What's new

Dear chinese and the other friends.

Admin

you have deleted so many our topic

That is the whole our effort, why would you delete it?

You Do not Respect us, please open all the topic is deleted, to let the world know, what's really going

That's what you get for spamming the forum with nationalistic tripe. Pakistan Defence Forum is a place to have a civilized discussion.
 
There is really no fair for us when the mods have deleted many interesting topics about Vietnam, but we will never quit:) just because of the ridiculous reasons.
 
Vietnamese documents written in chinese charaters, lol, so funny, poor vietnamese never had their own written language but have to use Chinese to record their everything, so pathetic, so hopeless, a country self claims 5000 years of history, never got ability to creat its own language, , and had to use chinese as writing language in the past 2000 years, and have to use Latin script today created by their french colonizer, very shameful, lol

well, that actually incurs the questions;


question1: Vietnamese had to write this documents in Chinese , i.e. they had to use a foreign language to write their owm documents, but do they really understand Chinese well? do they know what they are writing ? i.e. they must have made lots of mistakes using a foreign language translating their own spoken language .

question 2: no proof to prove that " those island mentioned in documents" are today's Paracels and spratly , actually they are just the islands very near the Vietnam coast, not the Chinese Parcels and spratly ,

I say about language many time. Now too bored to say it again. Stupid guy
 
Vietnamese documents written in chinese charaters, lol, so funny, poor vietnamese never had their own written language but have to use Chinese to record their everything, so pathetic, so hopeless, a country self claims 5000 years of history, never got ability to creat its own language, , and had to use chinese as writing language in the past 2000 years, and have to use Latin script today created by their french colonizer, very shameful, lol

well, that actually incurs the questions;


question1: Vietnamese had to write this documents in Chinese , i.e. they had to use a foreign language to write their owm documents, but do they really understand Chinese well? do they know what they are writing ? i.e. they must have made lots of mistakes using a foreign language translating their own spoken language .

question 2: no proof to prove that " those island mentioned in documents" are today's Paracels and spratly , actually they are just the islands very near the Vietnam coast, not the Chinese Parcels and spratly ,

Like many Korean Ultrationalists, some Viet Ultranationalists claim that their ancestor invented the Chinese characters.

Whereas the Han Chinese have just copied and stolen everything from them. :rofl:
 
Now your main point here.

Do you know the situation at this time?

From 1945, after WWII, France back to Vietnam. And for International, Vietnam still the colonized country until Frank Control. And Paracel and Spraty had been under control of France colonized until 1954.

After Dien Bien Phu battle, follow Paris Agreement 1954, Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV) controlled North of Vietnam and France controlled South of Vietnam after that France handover South of Vietnam to Republic of Vietnam (RP). RP under supported of American was accepted by Union Nation.

At this moment there were two Governments in Vietnam. And RP was the one who managed Spraty and Paracel. And RP always tolerated any claim of China and bring they ship to occupy Paracel and Spraty. (Remember RP is a Gov accpeted by Union Nation).

The letter of Phan Van Dong (1958) don't said clealy that he accepted China to managed those Island. It's letter and not have value like agreement or contract. Even It's true, DRV is not the Gov who managed those Island at the moment, it was illegal document.

After Vietnam united, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam always tolerate China claim.

And follow UNCLOS, any time in history, the Government of Vietnam who managed Paracel and Spraty always tolerate China claim.

Combine last and this post you can see China is only robber who invade Paracel Island from Vietnam.
 
Now your main point here.

Do you know the situation at this time?

From 1945, after WWII, France back to Vietnam. And for International, Vietnam still the colonized country until Frank Control. And Paracel and Spraty had been under control of France colonized until 1954.

After Dien Bien Phu battle, follow Paris Agreement 1954, Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV) controlled North of Vietnam and France controlled South of Vietnam after that France handover South of Vietnam to Republic of Vietnam (RP). RP under supported of American was accepted by Union Nation.

At this moment there were two Governments in Vietnam. And RP was the one who managed Spraty and Paracel. And RP always tolerated any claim of China and bring they ship to occupy Paracel and Spraty. (Remember RP is a Gov accpeted by Union Nation).

The letter of Phan Van Dong (1958) don't said clealy that he accepted China to managed those Island. It's letter and not have value like agreement or contract. Even It's true, DRV is not the Gov who managed those Island at the moment, it was illegal document.

After Vietnam united, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam always tolerate China claim.

And follow UNCLOS, any time in history, the Government of Vietnam who managed Paracel and Spraty always tolerate China claim.

Combine last and this post you can see China is only robber who invade Paracel Island from Vietnam.

