What's new

Dam Pakistan

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Dam Pakistan

The Kalabagh Dam will generate Pakistan’s largest amount of electricity. Once it is built, that is. Originally slated to start construction in 1985, the project has seen many delays. By late 2007, it appeared that the dam would finally get underway. In December, a minister of the interim federal government claimed that a decision to start construction might be made by the time the new government took power after the scheduled January 8 elections. But the December 27 assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto caused a postponement of the elections, and once again threw the Kalabagh project’s future into doubt.

The history of the dam project goes all the way back to 1960, when Pakistan and India signed the Indus water treaty. Under the treaty, the Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab Rivers were assigned to Pakistan, and the eastern Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej Rivers were reserved for India.

The treaty provided for two major dams in Pakistan. Construction of the Mangla Dam on the Jhelum River started in 1962 and it was completed five years later. During the summer, the dam’s high reservoir level can generate 1,150 megawatts of power. The capacity comes down to about 500 MW in winter.

There were two possible sites for the other dam, to be built on the Indus. The World Bank preferred Kalabagh due to technical reasons, but then-President, Ayub Khan, wanted Tarbela for political ones. He believed Tarbela would bring prosperity to his home district, Hazara. And he prevailed.
Tarbela, the world’s largest earth and rock filled dam (485 feet high and 9,000 feet long), was completed in 1974. During the high reservoir period the dam can generate 3,714 MW, due to a 15 percent permissible overloading. It comes to about 1,350 MW in the lean winter period.

Kalabagh will have an installed capacity of 2,400 MW initially and 3,600 MW ultimately. Pakistan’s Water and Power Development Authority estimates that annual electricity generated at Kalabagh will be 20 million barrels of oil equivalent, saving fuel that would otherwise be needed to produce thermal power. In 2005, the total project cost, including price escalation and interest during construction, was estimated at $6.1 billion, with construction expected to take six years or so.
 
Its unfortunate that projects of strategic importance have been held up due to provincialism....every moment we are losing precious water resources which could be harnessed to lower poverty all over Pakistan...its actually quite unfortunate that Musharraf was not able to kick start 5-6 of these mega dam projects while he was the Pres. and CoAS....any chance of a politician doing the same is virtually nil.
 
Its unfortunate that projects of strategic importance have been held up due to provincialism....every moment we are losing precious water resources which could be harnessed to lower poverty all over Pakistan...its actually quite unfortunate that Musharraf was not able to kick start 5-6 of these mega dam projects while he was the Pres. and CoAS....any chance of a politician doing the same is virtually nil.

One civil Engineer working for a civil contractor in Pakistan, told me that Musharraf never stopped the work on Kalabagh dam. Work is going on with full speed but it was never announced!

Only God knows the truth!
 
KalabaghDam.jpg
[/IMG]

Indus river, one of the mightiest in the world, is the major river in Pakistan. There is already a large dam on the Indus (Tarbela). Rest of the four major rivers in Pakistan also fall in the Indus before it finally meets the Arabian Sea. Kalabagh dam is a bone of contention in Pakistan, giving rise to inter-provincial rifts over water management. The dam has been proposed for a long time, but the objections from all provinces has made it an extremely sensitive political issue. Everyone agrees on the need for water reservoirs and management, as the region will soon face an imminent water shortage. The issue is still hot and burning with no obvious solution in sight, but die-hard drives from "musts" and "must-nots".
 
Its unfortunate that projects of strategic importance have been held up due to provincialism....every moment we are losing precious water resources which could be harnessed to lower poverty all over Pakistan...its actually quite unfortunate that Musharraf was not able to kick start 5-6 of these mega dam projects while he was the Pres. and CoAS....any chance of a politician doing the same is virtually nil.

I wonder why Musharraf didn't push for the full scale contriction when Pakistan was fully under Martial Law. We could have completed it by now.
 
While if the dams are needed to preserve water resources, then they should be built. But for power generation we should rely on our massive coal deposists, which are expected to last beyond 150 years from the time we start using them. Dams eat up precious land and displace people. We can cut our energy bill by using coal. I think something like 20,000 MW can be generated every year from our coal deposists alone, and it is a much cheaper and more reliable option than hydroelectric power. Even most of the powerplants in the US are coal.

And we should also rely more on nuclear power. There's plenty of areas in Balochistan where a nuclear power plant can be built and used to power places like Gwadar and other villages in Balochistan.
 
Maybe Pakistan does not need additional dams for irrigation, perhaps only for hydroelectricity ? Maybe the cost of building hydro dams is too high ?

Iran being dry has less water but more dams
List of dams and reservoirs in Iran - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Iran was constructing 88 small and giant dams in 2007.[2][3] On average, close to two billion cubic meters of water are added to the country’s water reserves annually.[4] As of 2010, Iran has constructed 588 dams (big and small), with 137 more under construction and 546 planned.[5]
 
Pakistan need dams for irrigation & flood control more than electricity.

Cost of building a dam may be high today but Kala Bagh dam was slated to be constructed in 80's.
Still if awarded to local contractors cost can be lowered.

Pakistan prepared its first power policy in 2002 and if it may have been followed we may not have any shortage of electricity.

Said power policy, suggest short term, medium term and long term solutions.

In addition to dams it was suggested to make barrages on rivers at regular intervals to exploit the potential of water fully.

Many states of the world copied that policy and replicated the ideas in their respective states on urgent basis but current govt. of Pakistan buried all development projects and destroyed our economy deliberately.
 
There are several major dams on the Indus River with large reservoirs. Presumably the water in the reservoirs can be carried via aqueduct to all neighboring areas, without the need to add more dams. Dams in flat areas are more tricky too, so perhaps only a few can be built in upstream areas. Flood control is a different issue ... you may have a point.
 
I know that Pakistan has virtually destroyed it's native wild life, but more dams would mean even more destruction of what little is left.

Dams destroy environments and I personally think that there should be no more built.
Instead focus should be made on renewable, nuclear, and even coal (coal can be clean).
 
I know that Pakistan has virtually destroyed it's native wild life, but more dams would mean even more destruction of what little is left.

Dams destroy environments and I personally think that there should be no more built.
Instead focus should be made on renewable, nuclear, and even coal (coal can be clean).

What is your qualification to claim this?

Dams will bring boost to agriculture, plantation and habitat.
It will save our infrastructure from flooding.

My opinion is not my personal, and does not apply to Pakistan only.
 
If there is no water shortage in Pakistan, then what you say makes sense.

But hydroelectricity is a renewable clean energy. It may not require huge reservoirs as much as many dams with turbines at various points using energy of gravity. Since Northern Pakistan has some of the highest mountains in the world lots of hydro power could be generated. But at the same time the remoteness of the area, difficult terrain, lack of roads would make it more expensive.

So, yes, probably no need to have many more dams, except in areas of Pakistan that have water shortage, far from Indus river.
 
There are several major dams on the Indus River with large reservoirs. Presumably the water in the reservoirs can be carried via aqueduct to all neighboring areas, without the need to add more dams. Dams in flat areas are more tricky too, so perhaps only a few can be built in upstream areas. Flood control is a different issue ... you may have a point.

Indus flow around 2000k.m before going wasted in sea.
We can build hundreds of barrages on this one river alone.
This shall not mean that dams shall not be built.
What ever dams we had built so far are only serving us good.

If you don't have basic knowledge in this field than stop guessing wrongly.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom