub-Saharan Africans.
Why are you so obsessed with race? What is your problem? Every post of yours- race race race skin colour haha
PS The killings were in response to bengalis launching attacks against Pakistan military personnel and non bengalis stationed there.
no
 
Why are you so obsessed with race? What is your problem? Every post of yours- race race race skin colour haha

no


Just stating the reality of the REAL reason why bangladesh was formed. That's all. And as Pakistanis are a unique and beautiful race that is very distinct from the rest of our immediate region, I intend for that race to be preserved.
 
Yes Bangladesh shouldn't have been part of Pakistan in the first place. Bengali Muslims never thought of joining Pakistan in the pre-Partition era. Infact Pakistan never included Bengal. Our interests would never align. We had ZERO benefits of joining Pakistan- no trade, no geographical continuity with other provinces.

Funny thing Pakistanis didn't want us yet when we declared ourselves autonomous in '71 they launched Operation Searchlight to stop it, turned Bihari Muslims against us labelling us RAW agents, and killed thousands of Muslims in our province. Funny Pakistanis

Complete it "Thousands of Armed Mukti Bahnis aligned with Hindus"
 
Complete it "Thousands of Armed Mukti Bahnis aligned with Hindus"
Mukhti Bahni was formed after Operation Searchlight of March 25, where Pakistan Army was instructed to kill all Awami league leaders and their supporters. They killed unarmed East Pakistanis and terrorized the province to make us drop our demand for autonomy. It was only after that Mukhti Bahni was formed by angry East Pakistani soldiers to resist military action. Its hindu membership was barely 1%.

And yes we were completely right in taking help from india. After West Pakistani soldiers started killing and oppressing East Pakistan Muslims we were absolutely justified in retaliating.
 
Mukhti Bahni was formed after Operation Searchlight of March 25, where Pakistan Army was instructed to kill all Awami league leaders and their supporters. They killed unarmed East Pakistanis and terrorized the province to make us drop our demand for autonomy. It was only after that Mukhti Bahni was formed by angry East Pakistani soldiers to resist military action. Its hindu membership was barely 1%.

And yes we were completely right in taking help from india. After West Pakistani soldiers started killing and oppressing East Pakistan Muslims we were absolutely justified in retaliating.


If the Pakistani Army is being attacked and shot at, we reserve the right to use lethal force to neutralise all threats.
 
Mukhti Bahni was formed after Operation Searchlight of March 25, where Pakistan Army was instructed to kill all Awami league leaders and their supporters. They killed unarmed East Pakistanis and terrorized the province to make us drop our demand for autonomy. It was only after that Mukhti Bahni was formed by angry East Pakistani soldiers to resist military action. Its hindu membership was barely 1%.

And yes we were completely right in taking help from india. After West Pakistani soldiers started killing and oppressing East Pakistan Muslims we were absolutely justified in retaliating.
Sheikh Mujib went to Agartala in 1965. The famous Agartala case was unearthed in 1967 much before this 1971 and everybody knows about it.He was a traitor..It was mentioned by Indians also "the story of India’s secret service published by Vikas Publishing House of New Delhi. The creation of Bangladesh was masterminded by RAW.According to Archer Blood, an American career diplomat who served as the last American Consul General to Dhaka, “Indian soil was made available for training camps, hospitals and supply depots for the Mukti Bahini”..For the record, as per the 1951 census there were 671,000 Biharis in East Pakistan-and imagine up to 20 percent of the entire Bihari population was massacred by the Mukti Bahini. So, NO Mukti bahnis were not unarmed and the operation was directed to them.
It was Mujib and his cronies with Indians who fight shoulder to shoulder against Pak Army.
 
Did you know the agartala plan against Pakistan which was leaked in 1967 in which indian govt decided to divide Pakistaen Marshal Ayub aware this plan he order to arrest the mujib ur rehman how can you say that indian later join this plan indian govt and raw was the main planer of this civil war in east Pakistan and they start planing just after the defeat in battlefield of 1965 where million indian army was not able to take a single city control in Pakistan and indian air force was destroyed in first seven days then they feel they can not defeat Pakistan in battlefield they decide to go for a proxy war because both wars in battlefields in 1948 and 1965 india lost then they took this idea don't try to be over smart and don't try to damage the original history

If u say that 1965 nd 1948 war was won by u its really make me laugh bt how u say that. First take 1948 where u attacked a different state which was neither of India nd Pakistan nd it was without protaction of any force u have reached near to srinagar then Indian army come light they attack to defend state nd u have pushed back... nd now also we have 2 to 3 part of that state.. if u say that win than be happy in dreams...
Now on 1965 where u again start a operation gebralter where u have send mujahidin to capture state bt they got arrested nd then Indian army attacked u nd reached to Lahore capital if punjab(if I m NT wrong) then ur leader run to soviet fr cease fire nd then cease fire happens nd virus territory given to each other... nd now u will say they never reached Lahore then I have pic where Indian army was in Lahore ..then u say that was Photoshop bt baby u don't have knowledge at that time there was not any that type of technology fr Photoshop...
 
Pakistan Army attacked unarmed East Pakistan Muslims without any provocation, so we reserved the right to retaliate.


We'll agree to disagree. We were attacked first by agent provocateurs so we reserved the right to use efficient, lethal deadly force.
 
Back
Top Bottom