It is a totally excuse.Your are mixing the concept of gov. with an individual. For an individual, a contract could be invalid as they are threatened when they signed the contract.However, for a gov., the threaten could never be an excuse as the function of the millitary is to against the threaten for the country. The gov. have to keep their promise therefore they have credit in the external world. All the economic activity of the gov. will be based on their credit, especially the function of money in that country. The point is Vietnam gov. has made a promise and they turn back, if it is an oral promise, they can say there is no evidence. The worst thing is they made enough evidence written down on the paper, which they cannot deny the fact, so they said it is illegal document in the country. However, in the international world, they never make such excuse as they know it is unacceptable. What kind of gov. make illegal document? An illegal gov. . If Vietnam denied one claim with the signature of gov., it means all the document with Vietnam gov. could be illegal if they want to turn it back. The credit which support issue of currency will collapse in the international world. The money in Vietnam can never exchange with other currency or goods. Vietnam gov. can make such excuse because they know little Vietnamese can understand the concept. They never denied the document in the international world because they know once they did, they are inviting troubles much more than losing the control of nasha, they will lose control of the whole country.
 
You can't understand the point and try to support your logic. It's guide to nothing.

Your Gov signed to UNCLOS and please try to respect it.

It is a totally excuse.Your are mixing the concept of gov. with an individual. For an individual, a contract could be invalid as they are threatened when they signed the contract.However, for a gov., the threaten could never be an excuse as the function of the millitary is to against the threaten for the country. The gov. have to keep their promise therefore they have credit in the external world. All the economic activity of the gov. will be based on their credit, especially the function of money in that country. The point is Vietnam gov. has made a promise and they turn back, if it is an oral promise, they can say there is no evidence. The worst thing is they made enough evidence written down on the paper, which they cannot deny the fact, so they said it is illegal document in the country. However, in the international world, they never make such excuse as they know it is unacceptable. What kind of gov. make illegal document? An illegal gov. . If Vietnam denied one claim with the signature of gov., it means all the document with Vietnam gov. could be illegal if they want to turn it back. The credit which support issue of currency will collapse in the international world. The money in Vietnam can never exchange with other currency or goods. Vietnam gov. can make such excuse because they know little Vietnamese can understand the concept. They never denied the document in the international world because they know once they did, they are inviting troubles much more than losing the control of nasha, they will lose control of the whole country.
 
and shameless dirty Vietnamese even keeps lying on the name of south china sea , instead of the name of "south china sea" recognized internationally on world map , world educational institutions, presses,,,,, ,,,,, Vietnamese liars self call it " east sea", exposing their evil and greedy ambition to become that entire vast area to Vietnamese's own sea, despite comparison with Vietnam's own tiny size
You are stupid or lack of knowledge. Vietnamese call this sea is Biển Đông meaning East Sea ( view from Vietnam ). Like East Sea of China next Japan.

Now we would call for the world change this sea into Southeast Asia Sea. It is more international. Do you get it, silly boy ?
 
oh,really? whats proof i can say u are not Australian obviously either.

and english? haha,

1, Australia has many different nationalities including Asian Australians, not all of them speaks good English, some don't even speak English
2, i do never have to speak any decent human language to dirty liars like viets, i only use good human language to decent people
3, i do never waste my time using good human language on retarded people like viets who do not understand good human language for example English, lolz

Now you are ban evading.

I have informed the admins once again and you will be banned shortly.
 
As far as I know, false flags are tolerant on this forum, (very annoying) but this is what the admins has decided.
 
Now you are ban evading.

I have informed the admins once again and you will be banned shortly.

OMG, a thief crying for thief? how about turn your twin baby brother "xdrive 1" in too? is it not a permanent ban according to the forum rule? hypocrisy at its highest level :lol:
 
As far as I know, false flags are tolerant on this forum, (very annoying) but this is what the admins has decided.

He was banned yesterday for racist comments in every single post he makes and now he has signed up again to evade the ban he received.

The admins will soon take care of him.

OMG, a thief crying for thief? how about turn your twin baby brother "xdrive 1" in too? is it not a permanent ban according to the forum rule? hypocrisy at its highest level :lol:

That account is actually disabled. I signed that account up because i forgot the pw to this account. I contacted the admin and he got my pw back and disabled xdrive1.

Ask before making silly assumptions friend :)
 
False flag is a problem but you really can't evade it since the IP of the user only tells you which country he is from and not his national origins.

I think we should probably tackle the problem using the opposite approach - getting rid of the flag system all together.
 
Back
Top Bottom